Docetaxel-Cisplatin-Fluorouracil Induction Chemotherapy for Larynx Preservation in Patients with Locally Advanced Hypopharyngeal Cancer: Predictive Factors of Oncologic and Functional Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to evaluate the clinical outcomes and their predictive factors in locally advanced hypopharyngeal cancer (HC) patients included in a docetaxel-cisplatin-fluorouracil induction chemotherapy (ICT)-based larynx preservation (LP) program. METHODS: Between 2005 and 2021, 82 patients with a locally advanced resectable HC who received ICT in an LP program were included in this retrospective study. The predictors of oncologic and swallowing outcomes were determined in univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The three- and five-year overall survival (OS) rates were 67 and 54%, respectively. The T4 tumor stage was the only predictive factor of poor response to ICT (p = 0.03). In multivariate analysis, a T stage = 4 (p = 0.02), an ICT cycle number < 3 (p = 0.003) and the absence of a response to ICT (p = 0.03) were significantly associated with worse OS. A low body mass index before therapy (p = 0.003) and enteral nutrition during therapy (p = 0.005) were significantly associated with severity of dysphagia 6 months after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The T stage, number of ICT cycles performed and response to ICT are the main predictors of oncologic outcomes. Patients with T4 HC are poor candidates for LP and should be referred to immediate radical surgery.

Salvage vs. Primary Total Laryngectomy in Patients with Locally Advanced Laryngeal or Hypopharyngeal Carcinoma: Oncologic Outcomes and Their Predictive Factors.

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to compare the survival outcomes of salvage vs. primary total laryngectomy (TL) in patients with locally advanced laryngeal or hypopharyngeal carcinoma and to determine their predictive factors. METHODS: Overall (OS), cause-specific (CSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of primary vs. salvage TL were compared in univariate and multivariate analysis taking into account other potential predictive factors (tumor site, tumor stage, comorbidity level etc.). RESULTS: A total of 234 patients were included in this study. Five-year OS was 53% and 25% for the primary and salvage TL groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis confirmed the independent negative impact of salvage TL on OS (p = 0.0008), CSS (p < 0.0001) and RFS (p < 0.0001). Hypopharyngeal tumor site, ASA score ≥ 3, N-stage ≥ 2a and positive surgical margins were the main other predictors of oncologic outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Salvage TL is associated with significantly worse survival rates than primary TL highlighting the need for careful selection of patients who are candidates for larynx preservation. The predictive factors of survival outcomes identified here should be considered in the therapeutic decision-making, especially in the setting of salvage TL, given the poor prognosis of these patients.

Management and outcomes of adolescent and young adult sarcoma patients: results from the French nationwide database NETSARC.

BACKGROUND: The initial management of patients with sarcoma is a critical issue. We used the nationwide French National Cancer Institute-funded prospective sarcoma database NETSARC to report the management and oncologic outcomes in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) patients with sarcoma at the national level. PATIENTS AND METHODS: NETSARC database gathers regularly monitored and updated data from patients with sarcoma. NETSARC was queried for patients (15-30 years) with sarcoma diagnosed from 2010 to 2017 for whom tumor resection had been performed. We reported management, locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in AYA treated in French reference sarcoma centers (RSC) and outside RSC (non-RSC) and conducted multivariable survival analyses adjusted for classical prognostic factors. RESULTS: Among 3,227 patients aged 15-30 years with sarcoma diagnosed between 2010 and 2017, the study included 2,227 patients with surgery data available, among whom 1,290 AYAs had been operated in RSC, and 937 AYAs in non-RSC. Significant differences in compliance to guidelines were observed including pre-treatment biopsy (RSC: 85.9%; non-RSC 48.1%), pre-treatment imaging (RSC: 86.8%; non-RSC: 56.5%) and R0 margins (RSC 57.6%; non-RSC: 20.2%) (p < 0.001). 3y-OS rates were 81.1% (95%CI 78.3-83.6) in AYA in RSC and 82.7% (95%CI 79.4-85.5) in AYA in non-RSC, respectively. Whereas no significant differences in OS was observed in AYAs treated in RSC and in non-RSC, LRFS and PFS were improved in AYAs treated in RSC compared to AYAs treated in non-RSC (Hazard Ratios (HR): 0.58 and 0.83, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance for AYA patients with sarcoma to be managed in national sarcoma reference centers involving multidisciplinary medical teams with paediatric and adult oncologists.

