Pharmacokinetic Interaction between Faldaprevir and Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus in Healthy Volunteers: A Prospective, Open-Label, Fixed-Sequence, Crossover Study.

Faldaprevir (FDV) is a potent, orally administered inhibitor of hepatitis C virus. In this single-centre, open-label, fixed-sequence, crossover study of 32 healthy adult male and female volunteers, subjects received either a single dose of cyclosporine (CsA) 50 mg (N = 16) or tacrolimus (TAC) 0.5 mg (N = 16), followed by a washout of at least 14 days. Each subject then received a loading dose of FDV 240 mg followed by 120 mg FDV once daily for 6 days. FDV 120 mg was then co-administered with an additional single dose of CsA (50 mg) or TAC (0.5 mg), followed by an additional 6 days of FDV 120 mg once daily. Intensive blood sampling was performed to assess the PK interaction potential. Assessment of relative BA indicated that exposure to CsA co-administered with FDV was similar to CsA alone. However, the AUCτ,ss and Cmax,ss of FDV were increased by 23% and 41%, respectively, when FDV was co-administered with CsA. Exposure to TAC was slightly increased (AUC0-∞ increased by 27%, no change in Cmax ) when TAC was co-administered with FDV. In contrast, exposure to FDV co-administered with TAC was similar to FDV alone. No unexpected safety findings arose from the trial. The limitations of the study (use of single, low dose of TAC and CsA, and only healthy volunteers in the trial) are discussed.

Pharmacokinetic analysis of nevirapine extended release 400 mg once daily vs nevirapine immediate release 200 mg twice daily formulation in treatment-naïve patients with HIV-1 infection.

BACKGROUND: VERxVE data showed non-inferior virologic efficacy with extended release nevirapine (NVP-XR) dosed 400 mg once daily (QD) versus immediate release nevirapine (NVP-IR) 200 mg twice daily in a double-blind, non-inferiority study in treatment-naïve HIV-1-positive patients. OBJECTIVE: To study the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the NVP formulations and identify possible associations with demographic factors. METHODS: Patients with viral load ≥1000 copies/mL and CD4+ count > 50- <400 cells/mm3 (males) and >50- <250 cells/mm3 (females) at screening received NVP-IR 200 mg QD during a 14-day lead-in and were then stratified by baseline viral load and randomized to NVP-XR or -IR. NVP trough concentrations at steady state (SS) (Cpre,ss,N) were measured up to week 48 for all participating patients. In a PK sub-study, SS parameters - AUC0-24, Cmax, Cmin, and peak-to-trough fluctuation were obtained and analyzed with relative bioavailability assessed at week 4 by plasma collection over 24 h. RESULTS: Trough concentrations were stable from week 4 to week 48 for all patients (n = 1011) with both formulations, with NVP-XR/IR ratios of 0.77-0.82. Overall, 49 patients completed the PK sub-study: 24 XR and 25 IR. NVP-XR showed less peak-to-trough fluctuation (34.5%) than IR (55.2%), and lower AUC0-24, Cmin, Cmax, and trough concentrations than IR. However, no effect of SS trough concentrations was found on the virologic response proportion at least up to 1000 ng/mL. No significant association was found between NVP PK and gender, race, and viral load. CONCLUSION: These data suggest NVP-XR achieves lower but effective NVP exposure compared with NVP-IR.

Contribution of Major Metabolites toward Complex Drug-Drug Interactions of Deleobuvir: In Vitro Predictions and In Vivo Outcomes.

The drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential of deleobuvir, an hepatitis C virus (HCV) polymerase inhibitor, and its two major metabolites, CD 6168 (formed via reduction by gut bacteria) and deleobuvir-acyl glucuronide (AG), was assessed in vitro. Area-under-the-curve (AUC) ratios (AUCi/AUC) were predicted using a static model and compared with actual AUC ratios for probe substrates in a P450 cocktail of caffeine (CYP1A2), tolbutamide (CYP2C9), and midazolam (CYP3A4), administered before and after 8 days of deleobuvir administration to HCV-infected patients. In vitro studies assessed inhibition, inactivation and induction of P450s. Induction was assessed in a short-incubation (10 hours) hepatocyte assay, validated using positive controls, to circumvent cytotoxicity seen with deleobuvir and its metabolites. Overall, P450 isoforms were differentially affected by deleobuvir and its two metabolites. Of note was more potent CYP2C8 inactivation by deleobuvir-AG than deleobuvir and P450 induction by CD 6168 but not by deleobuvir. The predicted net AUC ratios for probe substrates were 2.92 (CYP1A2), 0.45 (CYP2C9), and 0.97 (CYP3A4) compared with clinically observed ratios of 1.64 (CYP1A2), 0.86 (CYP2C9), and 1.23 (CYP3A4). Predictions of DDI using deleobuvir alone would have significantly over-predicted the DDI potential for CYP3A4 inhibition (AUC ratio of 6.15). Including metabolite data brought the predicted net effect close to the observed DDI. However, the static model over-predicted the induction of CYP2C9 and inhibition/inactivation of CYP1A2. This multiple-perpetrator DDI scenario highlights the application of the static model for predicting complex DDI for CYP3A4 and exemplifies the importance of including key metabolites in an overall DDI assessment.

Nevirapine extended-release formulation tablets in HIV-1-infected children--long-term follow-up.

In the optional extension of clinical trial 1100.1518 39/40, human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients (aged 3 to <18 years) received ≥48 weeks of treatment with extended-release nevirapine. By last visit, all patients had undetectable viral loads and no new safety signals, demonstrating the safety and efficacy of a once-daily antiretroviral regimen.

Interactions of the hepatitis C virus protease inhibitor faldaprevir with cytochrome P450 enzymes: in vitro and in vivo correlation.

The potential inhibition of the major human cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes by faldaprevir was evaluated both in vitro and in clinical studies (healthy volunteers and hepatitis C virus [HCV] genotype 1-infected patients). In vitro studies indicated that faldaprevir inhibited CYP2B6, CYP2C9, and CYP3A, and was a weak-to-moderate inactivator of CYP3A4. Faldaprevir 240 mg twice daily in healthy volunteers demonstrated moderate inhibition of hepatic and intestinal CYP3A (oral midazolam: 2.96-fold increase in AUC(0-24 h)), weak inhibition of hepatic CYP3A (intravenous midazolam: 1.56-fold increase in AUC(0-24 h)), weak inhibition of CYP2C9 ([S]-warfarin: 1.29-fold increase in AUC(0-120 h)), and had no relevant effects on CYP1A2, CYP2B6, or CYP2D6. Faldaprevir 120 mg once daily in HCV-infected patients demonstrated weak inhibition of hepatic and intestinal CYP3A (oral midazolam: 1.52-fold increase in AUC(0-∞)), and had no relevant effects on CYP2C9 or CYP1A2. In vitro drug-drug interaction predictions based on inhibitor concentration ([I])/inhibition constant (Ki) ratios tended to overestimate clinical effects and a net-effect model provided a more accurate approach. These studies suggest that faldaprevir shows a dose-dependent inhibition of CYP3A and CYP2C9, and does not induce CYP isoforms.

Mass balance, metabolite profile, and in vitro-in vivo comparison of clearance pathways of deleobuvir, a hepatitis C virus polymerase inhibitor.

