Utilidad de la diferencia venoarterial de PCO2 como predictor de complicaciones en el postoperatorio inmediato del trasplante hepático / Utility of the central venous-to-arterial CO2 difference to predict adverse outcomes after liver transplantation

Objetivo: Evaluar la relación de la diferencia venoarterial de PCO2 (ΔPCO2) con la aparición de complicaciones en el manejo postoperatorio precoz del trasplante hepático. Materiales y métodos: Estudio observacional y prospectivo realizado en una unidad de cuidados intensivos médico-quirúrgica de un hospital universitario. Se incluyó a 150 pacientes adultos que recibieron un trasplante de hígado ortotópico entre enero de 2015 y noviembre de 2018. Los pacientes fueron clasificados en 4grupos predefinidos de acuerdo con la evolución de la ΔPCO2 durante las primeras 6 h del postoperatorio en la unidad de cuidados intensivos, al considerar ese periodo como el de mayor riesgo de alteraciones hemodinámicas: 1) ΔPCO2 persistentemente normal (normal en T0 y T6); 2) ΔPCO2 descendente (alta en T0, normal en T6); 3) ΔPCO2 ascendente (normal en T0, alta en T6) y 4) ΔPCO2 persistentemente alta (alta en T0 y T6). Se comparó la relación de dichos grupos con la aparición de disfunción multiorgánica a las 72 h y las probabilidades de supervivencia globales y en el día 30 se describieron mediante curvas de Kaplan-Meier; las diferencias se calcularon mediante un test log-rank. Para el estudio de la correlación entre índice cardiaco y ΔPCO2 se utilizó el coeficiente de correlación de Spearman. Resultados: La disfunción multiorgánica representada mediante el SOFA a las 72 h (p=0,86) y el Δ-SOFA (p=0,088) no presentó diferencias significativas entre los 4grupos a estudio, de la misma forma que ocurrió con la mortalidad hospitalaria (χ2=5,72; p=0,126) y a los 30 días (χ2=2,23; p=0,5252). Con respecto a la relación entre índice cardiaco y ΔPCO2, se demostró una correlación inversa estadísticamente significativa de valor bajo (rho de Spearman: −0,17; p=0,002). Conclusiones: En pacientes críticos admitidos tras un trasplante hepático, la diferencia venoarterial de PCO2 no predice la mortalidad ni la incidencia de complicaciones en el periodo postoperatorio inmediato.(AU)

Objective: Test whether the development of abnormal venous-to arterial CO2 difference (ΔPCO2) during the early phases of postoperative care after a liver transplantation is related to multi-organ dysfunction and outcomes. Materials and methods: Prospective cohort study accomplished in a mixed intensive care unit at a university hospital. We included 150 eligible patients after a liver transplantation between 2015 and 2018. Patients were classified in 4predefined groups according to the ΔPCO2 evolution during the first 6h of resuscitation: 1) persistently normal ΔPCO2 (normal at T0 and T6); 2) decreasing ΔPCO2 (high at T0, normal at T6); 3) increasing ΔPCO2 (normal at T0, high at T6); and 4) persistently high ΔPCO2 (high at T0 and T6). Multiorgan dysfunction at day-3 was compared for predefined groups and a Kaplan Meier curve was constructed to show the survival probabilities using a log-rank test to evaluate differences between groups. A Spearman-rho was used to test the agreement between cardiac output and ΔPCO2. Results: There were no significant differences between the study groups regarding higher SOFA scores at day-3 (P=0.86), Δ-SOFA (P=0.088), as well as global mortality rates (χ2=5.72; P=0.126) and mortality rates at day-30 (χ2=2.23; P=0.5252). A significantly poor inverse agreement between cardiac output and ΔPCO2 was observed (rho de Spearman −0,17; P=0,002) at different points of resuscitation. Conclusions: After a liver transplantation, central venous-to-arterial CO2 difference was not associated with survival or postoperative adverse outcomes in a critical care patients population.(AU)

Utility of the central venous-to-arterial CO2 difference to predict adverse outcomes after liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: Test whether the development of abnormal venous-to arterial CO2 difference (ΔPCO2) during the early phases of postoperative care after a liver transplantation (LT) is related to multi-organ dysfunction and outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective cohort study accomplished in a mixed intensive care unit (ICU) at a university hospital. We included 150 eligible patients after a LT between 2015 and 2018. Patients were classified in four predefined groups according to the ΔPCO2 evolution during the first 6 h of resuscitation: (1) persistently normal ΔPCO2 (normal at T0 and T6); (2) decreasing ΔPCO2 (high at T0, normal at T6); (3) increasing ΔPCO2 (normal at T0, high at T6); and (4) persistently high ΔPCO2 (high at T0 and T6). Multiorgan dysfunction at day-3 was compared for predefined groups and a Kaplan Meier curve was constructed to show the survival probabilities using a log-rank test to evaluate differences between groups. A Spearman-Rho was used to test the agreement between cardiac output and ΔPCO2. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the study groups regarding higher SOFA scores at day-3 (P = .86), Δ-SOFA (P = .088), as well as global mortality rates (χ²â€¯= 5.72; P = .126) and mortality rates at day-30 (χ²â€¯= 2.23; P = .5252). A significantly poor inverse agreement between cardiac output and ΔPCO2 was observed (r2 -0,17; P = ,002) at different points of resuscitation. CONCLUSIONS: After a LT, central venous-to-arterial CO2 difference was not associated with survival or postoperative adverse outcomes in a critical care patients population.