Therapeutic strategies, oncologic and swallowing outcomes and their predictive factors in patients with locally advanced hypopharyngeal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Hypopharyngeal cancer (HC) is an aggressive and life-threatening malignancy that requires a complex multimodal treatment. The aims of the present study were to analyze, in locally advanced HC patients, the oncologic and swallowing outcomes and their predictive factors according to the therapeutic strategy. METHODS: All patients with locally advanced HC (T3/T4, N0-3, M0) treated at our institution between 2000 and 2020 were included in this retrospective study. Patients were classified in 3 groups according to the therapeutic strategy: primary radical surgery (RS), induction chemotherapy (ICT) or definitive (chemo)-radiation therapy ((C)RT). Predictive factors of oncologic outcomes (overall, cause-specific and recurrence-free survival: OS, CSS and RFS) and swallowing outcome (dysphagia outcome and severity scale: DOSS) were investigated in univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 217 patients were included in this study (RS: 40; ICT: 106; (C)RT: 71). 5-year OS, CSS and RFS rates were 36, 38 and 32%, respectively. ICT was associated with improved oncologic and swallowing outcomes in univariate analysis. After multivariate analysis, patient age ≥ 70 years (p = 0.0002) was the only factor significantly associated with a worse OS, whereas patient age ≥ 70 years (p = 0.002) and N stage ≥ 2 (p = 0.01) were significantly associated with a worse CSS. Comorbidity level (KFI ≥ 2; p = 0.01) and N stage (≥ 2; p = 0.02) were significantly associated with worse swallowing outcomes. CONCLUSION: In selected locally advanced HC patients, an ICT-based therapeutic strategy offers acceptable oncologic and functional outcomes. Patient age, N stage and comorbidity level are the main determinants of oncologic and functional outcomes.

The Polo-like kinase 1 inhibitor onvansertib represents a relevant treatment for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma resistant to cisplatin and radiotherapy.

Rationale: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) represent the 4th most aggressive cancer. 50% of patients relapse to the current treatments combining surgery, radiotherapy and cisplatin and die two years after the diagnosis. Elevated expression of the polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) correlated to a poor prognosis in epidermoid carcinomas. Methods: The molecular links between Plk1 and resistance to cisplatin/radiotherapy were investigated in patients and cell lines resistant to cisplatin and/or to radiotherapy. The therapeutic relevance of the Plk1 inhibitor onvansertib, alone or combined with cisplatin/radiotherapy, was evaluated on the proliferation/migration on HNSCC cell lines, in experimental HNSCC in mice, in a zebrafish metastasis model and on patient-derived 3D tumor sections. Results: Plk1 expression correlated to a bad prognosis in HNSCC and increased after relapse on cisplatin/radiotherapy. Onvansertib induced mitotic arrest, chromosomic abnormalities and polyploidy leading to apoptosis of sensitive and resistant HNSCC cells at nanomolar concentrations without any effects on normal cells. Onvansertib inhibited the growth of experimental HNSCC in mice and metastatic dissemination in zebrafishes. Moreover, onvansertib combined to cisplatin and/or radiotherapy resulted in a synergic induction of tumor cell death. The efficacy of onvansertib alone and in combination with reference treatments was confirmed on 3D viable sections of HNSCC surgical specimens. Conclusions: Targeting Plk1 by onvansertib represents a new strategy for HNSCC patients at the diagnosis in combination with reference treatments, or alone as a second line treatment for HNCSCC patients experiencing relapses.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Pazopanib in Patients and Determination of Target AUC.

