Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; : 1-8, 2024 Jun 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38901413

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Sensitivity to indoor allergens increases the risks of asthma and the emergence of allergic diseases. Indoor allergens include house dust mite (HDM), pet dander, cockroach (CR), and molds. We investigated how CR sensitivity was affected during the pandemic period. METHODS: This study included patients aged ≥18 years who visited the allergy unit of our clinic between March 2018 and March 2022 and who underwent skin prick tests (SPTs) for aeroallergens. Patients were divided into two groups: those of the prepandemic and pandemic periods, depending on the visit dates. RESULTS: In all, 7,687 patients were recruited; 5,074 individuals with negative SPT results were excluded. Among the 2,613 atopic patients, CR sensitivity was detected in 278 (10.6%). The prevalence of CR sensitivity was significantly higher in the pandemic group than in the prepandemic group (12% vs. 8.6%; p < 0.05). The frequency of asthma was higher in patients with CR sensitivity than in others (33.1% vs. 26%, p = 0.011). In addition, individuals with CR sensitivity were older than others (p = 0.001). CR sensitivity was more common in males than in females (44.2% vs. 37.7%, p = 0.034). Moreover, dog and HDM sensitivities were more common in individuals with CR sensitivity than in others (p = 0.004, p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: This study reveals an increased sensitivity to CR during the pandemic and establishes an association between such sensitivity and the frequency of asthma. Variability in terms of CR sensitivity across different countries is emphasized. In addition, HDM and dog sensitivities were more common in individuals with CR sensitivity.

2.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 185(4): 402-410, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38219730

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Diagnostic delay in cases of primary immunodeficiency (PID) is a significant problem for clinicians, and most do not have sufficient awareness of this uncommon disorder. The European Society for Immunodeficiencies (ESID) has developed 6 warning signs to increase awareness of adult PIDs. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of PID in older adults regardless of the reason for presentation and to evaluate the effectiveness of the 6 warning signs of ESID in the diagnosis of PIDs. METHODS: The study included 1,331 patients aged ≥65 years who presented at our clinic for any reason and were questioned about the ESID 6 warning signs for PIDs. After the exclusion of reasons for secondary immunodeficiency (SID), all the patients underwent immunological evaluation for the diagnosis of potential underlying PIDs. RESULTS: After excluding 6 patients diagnosed with SID, PID was diagnosed in 16 (1.2%) of 1,325 older adults using ESID warning signs. The most common reasons for presentation were infection (69%) in the PID group and urticaria and/or angioedema (41.5%) in the non-PID group. The most common PID subgroup was common variable immunodeficiency (50%). In 12 of the patients diagnosed with PID, there was at least 1 positive ESID warning sign. In 4 patients, PID was determined despite negative ESID warning signs. The patients diagnosed with PID showed a significant, minimal level of agreement with questions 1 and 4 of the ESID warning signs (p < 0.001, ĸ = 0.204, p = 0.005, ĸ = 0.208, respectively). CONCLUSION: The ESID warning signs do not encompass all the symptoms and findings of PIDs. There is a need for more infection-centered questions to determine PIDs in older adults. Therefore, the ESID warning signs should be further developed.


Assuntos
Imunodeficiência de Variável Comum , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência , Humanos , Idoso , Diagnóstico Tardio , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência/diagnóstico , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência/epidemiologia , Prevalência
3.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 185(2): 133-141, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37918371

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Cat and dog allergens are common indoor triggers for respiratory allergies such as allergic rhinitis and asthma. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of cat and dog allergies in adults and analyze changes during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 8,102 patients who visited an allergy clinic and underwent skin prick testing (SPT) from March 2018 to March 2022: 2 years before and 2 years during the pandemic. Demographic information, clinical attributes, and laboratory results were examined based on patient records. RESULTS: Of 8,102 SPTs performed, 400 (4.9%) were sensitized to cat allergen and 289 (3.6%) to dog allergen. Allergic rhinitis was the predominant clinical diagnosis in both groups. Of the 400 subjects exposed to cats, 240 (60%) experienced allergic symptoms, while of the 289 subjects exposed to dogs, 65 (22.5%) experienced allergic symptoms during exposure. Within the cat-sensitized group, anaphylaxis was observed in 5 patients (1.3%), while no cases of anaphylaxis were reported in the dog-sensitized group. Compared to the pre-pandemic period, patients presenting during the pandemic had higher rates of cat and dog sensitization (5.7% vs. 4.1%; p < 0.05, 5.2% vs. 1.7%; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an increase in cat and dog allergies among adults. Increased exposure to pet antigens, both directly and indirectly, has resulted in more people becoming sensitized to cats or dogs.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , COVID-19 , Rinite Alérgica , Adulto , Animais , Humanos , Cães , Gatos , Alérgenos , Pandemias , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Testes Cutâneos , Rinite Alérgica/epidemiologia
4.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 44(5): e11-e16, 2023 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37641229

