Stain-Free Sperm Analysis and Selection for Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Complying with WHO Strict Normal Criteria.

This multi-center study evaluated a novel microscope system capable of quantitative phase microscopy (QPM) for label-free sperm-cell selection for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Seventy-three patients were enrolled in four in vitro fertilization (IVF) units, where senior embryologists were asked to select 11 apparently normal and 11 overtly abnormal sperm cells, in accordance with current clinical practice, using a micromanipulator and 60× bright field microscopy. Following sperm selection and imaging via QPM, the individual sperm cell was chemically stained per World Health Organization (WHO) 2021 protocols and imaged via bright field microscopy for subsequent manual measurements by embryologists who were blinded to the QPM measurements. A comparison of the two modalities resulted in mean differences of 0.18 µm (CI -0.442-0.808 µm, 95%, STD-0.32 µm) for head length, -0.26 µm (CI -0.86-0.33 µm, 95%, STD-0.29 µm) for head width, 0.17 (CI -0.12-0.478, 95%, STD-0.15) for length-width ratio and 5.7 for acrosome-head area ratio (CI -12.81-24.33, 95%, STD-9.6). The repeatability of the measurements was significantly higher in the QPM modality. Surprisingly, only 19% of the subjectively pre-selected normal cells were found to be normal according to the WHO2021 criteria. The measurements of cells imaged stain-free through QPM were found to be in good agreement with the measurements performed on the reference method of stained cells imaged through bright field microscopy. QPM is non-toxic and non-invasive and can improve the clinical effectiveness of ICSI by choosing sperm cells that meet the strict criteria of the WHO2021.

Is there any truth in the myth that IVF treatments involve weight gain?

Purpose: To examine body weight change in women undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) using antagonist protocol after up to three treatment cycles. Methods: A prospective cohort study among IVF patients treated between 2018 and 2019. Each patient underwent weight measurement three times during the treatment cycle: before treatment, at the beginning of the hormonal stimulation, and at the completion of the cycle, on the day of the pregnancy test. Data were also analyzed according to the body mass index (BMI) groups for normal weight, overweight, and obese patients. Finally, weight changes were recorded following altogether 519 treatment cycles, 240, 131, and 148 cycles, for normal weight, overweight, and obese patients, respectively. Results: The change in the patient's weight was clinically non-significant either during the waiting period or during gonadotropin administration, and overall, during the first, second, or third treatment cycles. The recorded mean total weight change of 0.26 ± 1.85, 0.4 ± 1.81, and 0.17 ± 1.7, after the first, second, or third treatment cycles, represent a change of 0.36%, 0.56%, and 0.23% of their initial weights, respectively. This change of less than 1% of the body weight falls short of the clinically significant weight gain of 5%-7%. Analyzing the data for the various BMI groups, the changes observed in body weight were under 1%, hence with no clinical significance. Conclusion: The findings of the study reject the myth that hormone therapy involves clinically significant weight gain, and this can lower the concerns of many patients who are candidates for treatment of assisted reproductive technology.

Elective egg freezing patients may benefit from increasing the maximal daily gonadotropin dose above 300IU.