Pazopanib is a potent multi-targeted kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma and soft tissue sarcoma. The pharmacokinetics of pazopanib is characterized by a significant inter- and intra-patient variability and a target through plasma concentration of 20.5 mg·L-1. However, routine monitoring of trough plasma concentrations at fixed hours is difficult in daily practice. Herein, we aimed to characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of pazopanib and to identify a target area under the curve (AUC) more easily extrapolated from blood samples obtained at various timings after drug intake. A population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model was constructed to analyze pazopanib PK and to estimate the pazopanib clearance of a patient regardless of the time of sampling. Data from the therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of patients with cancer at Institute Gustave Roussy and a clinical study (phase I/II) that evaluates the tolerance to pazopanib were used. From the individual clearance, it is then possible to obtain the patient's AUC. A target AUC for maximum efficacy and minimum side effects of 750 mg·h·L-1 was determined. The comparison of the estimated AUC with the target AUC would enable us to determine whether plasma exposure is adequate or whether it would be necessary to propose therapeutic adjustments.

Correlations between long-term quality of life and patient needs and concerns following head and neck cancer treatment and the impact of psychological distress. A multicentric cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess patient needs and concerns after head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treatment and their possible correlations with long-term quality of life (QoL) and to examine the potential impact of psychological distress on these results. METHODS: Alive and disease-free HNSCC patients at least 1 year after treatment were enrolled in this cross-sectional multicentric study and completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and H&N35 QoL questionnaires, the head and neck cancer-specific patient concerns inventory (PCI-HN) questionnaire and the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). Correlations between QoL outcomes and patient needs and concerns were investigated using Spearman's correlation tests. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were enrolled in the study. Fear of cancer recurrence was the main patient concern followed by dental, salivary, fatigue, speech, and eating problems. The leading patient needs in terms of consultation were to be referred to the surgeon, the speech, and swallow therapist and the oral rehabilitation team. The number of patient concerns correlated negatively (r < .40) with functioning scales score and positively (r > .40) with general and head and neck symptoms. Psychological distress was the main determinant of QoL outcomes (p < .0001). We found a significant impact of gender (p = .002) on the number of patient concerns, and of patient age (p = .003) on the number of staff members selected by patients. CONCLUSION: Identification of patient needs and concerns along with multidisciplinary management of persistent symptoms and psychological distress seem essential steps towards improving QoL of HNSCC patients.

Incidence and prognostic factors of clinically meaningful toxicities of kinase inhibitors in older patients with cancer: The PreToxE study.

Most of the safety data of tyrosine and serine/threonine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) approved for cancer treatment are extrapolated from larger trials in which older patients generally accounted for a small fraction of the participants. The Predicting Severe Toxicity of Targeted Therapies in Elderly Patients With Cancer study (PreToxE)PreToxE study aims to describe the incidence and prognostic factors of clinically meaningful toxicities of TKI in patients with cancer aged over 70 years. The primary endpoint was incidence of severe toxicity, defined as treatment-related death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, hospitalization or the discontinuation of TKI treatment for more than three weeks. Our results indicate that despite frequent upfront dose reduction, clinically meaningful toxicities occurred in approximately 40% of older patients treated with TKIs. The use of at least three concomitant medications is an independent predictor of clinically meaningful toxicities.

Avelumab-cetuximab-radiotherapy versus standards of care in locally advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck: The safety phase of a randomised phase III trial GORTEC 2017-01 (REACH).

