Evaluation of Truncated AUC as an Alternative Measure to Assess Pharmacokinetic Comparability in Bridging Biologic-Device Using Prefilled Syringes and Autoinjectors.

Pharmacokinetic (PK) comparisons between therapeutic biologics have largely been based on the total area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and the maximum concentration (Cmax ). For biologics with a long half-life, a PK comparability study may be long in duration and costly to conduct. The goal of this study was to evaluate whether a truncated AUC (tAUC) can be used to assess PK comparability when bridging prefilled syringe (PFS) and autoinjector (AI) treatment options for biologics with a long half-life. Fifteen biologics license applications (BLAs) were included to determine the concordance and geometric percent coefficient of variation (%CV) between tAUCs evaluated on days 7, 14, 21, and 28 and AUC evaluated to infinity (AUC0-inf ). Concordance is established if the tAUCs are comparable with AUC0-inf . Trial simulation was performed to examine the effect of the absorption rate constant (ka ) and sample size on the concordance of tAUCs. The tAUCs evaluated on day 14, 21, and 28 had 100% concordance with AUC0-inf for all 15 BLAs. The concordance of tAUC evaluated at day 7 was 87.5%. Based on the trial simulation, tAUC evaluated to day 28 post-dose can achieve high concordance (≥85%) for biologics exhibiting linear or nonlinear elimination with a ka of ≥0.1/day and with a sample size of 70 subjects per arm. tAUC appears to be a promising alternative PK measure, relative to AUC0-inf , for PK comparability assessments.

Therapeutic Development in Polyarticular Course Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Extrapolation, Dose Selection, and Clinical Trial Design.

OBJECTIVE: Stakeholders met to address persistent challenges facing the development of therapeutics for polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA), which result in fewer approved therapies for children with pJIA than adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and long lag times from adult RA approval to pediatric labeling. Ensuring that new medications are authorized in a timely manner to meet the needs of JIA patients worldwide is critically important to multiple stakeholders. METHODS: The Food and Drug Administration in collaboration with the University of Maryland Center for Regulatory Science and Innovation held a public workshop entitled "Accelerating Drug Development for pJIA" on October 2, 2019, to address challenges surrounding access to new medications for children and adolescents with pJIA. Regulatory, academic, and industry stakeholders, as well as patient representatives, participated in the workshop, which consisted of 4 sessions, including panel discussions. RESULTS: The workshop facilitated broad public discussion of challenges facing the development of pJIA therapeutics, highlighting areas of need and outlining opportunities to expedite development, while underscoring the necessity of close collaboration between all stakeholders, including patients and families. CONCLUSION: This report summarizes key aspects of the workshop, including the appropriate application of innovative approaches to the development of pJIA therapeutics, including extrapolation, to address current challenges and provide timely access to newer safe and effective treatments. Long-term safety assessment is of pressing concern to stakeholders and cannot be fully extrapolated from adult studies but requires consistent postmarketing long-term follow-up.

Clinical pharmacology considerations for the approval of belimumab for the treatment of adult patients with active lupus nephritis: A regulatory perspective.

On 16 December 2020, FDA approved Benlysta® (belimumab) for both the intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) administration routes for the treatment of adult patients with active lupus nephritis (LN) who are receiving standard therapy. This approval represents the first FDA approved treatment of patients with active LN.The approved IV dosing regimen (10 mg/kg dose Q2W for three doses, then 10 mg/kg Q4W thereafter) was based on a randomized double-blind placebo controlled clinical trial in adult patients with LN. For the approval of the SC dosing regimen (400 mg dose QW for four doses, then 200 mg QW thereafter), efficacy was supported solely by pharmacokinetics (PK) modeling and simulation which estimated a matched steady state average concentration and higher trough concentrations for the SC administration route, for bridging to the efficacy of IV belimumab in adults with LN. The safety and immunogenicity profile of the SC administration route has been assessed in the SLE studies.In a population PK analysis, higher proteinuria was associated with greater belimumab clearance and lower belimumab exposure. In an exposure response analysis, the efficacy of belimumab as evaluated by renal response was mainly driven by patients with lower proteinuria at baseline regardless of other baseline characteristics (e.g. baseline renal function, renal biopsy classification), induction therapies, or belimumab exposure levels (within 10 mg/kg dosing regimen), etc. However, post hoc analyses showed that belimumab had activity in LN patients with higher proteinuria at baseline. There is no adequate information to suggest that a higher dose would provide additional benefit for patients with lower exposure (e.g. higher proteinuria).