The pharmacokinetics, mass balance, and metabolism of deleobuvir, a hepatitis C virus (HCV) polymerase inhibitor, were assessed in healthy subjects following a single oral dose of 800 mg of [(14)C]deleobuvir (100 µCi). The overall recovery of radioactivity was 95.2%, with 95.1% recovered from feces. Deleobuvir had moderate to high clearance, and the half-life of deleobuvir and radioactivity in plasma were ∼ 3 h, indicating that there were no metabolites with half-lives significantly longer than that of the parent. The most frequently reported adverse events (in 6 of 12 subjects) were gastrointestinal disorders. Two major metabolites of deleobuvir were identified in plasma: an acyl glucuronide and an alkene reduction metabolite formed in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract by gut bacteria (CD 6168), representing ∼ 20% and 15% of the total drug-related material, respectively. Deleobuvir and CD 6168 were the main components in the fecal samples, each representing ∼ 30 to 35% of the dose. The majority of the remaining radioactivity found in the fecal samples (∼ 21% of the dose) was accounted for by three metabolites in which deleobuvir underwent both alkene reduction and monohydroxylation. In fresh human hepatocytes that form biliary canaliculi in sandwich cultures, the biliary excretion for these excretory metabolites was markedly higher than that for deleobuvir and CD 6168, implying that rapid biliary elimination upon hepatic formation may underlie the absence of these metabolites in circulation. The low in vitro clearance was not predictive of the observed in vivo clearance, likely because major deleobuvir biotransformation occurred by non-CYP450-mediated enzymes that are not well represented in hepatocyte-based in vitro models.

Effect of the hepatitis C virus protease inhibitor faldaprevir on the pharmacokinetics of an oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel in healthy female volunteers.

Faldaprevir is a potent hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4A protease inhibitor. Faldaprevir is known to inhibit P-glycoprotein, CYP3A4, and UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1. This study evaluated the effect of steady-state 240 mg faldaprevir on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of an oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol (EE) and levonorgestrel (LNG) in healthy premenopausal women. In period 1, subjects received EE/LNG once daily (QD) for 14 days. Blood samples were taken on days 1, 11, and 12, with intensive PK blood sampling for EE and LNG on day 13. In period 2, subjects received EE-LNG QD and 240 mg faldaprevir QD on days 14 to 21 (240 mg faldaprevir twice daily on day 14). Blood samples were taken on days 14, 19, and 20, with PK profiling samples obtained for EE and LNG on day 21. A total of 15/16 subjects completed the study. Overall, EE and LNG exposure (assessed by the area under the curve) was approximately 1.4-fold higher when EE and LNG were coadministered with faldaprevir than when administered alone. Median t1/2 (terminal half-life in plasma at steady state) values were prolonged for both EE (2.4 h longer) and LNG (4.7 h longer) when EE and LNG were coadministered with faldaprevir. The mean oral clearance and apparent volume of distribution of both EE and LNG were lower (∼ 30%) when EE and LNG were coadministered with faldaprevir. Coadministration of faldaprevir and an oral contraceptive resulted in a moderate increase in exposure to both EE and LNG. However, this increase was not considered clinically meaningful, and no dose adjustment of oral contraceptives was deemed necessary. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration number NCT01570244.).

Efficacy and safety of faldaprevir, deleobuvir, and ribavirin in treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection and advanced liver fibrosis or cirrhosis.

Patients with advanced hepatic fibrosis or cirrhosis with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection represent an unmet need. The HCV NS3/4A inhibitor, faldaprevir, was evaluated in combination with the nonnucleoside NS5B inhibitor, deleobuvir, with or without ribavirin in treatment-naive patients with HCV genotype 1 infection in the SOUND-C2 study. Here, the efficacy and safety of this interferon-free regimen in a subset of patients with advanced liver fibrosis, including those with compensated cirrhosis, were assessed. Patients (n=362) were randomized to once-daily faldaprevir with either twice-daily (BID) or three-times-daily (TID) deleobuvir for 16 (TID16W), 28 (TID28W and BID28W), or 40 (TID40W) weeks with or without ribavirin (TID28W-NR). Patients were classified according to fibrosis stage (F0 to F2 versus F3 to F4) and the presence of cirrhosis (yes/no). In total, 85 (24%) patients had advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis (F3 to F4) and 33 (9%) had cirrhosis. Within each treatment arm, differences in rates of sustained virologic response 12 weeks after completion of treatment (SVR12) between patients with mild to moderate fibrosis (F0 to F2) versus F3 to F4 did not show a consistent pattern and were not statistically significant (63% versus 47% for TID16W, 53% versus 76% for TID28W, 48% versus 67% for TID40W, 70% versus 67% for BID28W, and 40% versus 36% for TID28W-NR, respectively; P > 0.05 for each arm). The most frequent adverse events in patients with/without cirrhosis were gastrointestinal and skin events, which were mostly mild or moderate in intensity. The degree of liver fibrosis did not appear to affect the probability of achieving SVR12 following treatment with the interferon-free regimen of faldaprevir, deleobuvir, and ribavirin. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01132313.).

