Rufinamide for generalized seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Lennox-Gastaut syndrome is a catastrophic pediatric epilepsy syndrome characterized by multiple types of treatment-resistant seizures and high rates of seizure-related injury. Current available treatments are inadequate, leaving patients with few treatment options and opportunities. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of the antiepileptic drug rufinamide in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Eligible patients between 4 and 30 years of age had multiple types of seizures (including tonic-atonic and atypical absence seizures) with a minimum of 90 seizures in the month before baseline and a recent history of a slow spike-and-wave pattern on EEG. RESULTS: After a 28-day baseline period, 139 eligible patients were randomized; 138 patients received either rufinamide (n = 74) or placebo (n = 64) in addition to their other antiepileptic drugs. The median percentage reduction in total seizure frequency was greater in the rufinamide therapy group than in the placebo group (32.7% vs 11.7%, p = 0.0015). There was a difference (p < 0.0001) in tonic-atonic ("drop attack") seizure frequency with rufinamide (42.5% median percentage reduction) vs placebo (1.4% increase). The rufinamide group had a greater improvement in seizure severity (p = 0.0041) and a higher 50% responder rate compared with placebo for total seizures (p = 0.0045) and tonic-atonic seizures (p = 0.002). The common adverse events (reported by >or=10% of patients receiving rufinamide) were somnolence (24.3% with rufinamide vs 12.5% with placebo) and vomiting (21.6% vs 6.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Rufinamide was an effective and well-tolerated treatment for seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.

Randomized, multicenter, dose-ranging trial of retigabine for partial-onset seizures.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of retigabine 600, 900, and 1,200 mg/day administered three times daily as adjunctive therapy in patients with partial-onset seizures. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed. After an 8-week baseline phase, patients were randomized to a 16-week double-blind treatment period (8-week forced titration and 8-week maintenance) followed by either tapering or entry into an open-label extension study. Primary efficacy was the percentage change from baseline in monthly seizure frequency and compared across treatment arms. Secondary efficacy comparisons included the proportion of patients experiencing >/=50% reduction in seizure frequency (responder rate), emergence of new seizure types, and physician assessment of global clinical improvement. Safety/tolerability assessments included adverse events (AEs), physical and neurologic examinations, and clinical laboratory evaluations. Efficacy analyses were performed on the intent-to-treat population. RESULTS: Of the 399 randomized patients, 279 (69.9%) completed the double-blind treatment period. The median percent change in monthly total partial seizure frequency from baseline was -23% for 600 mg/day, -29% for 900 mg/day, and -35% for 1,200 mg/day vs -13% for placebo (p < 0.001 for overall difference across all treatment arms). Responder rates for retigabine were 23% for 600 mg/day, 32% for 900 mg/day (p = 0.021), and 33% for 1,200 mg/day (p = 0.016), vs 16% for placebo. The most common treatment-emergent AEs were somnolence, dizziness, confusion, speech disorder, vertigo, tremor, amnesia, abnormal thinking, abnormal gait, paresthesia, and diplopia. CONCLUSION: Adjunctive therapy with retigabine is well tolerated and reduces the frequency of partial-onset seizures in a dose-dependent manner.

Efficacy and tolerability of the new antiepileptic drugs I: treatment of new onset epilepsy: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee and Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the evidence demonstrating efficacy, tolerability, and safety of seven new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) (gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, tiagabine, oxcarbazepine, levetiracetam, and zonisamide-reviewed in the order in which these agents received approval by the US Food and Drug Administration) in the treatment of children and adults with newly diagnosed partial and generalized epilepsies. METHODS: A 23-member committee, including general neurologists, pediatric neurologists, epileptologists, and doctors in pharmacy, evaluated the available evidence based on a structured literature review including MEDLINE, Current Contents, and Cochrane library for relevant articles from 1987 until September 2002, with selected manual searches up until 2003. RESULTS: There is evidence either from comparative or dose-controlled trials that gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, and oxcarbazepine have efficacy as monotherapy in newly diagnosed adolescents and adults with either partial or mixed seizure disorders. There is also evidence that lamotrigine is effective for newly diagnosed absence seizures in children. Evidence for effectiveness of the new AEDs in newly diagnosed patients with other generalized epilepsy syndromes is lacking. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this evidence-based assessment provide guidelines for the prescription of AEDs for patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy and identify those seizure types and syndromes where more evidence is necessary.

