Outcome and molecular landscape of patients with PIK3CA-mutated metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: α-Selective phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors improve outcome in patients with PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/Her2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Nevertheless, it is still unclear how to integrate this new drug family in the treatment landscape. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 649 patients with mBC from the SAFIR02 trial (NCT02299999), with available mutational profiles were selected for outcome analysis. PIK3CA mutations were prospectively determined by next-generation sequencing on metastatic samples. The mutational landscape of PIK3CA-mutated mBC was assessed by whole-exome sequencing (n = 617). Finally, the prognostic value of PIK3CA mutations during chemotherapy was assessed in plasma samples (n = 44) by next-generation sequencing and digital PCR. RESULTS: Some 28% (104/364) of HR+/Her2- tumors and 10% (27/255) of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) presented a PIK3CA mutation (P < 0.001). PIK3CA-mutated HR+/Her2- mBC was less sensitive to chemotherapy [adjusted odds ratio: 0.40; 95% confidence interval (0.22-0.71); P = 0.002], and presented a worse overall survival (OS) compared with PIK3CA wild-type [adjusted hazard ratio: 1.44; 95% confidence interval (1.02-2.03); P = 0.04]. PIK3CA-mutated HR+/Her2- mBC was enriched in MAP3K1 mutations (15% versus 5%, P = 0.0005). In metastatic TNBC (mTNBC), the median OS in patients with PIK3CA mutation was 24 versus 14 months for PIK3CA wild-type (P = 0.03). We further looked at the distribution of PIK3CA mutation in mTNBC according to HR expression on the primary tumor. Some 6% (9/138) of patients without HR expression on the primary and 36% (14/39) of patients with HR+ on the primary presented PIK3CA mutation (P < 0.001). The level of residual PIK3CA mutations in plasma after one to three cycles of chemotherapy was associated with a poor OS [continuous variable, hazard ratio: 1.03, 95% confidence interval (1.01-1.05), P = 0.007]. CONCLUSION: PIK3CA-mutated HR+/Her2- mBC patients present a poor outcome and resistance to chemotherapy. Patients with PIK3CA-mutated TNBC present a better OS. This could be explained by an enrichment of PIK3CA mutations in luminal BC which lost HR expression in the metastatic setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: SAFIR02 trial: NCT02299999.

Efficacy of molecularly targeted agents given in the randomised trial SHIVA01 according to the ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets.

BACKGROUND: A randomised trial SHIVA01 compared the efficacy of matched molecularly targeted therapy outside their indications based on a prespecified treatment algorithm versus conventional chemotherapy in patients with metastatic solid tumours who had failed standard of care. No statistical difference was reported between the two groups in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), challenging treatment algorithm. The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT) recently defined criteria to prioritise molecular alterations (MAs) to select anticancer drugs. We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy of matched molecularly targeted agents (MTAs) given in SHIVA01 according to ESCAT tiers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MAs used in SHIVA01 were retrospectively classified into ESCAT tiers, and PFS and overall survival (OS) were compared using log-rank tests. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-three patients were treated with matched MTAs in SHIVA01. MAs used to allocate MTAs were classified into tiers II, IIIA, IIIB and IVA according to the ESCAT. Median PFS was 2.0 months in tier II, 3.1 in tier IIIA, 1.7 in tier IIIB and 3.2 in tier IVA (p = 0.13). Median OS in tier IIIB was worse than that in tiers II, IIIA and IVA (6.3 months versus 11.7, 11.2 and 12.1, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Most MAs used to allocate therapy in SHIVA01 were shown to improve outcomes in other tumour types (tier IIIA). Worst outcome was observed in patients treated based on another type of alteration than the one reported to improve outcomes (tier IIIB), highlighting the crucial impact of the type of the alterations beyond the gene and the signalling pathway.

BEECH: a dose-finding run-in followed by a randomised phase II study assessing the efficacy of AKT inhibitor capivasertib (AZD5363) combined with paclitaxel in patients with estrogen receptor-positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer, and in a PIK3CA mutant sub-population.

