High Expectations Among Patients Who Have Undergone TKA Do Not Correlate With Satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: One of five patients is dissatisfied with the outcome of TKA. With the increasing number of TKAs, this affects many patients. It has been suggested that high expectations may influence satisfaction, but the relationship between preoperative patient expectations and postoperative patient satisfaction remains poorly understood. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Are preoperative patient expectations correlated with postoperative satisfaction? (2) Are expectations correlated with patient characteristics or patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)? (3) Is satisfaction correlated with patient characteristics or PROMs? (4) Do patients report specific items as more relevant to their expectations? METHODS: This was a single-center, observational, retrospective, comparative study involving patients who underwent TKA. Between December 2020 and June 2022, three senior surgeons performed 306 TKAs. Of these, 76% (234) had the preoperative PROMs required for this study, and of these, 82% (193) had completed PROMs at the 12-month follow-up interval and were analyzed. Of the 193 included patients, 53% (102) were women; the mean age was 68 ± 9 years. Data were collected at baseline, 4 months, and 12 months. Twelve months of follow-up has been shown to be adequate in studies with PROMs. Patient expectations were measured using the validated Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Replacement Expectation Survey on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher expectations. We also assessed patient satisfaction, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Forgotten Joint Score, High-Activity Arthroplasty Score, EQ-5D-3L, and the objective Knee Society Score. Bivariate linear correlations were analyzed using the Pearson or Spearman test. RESULTS: Preoperative patient expectations did not correlate with postoperative satisfaction. The mean Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Replacement Expectation Survey score was 82 ±16 points and did not correlate with satisfaction at either 4 months (r = -0.061; p = 0.42) or 12 months (r = -0.126; p = 0.11). Expectations did not correlate with patient characteristics or any of the preoperative or postoperative PROMs or the Knee Society Score. Patient satisfaction was 88% (158 of 179) at 4 months and 83% (160 of 193) at 12 months and did not correlate with patient characteristics or any of the preoperative PROMs or Knee Society Score. Patient satisfaction was medium to strongly correlated with postoperative PROMs and Knee Society Score. The Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Replacement Expectation Survey items with the most frequent expected improvement were "ability to walk" (99% [192 of 193]), "go downstairs" (99% [191 of 192]), and "go upstairs" (99% [192 of 193]). CONCLUSION: Preoperative expectations were not correlated with postoperative satisfaction or PROMs. Surgeons should be aware that patients have high expectations. However, these expectations appear to be less relevant in determining postoperative satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Comparison of Responsiveness of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the responsiveness of different patient-reported outcome measures in patients with primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: In this prospective observational study, we assessed patients with TKA before the surgery, after 4 months, after 1 year, and after 2 years. Measures were the objective Knee Society Score (KSS) and the following patient-reported outcome measures: Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), KOOS-12, Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12), High-Activity Arthroplasty Score, and EQ-5D-3L. Responsiveness was determined by effect size (ES), standardized response mean (SRM), area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, floor and ceiling effects, and hypothesis testing. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 309 TKAs (272 patients, 56% female). The ES and SRM for the change in KSS, KOOS, KOOS-12, FJS-12, and EQ-5D-3L from baseline to each follow-up were large (>0.8). The largest responsiveness from baseline to follow-up was found for the KSS, KOOS/KOOS-12 quality of life, KOOS-12 summary, KOOS-12 pain, and FJS-12 (2.0 > ES <3.9, 1.4 > SRM <2.4). The area under the curve from baseline to each follow-up was ≥0.7 for KOOS, KOOS-12, and FJS-12 (range 0.71 to 0.95) and <0.7 for KSS and EQ-5D-3L (range 0.65 to 0.74). We found floor or ceiling effects in the KOOS, KOOS-12, and EQ-5D-3L, but not in the KSS, FJS-12, and High-Activity Arthroplasty Score. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that responsiveness differed between the various measures. The KOOS-12 and FJS-12 showed the greatest internal and external responsiveness, although ceiling effects occurred in the KOOS-12.

Satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective matched-pair analysis of patients with customised individually made and off-the-shelf implants.

PURPOSE: Customised individually made (CIM) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was introduced to potentially improve patient satisfaction and other patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The purpose of this study was to compare PROMs, especially patient satisfaction, of patients with CIM and OTS TKA in a matched-pair analysis with a 2-year follow-up. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study with a propensity score matching of 85 CIM and 85 off-the-shelf (OTS) TKA. Follow-up was at 4 months, 1 year and 2 years. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction. Secondary outcomes were as follows: overall improvement, willingness to undergo the surgery again, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12), High-Activity Arthroplasty Score (HAAS), EQ-5D-3L, EQ-VAS, Knee Society Score (KSS) and surgeon satisfaction. RESULTS: Patient satisfaction ranged from 86 to 90% and did not differ between CIM and OTS TKA. The EQ-VAS after 4 months and the HAAS after 1 year and 2 years were higher for CIM TKA. KOOS, FJS-12 and EQ-5D-3L were not different at follow-up. The changes in KOOS symptoms, pain and daily living were higher for OTS TKA. The KSS was higher for patients with CIM TKA. Surgeon satisfaction was high throughout both groups. Patients who were satisfied after 2 years did not differ preoperatively from those who were not satisfied. Postoperatively, all PROMs were better for satisfied patients. Patient satisfaction was not correlated with patient characteristics, implant or preoperative PROMs, and medium to strongly correlated with postoperative PROMs. CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction was high with no differences between patients with CIM and OTS TKA. Both implant systems improved function, pain and health-related quality of life. Patients with CIM TKA showed superior results in demanding activities as measured by the HAAS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, prospective cohort study.

No difference in patient-reported satisfaction after 12 months between customised individually made and off-the-shelf total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: A subset of patients is usually not satisfied after a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Customised individually made (CIM) TKA are deemed to overcome drawbacks of classical off-the-shelf (OTS) TKA, but evidence is still sparse. The aim of this study was to compare satisfaction of patients with CIM and OTS TKA. METHODS: This prospective cohort study compared clinical and patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) between patients with CIM and OTS TKA. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction after 12 months. Secondary outcomes were the Knee Society Score (KSS), the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) and the EQ-5D-3L after 4 and 12 months. RESULTS: Data were analysed from 74 CIM TKA and 169 OTS TKA between January 2017 and September 2020. Patients with CIM TKA were slightly younger, more often male, had a lower body mass index, a lower KSS and partially higher preoperative PROMs. Patient satisfaction after 12 months was high and comparable (CIM 87%, OTS 89%). All PROMs improved for both groups (p < 0.001) and did not differ after 12 months (p > 0.063). The majority of patients improved above the minimal important difference (range 65 to 89%) and reported a clear overall improvement (CIM 86%, OTS 87%). The postoperative KSS, notably regarding knee stability, was higher for CIM TKA (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: No difference was found in patient satisfaction between CIM and OTS TKA after 12 months. In both groups, patient satisfaction was high and PROMs improved considerably. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, prospective cohort study.

The German version of the High-Activity Arthroplasty Score is valid and reliable for patients after total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The indications for a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) broadened to younger and more active patients. The High-Activity Arthroplasty Score (HAAS) is a self-administered instrument focussing on the wider range of functional abilities of more active patients. The HAAS was developed in English and is not available in German yet. This study aims to translate, cross-cultural adapt and assess the psychometric properties of the German HAAS in patients 12 months after primary TKA. METHODS: After forward and backward translation, we examined the final version regarding its psychometric properties in patients 12 months after primary TKA. The HAAS was sent out to 70 patients together with routine questionnaires comprising the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12), the EuroQol (EQ-5D-3L) and 2 numerical pain rating scales. Acceptability, reliability, responsiveness, content and construct validity as well as floor and ceiling effects were evaluated. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were recruited. The HAAS was well accepted with a mean time to completion of 2.4 min. Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency was 0.749, test-retest reliability was excellent with an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of 0.961. The smallest detectable change was 1.5. Good content validity was confirmed. A strong correlation was found between the HAAS and KOOS sport (r = 0.661) and a medium correlation for all other KOOS subscales (r = 0.324 to 0.453), the FJS-12 (r = 0.425), the EQ-5D-3L (r = 0.427) and pain (r = - 0.439 to - 0.308). The HAAS showed no floor and ceiling effects. CONCLUSIONS: The German version of the HAAS provides good validity and reliability. It can be easily self-administered and is recommended to capture high-intensity activities in patients after TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, Level I.

