Change in orthopaedic surgeon behaviour by implementing evidence-based practice.

INTRODUCTION: Orthopaedic practice is not always aligned with new evidence which may result in an evidence-practice gap. Our aim was to present and report the use of a new model for implementation of evidence-based practice using treatment of distal radius fractures (DRF) as an example. METHODS: A new implementation model from the Centre for Evidence-Based Orthopaedics (CEBO) was applied. It comprises four phases: 1) baseline practice is held up against best available evidence, and barriers to change are assessed. 2) A symposium involving all stakeholders discussing best evidence is held, and agreement on a new local guideline is obtained. 3) The new guideline based on the decisions at the symposium is prepared and implemented into daily clinical practice. 4) Changes in clinical practice are recorded. We applied the model on the clinical question of whether to use open reduction and internal fixation with a locked volar plate (VLP) or closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) in adults with DRF. RESULTS: Prior to application of the CEBO model, only VLP was used in the department. Based on best evidence, the symposium found that a change in practice was justified. A local guideline stating CRPP as first surgical choice was implemented. If acceptable reduction could not be obtained, the procedure was converted to VLP. A year after implementation of the guideline, the rate of VLP had declined from 100% to 44%. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to change surgeons' practice according to best evidence using the CEBO model. FUNDING: None. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not relevant.

Early Mobilization After Volar Locking Plate Osteosynthesis of Distal Radial Fractures in Older Patients-A Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: To investigate if early mobilization after open reduction internal fixation of distal radius fractures improved the functional outcome. We hypothesized that early mobilization would lead to improved patient-reported outcome. Second, we aimed to assess whether early mobilization increased the risk of postoperative implant loosening or breakage. METHODS: All included patients were treated with a volar locking plate. After surgery, patients were randomized to either early mobilization (E-MOB) with a removable orthosis (wrist lacer) and daily wrist exercises or to late mobilization (L-MOB) with a standard dorsal plaster cast for 2 weeks and, after that, a removable orthosis and exercises. We measured all patients at 4 weeks and at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. At each postoperative visit, we measured range of motion and grip strength and patients filled out the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Radiographic implant loosening or breakage was assessed 14 days after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients were allocated to E-MOB and 48 to L-MOB. The DASH score improved substantially throughout the follow-up period with no significant differences between the 2 groups at any time point. Implant loosening and fracture redisplacement was observed in 1 patient in the E-MOB group. Range of motion and grip strength were similar between the 2 groups at all time points. CONCLUSIONS: Early mobilization after surgical treatment of distal radius fractures does not lead to improved patient-reported outcome. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic I.