Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor therapy in kidney transplant patients with type 2 or post-transplant diabetes: an observational multicentre study.

Background: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) have cardioprotective and renoprotective effects. However, experience with SGLT2is in diabetic kidney transplant recipients (DKTRs) is limited. Methods: This observational multicentre study was designed to examine the efficacy and safety of SGLT2is in DKTRs. The primary outcome was adverse effects within 6 months of SGLT2i treatment. Results: Among 339 treated DKTRs, adverse effects were recorded in 26%, the most frequent (14%) being urinary tract infection (UTI). In 10%, SGLT2is were suspended mostly because of UTI. Risk factors for developing a UTI were a prior episode of UTI in the 6 months leading up to SGLT2i use {odds ratio [OR] 7.90 [confidence interval (CI) 3.63-17.21]} and female sex [OR 2.46 (CI 1.19-5.03)]. In a post hoc subgroup analysis, the incidence of UTI emerged as similar in DKTRs treated with SGLT2i for 12 months versus non-DKTRs (17.9% versus 16.7%). Between baseline and 6 months, significant reductions were observed in body weight [-2.22 kg (95% CI -2.79 to -1.65)], blood pressure, fasting glycaemia, haemoglobin A1c [-0.36% (95% CI -0.51 to -0.21)], serum uric acid [-0.44 mg/dl (95% CI -0.60 to -0.28)] and urinary protein:creatinine ratio, while serum magnesium [+0.15 mg/dl (95% CI 0.11-0.18)] and haemoglobin levels rose [+0.44 g/dl (95% CI 0.28-0.58]. These outcomes persisted in participants followed over 12 months of treatment. Conclusions: SGLT2is in kidney transplant offer benefits in terms of controlling glycaemia, weight, blood pressure, anaemia, proteinuria and serum uric acid and magnesium. UTI was the most frequent adverse effect. According to our findings, these agents should be prescribed with caution in female DKTRs and those with a history of UTI.

Clinical Effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Renal Transplant Recipients. Antibody Levels Impact in Pneumonia and Death.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have described the clinical impact of anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) in the context of omicron variant and the third vaccine dose. Antibody titer has been tried to relate to the prediction of outcomes related to SARS-CoV-2, but it results controversially in these populations. METHODS: All patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction followed at a RTRs reference center from March 15, 2020, to March 15, 2022, were considered for analysis. Cases were analyzed by vaccination status. Breakthrough cases were then analyzed by nonantibodies (<20 arbitrary unit [AU]/mL), low (20-100 AU/mL), and high antibody titers (>100 AU/mL) against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Outcomes included pneumonia and mortality. We used logistic regression multivariable to assess for confounders. RESULTS: Among 186 RTRs with coronavirus disease 2019, 50.5% (n = 94) were vaccinated versus 49.5% (n = 92) unvaccinated. Of the vaccinated patients, 67.02% developed a high antibody titer (>100 AU/mL) but 14.89% achieved a low antibody titer and 18.08% nonantibodies. Pneumonia-free survival (day 20) was 95% in high antibody titer but 40% in unvaccinated RTRs. Survival in RTRs at day 60 was similar in the unvaccinated group compared with nonantibodies breakthrough cases (82%) but 92% in the low antibody titer group (relative risk, 0.027; 95% confidence interval, 0.002-0.479; P = 0.014). Only patients with >100 AU/mL showed a 100% survival on day 60 postinfection. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccinated RTRs who achieve at least a low antibody titer (>20 AU/mL) had better results in terms of pneumonia and mortality than unvaccinated RTRs. Antibody titer >100 AU/mL associate with even better results than patients with lower antibody titers.

How to Assess Diabetic Kidney Disease Progression? From Albuminuria to GFR.

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is one of the most relevant complications of type 2 diabetes and dramatically increases the cardiovascular risk in these patients. Currently, DKD is severely infra-diagnosed, or its diagnosis is usually made at advanced stages of the disease. During the last decade, new drugs have demonstrated a beneficial effect in terms of cardiovascular and renal protection in type 2 diabetes, supporting the crucial role of an early DKD diagnosis to permit the use of new available therapeutic strategies. Moreover, cardiovascular and renal outcome trials, developed to study these new drugs, are based on diverse cardiovascular and renal simple and composite endpoints, which makes difficult their interpretation and the comparison between them. In this article, DKD diagnosis is reviewed, focusing on albuminuria and the recommendations for glomerular filtration rate measurement. Furthermore, cardiovascular and renal endpoints used in classical and recent cardiovascular outcome trials are assessed in a pragmatic way.