Clinical assessment of potential drug interactions of faldaprevir, a hepatitis C virus protease inhibitor, with darunavir/ritonavir, efavirenz, and tenofovir.

BACKGROUND: Faldaprevir is a potent, once-daily hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4A protease inhibitor. Studies were performed to investigate potential drug interactions between faldaprevir and the commonly used antiretrovirals darunavir/ritonavir, efavirenz, and tenofovir to guide the coadministration of faldaprevir with these agents in human immunodeficiency virus/HCV-coinfected patients. METHODS: In 3 open-label, phase 1 pharmacokinetic (PK) studies, healthy adult volunteers received (1) darunavir/ritonavir (800 mg/100 mg once daily) with and without faldaprevir (240 mg once daily); (2) faldaprevir (240 mg twice daily) with and without efavirenz (600 mg once daily); or (3) faldaprevir (240 mg twice daily) or tenofovir (300 mg once daily) alone and in combination. To assess potential drug interactions, geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals for PK parameters were calculated. Safety was evaluated. RESULTS: Efavirenz decreased faldaprevir area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) by 35%, Cmax by 28%, and Cmin by 46%, consistent with induction of CYP3A by efavirenz. Tenofovir decreased faldaprevir AUC by 22%, which was not considered to be clinically relevant. Faldaprevir had no clinically relevant effects on darunavir or tenofovir PK (15% and 22% AUC increase, respectively). Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profiles of faldaprevir and the antiretrovirals being examined. CONCLUSIONS: No clinically significant interactions were observed between faldaprevir and darunavir/ritonavir or tenofovir. A potentially clinically relevant decrease in faldaprevir exposure was observed when coadministered with efavirenz; this decrease can be managed using the higher of the 2 faldaprevir doses tested in phase 3 trials (240 mg once daily as opposed to 120 mg once daily).

Steady-state pharmacokinetics of nevirapine extended-release tablets in HIV-1-infected children and adolescents: an open-label, multiple-dose, cross-over study.

BACKGROUND: To compare steady-state (ss) pharmacokinetic targets of nevirapine extended-release (NVP-XR) tablets once-daily (QD) with immediate-release (NVP-IR) tablet or oral suspension twice-daily in HIV-1-infected children and adolescents. METHODS: Phase I, open-label, multidose, cross-over study with optional extension phase, in 85 patients 3 to <18 years of age, previously on an NVP-IR-based regimen for ≥18 weeks with baseline viral load <50 copies/mL. Patients were stratified by age, treated with NVP-IR twice-daily for 11 days, then NVP-XR QD for 10 days. Cpre,ss (steady-state, predose concentrations) was obtained from all, and 12-hour NVP-IR and 24-hour NVP-XR steady-state pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained in the pharmacokinetic substudy. Viral loads, CD4 counts and adverse events (AEs) were monitored. RESULTS: Eighty patients completed the trial. Adjusted geometric mean (gMean) Cpre,ss for NVP-XR and NVP-IR exceeded the target of 3000 ng/mL, and the adjusted gMean NVP-XR:NVP-IR ratio (90% confidence interval) for QD normalized and un-normalized Cpre,ss were 91.2% (83.5-99.6%) and 91.8% (83.7-100.7%). gMean 24-hour area under the curve at steady-state NVP-XR:NVP-IR for un-normalized dose was 90.4% and un-normalized Cpre,ss NVP-XR:NVP-IR were 91.0%, 81.9% and 103.7% for the 3 age groups, 3 to <6, 6 to <12 and 12 to <18 years, respectively. gMean values indicated no exposure to subtherapeutic NVP concentrations and viral suppression was adequate and maintained in all QD groups. Most AEs were mild and similar between age groups. No serious or Division of AIDS Grade 4 AEs or AE related treatment discontinuations occurred. CONCLUSIONS: NVP-XR exhibited adequate trough concentrations with equivalent area under the curve at steady-state relative to NVP-IR. NVP-XR was well-tolerated and is a valuable treatment option for HIV-infected children and adolescents.

Effects of tipranavir, darunavir, and ritonavir on platelet function, coagulation, and fibrinolysis in healthy volunteers.

The use of HIV protease inhibitors (PIs) as part of antiretroviral therapy in the treatment of HIV-1 infection may be associated with an increased risk of bleeding. This prospective, randomized, open-label trial in healthy volunteers compared the effects of tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r), darunavir/ ritonavir (DRV/r), and ritonavir (RTV) alone on platelet aggregation after a single dose and at steady-state concentrations. Subjects were selected on the basis of normal platelet aggregation and arachidonic acid (AA)-induced platelet aggregation inhibition after administration of a single 325-mg dose of aspirin. All 3 PI therapies were administered twice daily for 10 days. In some but not all subjects, TPV/r inhibited AA-induced platelet aggregation and prolonged PFA-100® closure time with collagen-epinephrine cartridge, which was of lesser magnitude and consistency compared with aspirin, but greater when compared to DRV/r and RTV. At least 2 subjects in each treatment arm showed complete inhibition of AA-induced platelet aggregation on treatment, and the magnitude of change in all platelet-function tests did not correlate with PI plasma concentrations. Effects of TPV/r on platelet aggregation were reversed 24 hours after the last TPV/r dose. None of the PI treatments tested were associated with increases in bleeding time, decreases in plasma coagulation factors, or increase in fibrinolysis. There was large inter-patient variability in antiplatelet effect for all PI treatments, ranging from no effect to complete inhibition of AA-induced platelet aggregation.

Lack of a pharmacokinetic interaction between steady-state tipranavir/ritonavir and single-dose valacyclovir in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the single-dose pharmacokinetics of the herpes antiviral acyclovir (administered as the pro-drug valacyclovir) alone and in combination with twice-daily 200 mg ritonavir-boosted tipranavir (500 mg) at steady state. METHODS: The study was an open label, one-sequence cross-over pharmacokinetic study in HIV-negative adults. Plasma drug concentrations were measured by validated LC/MS/MS assays; pharmacokinetics (AUC, C(max)) were determined using noncompartmental methods. The geometric mean ratio and 90% confidence interval [GMR, 90% CI] were used to evaluate the drug interaction. RESULTS: Twenty-six of 29 subjects completed the trial. With steady-state tipranavir/ritonavir, acyclovir C(max) decreased 4.9% [0.95, 0.88-1.02] and AUC increased 6.6% [1.07, 1.04-1.09]. The majority of subjects experienced at least one adverse event, most of which were mild gastrointestinal disorders. Three subjects discontinued tipranavir/ritonavir treatment as a result of drug-related increases in ALT/AST, including one subject who experienced mild upper abdominal pain. All subjects recovered without sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: When administered as a single dose of valacyclovir with steady-state tipranavir/ritonavir, there were no clinically important changes in acyclovir pharmacokinetics. This result indicates that valacyclovir can be co-administered safely with no dose adjustments.

Pharmacokinetic characterization of three doses of tipranavir boosted with ritonavir on highly active antiretroviral therapy in treatment-experienced HIV-1 patients.