BACKGROUND: Based on the hypothesis of synergistic effect of avelumab with cetuximab and radiotherapy, this new combination is tested in a randomised trial against two well-established standard of care (SOC) in locally advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA-SCCHN). METHODS: This phase III trial comprises two cohorts of patients deemed fit to receive cisplatin (100 mg/m2 Q3W) (cohort 1) or unfit to cisplatin (cohort 2). The SOC was Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) with cisplatin in cohort 1 (arm A) and with weekly cetuximab in cohort 2 (arm D). In both cohorts, experimental arms (arms B and C) were IMRT with cetuximab and avelumab (10 mg/kg day 7 and every 2 weeks) followed by avelumab every two weeks for 12 months. A safety phase was planned among the first 41 patients in experimental arms by monitoring grade ≥IV adverse events (AEs) with an unacceptable rate of 35%. RESULTS: Between September 2017 and August 2018, 82 patients with LA-SCCHN were randomised including 41 patients in experimental arms. All patients of experimental arms except one (arm C) received entire radiotherapy as planned. Most common grade ≥III AEs were mucositis, radio-dermatitis, and dysphagia. Grade ≥IV AEs occurred in 5/41 (12%) patients, all in arm C (no grade V). This rate was acceptable according to the hypotheses of the safety phase. In the SOC arms, grade ≥IV AEs occurred in 3/21 patients (14%) in arm A and 2/20 (10%) in arm D. One grade V haemorrhage occurred in arm A. CONCLUSION: The avelumab-cetuximab-RT combination was tolerable for patients with LA-SCCHN, and the approval was given for continuing the trial without modification. CLINICALTRIAL.GOV: NCT02999087.

Progressive Desmoid Tumor: Radiomics Compared With Conventional Response Criteria for Predicting Progression During Systemic Therapy-A Multicenter Study by the French Sarcoma Group.

OBJECTIVE. The response of desmoid tumors (DTs) to chemotherapy is evaluated with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) in daily practice and clinical trials. MRI shows early change in heterogeneity in responding tumors due to a decrease in cellular area and an increase in fibronecrotic content before dimensional response. Heterogeneity can be quantified with radiomics. Our aim was to develop radiomics-based response criteria and to compare their performances with clinical and radiologic response criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Forty-two patients (median age, 38.2 years) were included in this retrospective multicenter study because they presented with progressive DT and had an MRI examination at baseline, which we refer to as "MRI-0," and an early MRI evaluation performed after the first chemotherapy cycle (mean time after first chemotherapy cycle, 3 months [SD, 28 days]), which we refer to as "MRI-1." After signal intensity normalization, voxel size standardization, discretization, and segmentation of DT volume on fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging, 90 baseline and delta 3D radiomics features were extracted. Using cross-validation and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-penalized Cox regression, a radiomics score was generated. The performances of models based on the radiomics score, modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, European Association for the Study of the Liver criteria, Cheson criteria, Choi criteria, and revised Choi criteria from MRI-0 to MRI-1 to predict progression-free survival (PFS, as defined by RECIST 1.1) were assessed with the concordance index. The results were adjusted for performance status, tumor volume, prior chemotherapy, current chemotherapy, and ß-catenin mutation. RESULTS. There were 10 cases of progression. The radiomics score included four variables. A high score indicated a poor prognosis. The radiomics score independently correlated with PFS (adjusted hazard ratio = 5.60, p = 0.003), and none of the usual response criteria independently correlated with PFS. The prognostic model based on the radiomics score had the highest concordance index (0.84; 95% CI, 0.71-0.96). CONCLUSION. Quantifying early changes in heterogeneity through a dedicated radiomics score could improve response evaluation for patients with DT undergoing chemotherapy.

