Interval prolongation of etanercept in rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and psoriatic arthritis: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: The majority of patients with a rheumatic disease treated with etanercept may be overexposed. Data regarding etanercept tapering are scarce, particularly in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). We compared extending the dose interval to continuation of the standard dose and studied the success rate of etanercept discontinuation. Etanercept concentrations were measured throughout the study. METHOD: 160 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), PsA, or AS with sustained minimal disease activity (MDA) were enrolled in this 18-month, open-label, randomized controlled trial. The intervention group doubled the dosing interval at baseline and discontinued etanercept 6 months later. The control group continued the standard dose for 6 months and doubled the dosing-interval thereafter. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients maintaining MDA at 6 month follow-up. RESULTS: At 6 months, MDA status was maintained in 47 patients (63%) in the intervention group and 56 (74%) in the control group (p = 0.15), with comparable results in all rheumatic diseases. And median etanercept concentrations decreased from 1.50 µg/mL (interquartile range 1.06- 2.65) to 0.46 µg/mL (0.28-0.92). In total, 40% discontinued etanercept successfully with maintained MDA for at least 6 months. CONCLUSION: Etanercept tapering can be done without losing efficacy in RA, PsA, and AS patients in sustained MDA. A substantial proportion of patients could stop etanercept for at least 6 months. In many patients, low drug concentrations proved sufficient to control disease activity. However, the risk of minor and major flares is substantial, even in patients continuing standard dosing.

Serum drug concentrations to optimize switching from adalimumab to etanercept in rheumatoid arthritis.

Objectives: Inadequate response to adalimumab can be caused by insufficient blockade of the target tumour necrosis factor (TNF) at low serum concentrations. In such cases, patients may respond to another TNF inhibitor. We investigated whether the serum adalimumab concentration is related to the efficacy of a second TNF inhibitor, etanercept, in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Patients with RA starting etanercept treatment were prospectively observed in the Reade Rheumatology Registry. In patients previously on adalimumab, serum concentrations were determined before treatment discontinuation. According to this concentration, three subgroups were formed: < 0.5 µg/mL, 0.5-5.0 µg/mL, and ≥ 5.0 µg/mL. The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) good/moderate response rate after 52 weeks of etanercept was compared between the switcher subgroups and biologic-naive patients. Results: In total, 449 consecutive patients were included, of whom 69 switched from adalimumab (15%) and 380 were biologic naive (85%). EULAR good or moderate response was achieved by 74% of the biologic-naive patients and by 72%, 50%, and 52% of switchers with adalimumab concentration < 0.5 µg/mL, 0.5-5.0 µg/mL, and ≥ 5.0 µg/mL, respectively (p = 0.15). Patients with an adalimumab concentration ≥ 0.5 µg/mL were significantly less likely to achieve EULAR good/moderate response on etanercept compared to biologic-naive patients, whereas patients with a concentration < 0.5 µg/mL did not significantly differ from patients starting etanercept without prior biologic treatment. Conclusion: RA patients with an inadequate response to adalimumab, in the presence of sufficient drug concentrations, benefit less from switching to another TNF inhibitor, etanercept.

Six-year healthcare trajectories of adults with anxiety and depressive disorders: Determinants of transition to specialised mental healthcare.

BACKGROUND: To investigate potential facilitators and barriers for patients receiving specialised mental healthcare using a longitudinal design. METHODS: Longitudinal data on 701 adult participants with a depressive and/or anxiety disorder were derived from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA). Demographic, clinical and treatment determinants at baseline were assessed with self-report questionnaires and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 2.1). Transition to specialised mental healthcare was assessed at one, two, four, and six-year follow-up with a self-report resource use questionnaire (TiC-P). RESULTS: 28.3% of patients with a depressive and/or anxiety disorder transitioned from receiving no care or primary mental healthcare to specialised mental health services during six-year follow-up. The multivariate Cox regression model identified suicidal ideation, younger age, higher education level, openness to experience, pharmacological treatment, prior treatment in primary mental healthcare and perceived unmet need for help as determinants of transition, explaining 8-18% of variance. LIMITATIONS: This study focused on baseline determinants of future transition to specialised mental healthcare. Recovery and remittance of depression and anxiety in relation to transition were not studied. CONCLUSIONS: Not all key clinical guideline characteristics such as severity of symptoms and comorbidity were predictive of a transition to specialised mental healthcare, while non-clinical factors, such as age and perceived unmet need for help, did influence the process.

Comparison of drug survival and clinical outcome in patients with ankylosing spondylitis treated with etanercept or adalimumab.

OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of drug survival and clinical response during 2 years of follow-up in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients treated with etanercept or adalimumab in routine care. METHOD: Biological-naïve consecutive AS patients treated with etanercept (n = 163) or adalimumab (n = 82) were followed. Treatment discontinuation was due to inefficacy, adverse events, loss to follow-up, planning a pregnancy, or uveitis. Disease activity was assessed by the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score using C-reactive protein (ASDAS-CRP). Moderate disease activity was defined as an ASDAS-CRP < 2.1. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (32.9%) treated with adalimumab and 30 (18.4%) with etanercept discontinued treatment. Cox regression analysis demonstrated a significant difference in survival rate between discontinuation of the drug in adalimumab patients compared with etanercept patients [hazard ratio (HR) 2.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-4.5, p = 0.005; corrected for confounding factors: HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.3-4.5, p = 0.006]. There was no significant difference at 2 years of follow-up between the adalimumab- and the etanercept-treated patients in mean ± sd ASDAS-CRP (1.9 ± 1.1 and 2.0 ± 0.9, respectively, p = 0.624), and 23 out of 34 (67.6%) compared to 71 out of 117 (60.7%) reached ASDAS-CRP moderate disease activity (odds ratio 0.738, 95% CI 0.329-1.657, p = 0.530). CONCLUSION: No significant difference was found between AS patients treated with etanercept and those treated with adalimumab in mean ASDAS-CRP and reaching ASDAS-CRP minimal disease activity at 2 year follow-up. Drug survival rate was higher in etanercept- compared to adalimumab-treated patients. However, this should be interpreted cautiously as the risk of allocation bias cannot be excluded.

Does Internet-based guided-self-help for depression cause harm? An individual participant data meta-analysis on deterioration rates and its moderators in randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Almost nothing is known about the potential negative effects of Internet-based psychological treatments for depression. This study aims at investigating deterioration and its moderators within randomized trials on Internet-based guided self-help for adult depression, using an individual patient data meta-analyses (IPDMA) approach. METHOD: Studies were identified through systematic searches (PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cochrane Library). Deterioration in participants was defined as a significant symptom increase according to the reliable change index (i.e. 7.68 points in the CES-D; 7.63 points in the BDI). Two-step IPDMA procedures, with a random-effects model were used to pool data. RESULTS: A total of 18 studies (21 comparisons, 2079 participants) contributed data to the analysis. The risk for a reliable deterioration from baseline to post-treatment was significantly lower in the intervention v. control conditions (3.36 v. 7.60; relative risk 0.47, 95% confidence interval 0.29-0.75). Education moderated effects on deterioration, with patients with low education displaying a higher risk for deterioration than patients with higher education. Deterioration rates for patients with low education did not differ statistically significantly between intervention and control groups. The benefit-risk ratio for patients with low education indicated that 9.38 patients achieve a treatment response for each patient experiencing a symptom deterioration. CONCLUSIONS: Internet-based guided self-help is associated with a mean reduced risk for a symptom deterioration compared to controls. Treatment and symptom progress of patients with low education should be closely monitored, as some patients might face an increased risk for symptom deterioration. Future studies should examine predictors of deterioration in patients with low education.