Predicción de hemorragia masiva. Índice de shock e índice de shock modificado / Prediction of massive bleeding. Shock index and modified shock index

Objetivo: Determinar la capacidad de predicción del índice de shock y del índice de shock modificado para hemorragia masiva tras sufrir un trauma grave. Diseño: Cohorte retrospectiva. Ámbito: Atención inicial hospitalaria al paciente con enfermedad traumática grave en una unidad de cuidados intensivos de trauma de un hospital terciario. Sujetos: Pacientes mayores de 14 años con trauma grave (injury severity score [ISS] >15), admitidos de forma consecutiva desde enero de 2014 hasta diciembre de 2015. Variables: Se estudiaron sensibilidad (Se), especificidad (Sp), valores predictivos positivo y negativo (VP+ y VP-), razones de verosimilitud positiva y negativa (RV+ y RV-), curvas ROC (receiver operating characteristics) y el área bajo las mismas (AUROC) para predicción de hemorragia masiva. Resultados: Se incluyeron 287 pacientes, el 76,31% (219) fueron varones, con una edad media de 43,36 (±17,71) e ISS de 26 (rango intercuartil [RIC]: 21-34). La frecuencia global de hemorragia masiva fue de 8,71% (25). Para el índice de shock se obtuvo: AUROC de 0,89 (intervalo de confianza [IC] 95%: 0,84-0,94), con un punto de corte óptimo en 1,11, Se del 91,3% (IC 95%: 73,2-97,58) y Sp del 79,69% (IC 95%: 74,34-84,16). Para el índice de shock modificado se obtuvo: AUROC de 0,90 (IC 95%: 0,86-0,95), con un punto de corte óptimo en 1,46, Se del 95,65% (IC 95%: 79,01-99,23) y Sp del 75,78% (IC 95%: 70,18-80,62). Conclusiones: El índice de shock y el índice de shock modificado son buenos predictores de hemorragia masiva y de fácil aplicación durante la atención inicial del trauma grave (AU)

Objective: To determine the predictive value of the Shock Index and Modified Shock Index in patients with massive bleeding due to severe trauma. Design: Retrospective cohort. Setting: Severe trauma patient's initial attention at the intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital. Subjects: Patients older than 14 years that were admitted to the hospital with severe trauma (Injury Severity Score >15) form January 2014 to December 2015. Variables: We studied the sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive and negative predictive value (PV+ and PV-), positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR+ and LR-), ROC curves (Receiver Operating Characteristics) and the area under the same (AUROC) for prediction of massive hemorrhage. Results: 287 patients were included, 76.31% (219) were male, mean age was 43,36 (±17.71) years and ISS was 26 (interquartile range [IQR]: 21-34). The overall frequency of massive bleeding was 8.71% (25). For Shock Index: AUROC was 0.89 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.84 to 0.94), with an optimal cutoff at 1.11, Se was 91.3% (95% CI: 73.2 to 97.58) and Sp was 79.69% (95% CI: 74.34 to 84.16). For the Modified Shock Index: AUROC was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86 to 0.95), with an optimal cutoff at 1.46, Se was 95.65% (95% CI: 79.01 to 99.23) and Sp was 75.78% (95% CI: 70.18 to 80.62). Conclusion: Shock Index and Modified Shock Index are good predictors of massive bleeding and could be easily incorporated to the initial workup of patients with severe trauma (AU)

La hidroxicloroquina, un fármaco potencialmente letal / Hydroxychloroquine, a potentially lethal drug

No disponible

Prediction of massive bleeding. Shock index and modified shock index. / Predicción de hemorragia masiva. Índice de shock e índice de shock modificado.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the predictive value of the Shock Index and Modified Shock Index in patients with massive bleeding due to severe trauma. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Severe trauma patient's initial attention at the intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital. SUBJECTS: Patients older than 14 years that were admitted to the hospital with severe trauma (Injury Severity Score >15) form January 2014 to December 2015. VARIABLES: We studied the sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive and negative predictive value (PV+ and PV-), positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR+ and LR-), ROC curves (Receiver Operating Characteristics) and the area under the same (AUROC) for prediction of massive hemorrhage. RESULTS: 287 patients were included, 76.31% (219) were male, mean age was 43,36 (±17.71) years and ISS was 26 (interquartile range [IQR]: 21-34). The overall frequency of massive bleeding was 8.71% (25). For Shock Index: AUROC was 0.89 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.84 to 0.94), with an optimal cutoff at 1.11, Se was 91.3% (95% CI: 73.2 to 97.58) and Sp was 79.69% (95% CI: 74.34 to 84.16). For the Modified Shock Index: AUROC was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86 to 0.95), with an optimal cutoff at 1.46, Se was 95.65% (95% CI: 79.01 to 99.23) and Sp was 75.78% (95% CI: 70.18 to 80.62). CONCLUSION: Shock Index and Modified Shock Index are good predictors of massive bleeding and could be easily incorporated to the initial workup of patients with severe trauma.