BACKGROUND: BEECH investigated the efficacy of capivasertib (AZD5363), an oral inhibitor of AKT isoforms 1-3, in combination with the first-line weekly paclitaxel for advanced or metastatic estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer, and in a phosphoinositide 3-kinase, catalytic, alpha polypeptide mutation sub-population (PIK3CA+). PATIENTS AND METHODS: BEECH consisted of an open-label, phase Ib safety run-in (part A) in 38 patients with advanced breast cancer, and a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase II expansion (part B) in 110 women with ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer. In part A, patients received paclitaxel 90 mg/m2 (days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle) with capivasertib taken twice daily (b.i.d.) at two intermittent ascending dosing schedules. In part B, patients were randomly assigned, stratified by PIK3CA mutation status, to receive paclitaxel with either capivasertib or placebo. The primary end point for part A was safety to recommend a dose and schedule for part B; primary end points for part B were progression-free survival (PFS) in the overall and PIK3CA+ sub-population. RESULTS: Capivasertib was well tolerated, with a 400 mg b.i.d. 4 days on/3 days off treatment schedule selected in part A. In part B, median PFS in the overall population was 10.9 months with capivasertib versus 8.4 months with placebo [hazard ratio (HR) 0.80; P = 0.308]. In the PIK3CA+ sub-population, median PFS was 10.9 months with capivasertib versus 10.8 months with placebo (HR 1.11; P = 0.760). Based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event v4.0, the most common grade ≥3 adverse events in the capivasertib group were diarrhoea, hyperglycaemia, neutropoenia and maculopapular rash. Dose intensity of paclitaxel was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Capivasertib had no apparent impact on the tolerability and dose intensity of paclitaxel. Adding capivasertib to weekly paclitaxel did not prolong PFS in the overall population or PIK3CA+ sub-population of ER+/HER2- advanced/metastatic breast cancer patients.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01625286.

Comprehensive genomic profiling of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma reveals FGFR1 amplifications and tumour genomic alterations burden as prognostic biomarkers of survival.

BACKGROUND: We aimed at identifying deleterious genomic alterations from untreated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients, and assessing their prognostic value. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrieved 122 HNSCC patients who underwent primary surgery. Targeted NGS was used to analyse a panel of 100 genes selected among the most frequently altered genes in HNSCC and potential therapeutic targets. We selected only deleterious (activating or inactivating) single nucleotide variations, and copy number variations for analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the prognostic value of altered genes. RESULTS: A median of 2 (range: 0-10) genomic alterations per sample was observed. Most frequently altered genes involved the cell cycle pathway (TP53 [60%], CCND1 [30%], CDKN2A [25%]), the PI3K/AKT/MTOR pathway (PIK3CA [12%]), tyrosine kinase receptors (EGFR [9%], FGFR1 [5%]) and cell differentiation (FAT1 [7%], NOTCH1 [4%]). TP53 mutations (p = 0.003), CCND1 amplifications (p = 0.04), CDKN2A alterations (p = 0.02) and FGFR1 amplifications (p = 0.003), correlated with shorter overall survival (OS). The number of genomic alterations was significantly higher in the HPV-negative population (p = 0.029) and correlated with a shorter OS (p < 0.0001). Only TP53 mutation and FGFR1 amplification status remained statistically significant in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that genomic alterations involving the cell cycle (TP53, CCND1, CDKN2A), as well as FGFR1 amplifications and tumour genomic alterations burden are prognostic biomarkers and might be therapeutic targets for patients with HNSCC.

Randomized phase II trial comparing molecularly targeted therapy based on tumor molecular profiling versus conventional therapy in patients with refractory cancer: cross-over analysis from the SHIVA trial.

Background: Several studies used the ratio of progression-free survival (PFS) on genotype-matched treatment to PFS on genotype-unmatched treatment to assess the efficacy of therapy guided by patients' tumor molecular profiling. We evaluated the PFS ratio from patients who cross-over in the SHIVA trial. Patients and methods: The primary end point of the SHIVA trial was to compare PFS on molecularly targeted agents (MTAs) based on tumor molecular profiling and treatment at physician's choice (TPC) in patients with any kind of cancer who had failed standard-of-care therapy. The experimental treatment included only marketed MTAs given outside their indications according to a pre-specified treatment algorithm. Patients were allowed to cross-over at disease progression in both arms. Response was evaluated according to RECIST 1.1 at randomization and at cross-over. We evaluated the ratio of PFS on MTA (PFSMTA) to PFS on TPC (PFSTPC) in patients who crossed-over. Results: Among 741 patients enrolled in the SHIVA trial, 197 were randomized, and 95 crossed-over, including 70 patients from the TPC to the MTA arm and 25 patients from the MTA to the TPC arm. Two patients crossed-over in the TPC arm without disease progression. The PFSMTA/PFSTPC ratio exceeded 1.3 in 37% of patients who crossed-over from the TPC to the MTA arm. The PFSMTA/PFSTPC ratio exceeded 1.3 in 61% of patients who crossed-over from the MTA arm to the TPC arm. Conclusions: The cross-over analysis of the SHIVA trial identified 37% of patients who crossed-over from TPC to MTA with a PFSMTA/PFSTPC ratio exceeding 1.3.

