Paid sick leave among US private sector employees.

BACKGROUND: Inequities in US employees' access to paid sick leave are known, but it is not clear whether they are increasing or decreasing over time. More than two dozen state and local paid sick leave laws were recently enacted, many with the stated goal of reducing inequities in access to paid sick leave. We examined how inequities in access to paid sick leave have changed over time, focusing on the years when these laws were coming into effect. METHODS: Private sector employees participating in the National Health Interview Survey between 2006 (before laws came into effect) and 2018 (after most came into effect) reported if they had paid sick leave in their main job. We examined how differences in access to paid sick leave by Census region, race/ethnicity, work hours, and educational attainment changed over time. RESULTS: The percentage of employees with access to paid sick leave increased from 56% in 2006 to 61% in 2018, with most of the increases in access occurring in the West. Inequities by race/ethnicity decreased substantially between 2015 and 2018, the years when most paid sick leave laws came into effect. This change was driven by Hispanic and Latino workers rapidly gaining access to paid sick leave during this time. Differences in access to paid sick leave by work hours and education attainment remained stable over time. CONCLUSIONS: Inequities in access to paid sick leave remain. Paid sick leave laws could be effective means to increase access to paid sick leave and equalize access.

Partnerships to Care for Our Patients and Communities During COVID-19.

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic forced not only rapid changes in how clinical care and educational programs are delivered but also challenged academic medical centers (AMCs) like never before. The pandemic made clear the need to have coordinated action based on shared data and shared resources to meet the needs of patients, learners, and communities. Family medicine departments across the country have been key partners in AMCs' responses. The Duke Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (FMCH) was involved in many aspects of Duke University's and Health System's responses, including leadership contributions in delivering employee health and student health services. The pandemic also surfaced the biological and social interactions that reveal underlying socioeconomic inequalities, for which family medicine has advocated since its inception. Key to success was the department's ability to integrate "horizontally" with the broader community, thereby accelerating the institution's response to the pandemic.