Changes in blood pressure among patients in the Ontario Telehomecare programme: An observational longitudinal cohort study.

Background The objective of this study was to investigate the changes in blood pressure among patients enrolled in the Telehomecare programme in Ontario, Canada. Methods This observational study utilised a prospective longitudinal cohort design, including patients with heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease enrolled in the Ontario Telehomecare programme from July 2012 to July 2015. The outcome of interest was change in mean (biweekly) systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels over a six-month period. Patient data were extracted from the Ontario Telemedicine Network database, and analysed using generalised linear mixed model procedures. Results Overall, we analysed data for 3513 patients. Patients were on average 74.1 ± 11.4 years of age; almost half were men, 62% had heart failure, 55% chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and 29% diabetes. At baseline, the mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels were 130.4 ± 19.1 mmHg and 72.2 ± 12.5 mmHg for the total sample. At six months, the adjusted reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure values were 4.0 mmHg (95% confidence interval: -4.5 to -3.5) and 2.7 mmHg (95% confidence interval: -3.1 to -2.4), respectively. In a subgroup of 1220 patients with uncontrolled blood pressure at baseline (systolic/diastolic blood pressure of 150.7 ± 10.2 mmHg/80.2 ± 13.5 mmHg) the adjusted reduction in systolic blood pressure was 12.5 mmHg (95% confidence interval: -13.4 to -11.6) and in diastolic blood pressure was 7.1 mmHg (95% confidence interval: -7.8 to -6.5) over the six-month period. Conclusions Blood pressure levels were significantly reduced in patients enrolled in the Telehomecare programme, with changes being more pronounced in patients with uncontrolled blood pressure. The sustainability of decreased blood pressure on other clinical outcomes needs further evaluation.

Prehospital evaluation and economic analysis of different coronary syndrome treatment strategies--PREDICT--rationale, development and implementation.

BACKGROUND: A standard of prehospital care for patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) includes prehospital 12-lead and advance Emergency Department notification or prehospital bypass to percutaneous coronary intervention centres. Implementation of either care strategies is variable across communities and neither may exist in some communities. The main objective is to compare prehospital care strategies for time to treatment and survival outcomes as well as cost effectiveness. METHODS/DESIGN: PREDICT is a multicentre, prospective population-based cohort study of all chest pain patients 18 years or older presenting within 30 mins to 6 hours of symptom onset and treated with nitroglycerin, transported by paramedics in a number of different urban and rural regions in Ontario. The primary objective of this study is to compare the proportion of study subjects who receive reperfusion within the target door-to-reperfusion times in subjects obtained after four prehospital strategies: 12-lead ECG and advance emergency department (ED) notification or 3-lead ECG monitoring and alert to dispatch prior to hospital arrival; either with or without the opportunity to bypass to a PCI centre. DISCUSSION: We anticipate four challenges to successful study implementation and have developed strategies for each: 1) diversity in the interpretation of the ethical and privacy issues across 47 research ethics boards/committees covering 71 hospitals, 2) remote oversight of data guardian abstraction, 3) timeliness of implementation, and 4) potential interference in the study by concurrent technological advances. Research ethics approvals from academic centres were obtained initially and submitted to non academic centre applications. Data guardians were trained by a single investigator and data entry is informed by a detailed data dictionary including variable definitions and abstraction instructions and subjected to error and logic checks. Quality oversight provided by a single investigator. The window of the trial in each community has been confirmed with the base-hospital medical director to correspond to the planned technological advances of the system of care. We hope this comparative analysis across treatment strategies for clinical outcomes and cost will provide sufficient evidence to implement the superior strategy across all communities and improve outcomes for all STEMI patients.