Efficacy and tolerability of the new antiepileptic drugs II: treatment of refractory epilepsy: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee and Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the evidence demonstrating efficacy, tolerability, and safety of seven new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) (gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, tiagabine, oxcarbazepine, levetiracetam, and zonisamide) in the treatment of children and adults with refractory partial and generalized epilepsies. METHODS: A 23-member committee including general neurologists, pediatric neurologists, epileptologists, and doctors in pharmacy evaluated the available evidence based on a structured literature review including MEDLINE, Current Contents, and Cochrane library for relevant articles from 1987 until March 2003. RESULTS: All of the new AEDs were found to be appropriate for adjunctive treatment of refractory partial seizures in adults. Gabapentin can be effective for the treatment of mixed seizure disorders, and gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, and topiramate for the treatment of refractory partial seizures in children. Limited evidence suggests that lamotrigine and topiramate are also effective for adjunctive treatment of idiopathic generalized epilepsy in adults and children, as well as treatment of the Lennox Gastaut syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of AED depends upon seizure and/or syndrome type, patient age, concomitant medications, AED tolerability, safety, and efficacy. The results of this evidence-based assessment provide guidelines for the prescription of AEDs for patients with refractory epilepsy and identify those seizure types and syndromes where more evidence is necessary.

Topiramate and phenytoin pharmacokinetics during repetitive monotherapy and combination therapy to epileptic patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the potential pharmacokinetic interactions between topiramate (TPM) and phenytoin (PHT) in patients with epilepsy by studying their pharmacokinetics (PK) after monotherapy and concomitant TPM/PHT treatment. METHODS: Twelve patients with epilepsy stabilized on PHT monotherapy were enrolled in this study, with 10 and seven patients completing the phases with 400 and 800 mg TPM daily doses, respectively. TPM was added at escalating doses, and after stabilization at the highest tolerated TPM dose, PHT doses were tapered. Serial blood and urine samples were collected for PK analysis during the monotherapy phase or the lowest PHT dose after taper and the concomitant TPM/PHT phase. Potential metabolic interaction between PHT and TPM also was studied in vitro in human liver microsomal preparations. RESULTS: In nine of the 12 patients, PHT plasma concentrations remained stable, with a mean (+/-SD) area under the curve (AUC) ratio (combination therapy/monotherapy) of 1.13 +/- 0.17 (range, 0.89-1.23). Three patients had AUC ratios of 1.25, 1.39, and 1.55, respectively, and with the addition of TPM (800, 400, and 400 mg daily, respectively), their peak PHT plasma concentrations increased from 15 to 21 mg/L, 28 to 36 mg/L, and 27 to 41 mg/L, respectively. Human liver microsomal studies with S-mephenytoin showed that TPM partially inhibited CYP2C19 at very high concentrations of 300 microM (11% inhibition) and 900 microM (29% inhibition). Such high plasma concentrations would correspond to doses in humans that are 5 to 15 times higher than the recommended dose (200-400 mg). TPM clearance was approximately twofold higher during concomitant TPM/PHT therapy CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that the addition of TPM to PHT generally does not cause clinically significant PK interaction. PHT induces the metabolism of TPM, causing increased TPM clearance, which may require TPM dose adjustments when PHT therapy is added or is discontinued. TPM may affect PHT concentrations in a few patients because of inhibition by TPM of the CYP2C19-mediated minor metabolic pathway of PHT.

Recommendations on the clinical use of oxcarbazepine in the treatment of epilepsy: a consensus view.

Extensive clinical use and a series of clinical trials have shown that oxcarbazepine is a valuable antiepileptic drug for the treatment of adults and children with partial onset seizures both in initial monotherapy, for conversion to monotherapy and as adjunctive therapy. The clinically recommended titration scheme for all forms of therapy in adults is to start with 150 mg/day at night and to increase by 150 mg/day every second day until a target dose of 900-1200 mg/day is reached. If necessary, one can go faster and start with up to 600 mg/day and titrate with weekly increments of up to 600 mg/day. In children, treatment can be initiated with 8-10 mg/kg/day body weight in two to three divided doses. Dosage can be increased by 8-10 mg/kg/day in weekly increments if necessary for seizure control. Hyponatremia (serum sodium <125 mmol/l) can develop gradually during the first months of oxcarbazepine therapy in approximately 3% of patients with a previously normal serum sodium. However, there is no need to measure baseline serum sodium concentrations unless the patient has renal disease, is taking medication which may lower serum sodium levels (such as diuretics, oral contraceptives or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) or--in rare cases--has clinical symptoms of hyponatremia. During oxcarbazepine maintenance therapy measurement of serum sodium levels should also be considered if medications known to decrease sodium levels are added or symptoms of hyponatremia develop. Oxcarbazepine does not appear to have any clinically notable effects on other safety parameters such as renal and liver function or haematological test results. In summary, oxcarbazepine is a safe and well tolerated antiepileptic drug for partial epilepsy.

