RESUMO
The incidence of monoclonal gammopathy (MG) increases with age. In individuals over 80 years of age, we can diagnose the presence of monoclonal immunoglobulin (MIg) in up to 10 % of cases. Not only malignant diseases such as multiple myeloma (MM), but also benign forms such as MGUS (monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance) can lead to renal involvement. The light chains of immunoglobulins (LC) are the most damaging to the kidneys, as they are freely filtered into the urine due to their molecular weight. Detection of MIg relies mainly on a combination of immunofixation electrophoresis of serum (IELFO) and urine and determination of free light chains (FLC) of kappa and lambda and their ratio (κ/λ) in serum. The combination of these tests will detect the presence of MIg with 99 % sensitivity. Renal damage in MG may be caused by direct deposition of MIg in the glomeruli (e.g. AL amyloidosis, LC deposition disease) or tubules (in the distal tubule as a myeloma kidney or in the proximal tubule as Fanconi syndrome or proximal tubulopathy). Typical urinary findings in these diseases are moderate or severe proteinuria or nephrotic syndrome. Acute kidney injury (AKI) can be expected especially when serum FLC is >500 mg/l. Renal biopsy is crucial to establish an accurate diagnosis and thus initiate the correct treatment. Treatment of these types of renal damage involves the same treatment regimens used in the treatment of MM, including proteasome inhibitors or daratumumab.
Assuntos
Mieloma Múltiplo , Paraproteinemias , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiplo/complicações , Mieloma Múltiplo/diagnóstico , Paraproteinemias/complicações , Paraproteinemias/diagnóstico , Nefropatias/etiologia , Nefropatias/diagnósticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Rituximab is being increasingly prescribed for the treatment of autoimmune glomerular diseases. While it is highly effective for some diseases, the response is less predictable for others, which may be due to differing requirements in terms of the dosing according to the disease type and variations concerning exposure to the drug. METHODS: We compiled novel rituximab dosing schedules according to pharmacokinetic analysis of data gathered from rituximab treated patients in a tertiary referral nephrology centre between May 2020 and June 2023. The population-pharmacokinetic analysis was based on the rituximab dosing, the patients' characteristics, rituximab levels and anti-rituximab antibodies. RESULTS: The analysis, which was based on data from 185 patients, clearly highlighted differing rituximab dosing requirements for patients with ANCA associated vasculitis and minimal change disease compared to those with membranous nephropathy, focal-segmental glomerulosclerosis and lupus nephritis. This corresponded to the good treatment response of the first two diseases and the unreliable efficacy for the others. The model predicts the rituximab pharmacokinetics with high degree of accuracy when body weight, proteinuria, type of glomerulonephritis, treatment length and anti-rituximab antibodies formation are used as covariates. We proposed a dosing schedule with shortened dosing intervals for difficult-to-treat diagnoses with high proteinuria. CONCLUSION: In order to ensure reliable and comparable exposure of rituximab with respect to the full range of glomerular diseases, the dosing schedule should be adjusted for membranous nephropathy, focal-segmental glomerulosclerosis and lupus nephritis. This is largely, but not solely, due to the enhanced level of unselective proteinuria in these diseases.