Impact of Switching on Pharmacokinetics of Therapeutic Biologics and Interchangeability Assessment-A Simulation Study.

The risk in terms of safety or diminished efficacy of switching between an originator biological product and a proposed interchangeable product is an important consideration for interchangeability evaluation in the regulatory framework. This simulation study evaluated the impact of several switching study design scenarios on the pharmacokinetic (PK) assessment between a virtual originator biological product and a virtual proposed interchangeable product. Our results show that (1) at least 3 switches are needed to optimize the detection of potential PK differences, (2) the initial incidence of antidrug antibodies after treatment with the reference product in the lead-in period is a significant covariate affecting the PK results, and (3) the area under the concentration-time curve is more sensitive than peak concentration in assessing the impact of switching on PK similarity. Our simulation work illustrates that a range of factors should be carefully considered when designing a switching study for the assessment of interchangeability between 2 biological products.

Concentration-Response Model of Immediate Release Oxycodone Drug Liking by Different Routes of Abuse.

OBJECTIVE: To understand the correlation between oxycodone concentration and drug liking response for immediate-release formulations as they relate to different doses and different routes of administration following manipulation involved in opioid misuse and nontherapeutic use. METHODS: Concentration-response and noncompartmental analyses of drug liking and plasma oxycodone data from Category 3 human abuse potential studies (n = 15-29 per study) were conducted, using Phoenix 6.0 software. Time to onset of a set threshold of subjective effects (Tonset) and offset of subjective effects (Toffset) were estimated based on a baseline pharmacodynamic response set at 50 on a bipolar Drug Liking visual analog scale of 0-100 and the threshold for drug liking set at ≥65, based on study qualification criteria. Partial Area Under the Concentration (AUCTonset-Toffset) and Effect (AUETonset-Toffset) profiles were calculated and their correlation with individual partial AUE vs partial AUC was assessed. RESULTS: The oxycodone concentration-response (drug liking) was best described by a sigmoidal-effect Emax model (S-shaped). Using a defined threshold, drug liking was closely associated with the rate of rise in concentration and the onset of action for oxycodone administered via oral or intranasal route. Partial AUCTonset-Toffset and AUETonset-Toffset showed a strong linear correlation. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that oxycodone concentration-response and duration of drug liking following manipulation via different routes of administration may be an approach for further exploring drug liking effects of opioids.

Association of partial systemic exposure and abuse potential for opioid analgesics with abuse deterrence labeling claims supporting product-specific guidance.

BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, U.S. FDA has approved 10 opioid analgesics in abuse-deterrent formulations (ADFs). ADFs are intended to reduce abuse of a prescription opioid through manipulation of the product to use one or more routes of abuse. Although it is critically needed for evaluation of the abuse deterrent properties of an opioid product, the relationship between systemic exposure and likelihood of abuse of the opioid has not been fully characterized. To fill the current knowledge gap, we have evaluated the association of subjective measures predictive of abuse potential (e.g., scores of "drug liking," "take drug again"), which are referred to as 'pharmacodynamic (PD)' responses for measuring abuse potential, with systemic exposure of the opioid using the data from all the clinical abuse potential trials submitted to FDA in support of the approval of innovator ADFs. METHODS: Extensive pharmacokinetic (PK) and subjective response data from 11 clinical abuse potential trials in recreational opioid users following oral and nasal administration of intact and manipulated oxycodone, hydrocodone and morphine products from the FDA internal database were utilized for the present analysis. This retrospective study used data collected from January 11th, 2010 until March 25th, 2015. The potential relationship between PK metrics, especially those for early exposure measures, and the subjective measures of drug liking and take drug again as PD metrics of abuse potential were explored using linear and logistic regression analyses. Heterogeneity analysis was conducted to assess study-to-study variation and multi-level logistic regression analysis was used to affirm the identified PK-PD relationship based on pooled data. FINDINGS: Following oral and nasal administration of intact and manipulated opioids, the maximum visual analogue scale (VAS) for Drug Liking was generally achieved no later than the time to peak plasma drug concentration. Both heterogeneity analysis and multi-level logistic regression indicated insignificant inter study variability for the evaluated PK-PD relationships. Duration of Drug Liking response (i.e., VAS ≥ 65) lasted for 2 to 4 h after drug administration. The early portion of the systemic area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), e.g., partial AUCs in the first 3 h and 4 h were found to be associated with abuse potential measures including maximum Drug Liking VAS and maximum Taking Drug Again VAS. Neither a formulation factor (e.g., immediate-release vs. extended-release, intact vs. manipulated) nor a route of administration was identified as a significant factor together with early partial AUCs to predict the probability of maximum Drug Liking or maximum Take Drug Again responses being greater than or equal to 65. INTERPRETATION: Our assessment indicates that the measure of early systemic drug exposure of opioids is the best predictor of the abuse potential response in recreational opioid users following oral or nasal administration of a single dose of an intact or manipulated abuse deterrent opioids. Our findings support FDA's recommendation of comparative PK studies with early partial AUCs as a supportive PK metric for the assessment of abuse deterrent properties of generic opioid drug products in the general and product-specific guidance's of ADFs. FUNDING: The study was partially funded by Fiscal Year 2017 Critical Path of the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Response Similarity Assessment Between Polyarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and Adult Rheumatoid Arthritis for Biologics.

Polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA) is a pediatric chronic inflammatory arthritis, much like rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in adults. Drug development for pJIA can potentially be expedited by using extrapolation of efficacy from adult RA; however, the lack of understanding of the response and exposure relationship between pJIA and RA to therapeutic interventions has been a major roadblock. To address this, the objective of our analysis was to conduct a systematic response and exposure comparison between pJIA and RA trials for biologic products. Data from registration RA and pJIA clinical trials (parallel or withdrawal design) for infliximab, tocilizumab, golimumab, and adalimumab were utilized. First, exposure was compared between the pJIA trials and RA pivotal trials. Subsequently, the pJIA vs. RA response similarity was assessed by comparing similar individual subcomponents of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) scores between the two populations. The exposure comparison demonstrated that at the pJIA trial dose, exposure in pediatric patients was similar to or higher than adults for all biologics evaluated except infliximab, where lower exposure was observed in pJIA patients ≤ 35 kg. Response comparison for individual subcomponents indicated that in a majority of the cases, pJIA response was similar or higher as compared with response from RA trials. Overall, this analysis suggests response similarity between pJIA and RA across the biologic products when exposures are matched between the two populations. These analyses provide support for the use of pharmacokinetic exposure-matching for extrapolation of efficacy from adult RA to pediatric pJIA for the products with established mechanism(s) of action.

Impact of Sex on Clinical Response in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated With Biologics at Approved Dosing Regimens.

The prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is higher in females than in males. With the development of new treatment options and strategies such as biologics, we found it worthwhile to identify whether males and females warrant different treatment regimens to ensure the best clinical response. Our meta-analysis included 11 clinical trials of RA patients in support of the Food and Drug Administration's approval of 6 biological products. We evaluated the data of American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) 24 or 26 weeks after treatment. Logistic regression models were applied to compute the odds ratio (OR) of treatment responses between sexes. The ORs of ACR20 response rates in males and females were similar across all studies and not significantly different in overall studies (OR, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-1.16) analyzed with a fixed-effects model. Further analyses on the 7 ACR20 subcomponents showed high heterogeneity among studies (Q statistic P < .00007, I2 > 95%), with no observed clinically meaningful sex-related difference. Thus, our meta-analysis did not find significant difference in ACR20 response rates between male and female RA patients treated with biologics at approved dosing regimens. This result supports the current clinical practice of not requiring sex-dependent treatment regimens for RA patients.