Paternal safety of the use of mycophenolic acid in kidney transplant recipients. Results of the EMVARON study.

BACKGROUND: The use of mycophenolic acid (MPA) in women during pregnancy causes an increase in miscarriages and birth defects with a typical embryopathy profile. Although epidemiological data does not suggest a greater risk among the offspring of male kidney transplant recipients, the European Medicines Agency and The Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices introduced the recommendation of using contraceptive methods. METHODS: We conducted a national retrospective study in 15 Spanish Kidney Transplant Centers to evaluate the frequency of miscarriages and birth defects between the offspring from male kidney transplants recipients. We included 151 males who had fathered 239 offspring, 225 under MPA and 14 without MPA. RESULTS: The results of our study showed an incidence of miscarriages in the MPA group of 9.8%, and of birth defects of 4%. CONCLUSIONS: We observed an incidence of miscarriages between the offspring fathered by kidney transplant males under MPA lower than the general population. The incidence of birth defects was similar to the incidence described in other studies and the fact that we did not find the typical embryopathy profile makes it difficult to associate them to the use of MPA. Because of that, we urge the European and Spanish Agencies to reconsider their recommendations for males.

Should cyclosporine be useful in renal transplant recipients affected by SARS-CoV-2?

Minimization of immunosuppression and administration of antiretrovirals have been recommended for kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, outcomes remain poor. Given the likely benefit of cyclosporine because of its antiviral and immunomodulatory effect, we have been using it as a strategy in KTRs diagnosed with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We studied 29 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) who were admitted to our institution with COVID-19 between March 15and April, 24, 2020. Mycophenolate and/or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) were discontinued in all patients. Two therapeutic strategies were compared: Group 1, minimization of calcineurin inhibitors (N = 6); and Group 2, cyclosporine-based therapy (N = 23), with 15 patients switched from tacrolimus. Hydroxychloroquine was considered in both strategies but antivirals in none. Six patients died after respiratory distress (20.6%). Five required mechanical ventilation (17.2%), and 3 could be weaned. Nineteen patients had an uneventful recovery (65.5%). In group 1, 3 of 6 patients died (50%) and 1 of 6 required invasive mechanical ventilation (16.7%). In group 2, 3 of 23 patients died (12.5%). Renal function did not deteriorate and signs of rejection were not observed in any patient on the second treatment regime. In conclusion, immunosuppressant treatment based on cyclosporine could be safe and effective for KTRs diagnosed with COVID-19.

Kidney transplantation from donors after uncontrolled circulatory death: the Spanish experience.

Donation after uncontrolled circulatory death (uDCD) refers to donation from persons who have died following cardiac arrest and unsuccessful attempt at resuscitation. We report the Spanish experience of uDCD kidney transplantation, and identify factors related to short-term post-transplant outcomes. The Spanish CORE system compiles data on all donation and transplant procedures in the country. Between 2012-2015, 517 kidney transplants from 288 uDCD donors were performed. The incidence of primary non-function was 10%, and the incidence of delayed graft function was 76%. One-year death-censored graft survival was 87%. In a Cox-Model, donor age ≥ 60 years (odds ratio [OR] 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-6.1), in situ cooling of kidneys versus normothermic regional perfusion (OR 5.6; 95% CI 2.7-11.5) or hypothermic regional perfusion based on the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation devices (OR 4.3; 95% CI 2.1-8.6), and a recipient history of prior kidney transplant (OR 3.5; 95% CI 1.5-8.3) all significantly increased the risk of graft loss during the first year after transplantation. Kidney transplantation from uDCD donors provides acceptable 1-year outcomes, although there is room for improvement. Hypothermic and normothermic regional perfusion strategies are preferable to in situ cooling of kidneys from uDCD donors.

Uncontrolled donation after circulatory death: A cohort study of data from a long-standing deceased-donor kidney transplantation program.

