A retrospective, multicentre evaluation of eravacycline utilisation in community and academic hospitals.

OBJECTIVES: Eravacycline is a novel, fully-synthetic tetracycline approved by the FDA for treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in August 2018. This study sought to characterise early clinical experience with this novel antibiotic. METHODS: Eravacycline utilisation for 66 patients was retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Eravacycline was used as monotherapy in 62.1% of cases. Mean duration of therapy was 13.1 ± 9.9 days. The majority (68.2%) of treatment was for off-label indications, including 34.8% for pulmonary and 28.8% for skin/soft tissue infections. A number of difficult-to-treat organisms were encountered: 50% of identified Gram-negative pathogens were resistant to carbapenems in vitro; and 48% of identified Gram-positive pathogens were resistant to vancomycin in vitro. The patient population had a high illness acuity, with 42.4% requiring ICU admission, 59.1% having ≥2 co-morbidities and 33.3% having ≥3 co-morbidities. Nevertheless, 95.5% experienced clinical improvement, with 86.4% achieving full infection resolution following eravacycline. Three patients who did not experience clinical improvement had an intra-abdominal source of infection without adequate source control. The remaining six who did not experience full infection resolution died from unrelated non-infectious causes during hospital admission. Adverse events were uncommon (4.5%), limited to nausea/vomiting, and not leading to eravacycline discontinuation. Although two patients had a history of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), no patients developed CDI while receiving eravacycline. CONCLUSION: These results illustrate the potential versatility of eravacycline with a broad activity spectrum, good safety and tolerability profile, flexibility for use in patients with renal injury or antibiotic allergies, and positive clinical outcomes in this real-world cohort.

Upper extremity Histoplasma capsulatum treatment with isavuconazole.

Extrapulmonary Histoplasma capsulatum infections in the immunocompetent population are rare and pose a diagnostic challenge. Upper extremity histoplasmosis without a primary lung infection is uncommon. It is possible to acquire it by inadvertent trauma with direct inoculation. Our case describes an immunocompetent patient with progressive swelling with minimal pain in the wrist associated with a small puncture wound on the left dorsal forearm. The initial workup failed to identify a specific etiology. For the following six weeks, the patient experienced progressive worsening of symptoms, warranting a referral to an orthopedic hand surgeon. Left lower extremity magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings were non-specific. The surgeon performed a surgical exploration and debridement with the excision of hypertrophic tissue. Initial stains showed a granulomatous tissue but did not reveal an organism; however, a month later, mold was identified on the growth medium. The patient was initiated in isavuconazole empiric therapy. Four weeks later, a matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) confirmed the diagnosis as Histoplasma capsulatum. The patient had clinical remission with isavuconazole used as the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) off label use.

Improved economic and clinical outcomes with oritavancin versus a comparator group for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections in a community hospital.

BACKGROUND: Oritavancin is a lipoglycopeptide antibiotic with in vitro bactericidal activity against gram-positive pathogens indicated for use in adults with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). Its concentration-dependent activity and prolonged half-life provide a convenient single-dose alternative to multi-dose daily therapies for ABSSSI. This retrospective cohort study was conducted to quantify the clinical and economic advantages of using oritavancin compared to other antibiotic agents that have been historically effective for ABSSSI. METHODS: Seventy-nine patients received oritavancin who had failed previous outpatient antibiotic therapy (OPAT) for cellulitis or abscess and were subsequently readmitted to the hospital as an inpatient between 2016 and 2018. These patients were compared to a cohort of 28 patients receiving other antibiotics following OPAT failure and subsequent hospitalization for these two infection types. The primary clinical end point was average length of stay (aLOS) and secondary endpoints included readmission rates for the same indication at 30 and 90 days after discharge and the average hospital cost (aHC). RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were hospitalized for treatment of cellulitis or abscess. Demographic characteristics of both the oritavancin and comparator groups were similar except for the presence of diabetes. The primary clinical endpoint showed a non-significant decrease in aLOS between the oritavancin group versus comparator (2.12 days versus 2.59 days; p = 0.097). The secondary endpoints revealed lower readmission rates associated with oritavancin treatment at 30 and 90 days; the average hospital cost was 5.9% lower for patients that received oritavancin. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate that oritavancin provides not only a single-dose alternative to multi-day therapies for skin and skin structure infections, but also a clinical and economic advantage compared to other antibiotic agents.

Nontyphoidal Salmonella purulent pericarditis presenting with pericardial tamponade in a patient on infliximab therapy.

Infection with nontyphoidal Salmonella is traditionally characterized by intestinal manifestations. However, extra-intestinal infections are known to occur, with purulent pericarditis associated with cardiac tamponade being rare. This case report is of a 57-year-old male with Crohn's disease initiated on infliximab therapy two months prior to presentation. He presented with recurrent chest pain and a single occurrence of fever. A Computed Tomography (CT) scan of the chest revealed a pericardial effusion. An echocardiogram confirmed the presence of the fluid with tamponade physiology, requiring immediate surgical decompression. The pericardial fluid culture grew Salmonella enterica, despite the patient having only a single episode of fever, disproportionate to the severity of the infection. Conceivably, the lack of systemic symptoms may be attributed to recent infliximab therapy. Upon conducting a literature review, immunosuppressive factors seem to play a significant role in nontyphoid Salmonella enterica pericardial effusion presenting with cardiac tamponade.

Acute kidney injury risk assessment at the hospital front door: what is the best measure of risk?

BACKGROUND: We examined the prevalence of acute kidney injury (AKI) risk factors in the emergency medical unit, generated a modified risk assessment tool and tested its ability to predict AKI. METHODS: A total of 1196 patients admitted to medical admission units were assessed for patient-associated AKI risk factors. Subsequently, 898 patients were assessed for a limited number of fixed risk factors with the addition of hypotension and sepsis. This was correlated to AKI episodes. RESULTS: In the first cohort, the prevalence of AKI risk factors was 2.1 ± 2.0 per patient, with a positive relationship between age and the number of risk factors and a higher number of risk factors in patients ≥65 years. In the second cohort, 12.3% presented with or developed AKI. Patients with AKI were older and had a higher number of AKI risk factors. In the AKI cohort, 72% of the patients had two or more AKI risk factors compared with 43% of the cohort with no AKI. When age ≥65 years was added as an independent risk factor, 84% of those with AKI had two or more AKI risk factors compared with 55% of those with no AKI. Receiver operating characteristic analysis suggests that the use of common patient-associated known AKI risk factors performs no better than age alone as a predictor of AKI. CONCLUSIONS: Detailed assessment of well-established patient-associated AKI risk factors may not facilitate clinicians to apportion risk. This suggests that additional work is required to develop a more sensitive validated AKI-predictive tool that would be useful in this clinical setting.