RESUMO

Background: Autoimmune diseases can occur at any time in patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID). However, the relationship between low immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels and autoimmune diseases in patients with CVID remains poorly understood. Objective: We aimed to determine the relationship between autoimmunity and low IgE in patients with CVID. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted by using data that had been collected from 62 adult patients with CVID between April 2012 and December 2021. Serum basal IgE levels were compared between patients with and patients without autoimmune disease. Results: Overall, 23 of the 62 patients with CVID (37.1%) had at least one autoimmune disease (CVID-O). Autoimmune cytopenias, mainly immune thrombocytopenic purpura, were observed in half of all the patients. Other autoimmune diseases present among the patients included rheumatological diseases, inflammatory bowel diseases, lymphoma, granulomatous lymphocytic interstitial lung disease, autoimmune hepatitis, alopecia, and multiple sclerosis. Serum IgE levels were measured at the time of diagnosis; IgE was undetectable (<2.5 IU/mL) in 82.6% of the patients with CVID-O (n = 19). The median (interquartile range) serum IgE value in the patients with CVID-O was 2 IU/mL (1-16 IU/mL), which was significantly lower than the median serum IgE value in patients with CVID and without autoimmune disease (p < 0.001). Low IgE levels in patients with CVID-O were an independent risk factor for the development of autoimmune disease in patients with CVID (odds ratio 3.081 [95% confidence interval, 1.222-7.771]; p = 0.017). Conclusion: Low serum IgE levels were associated with the development of autoimmune disease in patients with CVID. The monitoring of serum IgE levels in patients with CVID may be useful in the early diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune diseases.


Assuntos
Doenças Autoimunes , Imunodeficiência de Variável Comum , Adulto , Humanos , Imunodeficiência de Variável Comum/diagnóstico , Imunodeficiência de Variável Comum/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doenças Autoimunes/diagnóstico , Doenças Autoimunes/epidemiologia , Autoimunidade , Imunoglobulina E
5.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 184(10): 1047-1055, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37473738

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) have been shown to be more predisposed to develop allergic diseases because of mucosal immune defects and immune dysregulation. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence, and clinical and laboratory characteristics of various allergic diseases in patients with CVID. METHODS: The study included patients aged ≥18 years who were followed up for a diagnosis of CVID. Patients were separated into 5 groups according to the clinical phenotypic characteristics of lymphoproliferation, autoimmunity, gastrointestinal diseases, allergic diseases, and malignancy. Atopic dermatitis (AD), drug hypersensitivity reaction (DHR), allergic rhinitis (AR), and asthma were accepted as allergic diseases. RESULTS: The most commonly seen clinical phenotypes were lymphoproliferation in 41 (48.8%) patients and allergic diseases in 31 (37%). AD was determined in 2 (2.4%) patient, DHR in 5 (6%), AR in 7 (8.3%), and asthma in 21 (25%). The delay in diagnosis of patients with allergic disease was determined to be shorter compared to those without allergic disease (p = 0.042). Serum total immunoglobulin E level, CD19+ B cell, switched memory B cell, and natural killer cell counts were determined to be higher in the CVID patients with allergic disease compared to those without (p = 0.007, p = 0.022, p = 0.023, p = 0.017, respectively). CONCLUSION: Allergic diseases should be considered as a marker of clinical phenotype in CVID because of the clinical and immunological differences. Early diagnosis and treatment of allergic diseases in patients with CVID can improve quality of life.


Assuntos
Asma , Imunodeficiência de Variável Comum , Dermatite Atópica , Hipersensibilidade , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto , Linfócitos B , Qualidade de Vida , Hipersensibilidade/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade/epidemiologia , Imunodeficiência de Variável Comum/diagnóstico , Imunodeficiência de Variável Comum/epidemiologia , Fenótipo
6.
World Allergy Organ J ; 15(7): 100665, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35891674

