Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Prostate ; 2024 May 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38734988

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Early salvage radiotherapy is indicated for patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. However, for various reasons, certain patients do not benefit from this treatment (OBS) or only at a late stage (LSR). There are few studies on this subject and none on a "high-risk" population, such as patients of African descent. Our objective was to estimate the metastasis-free (MFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients who did not receive salvage radiotherapy, and to identify risk factors of disease progression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study that included 154 patients, 99 in the OBS group and 55 in the LSR group. All were treated by total prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer between January 2000 and December 2020 and none received early salvage radiotherapy after biochemical recurrence. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for the time to biochemical recurrence. The median follow-up was 10.0 and 11.8 years for the OBS and LSR groups, respectively. The median time from surgery to LSR was 5.1 years. The two groups did not show a significant difference in MFS: 90.6% at 10 years for the OBS group and 93.3% for the LSR group. The median MFS was 19.8 and 19.6 years for the OBS and LSR groups respectively. OS for the OBS group was significantly higher than that for the LSR group (HR: 2.14 [1.07-4.29]; p = 0.03), with 10-year OS of 95.9% for the OBS group and 76.1% for the LSR group. Median OS was 16 and 15.6 years for the OBS and LSR groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this study, we observed satisfactory metastasis-free and OS rates relative to those reported in the scientific literature. The challenge is not to question the benefit of early salvage radiotherapy, but to improve the identification of patients at risk of progression through the development of molecular and genomic tests for more highly personalized medicine.

2.
Urology ; 171: 152-157, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36243142

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To analyze de novo graft carcinoma characteristics from our updated national multicentric retrospective cohort. METHODS: Thirty-two transplant centers have retrospectively completed the database. This database concerns all kidney graft tumors including urothelial, and others type but excludes renal lymphomas over 31 years. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty twokidney graft carcinomas were diagnosed in functional grafts. Among them 130 tumors were Renal Cell Carcinomas. The calculated incidence was 0.18%. Median age of the allograft at diagnosis was 45.4 years old. The median time between transplantation and diagnosis was 147.1 months. 60 tumors were papillary carcinomas and 64 were clear cell carcinomas. Median tumor size was 25 mm. 18, 64, 21 and 1 tumors were respectively Fuhrman grade 1, 2, 3 and 4. Nephron sparing surgery (NSS) was performed on 68 (52.3%) recipients. Ablative therapy was performed in 23 cases (17.7%). Specific survival rate was 96.8%. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed that renal graft carcinomas are a different entity: with a younger age of diagnosis; a lower stage at diagnosis; a higher incidence of papillary subtypes.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Transplante de Rim , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Carcinoma de Células Renais/epidemiologia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Renais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico , Rim/patologia , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos
3.
Prostate ; 82(2): 269-275, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34822183

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Several studies in the Caucasian population have shown the benefit of using docetaxel, abiraterone, or enzalutamide for patients with metastatic prostate cancer at the castration-resistant stage (mCRPC). However, there are no strong data for men of African ancestry. The objective of this study was to estimate the overall and progression-free survival of patients according to these treatments at the mCRPC stage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a monocentric retrospective study that consecutively included 211 men with mCRPC between June 1, 2009 and August 31, 2020. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). The secondary end point was progression-free survival. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed. RESULTS: The present study included 180 patients for analyses. There was no difference in OS (log-rank test = 0.73), with a median follow-up of 20.7 months, regardless of the treatment administered in the first line. Men with mCRPC who received hormonotherapy (abiraterone or enzalutamide) showed better progression-free survival than those who received docetaxel (log-rank test = 0.004), with a particular interest for abiraterone hazard ratio (HR) = 0.51 (95% confidence interval: 0.39-0.67). The patient characteristics were similar, except for bone lesions, irrespective of the treatment administered in the first line. After univariate then multivariate analysis, only World Health Organization status and metastases at diagnosis were significantly associated with progression. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest the use of hormonotherapy (abiraterone or enzalutamide) with a tendency for abiraterone in first line for men with African ancestry at the mCRPC stage.


Assuntos
Androstenos/uso terapêutico , Benzamidas/uso terapêutico , População Negra/estatística & dados numéricos , Docetaxel/uso terapêutico , Metástase Neoplásica , Nitrilas/uso terapêutico , Feniltioidantoína/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Guadalupe/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica/diagnóstico , Metástase Neoplásica/terapia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/sangue , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/etnologia , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/patologia , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Prostate ; 81(14): 1091-1096, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34320690

