The role of telehealth in pediatric emergency care.

In 2006, the Institute of Medicine published a report titled "Emergency Care for Children: Growing Pains," in which it described pediatric emergency care as uneven at best. Since then, telehealth has emerged as one of the great equalizers in care of children, particularly for those in rural and underresourced communities. Clinicians in these settings may lack pediatric-specific specialization or experience in caring for critically ill or injured children. Telehealth consultation can provide timely and safe management for many medical problems in children and can prevent many unnecessary and often long transport to a pediatric center while avoiding delays in care, especially for time-sensitive and acute interventions. Telehealth is an important component of pediatric readiness of hospitals and is a valuable tool in facilitating health care access in low resourced and critical access areas. This paper provides an overview of meaningful applications of telehealth programs in pediatric emergency medicine, discusses the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on these services, and highlights challenges in setting up, adopting, and maintaining telehealth services.

Initiative to Improve Postintubation Sedation in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: Previous research has shown that appropriate pediatric postintubation sedation (PIS) after rapid sequence intubation only occurs 28% of the time. Factors such as high provider variability, cognitive overload, and errors of omission can delay time to PIS in a paralyzed patient. PURPOSE: To increase the proportion of children receiving timely PIS by 20% within 6 months. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team identified key drivers and targeted interventions to improve timeliness of PIS. The primary outcome of "sedation in an adequate time frame" was defined as a time to post-Rapid Sequence Intubation sedative administration less than the duration of action of the RSI sedative agent. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients receiving any sedation and time to PIS administration. RESULTS: Pediatric postintubation sedation in an adequate time was improved from 27.9% of intubated patients to 55.6% after intervention (p = .001). The number of patients receiving any PIS improved from 74% to 94% (p = .006). The median time from RSI to PIS was reduced from 13 to 9 minutes (p < .001). Process control charts showed a reduction in PIS variability and a centerline reduction from 19 to 10 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an intubation checklist and a multidisciplinary approach improved the rate of adequate pediatric PIS.

Access to Optimal Emergency Care for Children.

Every year, millions of pediatric patients seek emergency care. Significant barriers limit access to optimal emergency services for large numbers of children. The American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Emergency Physicians, and Emergency Nurses Association have a strong commitment to identifying these barriers, working to overcome them, and encouraging, through education and system changes, improved access to emergency care for all children.

Association of Insurance With Use of Emergency Medical Services Among Children.

OBJECTIVE: The use of emergency medical services (EMS) can be lifesaving for critically ill children and should be defined by the child's clinical need. Our objective was to determine whether nonclinical demographic factors and insurance status are associated with EMS use among children presenting to the emergency department (ED). METHODS: In this cross-sectional study using the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, we included children presenting to EDs from 2009 to 2014. We evaluated the association between EMS use and patients' insurance status using multivariable logistic regressions, adjusting for demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical factors such as illness severity as measured by a modified and recalibrated version of the Revised Pediatric Emergency Assessment Tool (mRePEAT) and the presence of comorbidities or chronic conditions. A propensity score analysis was performed to validate our findings. RESULTS: Of the estimated 191,299,454 children presenting to EDs, 11,178,576 (5.8%) arrived by EMS and 171,145,895 (89.5%) arrived by other means. Children arriving by EMS were more ill [mRePEAT score, 1.13; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.12-1.14 vs mRePEAT score, 1.01; 95% CI: 1.01-1.02] and more likely to have a comorbidity or chronic condition (OR: 3.17, 95% CI: 2.80-3.59). In the adjusted analyses, the odds of EMS use were higher for uninsured children and lower for children with public insurance compared with children with private insurance [OR (95% CI): uninsured, 1.41 (1.12-1.78); public, 0.77 (0.65-0.90)]. The propensity score analysis showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to adult patients, children with public insurance are less likely to use EMS than children with private insurance, even after adjustment for illness severity and other confounders.

Making the Quick Diagnosis: A Case of Neonatal Shock.

BACKGROUND: The work-up and initial management of a critically ill neonate is challenging and anxiety provoking for the Emergency Physician. While sepsis and critical congenital heart disease represent a large proportion of neonates presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) in shock, there are several additional etiologies to consider. Underlying metabolic, endocrinologic, gastrointestinal, neurologic, and traumatic disorders must be considered in a critically ill infant. Several potential etiologies will present with nonspecific and overlapping signs and symptoms, and the diagnosis often is not evident at the time of ED assessment. CASE REPORT: We present the case of a neonate in shock, with a variety of nonspecific signs and symptoms who was ultimately diagnosed with tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy secondary to a resolved dysrhythmia. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: This case highlights the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to the critically ill neonate in the ED, and expands the differential diagnosis beyond sepsis and critical congenital heart disease. Knowledge of the potential life-threatening etiologies of shock in this population allows the Emergency Physician to appropriately test for, and empirically treat, several potential etiologies simultaneously. Additionally, we discuss the diagnosis and management of supraventricular tachycardia and Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome in the neonatal and pediatric population, which is essential knowledge for an Emergency Physician.

"Paramedics are bringing in a hypotensive gastrointestinal bleeder": an unexpected diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Acute esophageal rupture is a rare emergency that must be diagnosed quickly and treated aggressively to avoid significant morbidity and mortality. The typical presentation of this disease includes chest pain, and the diagnosis is challenging when cardinal features such as this are absent. OBJECTIVES: This case report discusses an atypical presentation of esophageal rupture in a patient with a predisposing condition and highlights the diagnostic and cognitive difficulties involved in making the appropriate diagnosis. CASE REPORT: We report a case of a 51-year-old woman who presented to the Emergency Department with hypotension and an emergency medical services report of hematemesis. The patient had a documented history of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome during her past hospitalizations; however, the patient was not anemic and had a negative stool guiac despite symptoms for 3 days. A subsequent chest radiograph led to the diagnosis of esophageal rupture with a bilateral pneumothorax requiring thoracostomies. She reported no chest pain. CONCLUSIONS: The esophageal rupture and subsequent hypotension was likely secondary to the combination of her Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and recent vomiting episodes. It is important to avoid premature diagnostic closure and think about unusual presentations of emergent conditions such as esophageal rupture.