Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pan Afr Med J ; 37: 186, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33447341

RESUMO

Differential diagnosis of retroperitoneal masses may become complex and requires careful anamnesis, physical examination and several complementary tests. We present the clinical case of a male patient aged 45 years who was diagnosed with a 4cm paraaortic lesion compatible with neuroendocrine tumor in the abdominal computed tomography (CT) exam. The workup performed with SPECT-CT, somatostatin receptors scintigraphy, MIBG scintigraphy, 24-hour urine total and fractionated catecholamines and 24-hour urine 5-OH indoleacetic did not confirm the first diagnostic impression. Finally, the lesion was biopsied and presence of micro-organisms was revealed. Further exams confirmed schistosomiasis as the cause of the paraaortic lesion. Histological diagnosis can be helpful with regard to the differential diagnosis of retroperitoneal masses.


Assuntos
Tumores Neuroendócrinos/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Retroperitoneais/diagnóstico , Espaço Retroperitoneal/parasitologia , Esquistossomose/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cintilografia , Tomografia Computadorizada com Tomografia Computadorizada de Emissão de Fóton Único
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA