Antioxidative treatment diminishes ethanol-induced congenital malformations in the rat.

BACKGROUND: Intrauterine exposure to ethanol causes embryonic and fetal growth retardation and maldevelopment. Oxidative stress in mother and offspring has been suggested to be part of the teratogenic mechanism, and supplementation of antioxidative agents to the pregnant women may therefore be of value in future prophylactic treatment regimen. There is a need for in vivo experimental work in this field, and in the present study, our aim was to investigate whether chronic ethanol consumption induced congenital malformations in rats and, if so, whether dietary supplementation of vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) diminished such maldevelopment. METHODS: Female Sprague-Dawley rats were given drinking water containing 20% ethanol and half of these received food containing 5% vitamin E. Non-ethanol-exposed female rats, with or without vitamin E treatment, served as controls. The pregnancy was interrupted on gestational day 20 when the offspring was evaluated morphologically and fetal hepatic 8-iso-PGF(2alpha) levels were measured to assess the degree of fetal oxidative stress. RESULTS: Exposure to 20% ethanol increased maternal blood ethanol to 1.5 promille and increased resorption and malformation rates in the offspring. Maternal vitamin E treatment did not affect blood ethanol levels, but normalized fetal development. The fetal hepatic levels of 8-iso-PGF(2alpha) were increased in the ethanol-exposed group and normalized by vitamin E treatment of the mother. CONCLUSIONS: Ethanol exposure disturbs embryogenesis partly by enhanced oxidative stress, and the adverse effects can be ameliorated by antioxidative treatment.

Fetus at risk: prevalence of alcohol consumption during pregnancy estimated with a simple screening method in Swedish antenatal clinics.

AIMS: Maternal alcohol consumption is a major health hazard for the fetus. Sweden has an extensive system of public antenatal care clinics, whose mission is to detect and prevent this type of health hazards. However, very few cases of alcohol consumption during pregnancy are detected. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of hazardous or harmful alcohol consumption during pregnancy in a consecutive series of Swedish pregnant females. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND MEASUREMENTS: The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) was used to collect anonymous data from consecutive pregnant subjects admitted during 1 year to an antenatal clinic in Stockholm, and signing up for parental education offered routinely (n = 1327). Data were obtained from 1101 subjects, typically in pregnancy week 30. A complete AUDIT form was filled out referring to alcohol use during the year prior to pregnancy. A separate form with the consumption items from AUDIT was filled out to report behaviour during pregnancy. FINDINGS: For the year preceding pregnancy, 17% of subjects reported AUDIT scores of 6 or higher, indicating hazardous or harmful alcohol use in women. Few individuals reported scores of 13 or higher (indicating abuse or dependence), but almost half the subjects (46%) reported binge drinking (six standard drinks on a single occasion) once/month or more often, and 6% reported binge drinking on every occasion of alcohol consumption. One-third of the subjects (30%) continued regular alcohol use during pregnancy, and 6% reported consumption two to four times/month. In a logistic regression model, AUDIT scores for the year prior to pregnancy and subject age, but not education level were significant predictors of continued alcohol use during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Alcohol use during pregnancy is more extensive than has been presumed in Sweden. Simple, clinically useful screening methodology detects hazardous consumption during pregnancy in a manner which regular antenatal care does not. If this methodology can be shown to have similar sensitivity when administered under non-anonymous conditions, it should be made part of routine antenatal care.

The dual-diagnosis concept used by Swedish social workers: limited validity upon examination using a structured diagnostic approach.

A co-existence of chemical dependence and other psychiatric syndromes is commonly referred to as "dual-diagnosis." This categorization is commonly made by social workers in several European countries assigned the primary responsibility for the care of drug and alcohol dependence. Here, we examined the validity of this categorization through systematic, structured patient evaluation following a minimum of 3 weeks of abstinence from drugs and alcohol. Less than one-third of patients originally labelled as suffering from "dual-diagnosis" by the social services did in fact obtain any Axis I DSM IIIR diagnosis, and less than half of the patients had any psychiatric diagnosis other than dependence. Syndromes commonly discussed in the context of self-medication, i.e., unipolar depression and anxiety syndromes, were not over-represented compared to a population sample, while chronic psychoses and bipolar syndromes were highly significantly more common. We conclude that the dual-diagnosis concept, unless substantiated through stringent diagnostic procedures by psychiatrically trained personnel, may be of questionable utility in caring for patients presenting with psychiatric symptoms and substance dependence. A systematic individual evaluation in an alcohol- and drug-free state of sufficient duration is necessary to obtain a basis for an adequate individual treatment plan.