Immunomodulatory Therapeutic Proteins in COVID-19: Current Clinical Development and Clinical Pharmacology Considerations.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by infection with SARS-CoV-2 has led to more than 600 000 deaths worldwide. Patients with severe disease often experience acute respiratory distress characterized by upregulation of multiple cytokines. Immunomodulatory biological therapies are being evaluated in clinical trials for the management of the systemic inflammatory response and pulmonary complications in patients with advanced stages of COVID-19. In this review, we summarize the clinical pharmacology considerations in the development of immunomodulatory therapeutic proteins for mitigating the heightened inflammatory response identified in COVID-19.

Clinical Pharmacology Considerations for Developing Small-Molecule Treatments for COVID-19.

Numerous drugs are being investigated for the treatment of COVID-19, including antivirals and therapies targeting complications related to COVID-19. The clinical presentation of COVID-19 varies from mild fever, cough, and dyspnea in the early stages of disease to severe complications such as acute respiratory distress syndrome, systemic hyperinflammation, and sepsis. A thorough understanding of the disease pathogenesis and the disease complications is essential to developing effective therapies to treat this potentially life-threatening disease. This review offers key clinical pharmacology considerations involved in the development of small molecules for the treatment of COVID-19. They are based on the major observed disease complications that impact drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination. We also address considerations regarding potential drug interactions, alternative routes and methods of administration, and dosing in patients on hemodialysis.

A Comprehensive Updated Review on SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19.

This literature review aims to provide a comprehensive current summary of the pathogenesis, clinical features, disease course, host immune responses, and current investigational antiviral and immunomodulatory pharmacotherapies to facilitate the development of future therapies and measures for prevention and control.

Effects of Food on Bioavailability of Analgesics; Resulting Dosage and Administration Recommendations.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate currently approved analgesics, that is, opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), anticonvulsants, and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) used as analgesics, for 1) differences in pharmacokinetic parameters under fed vs fasting conditions and 2) factors involved in dosage recommendations in relation to food. DESIGN: Systematic review. RESULTS: Food effect on the rate, extent of absorption, or shape of concentration-time profile can alter the onset of action, duration of action, or tolerability of a medication. Based on 79 analgesic products reviewed, food effect dosage recommendations depend on whether an analgesic will be dosed on a regular interval around-the-clock vs on an as-needed basis, the shape of concentration-time profile, steady-state concentrations, the type of meals used in the pharmacokinetic study, and drug administration with regard to food in clinical trials. Overall, most opioids do not have food restriction and are taken without regard to food, with the exception of OPANA products and XTAMPZA ER. For many NSAIDs, food does not affect absorption characteristics, with the exception of ZORVOLEX and CELEBREX. Although NSAIDs are commonly to be taken without regard to food, prescribers recommend administering them with food to reduce their propensity for gastrointestinal adverse events. A larger percentage of anticonvulsants and SNRIs used as analgesics are taken with food to improve their tolerability. Of all analgesic products, seven NSAIDs and six opioids lack food effect information, maybe due to their approval before Food and Drug Administration food effect guidance. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, because food effects could alter the onset and/or duration of pain relief, analgesic medication should be used as per labeled recommendations for proper pain management.

Update on Therapeutic Protein-Drug Interaction: Information in Labeling.

