Wear Behavior of the Human Enamel Antagonist to Different Glazed Zirconia.

In this study, the wear behavior of glazed zirconia was investigated to the antagonist with human enamel after simulated mastication. Twenty Y-TZP specimens were divided into 4 groups: untreated zirconia (Z), glazed zirconia with IPS e.max Ceram (GZE), glazed zirconia with VITA AKZENT® Plus (GZV), and glazed zirconia with glass (GZG). Glazing glass was mainly composed of SiO2, B2O3, Al2O3, Na2O and K2O (nearly 91 wt%). The surface roughness of the specimens was evaluated using roughness profiler. The maxillary premolar teeth were selected as the antagonist. The wear of human enamel against human enamel was used as a control. Five-disc specimens per group were subjected to chewing stimulation CS-4 (SD Mechatronic GmbH, Germany) for 240,000 cycles against human enamel. The wear loss of antagonistic teeth was calculated using a three-dimensional profiling system and the volume loss of the tooth was scanned using a 3D scanner. 3D data obtained before and after testing were overlapped using 3D software (Dentacian Software, EZplant, Korea). The wear loss of glazed zirconia GZE, GZV and GZG groups showed significantly lower than that of human enamel. Whereas, the zirconia (Z) group exhibits significantly lower volume loss than glazed zirconia and enamel. These results show that the wear of the glazing glass is comparable to other commercial glazing materials. Glazing materials are both more susceptible to wear the antagonist relative to zirconia.

Shear Bond Strength of Zirconia to Titanium Implant Using Glass Bonding.

This study evaluated the shear bond strength of zirconia to titanium implant components using silica-based glasses and compared the strength with that of implant components bonded using a commercial resin cement. Forty cylindrical zirconia specimens and forty titanium disks (Grade IV) were divided equally into four groups, depending on the adhesive used: three different types of glasses (group G, group GI, group GIB) and a self-adhesive resin cement (group U200), which was used as a control. The shear bond strength was evaluated using a universal testing machine and failure mode was examined by optical microscope. Data was analyzed using One-way ANOVA with p-value <0.05, which was considered statistically significant. The shear bond strength of the three glass groups was significantly higher than that of group U200 (p<0.05). Failure mode in all groups was a combination of adhesive and cohesive modes. Shear bond strength of zirconia to titanium bonded using glasses was higher than that using self-adhesive resin cement.