Cabozantinib in patients with advanced Ewing sarcoma or osteosarcoma (CABONE): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with Ewing sarcoma or osteosarcoma have a median overall survival of less than 12 months after diagnosis, and a standard treatment strategy has not yet been established. Pharmacological inhibition of MET signalling and aberrant angiogenesis has shown promising results in several preclinical models of Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma. We aimed to investigate the activity of cabozantinib, an inhibitor of MET and VEGFR2, in patients with advanced Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma. METHODS: We did a multicentre, single-arm, two-stage, phase 2 trial in patients with advanced Ewing sarcoma or osteosarcoma recruited from ten centres in the French Sarcoma Group. Key eligibility criteria were aged 12 years or older, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, and documented disease progression (according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1) before study entry. The number of previous lines of treatment was not limited. Patients received cabozantinib (adults 60 mg, children [<16 years] 40 mg/m2) orally once daily in 28-day cycles until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, the investigator's decision to discontinue, or participant withdrawal. The primary endpoint for Ewing sarcoma was best objective response within 6 months of treatment onset; for osteosarcoma, a dual primary endpoint of 6-month objective response and 6-month non-progression was assessed. All enrolled patients who received at least one dose of cabozantinib were included in the safety analysis, and all participants who received at least one complete or two incomplete treatment cycles were included in the efficacy population. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02243605. FINDINGS: Between April 16, 2015, and July 12, 2018, 90 patients (45 with Ewing sarcoma 45 with osteosarcoma) were recruited to the study. Median follow-up was 31·3 months (95% CI 12·4-35·4) for patients with Ewing sarcoma and 31·1 months (24·4-31·7) for patients with osteosarcoma. 39 (87%) patients with Ewing sarcoma and 42 (93%) patients with osteosarcoma were assessable for efficacy after histological and radiological review. In patients with Ewing sarcoma, ten (26%; 95% CI 13-42) of 39 patients had an objective response (all partial responses) by 6 months; in patients with osteosarcoma, five (12%; 4-26) of 42 patients had an objective response (all partial responses) and 14 (33%; 20-50) had 6-month non-progression. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were hypophosphataemia (five [11%] for Ewing sarcoma, three [7%] for osteosarcoma), aspartate aminotransferase increase (two [4%] for Ewing sarcoma, three [7%] for osteosarcoma), palmar-plantar syndrome (three [7%] for Ewing sarcoma, two [4%] for osteosarcoma), pneumothorax (one [2%] for Ewing sarcoma, four [9%] for osteosarcoma), and neutropenia (two [4%] for Ewing sarcoma, four [9%] for osteosarcoma). At least one serious adverse event was reported in 61 (68%) of 90 patients. No patients died from drug-related toxic effects. INTERPRETATION: Cabozantinib has antitumor activity in patients with advanced Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma and was generally well tolerated. Cabozantinib could represent a new therapeutic option in this setting, and deserves further investigation. FUNDING: Institut Bergonié; French National Cancer Institute; Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer.

Pazopanib or methotrexate-vinblastine combination chemotherapy in adult patients with progressive desmoid tumours (DESMOPAZ): a non-comparative, randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: Desmoid tumours are locally aggressive tumours associated with substantial morbidity. No systemic treatments are approved for this disease, with methotrexate-vinblastine the only chemotherapy regimen assessed in a clinical trial setting to date. VEGF overexpression is a common feature in aggressive desmoid tumours. Pazopanib is an oral antiangiogenic agent targeting VEGF receptors 1, 2, and 3, platelet-derived growth factor receptor-like protein (PDGFR) α and ß, and c-KIT tyrosine kinases. We aimed to assess antitumour activity and safety of targeted therapy or combination chemotherapy in progressive desmoid tumours. METHODS: DESMOPAZ was a non-comparative, randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial conducted at 12 centres from the French Sarcoma Group. We enrolled adults (≥18 years) with progressive desmoid tumours, normal organ function and centrally documented progressive disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 based on two imaging assessments obtained within less than a 6-month interval. Participants were randomly assigned (2:1) to oral pazopanib 800 mg per day for up to 1 year or to an intravenous regimen combining vinblastine (5 mg/m2 per dose) and methotrexate (30 mg/m2 per dose), administered weekly for 6 months and then every other week for 6 months. Randomisation was stratified according to inclusion centre and tumour location. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who had not progressed at 6 months in the first 43 patients who had received one complete or two incomplete cycles of pazopanib. This endpoint was also assessed as a prespecified exploratory endpoint in all patients who had received one complete or two incomplete cycles of methotrexate-vinblastane. Safety analyses were done for all patients who received at least one dose of allocated treatment. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01876082. FINDINGS: From Dec 4, 2012, to Aug 18, 2017, 72 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned (n=48 in the pazopanib group; n=24 in the methotrexate-vinblastine group). Median follow-up was 23·4 months (IQR 17·1-25·5). 46 patients in the pazopanib group and 20 patients in the methotrexate-vinblastine group were assessable for activity. In the first 43 patients assessable for the primary endpoint in the pazopanib group, the proportion of patients who had not progressed at 6 months was 83·7% (95% CI 69·3-93·2). The proportion of patients treated with methotrexate-vinblastine who had not progressed at 6 months was 45·0% (95% CI 23·1-68·5). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events in the pazopanib group were hypertension (n=10, 21%) and diarrhoea (n=7, 15%) and in the methotrexate-vinblastine group were neutropenia (n=10, 45%) and liver transaminitis (n=4, 18%). 11 patients (23%) had at least one serious adverse event related to study treatment in the pazopanib group, as did and six patients (27%) in the methotrexate-vinblastine group. INTERPRETATION: Pazopanib has clinical activity in patients with progressive desmoid tumours and could be a valid treatment option in this rare and disabling disease. FUNDING: GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis.