This review evaluated the significance of therapeutic protein (TP)-drug interactions and the current practices for assessing the interaction potential. We reviewed US FDA labels of approved TPs with drug-drug interaction (DDI) assessment. TP-drug interactions have been evaluated from in vitro studies, animal studies, and/or clinical settings. Of the 150 FDA-approved TPs as of May 2019, 49 TP labels contained pharmacokinetic (PK)-related DDI information derived from at least one study method. Our review found that more than half of the clinical PK DDI evaluations showed no interaction, and no dose adjustment has been recommended for any of the rest TPs. The results and trends observed in this review may further enhance and inform risk-based approaches to evaluating the potential for TP-drug interactions.

Drug Interaction Between Febuxostat and Thiopurine Antimetabolites: A Review of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and Medical Literature.

BACKGROUND: There is a known drug interaction (DI) between xanthine oxidase (XO) inhibitors and the thiopurine immunosuppressants, azathioprine (AZA) and mercaptopurine (6-MP). Xanthine oxidase inhibition increases concentrations of AZA and 6-MP active metabolites, possibly resulting in myelosuppression. When allopurinol is used with AZA or 6-MP, dose reduction of AZA or 6-MP is recommended. Febuxostat is a newer XO inhibitor approved for the treatment of gout. OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical impact of the febuxostat-thiopurine DI. DESIGN AND SETTING: Case series derived from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and published medical literature. PATIENTS: Nineteen patients who received concomitant febuxostat and either AZA or 6-MP. MEASUREMENTS: Laboratory and clinical data. RESULTS: Nineteen cases reporting myelosuppressive events were identified in patients receiving febuxostat with AZA or 6-MP. Eighteen cases were treated with the combination of AZA and febuxostat. A median of 1.6 months elapsed from initiation of the drug combination until discovery of the event. Sixteen cases required hospitalization; 15 reported administration of blood products. Thirteen cases reported resolution of the event with discontinuation of both drugs, two reported discontinuation of the thiopurine only, and one reported discontinuation of febuxostat only. LIMITATIONS: Thiopurine monotherapy may cause myelosuppression. Complications of immunosuppression that may contribute to the real-world morbidity and mortality associated with the febuxostat-thiopurine DI were not examined. Finally, FAERS data are limited by the voluntary nature of reporting. CONCLUSION: Current febuxostat labeling contraindicates concomitant administration of febuxostat with either AZA or 6-MP. This case series demonstrates that the DI can result in clinically significant adverse events and is supportive of current febuxostat labeling.

Key Physicochemical Characteristics Influencing ADME Properties of Therapeutic Proteins.

Therapeutic proteins are a rapidly growing class of drugs in clinical settings. The pharmacokinetics (PK) of therapeutic proteins relies on their absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) properties. Moreover, the ADME properties of therapeutic proteins are impacted by their physicochemical characteristics. Comprehensive evaluation of these characteristics and their impact on ADME properties are critical to successful drug development. This chapter summarizes all relevant physicochemical characteristics and their effect on ADME properties of therapeutic proteins.

A Novel Pharmacokinetic Bridging Strategy to Support a Change in the Route of Administration for Biologics.

Determination of appropriate pharmacokinetic end point to bridge different dosing regimens is often a challenge when developing a new route of administration. Trough concentrations (Ctrough) are often considered the most relevant PK end point to predict efficacy (ACR20/DAS28) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis for biologics. However, no systematic research has been conducted to evaluate this approach. We developed a novel strategy to predict the most relevant PK variables that may be used to support a change in the route of administration for biological products. Our analysis indicated that matching only Ctrough when switching from intravenous dosing to subcutaneous dosing with decreasing dosing interval may result in a lower treatment response. If only average concentration (Cave) is considered as the relevant variable, our analysis showed that treatment response may be worsened when switching from subcutaneous dosing to intravenous dosing with increasing dosing interval. The study results demonstrated that matching a single pharmacokinetic end point (Ctrough or Cave) may not be sufficient to ensure efficacy when switching between intravenous dosing and subcutaneous dosing. A practical novel pharmacokinetic bridging approach is provided to support a change in the route of administration for biological products.