Oxcarbazepine (Trileptal) as monotherapy in patients with partial seizures.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oxcarbazepine (OXC) as monotherapy for patients with uncontrolled partial seizures. METHODS: A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, dose-controlled monotherapy trial compared OXC at 2400 mg/day with OXC at 300 mg/day in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures previously receiving carbamazepine (CBZ) monotherapy. During a 28-day open-label conversion phase, patients were tapered off CBZ and titrated to OXC 2400 mg/day. After a 56-day open-label baseline phase on OXC 2400 mg/day, patients entered a 126-day double-blind treatment phase in which they were randomized to continue OXC at 2400 mg/day or were down titrated over 6 weeks to OXC at 300 mg/day. Patients met the efficacy endpoint by completing the double-blind treatment phase or by meeting one of four predefined exit criteria. The primary efficacy variable was time to meeting one of the exit criteria. The secondary efficacy variable was the percentage of patients meeting one of the exit criteria in each of the two treatment groups. RESULTS: Of the 143 patients enrolled, 96 were randomized in the double-blind treatment phase. Time to meeting an exit criterion was significantly in favor of the OXC 2400 mg/day group (p = 0.0001). The median time to meeting an exit criterion was 68 days for the OXC 2400 mg/day Group and 28 days for the OXC 300 mg/day Group. In addition, the percentage of patients meeting one of the exit criteria was significantly lower for the OXC 2400 mg/day Group (p = 0.0001). Overall, OXC was well tolerated with the most common adverse events consisting of fatigue, nausea, ataxia, and headache. CONCLUSION: This trial demonstrated that OXC at 2400 mg/day is well tolerated and efficacious when administered as monotherapy in patients with uncontrolled partial onset seizures.

Rapid initiation of gabapentin: a randomized, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the tolerability of two different dose-initiation regimens of gabapentin for the adjunctive treatment of partial seizures. BACKGROUND: Patient compliance is a key feature of successful outpatient pharmacologic therapy for epilepsy, and one aspect of compliance is simplicity of initiation. By using a rapid titration rate, leading to a rapid therapeutic gabapentin dose, perhaps there could be an improvement with compliance. METHODS: Male or female patients, at least 12 years old, with a recent history of partial seizures with or without secondary generalization, were randomized to receive gabapentin (following a blinded placebo period of an undisclosed number of days) as either a Slow initiation (300 mg day 1, 600 mg day 2, then 900 mg/day) or a Rapid initiation (900 mg/day immediately following the placebo lead-in). RESULTS: Starting gabapentin therapy at an initial therapeutic dosage of 900 mg/day is well tolerated by patients with epilepsy and is as safe as initiating with a titration schedule over 3 days. Of the four most common adverse events (somnolence, dizziness, ataxia, fatigue), only one, dizziness, occurred more often in the nontitrated (Rapid initiation) group than in the titrated (Slow initiation) group. CONCLUSION: Initiation of gabapentin at 900 mg/day is as well tolerated as is a 3-day titration, except for a higher incidence of dizziness.

Adjunctive therapy with oxcarbazepine in children with partial seizures. The Oxcarbazepine Pediatric Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of oxcarbazepine (OXC) as adjunctive therapy in children with inadequately controlled partial seizures on one or two concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). BACKGROUND: OXC has shown antiepileptic activity in several comparative monotherapy trials in newly diagnosed patients with epilepsy, and in a placebo-controlled monotherapy trial in hospitalized patients evaluated for epilepsy surgery. DESIGN: A total of 267 patients were evaluated in a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial consisting of three phases: 1) a 56-day baseline phase (patients maintained on their current AEDs); 2) a 112-day double-blind treatment phase (patients received either OXC 30-46 mg/kg/day orally or placebo); and 3) an open-label extension phase. Data are reported only from the double-blind treatment phase; the open-label extension phase is ongoing. METHODS: Children (3 to 17 years old) with inadequately controlled partial seizures (simple, complex, and partial seizures evolving to secondarily generalized seizures) were enrolled. RESULTS: Patients treated with OXC experienced a significantly greater median percent reduction from baseline in partial seizure frequency than patients treated with placebo (p = 0.0001; 35% versus 9%, respectively). Forty-one percent of patients treated with OXC experienced a > or =50% reduction from baseline in partial seizure frequency per 28 days compared with 22% of patients treated with placebo (p = 0.0005). Ninety-one percent of the group treated with OXC and 82% of the group treated with placebo reported > or =1 adverse event; vomiting, somnolence, dizziness, and nausea occurred more frequently (twofold or greater) in the group treated with OXC. CONCLUSION: OXC adjunctive therapy administered in a dose range of 6 to 51 mg/kg/day (median 31.4 mg/kg/day) is safe, effective, and well tolerated in children with partial seizures.