PURPOSE: This study characterized the pharmacokinetic effects, safety, and antiretroviral activity of three different doses of the nonpeptidic protease inhibitor tipranavir, in combination with ritonavir administered twice daily for 28 days, on a number of triple-combination regimens containing a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (efavirenz or nevirapine) plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (abacavir, didanosine, lamivudine, stavudine, and zidovudine) or a three nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor combination (zidovudine, lamivudine, and abacavir). METHODS: The study enrolled 208 HIV-1-positive patients who had been on stable antiretroviral treatment for at least 12 weeks prior to study entry and had an HIV-1 RNA load of delta 20,000 copies/mL. The patients were randomized to receive one of three dose combinations of tipranavir and ritonavir (1250/100 mg, 750/100 mg, and 250/200 mg) in addition to their antiretroviral (ARV) regimen for the next 22 days. The effects of twice-daily tipranavir and ritonavir combinations on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of the antiretrovirals were assessed by comparing pharmacokinetic parameters at baseline and after 3 weeks of coadministration. RESULTS: No clinically relevant changes were observed in the Cmin, Cmax, or AUC parameters for nevirapine, efavirenz, lamivudine, stavudine, or didanosine, when coadministered with tipranavir and ritonavir at the dose combinations studied. All three dose combinations of tipranavir and ritonavir decreased the systemic exposure of abacavir (by 35% to 44%) and zidovudine (by 31% to 42%). Consistent with previous tipranavir studies, gastrointestinal adverse events were those most frequently observed. These reactions tended to be mild, with the majority being of Grade 1, and only 8 being of Grade 3 or 4 in intensity. Virologic response improved from 40.4% of participants at baseline with <50 copies/mL to 67.6% at Day 28 of study following addition of tipranavir and ritonavir. CONCLUSIONS: Tipranavir coadministered with ritonavir has been demonstrated to be safe, effective, and pose little potential for clinically meaningful drug interactions when added to the highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens containing nevirapine, efavirenz, lamivudine, stavudine, or didanosine.

Pharmacokinetic interactions between buprenorphine/naloxone and tipranavir/ritonavir in HIV-negative subjects chronically receiving buprenorphine/naloxone.

HIV-infected patients with opioid dependence often require opioid replacement therapy. Pharmacokinetic interactions between HIV therapy and opioid dependence treatment medications can occur. HIV-seronegative subjects stabilized on at least 3 weeks of buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP/NLX) therapy sequentially underwent baseline and steady-state pharmacokinetic evaluation of open-label, twice daily tipranavir 500 mg co-administered with ritonavir 200 mg (TPV/r). Twelve subjects were enrolled and 10 completed the study. Prior to starting TPV/r, the geometric mean BUP AUC(0-24h) and C(max) were 43.9 ng h/mL and 5.61 ng/mL, respectively. After achieving steady-state with TPV/r (> or = 7 days), these values were similar at 43.7 ng h/mL and 4.84 ng/mL, respectively. Similar analyses for norBUP, the primary metabolite of BUP, demonstrated a reduction in geometric mean for AUC(0-24h) [68.7-14.7 ng h/mL; ratio=0.21 (90% CI 0.19-0.25)] and C(max) [4.75-0.94 ng/mL; ratio=0.20 (90% CI 0.17-0.23)]. The last measurable NLX concentration (C(last)) in the concentration-time profile, never measured in previous BUP/NLX interaction studies with antiretroviral medications, was decreased by 20%. Despite these pharmacokinetic effects on BUP metabolites and NLX, no clinical opioid withdrawal symptoms were noted. TPV steady-state AUC(0-12h) and C(max) decreased 19% and 25%, respectively, and C(min) was relatively unchanged when compared to historical control subjects receiving TPV/r alone. No dosage modification of BUP/NLX is required when co-administered with TPV/r. Though mechanistically unclear, it is likely that decreased plasma RTV levels while on BUP/NLX contributed substantially to the decrease in TPV levels. BUP/NLX and TPV/r should therefore be used cautiously to avoid decreased efficacy of TPV in patients taking these agents concomitantly.

Interaction studies of tipranavir-ritonavir with clarithromycin, fluconazole, and rifabutin in healthy volunteers.