OBJECTIVE: Nowadays, patients attempting social/elective egg freezing has spread globally. Ovarian stimulation (OS) with high daily gonatotropin doses, are commonly offered to this group of patients, aiming to achieve the maximal oocytes cohort with minimum IVF cycle attempts. We aim to assess the IVF-ET outcome, and specifically the oocyte yield, of patients undergoing two successive IVF cycle attempts for elective egg freezing (EEF), and whether changing the daily gonadotropin dose in the second IVF cycle attempt, affect the outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All women admitted to our IVF unit for social/EEF, who underwent 2 consecutive IVF cycle attempts, with only those who used in the first attempt a starting daily gonadotropin dose of 300 IU were included. Ovarian stimulation characteristics, duration of OS, number of retrieved oocytes, number of mature oocytes were assessed and compared between the 1st and the 2nd IVF cycle attempts, and between the different daily gonadotropin doses and the oocyte yields in the 2nd cycle attempt (increase, decrease or no change). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Oocytes and mature oocytes yield in the 2nd as compared to the 1st IVF cycle attempt. RESULTS: A reduced oocyte yield in the 2nd cycle attempt was observed in those who highly responded in the 1st attempt, regardless the daily dose in the 2nd cycle attempt (whether it was increased, no change and decreased). Moreover, the proportion of patients with same or more oocytes in the 2nd IVF cycle attempt was significantly lower in patients with high peak E2 levels, compared to those with peak E2 levels < 9175 pmol/L. Among patients with high peak E2 (> 9175 pmol/L), those who achieved a lower oocytes yield in the 2nd IVF cycle attempt had lower basal Day-3 FSH/LH ratio (1.5 + 0.5 vs 1.8 + 0.8, p < 0.03) and higher oocyte (range: 7-28, median:10; vs range: 2-15, median:7) and mature oocytes yields. With a cut-off of 9 oocytes, 78.8% of those with > 9 oocytes and 61.8% of those with < 9 oocytes will achieve lower/higher oocytes yield in the 2nd IVF cycle attempt, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Ovarian stimulation with high daily gonatotropin doses (300 IU) should be offered to patients attempting social/EEF. Moreover, in their 2nd IVF cycle attempt, those with high peak E2 (> 9175 pmol/L) in the 1st attempt, and basal Day-3 FSH/LH ratio < 1.5 and/or more than 9 oocytes retrieved, should receive same OS protocol with no change in the daily gonadotropin dose.

Evaluation of Clinical and Pathologic Risk Factors May Reduce the Rate of Multimodality Treatment of Early Cervical Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the rate of postoperative adjuvant treatment in patients who underwent radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer and to suggest criteria for the triage of patients who have a high probability of multimodality treatment. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective study of 514 patients with FIGO stages IA2-IIA cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy between 1999 and 2010. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether or not postoperative radiation was administered. The 2 groups were compared with regard to clinical and histopathologic variables divided into major and minor criteria (intermediate risk factors) based on lymph nodes status, parametrial involvement, tumor size, deep stromal invasion, and lymph-vascular space invasion. RESULTS: We identified 294 (57.2%) patients who received adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiation. Fifty-three percent of these patients who were treated by adjuvant radiation had only intermediate risk factors. Combining the various combinations of 2 out of 3 of the following criteria, we found that 89% of patients with tumors ≥2 cm and lymph-vascular space invasion received RT, 76% of patients with tumors ≥2 cm and depth of invasion >10 mm received RT, and 87% of patients with tumors depth of invasion >10 mm and lymph-vascular space invasion received RT. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that in patients with early cervical cancer, clinicopathologic evaluation of tumor size and lymph-vascular space invasion should be undertaken before performing radical hysterectomy. This approach can serve to tailor treatment, reducing the rate of employing both radical hysterectomy and chemoradiation.

Integration of PET/CT into the preoperative evaluation of patients with early cervical cancer does not decrease the proportion of patients with positive lymph nodes found after surgery.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether preoperative positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with early-stage cervical carcinoma reduced the proportion of patients with metastatic lymph nodes identified after surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a multicenter case-control study of 599 patients with early cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy at 1 of 10 gynecological oncology units in Israel. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether or not they underwent a preoperative PET/CT. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with nodal involvement. The 2 groups were compared with regard to the clinical and histological variables. RESULTS: Of the 599 patients who underwent surgery, 180 (36%) had preoperative PET/CT study. There were no significant differences between the PET/CT and control groups with regard to clinical and histological risk factors. The proportion of patients with involved nodes was similar in the control and PET/CT groups (20.8% vs 19%; P = 0.73) as well as the proportion of patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy/chemoradiation (58.3% vs 55.1%; P = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative PET/CT in patients with early cervical cancer does not reduce proportion of patients with metastatic nodal involvement and the employment of multimodality treatment. Prospective clinical trials comparing management based on PET/CT findings are warranted.

Does salpingectomy affect the ipsilateral ovarian response to gonadotropin during in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles?

In a study on the influence of salpingectomy on the same patient ipsilateral ovarian response, 15 patients who were admitted to our department with the diagnosis of uni- or bilateral hydrosalpinges and who were successfully treated by laparoscopic salpingectomy were evaluated. The observed significant decrease in the ipsilateral ovarian response after salgingectomy, as reflected by the quantity of developing follicles during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF, should be presented to patients during the decision-making process, before offering salpingectomy for the treatment of hydrosalpinx.