Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents ; 29(4 Suppl): 73-8, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26652492

RESUMO

Bone metastases from carcinomas are epidemiologically rising because of the increased survival rate of oncologic patients, related to several factors such as improvement of primary and secondary screening, advancement of medical research and technology and the better understanding of mechanisms underlying bone metastases origination from primary tumor. Skeletal Related Events (SREs) can seriously affect quality of life in patients with metastatic disease. These events include the necessity of radiotherapy or bone surgery, malignant hypercalcemia, pathologic fractures and spinal cord compression. Among the SREs, pathologic fractures are the most disabling events and represent an emergency in these delicate patients. A pathologic fracture is defined as a fracture that occurs at the level of a pre-existing bone lesion (that is often a tumor), spontaneously or as the result of low-energy trauma (1). The pre-existence of the metastatic lesion in the bone, its evaluation and the assessment of progression can make these complications predictable and preventable. Pathologic fractures imply several severe consequences, including patient immobilization (in the case of fractures involving the lower limbs), loss of autonomy, anaemia, need of blood transfusion, discontinuation of medical therapies or radiotherapy and protracted hospitalization. Secondary effects of prolonged immobilization and loss of autonomy further lengthen this list of complications in patients who are already significantly limited in their activities. In the present paper, the authors present a review on the main aspects involved in bone metastastic disease: biology, quality of life, economic impact and survival.

2.
Musculoskelet Surg ; 97 Suppl 1: 69-72, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23588834

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The aim of our study was to establish if aging influences rotator cuff tear size. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 586 consecutive patients (280 M, 306 F) mean age 59 years old (range 46-73) who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Tear size was determined during surgery. For the purpose of our study, patients were divided into two groups based on age older than 60 years. A multinomial logistic regression model was applied to explore the association between age older than 60 years and tear size. We used the ANCOVA method to determine whether the aging influences the severity of the tear. All analyses were adjusted for gender. RESULTS: Age older than 60 years was associated with a twofold higher overall risk of tear occurrence (OR = 2.12, 95 % CI 1.44-3.01). While no association was detected between age older than 60 years and the probability of a small tear (OR = 0.58, 95 % CI 0.27-1.07), subjects older than 60 years were twice more likely to experience a large tear (OR = 2.29, 95 %CI 1.51-3.27) and three times more likely to experience a massive tear (OR = 3.09, 95 % CI 2.07-5.38) as opposed to younger subjects. Mean age significantly increased from small tear (53.8 years) to large tear (66.8 years) to massive tear (69.4 years) patients (ANCOVA: F(2, 437) = 16.487, p = 1.51 × 10(-7)). DISCUSSION: We found a significantly older mean age in patients with a more severe tear. Our data provide and confirm evidence that aging is a significant risk factor for the occurrence and severity of rotator cuff tears.


Assuntos
Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Lesões do Manguito Rotador , Manguito Rotador/patologia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ruptura/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...