Despite good long-term outcomes of kidney transplants from controlled donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors, there are few uncontrolled DCD (uDCD) programs. This longitudinal study compares outcomes for all uDCD (N = 774) and all donation after brain death (DBD) (N = 613) kidney transplants performed from 1996 to 2015 at our center. DBD transplants were divided into those from standard-criteria (SCD) (N = 366) and expanded-criteria (N = 247) brain-dead donors (ECD). One-, 5-, and 10-year graft survival rates were 91.7%, 85.7%, and 80.6% for SCD; 86.0%, 75.8%, and 61.4% for ECD; and 85.1%, 78.1%, and 72.2% for uDCD, respectively. Graft survival was worse in recipients of uDCD kidneys than of SCD (P = .004) but better than in transplants from ECD (P = .021). The main cause of graft loss in the uDCD transplants was primary nonfunction. Through logistic regression, donor death due to pulmonary embolism (OR 4.31, 95% CI 1.65-11.23), extrahospital CPR time ≥75 minutes (OR1.94, 95%CI 1.18-3.22), and in-hospital CPR time ≥50 minutes (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.09-2.93) emerged as predictive factors of primary nonunction. According to the outcomes of our long-standing kidney transplantation program, uDCD could help expand the kidney donor pool.

Recommendations for donation after circulatory death kidney transplantation in Europe.

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors provides an invaluable source for kidneys for transplantation. Over the last decade, we have observed a substantial increase in the number of DCD kidneys, particularly within Europe. We provide an overview of risk factors associated with DCD kidney function and survival and formulate recommendations from the sixth international conference on organ donation in Paris, for best-practice guidelines. A systematic review of the literature was performed using Ovid Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases. Topics are discussed, including donor selection, organ procurement, organ preservation, recipient selection and transplant management.

Serum level of fibroblast growth factor 23 in maintenance renal transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: The discovery of fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) provides a new conceptual framework that improves our understanding of the pathogenesis of post-transplant bone disease. Excess FGF23 is produced in the early post-transplant period; levels return to normal in the months following transplant. However, few manuscripts discuss FGF23 levels in stable long-term renal transplant recipients. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional observational study of 279 maintenance kidney recipients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) Stages 1-4 and stable allograft function who had received their transplant at least 12 months previously. We calculated the estimated GFR (eGFR) using the MDRD4 equation. RESULTS: FGF23, parathyroid hormone (PTH) and phosphorus values were higher in more advanced stages, while the serum calcitriol levels and the phosphate reabsorption rate were lower. A significant inverse correlation was found between eGFR and FGF23 (r = -0.487; P < 0.001), PTH (r = -0.444; P < 0.001), serum phosphate levels (r = -0.315; P < 0.001) and fractional excretion of magnesium (r = -0.503; P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that increased time on corticosteroids (P < 0.001), PTH (P < 0.001), serum phosphate (P = 0.003), decreased serum calcitriol (P = 0.049) and estimated glomerular filtration (P = 0.003) rate were associated with high FGF23 levels. In contrast with pre-transplant patients and first year post-transplant patients, higher FGF23 values were not correlated with increased phosphate excretion. An elevated phosphate reabsorption rate was associated with decreased PTH (P < 0.001) and calciuria (P = 0.028) and increased serum calcitriol (P = 0.009), plasma bicarbonate (P = 0.024) and estimated glomerular filtration (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Serum FGF23 concentrations remain increased in long-term kidney graft recipients, even in the early stages of CKD. It remains to be seen whether measures aimed at reducing serum levels of PTH and phosphate and/or corticosteroid doses might help to lower serum FGF23 and whether this will improve kidney recipient outcomes.

Anemia control in renal transplant recipients receiving continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (C.E.R.A.) treatment: the AnemiaTrans Study.