RESUMO

Background: Despite the worldwide increase in life expectancy and the elderly population, very little is known about the characteristics of anaphylaxis in older adults. Methods: A retrospective scan was made of the files of patients who presented at the Allergy Unit of our clinic between October 2011 and October 2021. The study included 971 patients aged ≥18 years who met the criteria for diagnosis of anaphylaxis. The patients were separated into 2 groups of adults (18-64 years) and older adults (≥65 years). Results: The adult group included 887 (91.3%) patients and the older adult group, 84 (8.7%) patients. Comorbid diseases were seen more frequently in the older adults than in the adult group (p < 0.001). Drugs were seen to be the most common trigger of anaphylaxis in both groups, and this was more common in the older adult group (p = 0.039). Food was a more common trigger of anaphylaxis in the adult group than in the older adult group (p = 0.017). In both groups, the skin was the organ most affected, and was less affected in the older adults than in the adults (p = 0.020). Cardiovascular symptoms were seen significantly more and respiratory symptoms significantly less in the older adult group (p < 0.001, p = 0.002, respectively). Admission to the hospital and the intensive care unit was more frequent in the older adult group and rates of adrenalin administration were higher compared to the adult group (p < 0.001 for all). Conclusion: Anaphylaxis in the older adults is generally caused by drugs. Older adults were found to have more cardiovascular symptoms and more frequent adrenalin injections, hospitalizations and intensive care unit admissions.

7.
Nutr Clin Pract ; 37(5): 1206-1214, 2022 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34989028

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of malnutrition in outpatients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) and the utility of nutrition screening tools to detect malnutrition in these patients. METHODS: Fifty outpatients with CVID were included in the study. Nutrition risk for each patient was evaluated using four nutrition screening tools: Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ), and Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002). RESULTS: According to MUST, MST, SNAQ, and NRS-2002, malnutrition risk was determined to be 48% (n = 24), 26% (n = 13), 20% (n = 10), and 20% (n = 10), respectively. Malnutrition was detected in 54% (n = 27) of the patients. It was found that MUST showed a better correlation in detecting malnutrition in outpatients with CVID (κ = 0.482, P = 0.001). MUST has a higher positive and negative predictive value than other nutrition screening tools (79% and 70%, respectively). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, it was found that low serum immunoglobulin A (IgA) levels at diagnosis increased the risk of malnutrition by ∼15 times, and low CD19+ B-cell counts increased the risk by approximately eight times. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of malnutrition in patients with CVID was found to be quite high, and there was a strong correlation between malnutrition and low CD19+ B-cell counts and low serum IgA levels. Given the high rate of malnutrition in patients with CVID, nutrition assessment is recommended rather than starting with nutrition screening.


Assuntos
Imunodeficiência de Variável Comum , Desnutrição , Adulto , Imunodeficiência de Variável Comum/complicações , Imunodeficiência de Variável Comum/epidemiologia , Humanos , Imunoglobulina A , Desnutrição/diagnóstico , Desnutrição/epidemiologia , Desnutrição/etiologia , Programas de Rastreamento , Avaliação Nutricional , Estado Nutricional
8.
Tuberk Toraks ; 62(4): 286-90, 2014.
Artigo em Turco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25581693

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Tuberculosis occurrence was evaluated in patients that applied tuberculosis chemoprophylaxis and currently receiving tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) blocker. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Incidence of tuberculosis were retrospectively evaluated in patients that currently receiving TNF-α-blocking therapy and received tuberculosis chemoprophylaxis at Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Lung Disease Department, between 2006-2013 years. 134 patients that were diagnosed with rheumatologic and dermatologic diseases, were evaluated. Patients were in the age range 18-80 years. Age, gender, smoking status, BCG vaccination, chest radiography, diagnose of disease, presence of concomitant disease, tuberculosis story, PPD value, chemoprophylaxis acquisition, which anti-tuberculosis agents received, duration of chemoprophylaxis, duration of TNF-α blocker, other immunosuppressive using were measured. RESULTS: Rheumatologic diseases were often. Prophylaxis has given at 73.9% of patients. Patients with received anti-TNF-α therapy (n= 134) have not developed pulmonary or extra-pulmonary tuberculosis disease. CONCLUSION: Patients with received anti-TNF-α therapy, are scanned with TST or Quantiferon. If latent tuberculosis infection are diagnosed, tuberculosis prophylaxis should be started pre-anti-TNF-α therapy at least one month and INH chemoprophylaxis should be completed on 9 months or RIF should be completed on 4 months. Serum liver enzymes and bilirubin measurements monthly; follow-up physical examination and chest radiography should be performed for 3 months.


Assuntos
Antituberculosos/administração & dosagem , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Tuberculose Latente/epidemiologia , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Tuberculose Latente/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Turquia/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...