Outcomes of patients with COVID-19 requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and continuous renal replacement therapy in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Some patients develop severe acute respiratory distress syndrome and kidney failure requiring the combination of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 127 consecutive patients requiring combined ECMO and CRRT support in intensive care units at an ECMO center in Marietta, GA, United States. RESULTS: Sixty and 67 patients with and without COVID-19, respectively, required ECMO-CRRT support. After adjusting for confounding variables, patients with COVID-19 had increased mortality at 30 days (hazard ratio [HR], 5.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.51-10.7; P<0.001) and 90 days (HR, 6.23; 95% CI, 2.60-14.9; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, patients with COVID-19 who required ECMO-CRRT had increased mortality when compared to patients without COVID-19.

Veno-arteriovenous (V-AV) ECMO configuration: A single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: With increasing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) utilization over the last decade, clinicians have developed "hybrid" configurations to meet complex perfusion requirements. In the setting of differential hypoxemia, a veno-arteriovenous (V-AV) configuration provides oxygenated cardiac preload and hemodynamic support to satisfy physiologic demands. We aim to further characterize the patient population, indications, and outcomes associated with this hybrid configuration. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all adult patients placed on V-AV ECMO at our institution from June 2016 to December 2019. Through a review of the electronic medical records, data describing demographic features, comorbidities, and ECMO-specific information were analyzed systematically. RESULTS: 14 patients were placed on V-AV ECMO during the study period. Our cohort was 79% male with a median age of 54 and BMI of 30.3. These patients had a median SOFA-0 score of 15 and SAVE score of -12. Patients were treated with ECMO support for a median of 144.1 (IQR 98.5 - 183.1) hours, consisting of 0.2 (IQR 0 - 17.7) hours of VA and 92.4 (IQR 53.7 - 115.1) hours of V-AV followed by 67.4 (IQR 20.3 - 96.6) hours of VV support. Of these 14 patients, 11 survived to decannulation (79%) and 9 survived to hospital discharge (64%). CONCLUSION: ECMO patients with recovering left ventricular function and persistent gas exchange abnormalities are at risk for developing differential hypoxemia. We describe an approach to utilizing V-AV configuration when the likelihood of differential hypoxemia is extremely high, with a survival rate that compares favorably to Extracorporeal Life Support Organization statistics and published case series.

Cost-effectiveness of Argatroban Versus Heparin Anticoagulation in Adult Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Patients.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of argatroban compared to heparin during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy. Methods: This was a retrospective study of patients who received argatroban or heparin infusions with ECMO therapy at a community hospital between January 1, 2017 and June 30, 2018. Adult patients who received heparin or argatroban for at least 48 hours while on venovenous (VV) or venoarterial (VA) ECMO were included. Patients with temporary mechanical circulatory assist devices were excluded. Each continuous course of anticoagulant exposure that met the inclusion criteria was evaluated. The primary endpoint was the total cost of anticoagulant therapy for heparin versus argatroban, including all administered study drugs, blood or factor products, and associated laboratory tests. Secondary endpoints included safety and efficacy of anticoagulation with each agent during ECMO. Documentation of bleeding events, circuit clotting, and ischemic events were noted. Partial thromboplastin time (PTT) values were evaluated for time to therapeutic range and percentage of therapeutic PTTs. Results: A total of 11 courses of argatroban and 24 courses of heparin anticoagulation were included in the study. The average cost per course of argatroban was less than the average cost per course of heparin ($7,091.98 vs $15,323.49, respectively; P value = 0.15). Furthermore, argatroban was not associated with an increased incidence of bleeding, thrombotic, or ischemic events. Conclusion: Argatroban may be more cost-effective during ECMO therapy in patients with low antithrombin III levels without increased risk of adverse events.

Antibody-Negative Relapse of Goodpasture Syndrome with Pulmonary Hemorrhage.

Goodpasture syndrome is a rare autoimmune disease comprising antiglomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) crescentic glomerulonephritis and pulmonary capillaritis with circulating anti-GBM antibodies. Rarely, antibody-negative cases have been described. We report a young, African American adult woman admitted with flank pain and hematuria with laboratory testing and kidney biopsy demonstrating anti-GBM crescentic glomerulonephritis with elevated anti-GBM antibody levels. She received treatment but remained dialysis-dependent. She was seronegative and clinically stable until she presented 8 months later with dyspnea and hemoptysis requiring mechanical ventilation. Bronchoscopy revealed diffuse alveolar hemorrhage. She was treated for relapse of Goodpasture syndrome. However, anti-GBM antibodies were undetectable. This case emphasizes prompt diagnosis and treatment of Goodpasture syndrome to preserve renal function. Additionally, clinical manifestations of Goodpasture syndrome and its degree of activity do not necessarily correlate with the actual antibody titer on relapse. Clinicians should have enhanced awareness of this atypical presentation of a rare disease.