INTRODUCTION: Continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (C.E.R.A.) effectively enables anemia control in patients with chronic kidney disease, but little information is available in renal transplant recipients. The authors aimed to evaluate the effect of C.E.R.A. under clinical practice conditions on anemia control in renal transplant recipients. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational study carried out in adult renal transplant patients in the immediate posttransplant period and at late posttransplant period receiving C.E.R.A. in clinical practice. Patients' data were retrieved from their medical charts at baseline and months 1, 3, and 6. RESULTS: A total of 318 evaluable patients were enrolled into the study: 32 in the immediate posttransplant period and 286 at late posttransplant period (erythropoiesis-stimulating agent [ESA]-naïve, n = 44; converting from other ESAs, n = 242). Patients in the immediate posttransplant period experienced a significant increase in hemoglobin (Hb) levels from baseline to month 1 (9.9±1.5 g/dL vs. 11.5±1.4 g/dL; P< 0.001). ESA-naïve patients showed increasing mean Hb levels from baseline to month 6 (10.1±0.7 g/dL vs. 11.7±1.0 g/dL; P < 0.001) and 94.7% achieved Hb ≥11 g/dL during the study. In patients converted from other ESAs, the percentage of patients with Hb between 11-13 g/dL was maintained from baseline to month 6 with no significant differences (61.0% vs. 62.4%). Mean monthly doses of C.E.R.A. at baseline were 134.4±56.4 µg, 81.3±28.1 µg, and 93.0±44.2 µg in immediate posttransplant, ESA-naïve, and converted patients, respectively. C.E.R.A. was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: C.E.R.A. enables anemia control in renal transplant recipients, allowing target Hb levels to be achieved and maintained with doses even below those described in the Summary of Product Characteristics.

Limited-sampling strategy for mycophenolic acid in renal transplant recipients reciving enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium and tacrolimus.

BACKGROUND: Substantial research has been conducted to develop limited-sampling strategies (LSS) to estimate the area under the curve (AUC(0-12h)) in patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil. However, no LSS has been validated for enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS). Our aim was to develop an LSS to measure the AUC(0-12h) of mycophenolic acid in kidney recipients treated with tacrolimus and EC-MPS. STUDY DESIGN: Thirteen serial blood samples were collected over 12 hours from 71 patients treated with tacrolimus and EC-MPS. Mycophenolic acid was measured in plasma using the enzyme-multiplied immunoassay. LSSs were developed and validated by multiple regression analysis using a 2-group method (test, n = 47; validation, n = 24). RESULTS: The best LSS obtained in the test group were for 3 and 4 time points AUC(0-12h) (mg·h(-1)·L(-1)) = 15.99 + 0.87C1 h + 0.68C2 h + 7.85C4 h and AUC(0-12h) (mg·h(-1)·L(-1)) =11.15 + 0.68C1 h + 0.45C1.5 h + 0.57C2 h + 8.16C4 h, respectively. When these LSS were tested in the validation group, the results were acceptable (adjusted r(2) = 0.71, bias =-0.214 [95% confidence interval (CI): -7.91 to 7.48], precision = 7.48 (95% CI: 3.69-19.39) for 3 time points and adjusted r(2) = 0.76, bias = -1.48 (95% CI: -8.23 to 5.27), precision = 7.68 (95% CI: 4.23-13.50) for 4 time points). CONCLUSIONS: : An LSS using time points at C(1h)-C(2h)-C(4h) or C(1h)-C(1.5h)-C(2h)-C(4h) provides the most reliable and accurate estimation of the AUC(0-12h) of mycophenolic acid in stable renal transplant recipients treated with EC-MPS and tacrolimus.

Everolimus as primary immunosuppression in kidney transplantation: experience in conversion from calcineurin inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: We analyzed our clinical experience with everolimus (EVL) and identified prognostic factors for a successful conversion. METHODS: Retrospective study of 220 kidney recipients consecutively converted to EVL with calcineurin inhibitor elimination. We studied risk factors for proteinuria at 1 year after conversion, decline in renal function, and graft survival. RESULTS: Baseline creatinine clearance was 52.4±17.8 mL/min vs. 53.4±20.1 mL/min 1 year after conversion (P=0.150). Median proteinuria increased from 304 mg/day (interquartile range 160-507) to 458 mg/day (interquartile range 238-892; P<0.001). Risk factors for development of proteinuria ≥900 mg/day (P75) at 1-year postconversion were creatinine clearance less than 60 mL/min (odds ratio [OR] 3.37; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-9.89), serum triglycerides ≥150 mg/day (OR 4.35; 95% CI: 1.70-11.17), no treatment with prednisone (OR 3.04; 95% CI: 1.22-7.59), baseline proteinuria ≥550 mg/day (OR 10.37; 95% CI: 3.99-26.99), and conversion ≥3 years after transplant (OR 5.77; 95% CI: 1.89-17.59). An interaction was observed between baseline proteinuria and time to conversion: in patients with baseline proteinuria ≥550 mg/day, the risk of developing proteinuria ≥900 mg/day was 77.1% if they were converted after ≥3 years posttransplant. However, this risk was 29.8% in the subgroup converted before (P=0.02). Actuarial graft survival at 1 and 4 years postconversion was 98.2% and 86.5%, respectively. Baseline proteinuria ≥550 mg/day was a risk factor for graft loss in patients converted after the third year but not in patients converted before this time. EVL discontinuation rate was 24% in the first year postconversion. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion to EVL and elimination of calcineurin inhibitors is safe. Success depends on not making late conversions and not converting patients with high baseline proteinuria.