Time-varying effect and long-term survival analysis in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have indicated the prognostic value of tumour subtype and pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). However these results were reported after a short follow-up and using a standard Cox model which could be unsatisfactory for time-dependent factors. In the present study, we identified the prognostic factors for long-term outcome after NAC, considering that they could have an inconstant impact over time. METHODS: Prognostic factors from 956 consecutive breast cancer patients treated with NAC were identified and associated with long-term outcomes. We estimated survival by a time function multivariate Cox model regression and stratified by follow-up length. RESULTS: The prognostic value of tumour histological grade and hormone receptors status varied as distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) increased. The multivariate analysis identified the following significant prognostic factors: tumour size, N stage, clinical and pathological response to NAC, hormone receptors (HR) status and histological tumour grade. The 'prognostic benefit' of low-grade and positive-HR status decreased over the years. Thus, in the early years after cancer diagnosis, the hazard ratio of distant recurrences in patients with positive-HR status increased from 0.26 (95% CI 0.1-0.4) at 6 months to 2.2 (95% CI 1.3-3.7) at 120 months. The histological tumour grade followed a similar trend. The hazard ratio of grade III patients compared with grade I was 1.83 (95% CI 1.1-2.8) at 36 months and diminished over time to 0.70 (95% CI 0.4-1.3) at 120 months. This indicates that the risk of recurrence for positive-HR patients was 74% lower at 6 months compared with the negative-hormone receptor group, but 30% higher at 5 years and more than double at 10 years. High-grade tumours presented a risk of 83% in the earlier years decreasing to 30% at 10 years versus the low-grade group. CONCLUSION: From the present study, we conclude the importance of identifying time-dependent prognostic factors. Distant recurrence-free interval within women who receive NAC are influenced by achieving pCR and breast cancer subtype. Tumours with more aggressive biology have poorer survival during the first 5 years, but if they exceed this point their prognostic impact is no longer significant. Conversely, positive-HR patients remain at risk for distant recurrence for many years.

Histological grade concordance between diagnostic core biopsy and corresponding surgical specimen in HR-positive/HER2-negative breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The identification and validation of suitable predictive and prognostic factors are a challenge to improve the treatment scheme selection. Discordances in histological grade can be established between core biopsy and surgical specimens. This is important in HR-positive/HER2-negative subgroup where histological grade identifies patients at high risk and is a strong determinant for treatment scheme. METHODS: A total of 350 consecutive invasive breast carcinoma biopsies were assessed and compared with surgical specimens in Institut Curie, Paris, France. Clinical, radiological and pathological data were recorded. RESULTS: Histological grade concordance rate in the HR+/HER2- group was 75%. A grade underestimation was mainly due to mitotic index misgrading (23%). Large tumours (P<0.05), premenopausal patients (P=0.005) and non-ultrasound-guided biopsies (P=0.04) were risk factors for misgrading. The highest discordance was found in tumours that required chemotherapy (39%, P<0.05), and it was related to an underestimation of histological grade on core biopsies (94%). CONCLUSIONS: Histological grade in HR+/HER2- group is important to identify patients with poor prognosis and start a systemic therapy. Histological grade discordance was correlated with an underestimation of mitotic index and factors probably associated with intratumor heterogeneity (premenopausal status, tumour size and the type of core biopsy performed). But such discordance did not appear to modify the therapeutic decision, because systemic treatment decision-making also integrates other variables. Determining histological grade in core biopsy can be especially important in HR-positive/HER2-negative subgroup where it identifies patients at high risk and is a strong determinant of the treatment scheme.

Single agent and combination studies of pralatrexate and molecular correlates of sensitivity.