Three separate controlled, two-period studies with healthy volunteers assessed the pharmacokinetic interactions between tipranavir-ritonavir (TPV/r) in a 500/200-mg dose and 500 mg of clarithromycin (CLR), 100 mg of fluconazole (FCZ), or 150 mg of rifabutin (RFB). The CLR study was conducted with 24 subjects. The geometric mean ratios (GMR) and 90% confidence intervals (90% CI; given in parentheses) of the areas under the concentration-time curve (AUC), the maximum concentrations of the drugs in serum (C(max)), and the concentrations in serum at 12 h postdose (Cp12h) for multiple-dose TPV/r and multiple-dose CLR, indicating the effect of TPV/r on the CLR parameters, were 1.19 (1.04-1.37), 0.95 (0.83-1.09), and 1.68 (1.42-1.98), respectively. The formation of the metabolite 14-OH-CLR was decreased by 95% in the presence of TPV, and the TPV AUC increased 66% compared to that for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-negative historical controls. The FCZ study was conducted with 20 subjects. The GMR (and 90% CI) of the AUC, C(max), and Cp24h, indicating the effect of multiple-dose TPV/r on the multiple-dose FCZ parameters, were 0.92 (0.88-0.95), 0.94 (0.91-0.98), and 0.89 (0.85-0.92), respectively. The TPV AUC increased by 50% compared to that for HIV-negative historical controls. The RFB study was conducted with 24 subjects. The GMR (and 90% CI) of the AUC, C(max), and Cp12h for multiple-dose TPV/r and single-dose RFB, indicating the effect of TPV/r on the RFB parameters, were 2.90 (2.59-3.26), 1.70 (1.49-1.94), and 2.14 (1.90-2.41), respectively. The GMR (and 90% CI) of the AUC, C(max), and Cp12h of TPV/r and RFB with 25-O-desacetyl-RFB were 4.33 (3.86-4.86), 1.86 (1.63-2.12), and 2.76 (2.44-3.12), respectively. Coadministration of TPV with a single dose of RFB resulted in a 16% increase in the TPV Cp12h compared to that for TPV alone. In the general population, no dose adjustments are necessary for the combination of TPV/r and CLR or FCZ. Combining TPV/r with RFB should be done with caution, while toxicity and RFB drug levels should be monitored. Study medications were generally well-tolerated in these studies.

Combined tipranavir and enfuvirtide use associated with higher plasma tipranavir concentrations but not with increased hepatotoxicity: sub-analysis from RESIST.

In RESIST, enfuvirtide co-administered with ritonavir-boosted tipranavir was associated with higher plasma tipranavir concentrations, which seldom rose above those associated with an increased risk of grade 3/4 transaminase elevations. Transaminase elevation rates (6.5%) and clinical hepatic event rates (5.9 events/100 person exposure years) were lower in the tipranavir/ritonavir with enfuvirtide group than in the tipranavir/ritonavir without enfuvirtide group. Observed increases in plasma tipranavir concentrations thus had no apparent effect on the risk of hepatotoxicity.

Steady-state disposition of the nonpeptidic protease inhibitor tipranavir when coadministered with ritonavir.

The pharmacokinetic and metabolite profiles of the antiretroviral agent tipranavir (TPV), administered with ritonavir (RTV), in nine healthy male volunteers were characterized. Subjects received 500-mg TPV capsules with 200-mg RTV capsules twice daily for 6 days. They then received a single oral dose of 551 mg of TPV containing 90 microCi of [(14)C]TPV with 200 mg of RTV on day 7, followed by twice-daily doses of unlabeled 500-mg TPV with 200 mg of RTV for up to 20 days. Blood, urine, and feces were collected for mass balance and metabolite profiling. Metabolite profiling and identification was performed using a flow scintillation analyzer in conjunction with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The median recovery of radioactivity was 87.1%, with 82.3% of the total recovered radioactivity excreted in the feces and less than 5% recovered from urine. Most radioactivity was excreted within 24 to 96 h after the dose of [(14)C]TPV. Radioactivity in blood was associated primarily with plasma rather than red blood cells. Unchanged TPV accounted for 98.4 to 99.7% of plasma radioactivity. Similarly, the most common form of radioactivity excreted in feces was unchanged TPV, accounting for a mean of 79.9% of fecal radioactivity. The most abundant metabolite in feces was a hydroxyl metabolite, H-1, which accounted for 4.9% of fecal radioactivity. TPV glucuronide metabolite H-3 was the most abundant of the drug-related components in urine, corresponding to 11% of urine radioactivity. In conclusion, after the coadministration of TPV and RTV, unchanged TPV represented the primary form of circulating and excreted TPV and the primary extraction route was via the feces.