Everolimus: an update on the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics and recent clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: A growing body of evidence suggests that everolimus might offer effective immunosuppressive activity together with antiproliferative effects that may address some of the unmet needs in the long-term therapeutic management of the post-transplant patient. OBJECTIVE: To summarize the emerging evidence for employing everolimus-based immunosuppression. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted of the Medline, Embase and Renal Health Library (Cochrane Collaboration) databases, and of the summary publications from international transplant meetings and congresses during 2000-2008. RESULTS: This article summarizes this analysis, with special focus on the pharmacokinetic characteristics of everolimus and on the results of its use in renal transplantation. Some data has also been included about the efficacy of the drug in other solid organ transplantation and in tumours. CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus is an immunosuppressant drug with proven efficacy in transplantation. When used in combination with cyclosporin, better results are obtained in renal function with low cyclosporin doses. Adverse events related to this drug are frequent and lead to moderate dropout rates.

Victims of cardiac arrest occurring outside the hospital: a source of transplantable kidneys.

BACKGROUND: The use of non-heart-beating donors could help shorten the list of patients who are waiting for a kidney transplant. Several reports describe acceptable results of transplantations from non-heart-beating donors who had in-hospital cardiac arrest, but few reports describe results of transplantations from non-heart-beating donors who had cardiac arrest that occurred outside of the hospital (Maastricht type I and type II donors). OBJECTIVE: To compare graft survival rates among patients receiving kidneys from heart-beating donors versus type I or type II non-heart-beating donors. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of transplantations performed from January 1989 to December 2004. SETTING: Kidney transplant program of a teaching hospital in Madrid, Spain. PATIENTS: 320 patients who received a kidney transplant from non-heart-beating donors (273 type I donors and 47 type II donors) and 584 patients who received a kidney transplant from heart-beating donors divided into 2 groups according to donor age (age <60 years [n = 458] and age > or =60 years [n = 126]). MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome measure was graft survival. The median follow-up time was 68 months (range, 9 to 198 months). RESULTS: One- and 5-year graft survival rates were 90.7% and 85.5%, respectively, for transplants from heart-beating donors younger than 60 years of age; 79.8% and 73.3%, respectively, for transplants from heart-beating donors 60 years of age or older (P < 0.001); and 87.4% and 82.1%, respectively, for transplants from non-heart-beating donors (P = 0.22 [vs. those from heart-beating donors < 60 years of age] and P = 0.014 [vs. those from heart-beating donors >or = 60 years of age]). Graft survival did not differ between patients who received kidneys from heart-beating donors younger than 60 years of age and patients who received kidneys from non-heart-beating donors. LIMITATIONS: This single-site, observational study was retrospective, and immunosuppressive therapy regimens given to transplant recipients varied over time. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of transplants from non-heart-beating donors and younger heart-beating donors are similar, and results for transplants from non-heart-beating donors improved compared with those from older heart-beating donors. On the basis of these results, the authors encourage other transplant units to adopt the use of type I and type II non-heart-beating donors.

Use of different immunosuppressive strategies in recipients of kidneys from nonheart-beating donors.

