The clinical relevance of Raynaud's phenomenon symptom characteristics in systemic sclerosis.

Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) is a cardinal feature of systemic sclerosis (SSc) and manifests with pain, digital colour change, sensory symptoms, and impaired function. SSc-RP is exacerbated by cold exposure (RP 'attacks') but many patients report persistent symptoms of background digital ischaemia. The aim of our study was to examine the significance of RP with digital colour change with or without symptoms, and persistent colour change in between attacks. Patients with SSc responses were obtained from the Patient Survey of experiences of Raynaud's Phenomenon (PASRAP). We enquired about symptoms associated with Raynaud's attacks, and persistent symptoms in between attacks. Data were analysed as descriptive statistics with appropriate parametric/non-parametric testing. Relevant PASRAP survey question data from 747 evaluable SSc patients from across three continents were analysed. Isolated colour change was rare (29/484, 6%). Digital ulcers were more common in SSc-RP associated with other sensory symptoms (42.1% vs. 24.1%, P=0.057) and more readily treated with phosphodiesterase-type 5 inhibitors (22.5% vs. 10.3%%, P=0.124). Over one-third of patients (n=92/239, 38%) reported persistent colour change in between Raynaud's attacks. Patients with persistent colour change were more likely to have pulmonary arterial hypertension (15.2% vs. 7.5%, P=0.057) and be treated with calcium channel blockers (54.3% vs. 39.0%, P=0.021). SSc-RP with colour change and other symptoms and/or or persistent decolourisation in between attacks were more likely to have vascular complications of SSc and be treated with vascular therapies. Future research should explore the judicious use of vascular therapies as a potential form of disease modification in SSc. Key Points • Isolated colour change without other symptoms is rare in SSc patients. • SSc patients often identify persistent symptoms in between attacks of RP. • SSc-RP with colour change and other symptoms, or persistent decolourisation, may have greater disease severity and be treated with vascular therapies.

Factors Influencing Patient Decision-Making Concerning Treatment Escalation in Raynaud's Phenomenon Secondary to Systemic Sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: To explore patient priorities and ranking of factors influencing patient decision-making concerning treatment escalation in the management of Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) secondary to systemic sclerosis (SSc). METHODS: Patients with SSc were invited to participate in an online survey disseminated through patient-led organizations and social media platforms. RESULTS: Responses from 747 individuals with self-reported SSc-RP were evaluable with broad international representation. The mean ± SD age (54.7 ± 12.1 years), clinical phenotype, and disease subsets distribution (limited cutaneous SSc [402 of 747, 53.8%], diffuse cutaneous SSc [260 of 747, 34.8%], and overlap disease [85 of 747, 11.4%]) were consistent with expected demographic information. Around one-half (56.3%) of patients reported that their SSc-RP symptoms were adequately controlled. The 5 highest ranked factors (of 13) that would prompt treatment escalation for SSc-RP were as follows: 1) inability to use the fingers properly; 2) emergence of new digital ulcer on ≥1 fingers; 3) worsening pain or discomfort from RP; 4) more severe attacks; and 5) if it may help with internal problems. Despite symptoms not being adequately controlled, 47.1% were concerned about potential treatment side effects and were more likely to accept mild (~20-40%) versus severe (2%) side effects. Patients were open to different management strategies for uncontrolled RP that included adding new treatment in combination with existing treatment (52.8%), drug substitution (40.9%), increasing the current dose (28.8%), or focusing on nonpharmacologic approaches (29.7%). CONCLUSION: We have identified the relative importance of different factors influencing patient preferences for treatment decision-making regarding SSc-RP. Side-effect profiles influence acceptability of drug treatments, and many patients report a preference for nonpharmacologic management of SSc-RP.

Intensive and app-delivered occupational therapy to improve upper extremity function in early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: a pilot two-arm trial.

OBJECTIVE: SSc reduces upper extremity function and performance of everyday activities; however, there are few evidence-based rehabilitation interventions. This study examined short and longer-term effects of two occupational therapy interventions on hand disability. METHODS: Participants with diffuse cutaneous SSc were randomized to one of two 18-week interventions: Intensive group, receiving eight weekly in-person occupational therapy sessions with App-delivered home exercises, or App Alone group. The primary outcome was QuickDASH hand disability; secondary outcomes were physical function (PROMIS scale), and total active hand motion. Linear mixed models were used to examine treatment effects. RESULTS: Most participants were female (72%); the mean age was 52 years (13.4) (n = 32). There were no significant between-group effects on QuickDASH (P = 1.0; mean change -6.4 on 0-100 scale in both groups at 18 weeks). Left lateral pinch, an exploratory outcome, improved in App Alone compared with Intensive from baseline to 18 weeks. Within groups, the Intensive group had the largest improvements after 8 weeks (-8.5 on QuickDASH; P = 0.03), but then lost gains from 8 to 18 weeks while the App Alone group had modest improvements from baseline to 8 weeks, but then continued to improve. Of completers, 50% had clinically meaningful improvement on QuickDASH in the Intensive group and 64% had improvement in App Alone. CONCLUSION: Both interventions showed beneficial effects on hand disability. Participants in the App Alone group improved equally to the Intensive group at 18 weeks. Our findings provide support for further study into telehealth rehabilitation approaches. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03482219.

How do patients define Raynaud's phenomenon? Differences between primary and secondary disease.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: To examine how people define Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) based on their lived experiences and explore if differences exist depending on primary or secondary RP diagnosis. METHOD: An international survey was sent to people with RP through health systems, foundations, and social media. Qualitative coding of responses to an open text question regarding one's own definition of RP was performed and themes were identified. The prevalence of themes among the sample and then comparisons between themes among people who self-reported primary versus secondary diagnosis of RP were performed. RESULTS: There were 1345 respondents from 45 countries (mean age 51.5 years, 93% female) who defined RP in their own words; 17% reported primary RP and 83% reported secondary RP (69% of secondary RP was scleroderma-related, n = 927). Over half defined their RP by describing the body parts affected, color changes, pain, and triggers or situations in which an episode occurs. Patients with primary RP more frequently defined RP in terms of its impact on function/quality of life and pain compared to those with secondary RP (34.5% versus 25.3%, respectively, p=0.004; 54.0% versus 46.8%, p=0.05). Patients with secondary RP more frequently included specific body parts, color change, the management of attacks, and other digital vascular complications in their definition of RP. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified differences in how people with primary and secondary RP define RP, in terms of how they feel and function. Our findings have implications for the domains of outcome measures for assessing RP within different patient populations. Key Points • Pain is more often mentioned in primary RP and color change in secondary RP. • Over 25% of patients included reduced the quality of life as part of their RP definition. • The concept of "attack" is used to define RP by only 2% of patients.