Survival, treatment patterns, and costs of HER2+ metastatic breast cancer patients in Ontario between 2005 to 2020.

BACKGROUND: To enable the integration of novel therapies, it is critical to understand current long-term outcomes in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC), including survival, treatment patterns, and costs. We sought to define these outcomes among patients with mBC in Ontario. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective population-level study in Ontario women diagnosed with breast cancer of any stage between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2019, with follow-up until December 31, 2020. HER2-positivity was based on receipt of a HER2-targeted therapy (HER2-TT) in the first line (1L) metastatic setting. Administrative databases at ICES were used to assess outcomes. RESULTS: In Ontario, 2557 patients were diagnosed with mBC and received a HER2-TT, and of these 1606 were diagnosed with early-stage (stage I-III) that became metastatic (recurrent), while 951 were diagnosed with late stage/de novo mBC (stage IV). The average age of all patients was 54.8 years ± 12.7 years. Treatment regimens that included pertuzumab and trastuzumab (cohort name: pert_tras) were the most frequently used HER2-TT for 1L mBC (51.4%), while T-DM1 was the most frequent therapy (87.5%) in second line (2L). The median overall survival (mOS) from initiation of 1L pert_tras was not reached, whereas mOS from initiation of T-DM1 in 2L was 18.7 months. The overall mean cost per patient on pert_tras during 1L was $267,282. The main cost drivers were the cost of systemic therapy, followed by cancer clinic visits, with a mean cost per patient at $158,961 and $73,882, respectively. CONCLUSION: The baseline characteristics and treatment patterns for patients who received HER2-TT in our study align with previously reported results. However, the mOS observed for 2L T-DM1 was shorter than that found in pivotal, clinical trial literature. As expected, anti-cancer systemic therapy costs were the main contributor to the over quarter-million dollar mean cost per patient on pert_tras in 1L.

Radiation costing methods: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Costs for radiation therapy (rt) and the methods used to cost rt are highly diverse across the literature. To date, no study has compared various costing methods in detail. Our objective was to perform a thorough review of the radiation costing literature to identify sources of costs and methods used. METHODS: A systematic review of Ovid medline, Ovid oldmedline, embase, Ovid HealthStar, and EconLit from 2005 to 23 March 2015 used search terms such as "radiation," "radiotherapy," "neoplasm," "cost," " cost analysis," and "cost benefit analysis" to locate relevant articles. Original papers were reviewed for detailed costing methods. Cost sources and methods were extracted for papers investigating rt modalities, including three-dimensional conformal rt (3D-crt), intensity-modulated rt (imrt), stereotactic body rt (sbrt), and brachytherapy (bt). All costs were translated into 2014 U.S. dollars. RESULTS: Most of the studies (91%) reported in the 33 articles retrieved provided rt costs from the health system perspective. The cost of rt ranged from US$2,687.87 to US$111,900.60 per treatment for imrt, followed by US$5,583.28 to US$90,055 for 3D-crt, US$10,544.22 to US$78,667.40 for bt, and US$6,520.58 to US$19,602.68 for sbrt. Cost drivers were professional or personnel costs and the cost of rt treatment. Most studies did not address the cost of rt equipment (85%) and institutional or facility costs (66%). CONCLUSIONS: Costing methods and sources were widely variable across studies, highlighting the need for consistency in the reporting of rt costs. More work to promote comparability and consistency across studies is needed.