In nonheart-beating donor (NHBD) kidney transplants, immunosuppressive management is difficult mainly because of the high incidence of acute tubular necrosis. This has meant that since the start of our NHBD transplant program, several immunosuppression regimes have been used. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the results obtained over 7 years using different treatment protocols. A total of 172 consecutive NHBD transplants performed between April 1996 and December 2002 were treated as follows: G-I (n = 21), cyclosporine (8 mg/kg/day) plus azathioprine plus steroids; G-II (n = 65), low-dose cyclosporine (5 mg/kg/day) plus mycophenolate plus steroids; G-III (n =17), low-dose tacrolimus (0.1 mg/kg/day) plus mycophenolate plus steroids; and G-IV (n = 69), daclizumab plus low-dose tacrolimus plus mycophenolate plus steroids. Delayed graft function rates were 76.2%, 72.3%, 76.5%, and 42%, respectively, for the four groups (P = 0.000). Rejection-free patient rates were 76.2%, 46.2%, 35.3%, and 71% (P < 0.001). Vascular rejection rates were 19%, 30.8%, 52.9%, and 18.8%, (P = 0.025). Two-year graft survival was 71.4% in group I, 95.4% in group II, 94.1 in group III, and 93.8% in group IV (P =0.004). Patient survival was worse in group I (75.2% in group I, 100% in group II, 100% in group III, and 96.7% in group IV at 2 years; P < 0.001). The use of daclizumab and low-dose tacrolimus could be effective at lowering the incidence of delayed graft function in NHBDT, with no negative repercussions on acute rejection.

Does donor brain death influence acute vascular rejection in the kidney transplant?

BACKGROUND: There is increasing experimental evidence to suggest that donor brain death enhances susceptibility to early inflammatory responses such as acute rejection in the kidney transplant. The aim of the present study was to establish whether the injury induced or aggravated by donor brain death could exert an effect on recipient immunologic tolerance by comparing data from patients receiving a kidney from non-heart-beating donors (NHBD) or from brain-dead donors (BDD). METHODS: We reviewed data corresponding to 372 renal transplants performed from January 1996 to May 2002. The data were stratified according to donor type as 197 (53%) brain-dead and 175 (47%) non-heart-beating donors, and the two groups were compared in terms of acute vascular rejection by Cox's regression analysis. RESULTS: The rate of vascular rejection was 28% in the BDD group and 21.7% in the NHBD (P=0.10). The following predictive variables for acute vascular rejection were established: brain death [RR 1.77 (95% CI 1.06-3.18)], presence of delayed graft function [RR 3.33 (1.99-5.55)], previous transplant [RR 2.35 (1.34-4.13)], recipient age under 60 years [RR 1.86 (0.99-2.28)], female recipient [RR 1.50 (0.99-2.28)], cerebrovascular disease as cause of donor death [RR 1.72 (1.02-2.91)], and triple therapy as immunosuppressive treatment. CONCLUSION: Donor brain death could be a risk factor for the development of vascular rejection in kidney recipients. This process could affect the quality of the graft and host alloresponsiveness. Delayed graft function in transplants from dead brain donors could be a reflection of severe autonomic storm, leading to a higher incidence of vascular rejection in these patients.

Increasing the donor pool using en bloc pediatric kidneys for transplant.

OBJECTIVES: En bloc pediatric kidney transplants (EBPKT) are still a subject of controversy. The aim of this study was to determine whether acceptable long-term graft survival and function can be achieved in EBPKT compared with the transplant of single, cadaveric, adult donor kidneys. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 66 recipients of en bloc kidneys from cadaveric pediatric donors and 434 patients who underwent transplantation with a single kidney from an adult donor between January 1990 and May 2002 at the authors' hospital. The recipients were well-matched demographically. Both transplant groups were analyzed for short- and long-term performance in terms of transplant outcome and quality of graft function. RESULTS: Overall death-censored actuarial graft survival rates at 1 and 5 years were 89.2% and 84.6% in the adult kidney transplants (AKT) and 83.3% and 81.1% in EBPKT, respectively (P=0.56). In the EBPKT group, graft function was improved over that observed in AKT. Vascular thrombosis was the most common cause of graft loss in EBPKT. Acute rejection occurred more frequently in AKT and Cox's regression analysis indicated that undergoing an AKT was a predictive factor for acute vascular rejection (adjusted risk ratio, 3.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-10.2; P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Overall graft survival was similar in both groups, vascular complications were the main cause of graft loss in EBPKT, and the EBPKT showed excellent long-term graft function and a low incidence of acute rejection.