Evaluation of the information given to patients undergoing total pharyngolaryngectomy and quality of life: a prospective multicentric study.

BACKGROUND: Providing cancer patients with adequate information is essential to their confidence and satisfaction regarding medical care. The aims of this study were to evaluate the information given to patients undergoing total pharyngolaryngectomy (TPL) as well as the evolution and predictors of patient quality of life (QoL). METHODS: We conducted a prospective multicentric study on patients undergoing TPL for a locally advanced laryngeal/hypopharyngeal cancer. All patients completed the EORTC QLQ-INFO25, QLQ-C30, and QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires, before and after surgery. RESULTS: This study enrolled 46 patients. Between the pre- and post-therapeutic periods, we observed no significant changes in the global QLQ-INFO25 and QLQ-C30 scores. However, we found a significant deterioration in 4 QLQ-INFO25 scales/items and in social functioning, as well as an increase of sense, speech, and social contact problems. N-stage and professional activity were significant predictors of preoperative QLQ-INFO25 scores. Younger age was significantly associated with financial difficulties, whereas professional activity and lower education level were significant predictors of xerostomia and swallowing problems, respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing TPL, we observed significant changes in QLQ-INFO25 scores between the pre- and post-treatment periods and, particularly, a deterioration of patient satisfaction with the information received. Several clinical factors were identified as significant predictors of QLQ-INFO25 and QoL scores.

Evolution and predictive factors of quality of life in patients undergoing oncologic surgery for head and neck cancer: A prospective multicentric study.

OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to assess the evolution of quality of life (QoL) in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) undergoing oncologic surgery and to determine the predictive factors of post-therapeutic QoL. METHODS: All HNSCC patients who underwent primary surgery, between 2012 and 2014, were enrolled in this prospective multicentric study. Patients completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires before surgery and at 6 months after treatment. Predictive factors of post-therapeutic QoL scores were determined. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients were included in this study. There was no significant deterioration of global QoL and no significant increase in general symptoms between the pre- and post-therapeutic periods, but a significant deterioration in role and social functioning, and an increase of most head and neck symptoms. Tumor stage, tumor site and treatment modalities (type of surgery, adjuvant therapy) were the main predictors of QoL scores. We found a negative correlation between satisfaction with the information received and global QoL score or several functioning scales. CONCLUSION: HNSCC surgical treatment affects patients QoL mainly by increasing head and neck symptoms, which results in social and role functioning deterioration. These results are of great interest to improve multidisciplinary care of HNSCC patients.