A Model-Based Approach to Quantify the Time-Course of Anti-Drug Antibodies for Therapeutic Proteins.

A mathematical antidrug antibody (ADA) model was developed to quantitatively assess immunogenicity for therapeutic proteins. The ADA model was built with antibody titer data in subjects from 10 clinical trials. The time course of the antibody titers was quantitatively characterized with a two-component semimechanistic model describing the double peaks of ADA titers. The relationship between antibody titer and incidence was also explored. The ADA incidences in subjects from 12 clinical trials were used for internal and external validations. The ADA titers reasonably predicted the incidence of antibody. The model-predicted elimination rate constant for antibody titer was 14.1 × 10-3  day-1 and 8.1 × 10-3  day-1 in healthy subjects and patients, respectively. This research provided a useful tool to quantitatively evaluate immunogenicity and its impact for therapeutic proteins.

Use of a Systems Pharmacology Model Based Approach Toward Dose Optimization of Parathyroid Hormone Therapy in Hypoparathyroidism.

We present an application of a quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) model to support a regulatory decision, specifically in assessing the adequacy of the proposed dosing regimen. On January 23, 2015, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Natpara (human parathyroid hormone (PTH)) to control hypocalcemia in patients with hypoparathyroidism. Clinical trial results indicated that although once-daily PTH reduced calcium and vitamin D dose requirement while maintaining the normocalcemia, the regimen was not adequate to control hypercalciuria. We hypothesized that the lack of control on urinary calcium excretion was due to the short half-life of PTH. The QSP model-based simulations indicated that a more frequent dosing regimen may provide better control on hypercalciuria while maintaining normocalcemia. A postmarketing trial was recommended to assess pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics (PDs) of PTH dose and dosing regimen. Although other modeling approaches may be feasible, in this specific case, QSP model-based simulations fulfilled the information gap to support recommendations of this postmarketing trial.

Methadone Metabolism and Drug-Drug Interactions: In Vitro and In Vivo Literature Review.

Methadone is utilized for the treatment of individuals with opiate dependence. Methadone undergoes N-demethylation by multiple cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes including CYP3A4, CYP2B6, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2C9, and CYP2C8. In vivo, polymorphism effects on methadone systemic exposure have been noted for CYP2B6, CYP3A4, and CYP2D6. Clinical drug interaction studies with antiviral drugs in methadone maintenance treatment patients yield varying results on methadone pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. In general, CYP inhibitors altered methadone exposure with no adverse effects. CYP inducers generally decreased methadone exposure with some reports of withdrawal symptoms in the subjects. Interaction studies with antiviral drug combinations yielding differing results depend on the enzyme(s) affected. For certain antiviral medicines which are dual inhibitor(s) and inducer(s) for CYP enzymes, their effect on methadone pharmacokinetics can change with time since the effect of induction is usually delayed compared to the effect of inhibition.

Exposure-Response Modeling and Power Analysis of Components of ACR Response Criteria in Rheumatoid Arthritis (Part 2: Continuous Model).

Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models were developed to quantitate the exposure-response relationships using continuous longitudinal data on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) subcomponents, that is, tender-joint count (TJC), swollen-joint count (SJC), C-reactive protein, patient's assessment of pain, patient's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessment of disease activity, and patient's assessment of physical function for 5 biologics approved for use in rheumatoid arthritis. The models were then used to simulate the time courses of clinical outcomes following different treatment regimens. The relative sensitivity of the 7 subcomponents was assessed using Monte Carlo simulation-based power analysis. The developed population PK/PD models adequately described the relationship between serum concentrations and changes in ACR subcomponents. The trial simulation and subsequent power analysis showed that SJC and TJC appeared to be more sensitive than the other 5 ACR subcomponents to detect treatment effect over placebo/methotrexate. These 7 ACR subcomponents had similar power in detecting the treatment difference between different doses. In addition, the continuous measures of ACR subcomponents did not appear to be more sensitive than binary measures.