Oxcarbazepine monotherapy for partial-onset seizures: a multicenter, double-blind, clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of oxcarbazepine (OXC) 2,400 mg/day versus OXC 300 mg/day monotherapy in patients with medically refractory partial epilepsy. BACKGROUND: OXC is primarily metabolized by reductase enzymes and, consequently, has a low propensity to inhibit or induce oxidative enzymes and a minimal potential for drug-drug interactions. The efficacy of OXC as monotherapy was shown in several comparative trials in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy and in hospitalized patients undergoing evaluation for epilepsy surgery. METHODS: A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group trial design was chosen to assess the antiepileptic efficacy of OXC as monotherapy in a refractory epilepsy patient population. Outpatients aged 12 years or older with inadequately controlled partial seizures, with or without secondarily generalized seizures, were enrolled. Patients finished the trial by completing the double-blind phase or by meeting one of four predefined exit criteria: a twofold increase in partial seizure frequency in any 28-day period relative to baseline; a twofold increase in the highest consecutive 2-day partial seizure frequency relative to baseline; occurrence of a single generalized seizure if none occurred during the 6 months prior to randomization; or prolongation or worsening of generalized seizure duration or frequency requiring intervention. Adverse events (AEs), vital signs, and clinical laboratory tests were evaluated. RESULTS: The percentage of patients meeting one of the exit criteria was significantly lower (p < 0.0001) for the OXC 2400 mg/day group (14/34; 41%) than the OXC 300 mg/day group (42/45; 93%). In addition, there was a significant difference in time to exit in favor of the OXC 2400 mg/day group (p = 0.0001). In the intent-to-treat analysis, 12% of patients in the OXC 2400 mg/day group were seizure-free compared with none in the 300 mg/day group. OXC was well-tolerated, with dizziness, fatigue, somnolence, and nausea being the most frequent AEs. Most of these AEs were transient and rated as mild to moderate in intensity. CONCLUSION: OXC is safe and effective in the treatment of patients with partial epilepsy previously receiving treatment with other antiepileptic drugs. The results of this trial are consistent with previous monotherapy trials with OXC.

Topiramate in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: open-label treatment of patients completing a randomized controlled trial. Topiramate YL Study Group.

PURPOSE: The response to topiramate (TPM) as long-term adjunctive therapy was evaluated in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) in a long-term, open-label extension to a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. METHODS: In 97 patients with LGS (mean age, 11 years), dosages of TPM and concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were adjusted to optimal clinical response (mean TPM dosage, 10 mg/kg/day). RESULTS: For those patients who had completed 6 months of TPM therapy, drop attacks were reduced > or =50% in 55% of patients; 15% of patients had no drop attacks for > or =6 months at the last visit. After treatment up to 3+ years, 71% of patients who started open-label TPM were continuing therapy at the last visit. CONCLUSIONS: During long-term therapy, TPM is effective and well tolerated in controlling the treatment-resistant drop attacks and seizures associated with LGS.

Challenging our past paradigm in the management of epilepsy.

Trial designs of antiepileptic drugs have been reviewed. Add-on trials that were used to obtain marketing approval for many of the new antiepileptic drugs provide useful information but have definite limitations. The new monotherapy trial designs offer greater promise both in the provision of safety and efficacy information for registration purposes as well as the clinical use of these new agents to physicians.

Coadministration of phenytoin and felbamate: evidence of additional phenytoin dose-reduction requirements based on pharmacokinetics and tolerability with increasing doses of felbamate.