Efficacy and safety of regorafenib in adult patients with metastatic osteosarcoma: a non-comparative, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: Regorafenib has proven activity in patients with pretreated gastrointestinal stromal tumours and colorectal and hepatocellular carcinoma. We designed REGOBONE to assess the efficacy and safety of regorafenib for patients with progressive metastatic osteosarcoma and other bone sarcomas. This trial comprised four parallel independent cohorts: osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, chondrosarcoma, and chordoma. In this Article, we report the results of the osteosarcoma cohort. METHODS: In this non-comparative, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial, patients aged 10 years or older with histologically confirmed osteosarcoma whose disease had progressed after treatment with one to two previous lines of chemotherapy for metastatic disease and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either oral regorafenib (160 mg/day, for 21 of 28 days) or matching placebo. Patients in both groups also received best supportive care. Randomisation was done using a web-based system and was stratified (permuted block) by age at inclusion (<18 vs ≥18 years old). Investigators and patients were masked to treatment allocation. Patients in the placebo group, after centrally confirmed progressive disease, could cross over to receive regorafenib. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients without disease progression at 8 weeks. Analyses were done by modified intention to treat (ie, patients without any major entry criteria violation who initiated masked study drug treatment were included). All participants who received at least one dose of study drug were included in the safety analyses. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02389244, and the results presented here are the final analysis of the osteosarcoma cohort (others cohorts are ongoing). FINDINGS: Between Oct 10, 2014, and April 4, 2017, 43 adult patients were enrolled from 13 French comprehensive cancer centres. All patients received at least one dose of assigned treatment and were evaluable for safety; five patients were excluded for major protocol violations (two in the placebo group and three in the regorafenib group), leaving 38 patients who were evaluable for efficacy (12 in the placebo group and 26 in the regorafenib group). 17 of 26 patients (65%; one-sided 95% CI 47%) in the regorafenib group were non-progressive at 8 weeks compared with no patients in the placebo group. Ten patients in the placebo group crossed over to receive open-label regorafenib after centrally confirmed disease progression. 13 treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in seven (24%) of 29 patients in the regorafenib group versus none of 14 patients in the placebo group. The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events during the double-blind period of treatment included hypertension (in seven [24%] of 29 patients in the regorafenib group vs none in the placebo group), hand-foot skin reaction (three [10%] vs none), fatigue (three [10%] vs one [3%]), hypophosphataemia (three [10%] vs none), and chest pain (three [10%] vs none). No treatment-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION: Regorafenib demonstrated clinically meaningful antitumour activity in adult patients with recurrent, progressive, metastatic osteosarcoma after failure of conventional chemotherapy, with a positive effect on delaying disease progression. Regorafenib should be further evaluated in the setting of advanced disease as well as potentially earlier in the disease course for patients at high risk of relapse. Regorafenib might have an important therapeutic role as an agent complementary to standard cytotoxic chemotherapy in the therapeutic armamentarium against osteosarcoma. FUNDING: Bayer HealthCare.

Primary radical ablative surgery and fibula free-flap reconstruction for T4 oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma with mandibular invasion: oncologic and functional results and their predictive factors.

The aims of this study were to evaluate clinical outcomes and to determine their predictive factors in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) invading the mandibular bone (T4) who underwent primary radical surgery and fibula free-flap reconstruction. Between 2001 and 2013, all patients who underwent primary surgery and mandibular fibula free-flap reconstruction for OCSCC were enrolled in this retrospective study. Predictive factors of oncologic and functional outcomes were assessed in univariate and multivariate analysis. 77 patients (55 men and 22 women, mean age 62 ± 10.6 years) were enrolled in this study. Free-flap failure and local and general complication rates were 9, 31, and 22 %, respectively. In multivariate analysis, ASA score (p = 0.002), pathologic N-stage (p = 0.01), and close surgical margins (p = 0.03) were independent predictors of overall survival. Six months after therapy, oral diet, speech intelligibility, and mouth opening functions were normal or slightly impaired in, respectively, 79, 88, and 83 % of patients. 6.5 % of patients remaining dependent on enteral nutrition 6 months after therapy. With acceptable postoperative outcomes and satisfactory oncologic and functional results, segmental mandibulectomy with fibula free-flap reconstruction should be considered the gold standard primary treatment for patients with OCSCC invading mandible bone. Oncologic outcomes are dependent on three main factors: ASA score, pathologic N-stage, and surgical margin status.

Radiotherapy for elderly patients and cetuximab, a monocentric study.

