Outcomes of Heart Block in Myocarditis: A Review of 31,760 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Various electrocardiographic abnormalities, including atrioventricular conduction block, have been reported in patients with myocarditis. We performed an observation study to describe the characteristics and outcomes of inpatients diagnosed with myocarditis complicated by heart block (HB) in a large national cohort. METHODS: We identified patients with primary ICD-9 codes for myocarditis HB from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) Database from 1998 to 2013. We compared the baseline characteristics and compared clinical outcomes between patients with and without HB, and in patients with/without high degree atrioventricular block (HDAVB). RESULTS: From the NIS database, 31,760 patients had a principal diagnosis of myocarditis and HB was reported in 1.7% of these patients (n=540). Female gender and Asian race were independently associated with HB. Out of 540 patients, 363 patients had HDAVB (67.2%) and 177 patients had not advanced HB (32.8%). Not advanced HB was not associated with an increased mortality rate compared to patients without HB (0% vs. 2.7%, p=0.315). On the other hand, the incidence of cardiogenic shock, respiratory failure and renal failure were higher in patients with HDAVB (26.2% vs. 5.0%, 33.9% vs. 5.9% and 29.2% vs. 5.5%, p<0.001 respectively). Patients with HDAVB required more procedural support (incidence of intra-aortic balloon pump 17.8% vs. 3.3%). They also had significantly longer lengths of hospital stay (9.4±9.4 vs. 4.3±8.4, p<0.001) and higher mortality (15.5% vs. 2.7%, p<0.001). Compared to myocarditis patients without HB, the odds for mortality in myocarditis patients with HDAVB 1.58 (95% CI=1.03-2.49, p=0.039). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of HB and HDAVB among patients with acute myocarditis was 1.7% and 1.1% respectively. Female gender and Asian race were both independently associated with significant odds for the occurrence of HB and HDAVB. High degree atrioventricular block was independently associated with increased morbidity and mortality.

Comparison of Outcomes in Patients Having Acute Myocardial Infarction With Versus Without Sickle-Cell Anemia.

Sickle-cell disease (SCD) affects millions worldwide. Sickle-cell anemia (SCA), the most severe form of this disease, is the most common inherited blood disorder in the United States. There are limited data on the incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in these patients. Using data from the National Inpatient Sample database, we matched cases (AMI with SCA) with controls (AMI without SCA) in a 1:1 ratio for age, gender, race, and year of admission. We compared both groups in terms of clinical characteristics and inpatient outcomes and performed a logistic regression with mortality as the primary outcome. Using weighted samples, we also described trends of SCA in the general population of patients with AMI. Of the 2,386,657 admissions with AMI, SCA was reported in 501 (0.02%) patients, and 495 were successfully matched to controls. Patients with SCA were less likely to have risk factors for coronary artery disease than those without SCA. Patients with SCA were more likely to develop pneumonia, respiratory failure, and acute renal failure, and require mechanical ventilation, hemodialysis for acute renal failure and blood transfusion. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in patients with SCA. In a multivariate analysis, SCA was an independent predictor of mortality (odds ratio 3.49; 95% confidence interval 1.99 to 6.12; p = < .001). In conclusion, myocardial infarction occurs in patients with SCA at a relatively early age. These patients do not typically have the traditional risk factors for the acute coronary syndrome. Mortality in these patients is significantly higher in age-, gender-, and race-matched controls.

Cardiovascular Outcomes With Surgical Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Who Underwent Valvular Heart Surgery (from the National Inpatient Sample Database).

Left atrial appendage (LAA) exclusion is a commonly performed procedure to reduce the embolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent cardiac surgeries. Our study aimed to evaluate the in-hospital outcomes of LAA exclusion in patients with AF who underwent valvular heart surgeries. We queried the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database from 1998 to 2013 for patients with the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition, Clinical Modification, diagnosis codes for AF and underwent any valvular heart surgery. We then performed a case-control matching based on the CHA2DS2VASc score for those who underwent LAA exclusion versus those who did not. Primary outcome was the incidence of in-hospital cerebrovascular events, whereas the secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, length of hospital stay, and bleeding. Our analysis included 1,304 patients. Patients who underwent LAA exclusion had significantly less incidence of cerebrovascular events (2.5% vs 4.6%, p = 0.04), in-hospital death (1.5% vs 4.9%, p = 0.001), and shorter hospital stay (10.5 vs 12.9 days, p <0.01). The LAA exclusion cohort had more incidence of pericardial effusion (1.3% vs 0.5%, p = 0.04) but no difference in bleeding events (p = 0.55). In conclusion, in patients with AF who underwent valvular surgeries, LAA exclusion may be associated with lower in-hospital cerebrovascular events and mortality and shorter hospital stay.