Subgrouping of facilitatory or inhibitory conditioned pain modulation responses in patients with chronic knee pain. Explorative analysis from a multicentre trial.

BACKGROUND: Facilitatory and inhibitory conditioned pain modulation (CPM) responses are observed in healthy volunteers and chronic pain patients, but the clinical implications for phenotyping are unknown. This study aimed to subgroup and compare chronic knee pain patients according to their CPM responses. METHODS: This explorative, cross-sectional study included 127 patients with chronic knee pain (osteoarthritis or following total knee arthroplasty). Individual CPM responses were categorized as facilitatory (test stimuli pain intensity increased when conditioning stimuli were applied), as inhibitory (test stimuli pain intensity decreased) or as no change (defined as less than 5.3% change in pain intensity). Outcomes were clinical pain intensities, temporal summation, widespread pain, self-reported physical function, PainDETECT questionnaire and Pain Quality Assessment Scale. Data were analysed as comparisons between the inhibitory and the facilitatory groups and using multivariate linear regression models. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients had facilitatory CPM responses, 49 had inhibitory CPM responses, and 24 showed no change in CPM response. A between-group difference was observed for self-reported physical function, with the facilitatory CPM group reporting better function (54.4 vs. 46.0, p = 0.028) and the facilitatory CPM group reported more deep pain sensations (3.2 vs. 2.0, p = 0.021). The remaining outcomes showed no between-group differences. Higher clinical pain intensity and facilitated temporal summation were associated in the facilitated CPM group but not in the inhibitory CPM group. CONCLUSION: These explorative findings indicated that quantitative clinical and experimental differences exist between facilitatory or inhibitory CPM responses in a chronic knee pain patient population. Differences in patients' CPM responses should be further investigated to unravel possible clinical importance. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings confirm that conditioned pain modulation consist of inhibitory and facilitatory responders among a patient population with chronic knee pain. This explorative study indicates that patients with either facilitatory or inhibitory conditioned pain modulation could exhibit differences in pain outcomes. Subgrouping of chronic pain patients depending on individual conditioned pain modulation responses could be considered in phenotyping patients prior to inclusion in clinical trials or used for personalizing the management regime.

[Treatment of polyneuropathy: autonomic symptoms and pain]. / Therapie der Polyneuropathie ­ autonome Symptome und Schmerzen.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of polyneuropathy includes symptomatic therapy of sensory, motor and autonomic dysfunctions. AIM: This article provides an overview of the current treatment recommendations for polyneuropathy, focusing on pain. METHODS: Current treatment guidelines will be discussed based on a literature research. RESULTS: Calcium-channel anticonvulsants gabapentin/pregabalin as well as antidepressants duloxetine and amitriptyline are recommended as first line therapeutics. Alternatively, topical therapeutics can be used in the case of localized disorders. In individual cases, opioids or other antidepressants/anticonvulsants may be effective. Pharmacological treatment is often limited due to adverse events, which affect the central nervous system in particular. DISCUSSION: In general, treatment for polyneuropathy should follow a multimodal concept and include the treatment of other symptoms. When choosing pain medication, comorbidities, patient's age and adverse events need to be taken into consideration. Phenotype-based stratification may support specialized pain therapy and achieve the best medical treatment.