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) accounts for 12% of prostate cancers diagnosed in Guadeloupe according to the Guadeloupean cancer registry. Most published studies have been conducted on the Caucasian population, whereas data concerning mHSPC in the Afro-Caribbean population are lacking. We aimed to describe the patient characteristics and estimate the progression-free survival of men with mHSPC in an Afro-Caribbean population according to the available treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a monocentric retrospective study that consecutively included 133 men with mHSPC between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019 at the University Hospital of Guadeloupe. The primary endpoint was a description of the patients' characteristics with a description of complications at diagnosis. The secondary endpoint was progression-free survival. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed. RESULTS: The median age at diagnosis was 71 years. The median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 147 ng/ml and 37% of patients presented with a disease-related complication at diagnosis. The survival analysis according to treatment showed median survival of 15 months for the androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) + chemotherapy group, 20 months for the ADT + new hormone therapy group, and 21.5 months for the ADT alone group, with no significant difference between the three therapeutic options (log-rank test: 0.27). In univariate analysis, none of the patient characteristics at diagnosis (i.e., age, PSA, bone lesions, visceral lesions) were significantly associated with the risk of progression, regardless of the treatment. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in terms of progression-free survival between currently validated treatments administered in the first line, regardless of the tumor volume or risk group. Future studies with larger numbers of patients and involving molecular factors are required to confirm or invalidate these results and understand the evolution of prostate cancer in our population and thus better prevent complications related to the disease.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Ósseas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/secundário , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias Ósseas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ósseas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Guadalupe , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Prognóstico , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
J Urol ; 197(5): 1229-1236, 2017 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27993665

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Active surveillance is a treatment option for favorable risk prostate cancer. However, data are missing on populations of African descent. We evaluated the safety and benefit of active surveillance in an African Caribbean cohort with favorable risk prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2005 and 2016, a single center, prospective cohort study was performed in Guadeloupe, French West Indies, including patients on active surveillance who had low risk prostate cancer (prostate specific antigen 10 ng/ml or less and Gleason score 6 or less) or favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer (prostate specific antigen 10 to 20 ng/ml, Gleason score 3 + 4 or less and life expectancy less than 10 years). Treatment was recommended in case of grade progression, increased tumor volume, prostate cancer doubling time less than 36 months or patient wish. Overall survival, disease specific survival and duration of active surveillance were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model to identify predictors of active surveillance termination. RESULTS: A total of 234 patients with a median age of 64 years were enrolled in study. Median followup was 4 years (IQR 2.3-5.5). Overall survival at 30 months, 5 years and 10 years was 99.5%, 98.5% and 90.7%, respectively. Disease specific survival at 30 months, and 5 and 10 years was 100%. At 30 months, 5 years and 10 years 72.7%, 52.6% and 40.4% of patients, respectively, remained untreated and on active surveillance. Age (HR 0.96 per additional year, 95% CI 0.93-0.99) and prostate specific antigen density (HR 1.52 per additional 0.1 ng/ml, 95% CI 1.20-1.89) were found to be independent predictors of active surveillance termination. CONCLUSIONS: Active surveillance is safe and beneficial for highly selected African Caribbean patients. It seems to be feasible for patients at low risk and intermediate favorable risk. Prostate specific antigen density could help better select these patients.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Conduta Expectante/métodos , Idoso , População Negra , Região do Caribe , Estudos de Coortes , Progressão da Doença , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/etnologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Medição de Risco/métodos
6.
Urology ; 83(2): 364-8, 2014 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24286600

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of active surveillance (AS) series between African American men (AAM) and non-AAM diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer at 3 medical centers. METHODS: Between 2005 and 2012, 214 men accepted AS on the basis of favorable clinical features and parameters after initial and repeat biopsy. Failure was defined as increase in Gleason score >6, total positive cores >33%, maximum cancer volume in any core >50%, or a prostate-specific antigen >10 ng/mL. Disease progression and overall AS failure were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Of 214 men, 75 were excluded, leaving 67 AAM and 72 non-AAM on AS. Median age at diagnosis was 64 and 67 years for AAM and non-AAM, respectively, and median follow-up was 34 and 46 months, respectively. During this time, 44 AAM (66%) remained on AS, and 23 (34%) underwent treatment, of whom 6 (26%) were treated by patient choice and 17 (74%) because of disease progression. In the non-AAM group, 59 (82%) men remained on AS, and 13 (18%) underwent treatment, 8 (62%) were treated by patient choice and 5 (38%) because of disease progression. The 3-year freedom from overall treatment was 74% and did not differ by race (P = .06). The 3-year freedom from disease progression was 85%, where AAM were at significantly higher risk of disease progression (hazard ratio = 3.8; 95% confidence interval: 1.4-10.4; P = .01). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests a higher disease progression rate in AAM who choose AS for low-risk prostate cancer compared with non-AAM, signifying a potential need for closer follow-up and more stringent enrollment criteria in AAM.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Conduta Expectante , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Idoso , Progressão da Doença , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...