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the quality of clinical practice, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important as certain questions could only be answered by the patient himself. PROMs help to get a better understanding what is meaningful to a patient and directly affects daily functioning. To move beyond traditional measures, we are interested in what matters to patients and developed this project. The aim of this article is to provide the protocol for our study collecting PROMs in daily medical practice from patients who undergo knee arthroplasty. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a single-site, observational, prospective cohort study. We will recruit patients scheduled for a knee arthroplasty in our medical office, situated in a private clinic. After signed informed consent, patients complete self-reported questionnaires before the surgery, after 4 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years and 5 years. We will use the following PROMs: Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Forgotten Joint Score, EuroQol five dimensions and satisfaction. Additionally, the surgeon will complete the objective Knee Society Score. Administration of the questionnaires will be electronically or paper-based. We will assess differences between preoperative and postoperative data with paired t-test for continuous variables and Wilcoxon signed-rank test for categorical variables. To assess subgroup differences, we will use unpaired t-test for continuous variables and Mann-Whitney U test for categorical variables. To assess possible presence of bias, we will conduct sensitivity analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been reviewed and approved by the local ethics committee in Basel, Switzerland. Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients. We will disseminate the results of the study through peer-reviewed journals, national and international conference presentations and presentations to relevant stakeholders through appropriate channels.

Clinical and radiological outcomes after management of traumatic knee dislocation by open single stage complete reconstruction/repair.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to analyze the clinical and radiological long-term outcomes of surgically treated traumatic knee dislocations and determine prognostic factors for outcome. METHODS: Retrospective consecutive series of patients treated surgically for traumatic knee dislocation with reconstruction/refixation of the anterior (ACL) and posterior cruciate ligaments (PCL) and primary complete repair of collaterals and posteromedial and posteromedial corner structures. 68 patients were evaluated clinically (IKDC score, SF36 health survey, Lysholm score, Knee Society score, Tegner score, visual analogue scale - VAS pain and satisfaction, Cooper test) and radiologically (weight bearing and stress radiographs) with a mean follow up of 12 +/- 8 years. Instrumented anterior-posterior translation was measured (Rolimeter, KT-1000). Pearson correlation and stepwise regression analysis was used. RESULTS: 82% of patients (n = 56) returned to their previous work. At final follow-up 6 patients (9%) suffered from pain VAS > 3. The mean side-to-side difference of anterior/posterior translation (KT-1000, 134N) was 1.6 +/- 1.6 mm and 2.6 +/- 1.4 mm. Valgus and varus stress testing in 30 degrees flexion was <3 mm (normal) in 57 patients (86%). The IKDC score was normal/nearly normal in 38 (58%) patients and the mean Lysholm score 83 +/- 17 (intact 98 +/- 7). The median Tegner score decreased from 7 preinjury (range 3-10) to 5 at follow-up (range 0-10). The mean Knee Society score was 187 +/- 15 (out of maximum 200). In 7 patients (10%) a secondary ligament reconstruction was performed. Three patients (4%) underwent a high tibial osteotomy and four (6%) received a primary unconstrained total knee replacement. According to the Kellgren Lawrence osteoarthritis score only mild degenerative changes were present. The stress radiographs showed stable results for anteroposterior translation. Injury of the lateral collateral ligament, refixation of the ACL/PCL and delayed surgery >40 days were significantly associated with worse outcome (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Early complete reconstruction can achieve good functional results and patient satisfaction with overall restoration of sports and working capacity. Negative predictive factors for outcome were injury pattern, type of surgical procedure and timing of surgery.