Interaction of ritonavir-boosted tipranavir with loperamide does not result in loperamide-associated neurologic side effects in healthy volunteers.

Loperamide (LOP) is a peripherally acting opioid receptor agonist used for the management of chronic diarrhea through the reduction of gut motility. The lack of central opioid effects is partly due to the efflux activity of the multidrug resistance transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) at the blood-brain barrier. The protease inhibitors are substrates for P-gp and have the potential to cause increased LOP levels in the brain. Because protease inhibitors, including tipranavir (TPV), are often associated with diarrhea, they are commonly used in combination with LOP. The level of respiratory depression, the level of pupil constriction, the pharmacokinetics, and the safety of LOP alone compared with those of LOP-ritonavir (RTV), LOP-TPV, and LOP-TPV-RTV were evaluated in a randomized, open-label, parallel-group study with 24 healthy human immunodeficiency virus type 1-negative adults. Respiratory depression was assessed by determination of the ventilatory response to carbon dioxide. Tipranavir-containing regimens (LOP-TPV and LOP-TPV-RTV) caused decreases in the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity for LOP (51% and 63% decreases, respectively) and its metabolite (72% and 77% decreases, respectively), whereas RTV caused increases in the levels of exposure of LOP (121% increase) and its metabolite (44% increase). In vitro and in vivo data suggest that TPV is a substrate for and an inducer of P-gp activity. The respiratory response to LOP in combination with TPV and/or RTV was not different from that to LOP alone. There was no evidence that LOP had opioid effects in the central nervous system, as measured indirectly by CO2 response curves and pupillary response in the presence of TPV and/or RTV.

Pharmacokinetic characterization of different dose combinations of coadministered tipranavir and ritonavir in healthy volunteers.

PURPOSE: To characterize the steady-state pharmacokinetic combination of the nonpeptidic protease inhibitor tipranavir (TPV) with ritonavir (RTV) in 95 healthy adult volunteers, a phase 1, single-center, open-label, randomized, parallel-group trial was conducted. METHOD: Participants received 250-mg self-emulsifying drug delivery system (SEDDS) capsules of TPV at doses between 250 mg and 1250 mg twice daily for 11 days, then received one or two RTV 100-mg SEDDS capsules, in addition to the TPV capsules, for the next 21 days. RESULTS: Coadministration of TPV and RTV (TPV/r) resulted in a greater than 20-fold increase in steady-state TPV trough concentrations (Cssmin) as compared with TPV at steady state alone. Mean TPV Cssmin was above a preliminary target threshold of 20 microM with all but one of the RTV-boosted doses; without boosting, none of the TPV-alone doses exceeded the threshold. The average steady-state Cssmin for TPV 500 mg and 750 mg with RTV 100 mg or 200 mg were 20 to 57 times the protein-adjusted TPV IC90R49\CCR418569) for protease inhibitor-resistant HIV-1. An erythromycin breath test, a surrogate marker for cytochrome P450 isoenzyme 3A4 activity, indicated that all TPV/r combinations given provided net inhibition of this isoenzyme. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were mild gastrointestinal symptoms. CONCLUSION: This phase 1 study demonstrated that RTV-boosted TPV achieves concentrations that are expected to be effective in treating drug-experienced patients.