PURPOSE: This open-label study investigated the pharmacokinetic interaction of phenytoin (PHT) and felbamate (FBM). METHODS: Ten subjects with epilepsy receiving PHT monotherapy were administered increasing doses of FBM (1,200, 1,800, 2,400-3,600 mg/day) at 2-week intervals. PHT doses were reduced by 20% on an individual basis when evidence of clinically significant intolerance was present. With intolerance, the PHT dose was reduced before the next incremental FBM dose. Blood samples were analyzed for FBM, PHT, and PHT metabolite 5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-5-phenylhydantoin (HPPH). RESULTS: Total PHT plasma concentrations increased with coadministered FBM. PHT Cmax increased from 15.9 microg/ml at baseline to 20.9 microg/ml after 1,200 mg/day FBM and to 26.8 microg/ml after 1,800 mg/day FBM. Four subjects required a 20% PHT dose reduction after 1,800 mg/day FBM and six after the administration of 2,400 mg/day FBM. All subjects required further 20% PHT reductions before 3,600 mg/day FBM. FBM Cmax and AUCT were reduced, and apparent clearance increased compared with data from FBM monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: With the initiation of FBM therapy in subjects receiving PHT, the PHT dosage should be reduced by 20%. Further PHT dose reductions are likely to be necessary if the FBM dose is increased. The requirements for reductions in dose might be predicted by clinical signs of PHT intolerance.

A double-blind, randomized trial of topiramate in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Topiramate YL Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of topiramate as adjunctive therapy for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. BACKGROUND: Conventional antiepileptic drugs are frequently ineffective against multiple-seizure types of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients >1 year to <30 years of age, with slow spike-and-wave patterns on EEG, seizure types including drop attacks, and either a history of or active atypical absence seizures, were assigned to an 11-week, double-blind treatment phase with either topiramate or placebo. Topiramate was titrated to target doses of approximately 6 mg/kg/d. RESULTS: For drop attacks, the most severe seizures associated with this syndrome, the median percentage reduction from baseline in average monthly seizure rate was 14.8% for the topiramate group and -5.1% (an increase) for the placebo group (p = 0.041). Topiramate-treated patients demonstrated greater improvement in seizure severity than did placebo-treated patients based on parental global evaluations (p = 0.037). The percentage of patients with a > or = 50% reduction from baseline in major seizures (drop attacks and tonic-clonic seizures) was greater in the topiramate group (15/46 or 33%) than in the control group (4/50 or 8%; p = 0.002). The most common adverse events in both groups were CNS related; there were no discontinuations from topiramate therapy due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Topiramate adjunctive therapy was effective in reducing the number of drop attacks and major motor seizures and in improving seizure severity as determined by parental global evaluation.

Topiramate efficacy in infancy.

Topiramate is a sulfamate-substituted monosaccharide that has demonstrated efficacy as an antiepileptic drug in adults with partial onset seizures. Experience in children has been limited, but early reports have supported its safety and effectiveness in children as young as 2 years of age. In two infants ages 12 and 9 months, respectively, with partial seizures, the authors report excellent efficacy with good tolerability at doses up to 7.7 mg/kg. Although long-term safety and possible adverse sequelae have not been fully established in children, topiramate may represent an option for infants with high seizure frequency unresponsive to standard antiepileptic drugs.

Double-blind randomized trial of tramadol for the treatment of the pain of diabetic neuropathy.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tramadol in treating the pain of diabetic neuropathy. BACKGROUND: The pain of diabetic neuropathy is a major cause of morbidity among these patients and treatment, as with other small-fiber neuropathies, is often unsatisfactory. Tramadol is a centrally acting analgesic for use in treating moderate to moderately severe pain. METHODS: This multicenter, outpatient, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study consisted of a washout/screening phase, during which all analgesics were discontinued, and a 42-day double-blind treatment phase. A total of 131 patients with painful diabetic neuropathy were treated with tramadol (n=65) or placebo (n=66) tramadol, which were administered as identical capsules in divided doses four times daily. The primary efficacy analysis compared the mean pain intensity scores in the tramadol and placebo groups obtained at day 42 of the study or at the time of discontinuation. Secondary efficacy assessments were the pain relief rating scores and a quality of life evaluation based on daily activities and sleep characteristics. RESULTS: Tramadol, at an average dosage of 210 mg/day, was significantly (p < 0.001) more effective than placebo for treating the pain of diabetic neuropathy. Patients in the tramadol group scored significantly better in physical (p=0.02) and social functioning (p=0.04) ratings than patients in the placebo group. No statistically significant treatment effects on sleep were identified. The most frequently occurring adverse events with tramadol were nausea, constipation, headache, and somnolence. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this placebo-controlled trial showed that tramadol was effective and safe in treating the pain of diabetic neuropathy.

