Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Pers Med ; 12(4)2022 Apr 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35455750

RESUMO

The purpose of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to determine the analgesic effectiveness of peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs), including each anatomical approach, with or without intrathecal morphine (ITMP) in cesarean delivery (CD). All relevant randomized controlled trials comparing the analgesic effectiveness of PNBs with or without ITMP after CD until July 2021. The two co-primary outcomes were designated as (1) pain at rest 6 h after surgery and (2) postoperative cumulative 24-h morphine equivalent consumption. Secondary outcomes were the time to first analgesic request, pain at rest 24 h, and dynamic pain 6 and 24 h after surgery. Seventy-six studies (6278 women) were analyzed. The combined ilioinguinal nerve and anterior transversus abdominis plane (II-aTAP) block in conjunction with ITMP had the highest SUCRA (surface under the cumulative ranking curve) values for postoperative rest pain at 6 h (88.4%) and 24-h morphine consumption (99.4%). Additionally, ITMP, ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block in conjunction with ITMP, lateral TAP block, and wound infiltration (WI) or continuous infusion (WC) below the fascia also showed a significant reduction in two co-primary outcomes. Only the II-aTAP block had a statistically significant additional analgesic effect compared to ITMP alone on rest pain at 6 h after surgery (-7.60 (-12.49, -2.70)). In conclusion, combined II-aTAP block in conjunction with ITMP is the most effective post-cesarean analgesic strategy with lower rest pain at 6 h and cumulative 24-h morphine consumption. Using the six described analgesic strategies for postoperative pain management after CD is considered reasonable. Lateral TAP block, WI, and WC below the fascia may be useful alternatives in patients with a history of sensitivity or severe adverse effects to opioids or when the CD is conducted under general anesthesia.

2.
Anesth Pain Med (Seoul) ; 16(3): 290-294, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34233412

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hypertrophic osteoarthropathy (HOA) is a rare clinical condition including an abnormal periosteal reaction in the long bones that causes painful swelling and tenderness of the extremities, digital clubbing, arthritis, synovitis, and joint effusions. Most cases are associated with tumorous conditions and most commonly with lung cancer. HOA has been rarely reported in association with other cancers. CASE: A patient with a history of recurrent renal cell carcinoma was referred to our clinic with bilateral leg pain, knee joint effusion, and arthritis. Simple radiography and bone scintigraphy confirmed a diagnosis of HOA. Oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, joint fluid aspiration, and intra-articular injection of pain medications were found to be effective in the management of HOA pain. CONCLUSIONS: HOA prognosis depends on the underlying disease, therefore, cancer treatment is critical. This case demonstrates the need to consider HOA in patients with various malignancies who present with bone or joint pain of the extremities.

3.
J Card Surg ; 36(9): 3283-3287, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34171136

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The transaortic approach is the most common method of septal myectomy. However, difficulties arise due to a limited view of the surgical field. Here, we report our experience with videoscope-assisted transaortic myectomy. METHODS: We reviewed myectomy operations that were performed between July 2015 and June 2019 at Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea. Patients who previously had cardiac surgery, alcohol septal ablation, or concomitant disease which required combined surgery, were excluded. Among the 21 patients included, 10 patients underwent videoscope-assisted transaortic myectomy (VA group), and 11 patients underwent myectomy in a conventional manner (CO group). The preoperative data, echocardiographic images, operative records, and postoperative outcomes of these patients were reviewed. RESULTS: There were no differences in baseline characteristics between groups VA and CO. The main indications for videoscope-assisted transaortic myectomy in group VA were midventricular septal muscle resection (70%), abnormal papillary muscle resection (40%), and abnormal chordal connection resection (30%). Eight (80%) patients had multiple indications for videoscope-assisted transaortic myectomy. There was no surgical mortality in either group. Postoperative patients showed less than moderate mitral regurgitation and a New York Heart Association class either III or IV. There were no differences in hospital days (9.5 vs. 12.0 days; p = .383), nor postoperative pressure gradient (14 vs. 15 mmHg; p > .99). CONCLUSIONS: Videoscope-assisted transaortic myectomy is an effective surgical technique in selective hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with complex intraventricular anatomy, diffuse hypertrophy, and midventricular obstruction.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Cardiomiopatia Hipertrófica , Cardiomiopatia Hipertrófica/complicações , Cardiomiopatia Hipertrófica/cirurgia , Septos Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagem , Septos Cardíacos/cirurgia , Ventrículos do Coração , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Data Brief ; 28: 104852, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31871993

RESUMO

This article presents dataset of network meta-analysis (NMA) and systemic review, entitled, Comparison of supraglottic airway devices in laparoscopic surgeries: A network meta-analysis Yoon SW et al., 2019. The data tables demonstrate numeric values for endpoints: oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) before and after pneumoperitoneum, peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) before and after pneumoperitoneum, and gastric tube insertion success rate for each supraglottic airway device (SAD). All relevant randomized controlled trials published up to 31 March 2018 were collected from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Google Scholar databases. 26 studies with a total of 2142 patients that included eight different SADs were included. The data described in this article are available as a supplementary file.