BACKGROUND: Pralatrexate is a dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) inhibitor with high affinity for reduced folate carrier 1 (RFC-1) and folylpolyglutamate synthetase (FPGS), resulting in extensive internalization and accumulation in tumour cells. Pralatrexate is approved in the US for the treatment of relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma and is being investigated in various malignancies. Here, we evaluated molecular correlates of sensitivity to pralatrexate and explored combinations with a variety of anticancer agents. METHODS: Antiproliferative effects of pralatrexate were evaluated in 15 human-cancer cell lines using the MTT assay. Gene expression was evaluated using qRT-PCR. RESULTS: Pralatrexate and methotrexate had a similar pattern of cytotoxicity, pralatrexate being more potent. Pralatrexate potentiated the effects of platinum drugs, antimetabolites and EGFR inhibitors. Dose- and time-dependent cytotoxicity of pralatrexate correlated with high mRNA expression of FPGS. Acquired resistance to pralatrexate was associated with decreased RFC-1 expression, whereas methotrexate resistance correlated with increased DHFR expression, suggesting different mechanisms of acquired resistance. CONCLUSION: Pralatrexate was more potent than methotrexate in a panel of solid tumour lines. Our findings support the further clinical development of pralatrexate in combination with certain cytotoxics and targeted therapies, and suggest that RFC-1, FPGS and DHFR may be potential biomarkers of outcome.

Sequential sorafenib and sunitinib for renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Sorafenib and sunitinib are 2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors that were recently approved for renal cell carcinoma. In many patients sequential administration of the 2 drugs occurs because of the lack of sustained efficacy of the first agent. We determined the efficacy and safety of sequential administration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To determine whether cross-resistance occurs between these 2 drugs we analyzed the outcome in 90 consecutive patients with renal cell carcinoma from 4 sites in France who had received the 2 drugs sequentially. All patients received sorafenib followed by sunitinib or vice versa. From 2003 to 2006, 68 patients received sorafenib, while 22 received sunitinib first. RESULTS: In the sorafenib-sunitinib group median progression-free survival was 26 weeks with sorafenib and 28 with sunitinib. In the sunitinib-sorafenib group median progression-free survival was 22 weeks with sunitinib and 17 with sorafenib. Median overall survival was 135 weeks in the sorafenib-sunitinib group and 82 weeks in the sunitinib-sorafenib group (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.96, p = 0.04). The average duration of sequential administration was 61 and 49 weeks, respectively, in the sorafenib-sunitinib and sunitinib-sorafenib groups. Each sequence was well tolerated and no increase in grade 3-4 toxicity was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Overall this retrospective study supports the conclusion of the lack of absolute cross-resistance between tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In this renal cell carcinoma population sorafenib followed by sunitinib was associated with longer survival than sunitinib followed by sorafenib. However, this observation needs further confirmation.

[Colorectal cancers: prognostic and predictive factors of response to treatment]. / Les cancers coliques : facteurs pronostiques et prédictifs de la réponse au traitement.

For many years, 5-fluorouracil was the unique drug approved in the management of colorectal cancer. In the last decade, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, capecitabine and more recently targeted therapies as cetuximab and bevacizumab have been added to chemotherapy schedules. Prognosis and predictive factors are deeply needed to improve the management of the patients. To date, the TNM classification remains the only factor widely approved. But thanks to the progress of fundamental and translational research, it appears clearly that more clinical and molecular markers should be available soon to help the physician in the management of colorectal cancer.

[Topics in mTOR pathway and its inhibitors]. / Actualités sur la voie mTOR et ses inhibiteurs.

PI3K/AKT/mTOR is a cell signalling pathway that plays a major role in regulation of apoptosis, cell growth and cell cycle. This pathway is often disregulated in human cancers, and constitutes an interesting target for antitumor therapy. Rapamycin is an inhibitor of mTOR that has first been developed for its immunosuppressive characteristics, as a preventive treatment of graft rejection. More recently, three rapamycin analogs have been developed, resulting in interesting results in preclinical studies on cancer cell lines : temsirolimus, everolimus, and deforolimus. These molecules are being tested in clinical studies, and both temsirolimus and everolimus have demonstrated efficacy in metastatic renal cancers. In contrast, perfosin, an AKT inhibitor, did not prove to be active in clinical studies. Many ongoing studies explore next indications of these drugs, given alone or in combination with chemotherapy or with other targeted therapy. Identification of predictive factors for sensibility to treatment represents another way of research.