Topiramate. Clinical profile in epilepsy.

Topiramate, a sulfamate-substituted monosaccharide, is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) approved as adjunctive therapy for partial-onset seizures in adults. Topiramate is rapidly absorbed, has linear pharmacokinetics, minimal protein binding and a long half-life facilitating a twice-daily dosage regimen. Topiramate has little effect on the plasma concentrations of other AEDs with the exception of phenytoin, concentrations of which may increase in some patients when topiramate is added to the therapy. Topiramate metabolism is increased when administered with carbamazepine or phenytoin. In the absence of enzyme-inducing AEDs, topiramate is eliminated primarily by renal excretion, with 50 to 80% of a dose excreted as unchanged topiramate. In 6 double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, topiramate was shown to be well tolerated and effective as adjunctive therapy for partial-onset seizures in adults. Topiramate consistently reduced seizures across all patient groups defined by age, gender and baseline seizure frequency. Adverse effects were generally mild-to-moderate CNS-related effects and often resolved spontaneously or with slowing of topiramate titration and/or reduction of the dosage of concomitant AEDs. Clinical studies are currently evaluating the effectiveness and safety of topiramate as monotherapy and adjunctive therapy in children with partial seizures, in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and in patients with generalised tonic-clonic seizures of non-focal onset. Preliminary findings suggest that topiramate has a broad spectrum of clinical use.

Evaluation of the potential interaction between felbamate and erythromycin in patients with epilepsy.

Effects of erythromycin on hepatic CYP450 3A4 isozymes can profoundly influence the metabolism of many therapeutic agents. An open-label, randomized, two-period, crossover study was therefore conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of felbamate before and after a concurrent 10-day regimen (333 mg three times daily) of erythromycin. Patients were receiving either 3,000 or 3,600 mg/day felbamate monotherapy for treatment of epilepsy. Mean dose-normalized values for maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC tau) of felbamate were not statistically different in patients taking felbamate as monotherapy than in patients after erythromycin coadministration. Estimates of time to Cmax (tmax), minimum concentration (Cmin), apparent clearance (Cl/kg), average concentration (Cav), and degree of fluctuation (DFss) were likewise unchanged. The incidence of mild and moderate adverse events increased during coadministration of the two drugs. Because patients with epilepsy can not be treated with erythromycin alone, it could not be determined whether the adverse events were attributable to erythromycin or to the combination of the two drugs. Steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters of felbamate were not influenced by erythromycin coadministration.

Tolerability and pharmacokinetics of monotherapy felbamate doses of 1,200-6,000 mg/day in subjects with epilepsy.

PURPOSE: Felbamate (FBM) pharmacokinetic parameters, safety and tolerability in the dose range of 1,200-6,000 mg/day were assessed in two open-label studies with similar designs. METHODS: In study A, newly diagnosed subjects with epilepsy receiving FBM monotherapy at a starting dose of 1,200 mg/day (400 mg/three times daily, t.i.d.) and increased 1,200 mg/day, if tolerated, at 14-day intervals to 3,600 mg/day were investigated. In study B, epilepsy subjects with prior FBM monotherapy exposure received ascending FBM doses in five consecutive 14-day periods with a starting dose of 3,600 mg/day (1,200 mg t.i.d.) FBM. In each successive period, if FBM was well tolerated, the dose was increased by 600 mg/day to a maximum of 6,000 mg/day (2,000 mg t.i.d.). RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic parameter estimates maximum observed concentration (Cmax), area under the concentration-time curve (AUCtau) Ctrough, and Cav showed a linear dependence to dose above the 1,200-6,000 mg/day FBM dose range (F-tests; p < 0.0001) with apparent clearance (Cl/kg) and Tmax (time to Cmax) independent of dose. When AUCtau, Cmax and Ctrough were adjusted for dose, there were no significant differences between the dosing periods. CONCLUSIONS: The data establish that plasma concentrations of FBM are linear with respect to dose to 6,000 mg/day. In addition, FBM was safely administered at these doses for periods as long as 14 days to epileptic subjects with prior exposure to FBM. FBM-naive subjects appeared to report more adverse experiences (generally of mild to moderate severity) than did subjects with prior FBM exposure.