[The Effect of Radiation Protection Education for the Operators' Ocular Lens in Cardiac Catheterization].

The purpose of this study was to educate operators regarding cardiac catheterization using radiation protection slides prepared for this study and to consider whether or not this radiation protection education contributes to reducing the exposure of the operator's ocular lens. Thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) was installed at the outside left, inside left, outside right, and inside right of the X-ray protective eyewear of the operators performing the cardiac catheterization. The exposure dose rate before and after radiation protection education for 3 operators performing cardiac catheterization was compared. The exposure dose ratio was defined by dividing the TLD measurement value, which is the air kerma calculated by the X-ray diagnosis apparatus for the angiography. In other words, this can calculate the ratio of how much the operators are exposed to radiation from the dose of the patient per examination. When comparing the radiation dose ratio obtained from the dosimeter installed on the right outer side before and after education, p-value was <0.05 in the left anterior oblique-cranial and right anterior oblique- cranial, and a significant difference was recognized. The radiation protection education carried out in this study contributes to a reduction in the exposure dose of the operators.

[Proposal for an auxiliary tool designed to reduce retake rates for lateral radiography of the knee joint].

The reproducibility of lateral radiography of the knee joint in the lateral position is low because patient positioning can be easily affected by passive rotation of the knee joint. We calculated the correction angle of the femoral external rotation and the lower leg elevation and developed our own auxiliary tool for obtaining a lateral view image. We were able to obtain, in a single attempt, an image with misalignment of the condyle limited to less than 7 mm. Our tool also contributed to the reduction of the re-imaging rate, suggesting its usefulness in contributing to a lower re-imaging rate for lateral radiography of the knee joint.

[Exposed dose comparison between coronary computed tomographic angiography and coronary angiography: basic examination by phantom].

The new type of coronary angiography(CAG)that uses 40 mm volumetric computed tomography(VCT)has great potential for cardiac disease. However, it is still necessary to be cognizant of exposure dose. We measured doses of CAG by both VCT and cardiovascular X-ray using a body phantom within 170 glass dosimeters. VCT protocols were 120 kV, 570 mA, and 0.35 sec/rot with and without the dose-reduction features(small cardiac X-ray beam filter and ECG mA modulation). The cardiovascular X-ray protocol was Auto(65 - 77 kV)kV, Auto(41 - 46 mA)mA, 5 secx11 shots+11 min fluoroscopy(minimum protocol for screening). VCT with and without the dose-reduction features has the same dose distribution, however, the dose-reduction features reduced the amount of dose by about 40-50%. For VCT with those features, measured dose was about 70 mGy in the cardiac area and 60 mGy at the skin of the back, whereas those of cardiovascular X-ray were 10 mGy and 30 mGy. We measured detailed dose distributions and variations in the phantom, and we also demonstrated the possibility of VCT's dose-reduction features. The CT dose was still higher than that of cardiovascular X-ray, however, there were advantages of CT scanning, for instance, information about calcification, soft plaque, and 3D visualization. We think it is important to use both systems with an understanding of their advantages and limitations.