5.
J Clin Anesth ; 55: 52-66, 2019 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30597453

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To review all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on supraglottic airway devices (SADs) used in laparoscopy and compare their oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) and peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) before and after pneumoperitoneum, and success rate of gastric tube insertion rate. DESIGN: Systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs. SETTING: Laparoscopic surgeries using SADs. PATIENTS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar databases to detect all relevant RCTs on SADs for laparoscopic surgery published until March 2018. INTERVENTIONS: Use of different SADs. MEASUREMENTS: The primary endpoint was OLP before and after pneumoperitoneum. The secondary endpoints were PIP before and after pneumoperitoneum and gastric tube insertion success rate. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-six studies involving 2142 patients with eight different SADs were evaluated. According to surface under the cumulative ranking curve value, the OLP before pneumoperitoneum was the highest in Ambu AuraGain (95.7%), followed by Laryngeal Mask Airway ProSeal (77.3%) and Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway (75.6%); after pneumoperitoneum, the pressure was the highest in i-gel (95.8%). PIP was the highest in Ambu AuraGain (80.9%) before pneumoperitoneum and i-gel (69.4%) after pneumoperitoneum. CONCLUSION: Although all SADs available were not evaluated, and further studies are needed to establish our results, OLP was the highest in Ambu AuraGain before pneumoperitoneum and i-gel after pneumoperitoneum.


Assuntos
Anestesia Geral/instrumentação , Laparoscopia/instrumentação , Máscaras Laríngeas , Pressão do Ar , Anestesia Geral/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Metanálise em Rede , Orofaringe , Pneumoperitônio Artificial , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Testes de Função Respiratória
6.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 33(5): 1224-1229, 2019 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30655204

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the degree of lethal and sublethal damage to red blood cells (RBCs) by cell saver (CS) processing among different conditions of shed blood in cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Prospective randomized, double-blinded, controlled study. SETTING: Single university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty rabbits were divided randomly into non-heparinized and heparinized groups. Thereafter, each group was subdivided into non-gauze and gauze groups based on whether the blood was collected with gauze and squeezed out. INTERVENTIONS: Blood from each group was aspirated directly from the heart and underwent CS processing. Mechanical fragility index (MFI) and percent hemolysis were measured pre- and post-CS processing. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In RBCs after CS processing, the MFI and percent hemolysis were increased significantly in both the non-heparinized and heparinized groups compared to pre-CS processing. The MFI was significantly higher in the heparinized group than in the non-heparinized group (p = 0.002). However, no differences in percent hemolysis were detected between groups (p = 0.696). The MFI and percent hemolysis of the non-gauze and gauze groups did not differ. CONCLUSION: This study reports the increase in sublethal and lethal injuries to RBCs from heparinized and non-heparinized blood after CS processing. CS-processed heparinized blood contained more sublethally injured RBCs compared to CS-processed non-heparinized blood. RBCs collected by squeezing blood-saturated gauze did not exhibit additional trauma. Further investigation is required to determine the clinical implications of transfusing rescued but injured RBCs using a CS.


Assuntos
Coleta de Amostras Sanguíneas/métodos , Coleta de Amostras Sanguíneas/normas , Eritrócitos/fisiologia , Animais , Método Duplo-Cego , Transfusão de Eritrócitos/métodos , Transfusão de Eritrócitos/normas , Estudos Prospectivos , Coelhos , Distribuição Aleatória
7.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 98(1): e13947, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30608428

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia is the standard technique for elective cesarean section, but the incidence of maternal hypotension in this setting is reportedly about 80%, without any prophylactic management. Vasopressors are the most reliable method for counteracting the hypotension induced by spinal anesthesia. However, studies investigating the effects of vasopressors have yielded inconsistent and debatable results. Therefore, we plan to conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis to identify the most effective vasopressor to prevent maternal hypotension, and to decrease fetal acidosis in women undergoing spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. METHODS: A systematic and comprehensive search to detect all the randomized controlled studies on vasopressors for the management of maternal hypotension during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia will be performed using information in the databases, MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Google Scholar, beginning from their inception to October 2018. We will conduct a network meta-analysis to combine the direct and indirect comparisons of the vasopressors. We will use the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values and rankograms to present the hierarchy of vasopressors. A comparison-adjusted funnel plot will be used to assess the presence of small-study effects. The quality of the studies included will be assessed using the risk of bias tool. All statistical analyses will be performed using Stata SE version 15.0. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systematic review and meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. Ethical approval and informed consent are not required, as the study will be a literature review and will not involve direct contact with patients or alterations to patient care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The protocol for this review has been registered in the PROSPERO network (registration number: CRD42018111852).


Assuntos
Raquianestesia , Cesárea , Hipotensão , Vasoconstritores , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Acidose/prevenção & controle , Raquianestesia/efeitos adversos , Cesárea/efeitos adversos , Doenças Fetais/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Fetais/metabolismo , Hipotensão/induzido quimicamente , Hipotensão/tratamento farmacológico , Metanálise em Rede , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resultado do Tratamento , Vasoconstritores/administração & dosagem , Vasoconstritores/uso terapêutico , Metanálise como Assunto , Revisões Sistemáticas como Assunto
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...