Concomitant radiotherapy and cetuximab association has shown superiority to exclusive radiotherapy for head and neck cancers. Data on this association are scarce for the elderly population despite its rising incidence. A retrospective monocentric data collection was performed in the Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center in France. Inclusion criteria were: age >70 years at time of diagnosis, histologically proven head and neck epidermoid carcinoma, treated with radiotherapy combined with cetuximab. Thirty-five patients were included between 2008 and 2012. Median follow-up was 22 months. Median age was 74 years (70-86). Median performance status was 1 (0-2). Female/male sex ratio was 0.34. Tumor sites were: oropharynx (57.1 %), larynx (20 %), hypopharynx (14.3 %), oral cavity (2.9 %), nasopharynx (2.9 %), and lymph node with unknown primary (2.9 %). Using TNM classification, tumors were: T1 (5.9 %), T2 (35.3 %), T3 (35.3 %), T4 (22.9 %), N0 (28.6 %), N1 (8.6 %), N2 (48.6 %), and N3 (14.3 %). Median radiotherapy dose was 70 (60-70). RT was interrupted in 94 % of patients and the dose of cetuximab was reduced in 29 %. Median survivals were, respectively: 49 months for overall survival (standard error (SE) = 8) and 32 months for relapse-free survival (SE = 10). Two-year local-regional relapse and metastatic relapse-free survivals were, respectively, 59 % (SE = 10) and 74 % (SE = 10). Concomitant radiotherapy and cetuximab seem to be an effective therapy in the elderly population with encouraging results similar to the literature concerning its efficacy and toxicity. This treatment should be considered for patients >70 years.

Evaluation of the information given to patients undergoing head and neck cancer surgery using the EORTC QLQ-INFO25 questionnaire: A prospective multicentric study.

AIM: Providing head and neck cancer patients with adequate information is essential to their confidence and satisfaction regarding medical care. The aims of this study were to evaluate patient perceptions of the information received, the predictive factors of such perceptions and their potential correlation with patient quality of life (QoL). METHODS: We conducted a prospective multicentric study using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-INFO25 and QLQ-C30 questionnaires before and after surgery. RESULTS: This study enrolled 200 patients, 149 men and 51 women, mean age 63.5 ± 10.3 years. Before and after treatment, global QLQ-INFO25 scores were 39.3 and 42.5, respectively, whereas satisfaction with the information received scores were 69.9 and 58.1, respectively. Regarding EORTC QLQ-INFO25 scores, between the pre- and post-treatment periods, we observed a significant increase in three scales/items (information about other services, information about different places of care and information about things you can do to help yourself) and a significant decrease in two scales/items (satisfaction with the information received and overall the information has been helpful). Before and after treatment, global QoL scores were 62.7 and 61.0, respectively. Overall, we found low correlations between QLQ-INFO25 and QLQ-C30 scores. Patient age and education level, centre of care, tumour site and treatment characteristics had a significant impact on QLQ-INFO25 scores. CONCLUSION: Perceived information was satisfactory in the perioperative period for head and neck cancer patients. Several demographic and clinical factors were identified as significant predictors of QLQ-INFO25 scores.

[Is FDG TEP CT practice changing in the management of sarcomas in adults?]. / Évaluation de l'utilisation de la TEP au FDG pour le bilan des sarcomes de l'adulte en pratique quotidienne.

BACKGROUND: FDG PET (PET)±computed tomography (CT) has increasingly been used in some areas of oncology imaging. It is sometimes performed outside recommendations, at diagnosis or monitoring of sarcomas. We assessed the value of PET-CT in routine practice in sarcomas. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All consecutive sarcoma adult patient charts presented at the multidisciplinary sarcoma meeting in a tertiary care center over a period of 10months were examined in order to analyze the performances of PET-CT when available. RESULTS: Of 232 patients, 50 (21 %) underwent a PET-CT. Sensitivity and specificity of PET-CT were 94.7 %, 57.1 %, respectively. SUV values were highly variable, including for a given histology or grade. PET-CT resulted in practice changing in 14 % of cases. When extrapulmonary metastases are suspected and for some subtypes of sarcomas, PET-CT could provide additional information because in view of its good sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Given the most frequent pulmonary tropism, first hand chest CT may be sufficient at first diagnostic work-up for the detection of pulmonary metastases. However, the relatively poor specificity suggests that further analyses should be performed to identify clinical situations where PET-CT may be of added value compared to current standards.