CO Oxidation Kinetics over Au/TiO2 and Au/Al2O3 Catalysts: Evidence for a Common Water-Assisted Mechanism.

The mechanism of CO oxidation over supported gold catalysts has long been debated, with two prevailing mechanisms dominating the discussion: a water-assisted mechanism and a mechanism involving O-defect sites. In this study, we directly address this debate through a kinetic and mechanistic investigation of the role of water in CO oxidation over Au/TiO2 and Au/Al2O3 catalysts; the results clearly indicate a common water-assisted mechanism to be at work. Water adsorption isotherms were determined with infrared spectroscopy; the extracted equilibrium constant was essentially the same for both catalysts. Added water decreases CO adsorption on Au/TiO2, likely by blocking CO binding sites at the metal-support interface. Reaction kinetics (CO, O2, and H2O reaction orders) were essentially the same for both catalysts, as were measured O-H(D) kinetic isotope effects. These data indicate that the two catalysts operate by essentially the same mechanism under the conditions of these experiments (ambient temperature, significant amounts of water available). A reaction mechanism incorporating the kinetic and thermodynamic data and accounting for different CO and O2/COOH binding sites is proposed. The mechanism and kinetic data are treated with an active site (Michaelis-Menten) approach. This indicated that water adsorption does not significantly affect reaction rate constants, only the number of active sites available at a given water pressure. Extracted water and O2 binding constants are similar on both catalysts and consistent with previous DFT calculations. Water adsorption constants are also similar to independently determined equilibrium constants measured by IR spectroscopy. The likely roles of water, surface carbonates, and oxygen vacancies at the metal-support interface are discussed. The results definitively show that, at least in the presence of added water, O vacancies cannot play an important role in the room-temperature catalysis, and that the water-assisted mechanism is far more consistent with the preponderance of the kinetic data.

Controlling activity and selectivity using water in the Au-catalysed preferential oxidation of CO in H2.

Industrial hydrogen production through methane steam reforming exceeds 50 million tons annually and accounts for 2-5% of global energy consumption. The hydrogen product, even after processing by the water-gas shift, still typically contains ∼1% CO, which must be removed for many applications. Methanation (CO + 3H2 → CH4 + H2O) is an effective solution to this problem, but consumes 5-15% of the generated hydrogen. The preferential oxidation (PROX) of CO with O2 in hydrogen represents a more-efficient solution. Supported gold nanoparticles, with their high CO-oxidation activity and notoriously low hydrogenation activity, have long been examined as PROX catalysts, but have shown disappointingly low activity and selectivity. Here we show that, under the proper conditions, a commercial Au/Al2O3 catalyst can remove CO to below 10 ppm and still maintain an O2-to-CO2 selectivity of 80-90%. The key to maximizing the catalyst activity and selectivity is to carefully control the feed-flow rate and maintain one to two monolayers of water (a key CO-oxidation co-catalyst) on the catalyst surface.

The critical role of water at the gold-titania interface in catalytic CO oxidation.

We provide direct evidence of a water-mediated reaction mechanism for room-temperature CO oxidation over Au/TiO2 catalysts. A hydrogen/deuterium kinetic isotope effect of nearly 2 implicates O-H(D) bond breaking in the rate-determining step. Kinetics and in situ infrared spectroscopy experiments showed that the coverage of weakly adsorbed water on TiO2 largely determines catalyst activity by changing the number of active sites. Density functional theory calculations indicated that proton transfer at the metal-support interface facilitates O2 binding and activation; the resulting Au-OOH species readily reacts with adsorbed Au-CO, yielding Au-COOH. Au-COOH decomposition involves proton transfer to water and was suggested to be rate determining. These results provide a unified explanation to disparate literature results, clearly defining the mechanistic roles of water, support OH groups, and the metal-support interface.