Augmented Reality Microsurgery: Proof of Concept for a Novel Approach to Microsurgical Field Visualization in Plastic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Microsurgery is conducted on tiny anatomical structures such as blood vessels and nerves. Over the past few decades, little has changed in the way plastic surgeons visualize and interact with the microsurgical field. New advances in augmented reality (AR) technology present a novel method for microsurgical field visualization. Voice- and gesture-based commands can be used in real time to adjust the size and position of a digital screen. Surgical decision support and/or navigation may also be used. The authors assess the use of AR in microsurgery. METHODS: The video feed from a Leica Microsystems OHX surgical microscope was streamed to a Microsoft HoloLens2 AR headset. A fellowship-trained microsurgeon and three plastic surgery residents then performed a series of four arterial anastomoses on a chicken thigh model using the AR headset, a surgical microscope, a video microscope (or "exoscope"), and surgical loupes. RESULTS: The AR headset provided an unhindered view of the microsurgical field and peripheral environment. The subjects remarked on the benefits of having the virtual screen track with head movements. The ability of participants to place the microsurgical field in a tailored comfortable, ergonomic position was also noted. Points of improvement were the low image quality compared with current monitors, image latency, and the lack of depth perception. CONCLUSIONS: AR is a useful tool that has the potential to improve microsurgical field visualization and the way surgeons interact with surgical monitors. Improvements in screen resolution, latency, and depth of field are needed.

Updates on Enhanced Recovery after Surgery protocols for plastic surgery of the breast and future directions.

Introduction: Perioperative pain control is an important component of any plastic surgery practice. Due to the incorporation of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols, reported pain level, opioid consumption, and hospital length of stay numbers have decreased significantly. This article provides an up-to-date review of current ERAS protocols in use, reviews individual aspects of ERAS protocols, and discusses future directions for the continual improvement of ERAS protocols and control of postoperative pain. ERAS components: ERAS protocols have proven to be excellent methods of decreasing patient pain, opioid consumption, and postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and/or inpatient length of stay. ERAS protocols have three phases: preoperative education and pre-habilitation, intraoperative anesthetic blocks, and a postoperative multimodal analgesia regimen. Intraoperative blocks consist of local anesthetic field blocks and a variety of regional blocks, with lidocaine or lidocaine cocktails. Various studies throughout the surgical literature have demonstrated the efficacy of these aspects and their relevance to the overall goal of decreasing patient pain, both in plastic surgery and other surgical fields. In addition to the individual ERAS phases, ERAS protocols have shown promise in both the inpatient and outpatient sectors of plastic surgery of the breast. Conclusion: ERAS protocols have repeatedly been shown to provide improved patient pain control, decreased hospital or PACU length of stay, decreased opioid use, and cost savings. Although protocols have most commonly been utilized in inpatient plastic surgery procedures of the breast, emerging evidence points towards similar efficacy when used in outpatient procedures. Furthermore, this review demonstrates the efficacy of local anesthetic blocks in controlling patient pain.

Modern Approaches to Alternative Flap-Based Breast Reconstruction: Transverse Upper Gracilis Flap.

The transverse upper/myocutaneous gracilis is a medial thigh-based flap primarily reserved as a secondary choice for autologous reconstruction of small to moderate-sized breasts in women without a suitable abdominal donor site. Its consistent and reliable anatomy based on the medial circumflex femoral artery permits expedient flap harvest with relatively low donor site morbidity. The primary disadvantage is the limited achievable volume, often necessitating augmentation such as extended flap modifications, autologous fat grafting, flap stacking, or even implant placement.

Decreasing Opioids in Outpatient Breast Surgery with an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Program and Preoperative Education.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs have been detailed in the literature predominantly in the inpatient setting. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of an ERAS protocol with a preoperative educational class on opioid prescribing and patient outcomes for outpatient breast surgery. METHODS: An ERAS protocol was formulated focusing on preoperative education, multimodal pain control, and an intraoperative block. The study was conducted as an institutional review board-approved retrospective review. Women undergoing breast reconstruction revision, breast reduction, delayed insertion of prosthesis, tissue expander to implant exchange, and matching procedures were included. The patients were separated into pre-ERAS and ERAS cohorts. Data on demographic characteristics, postanesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay, PACU oral morphine equivalent (OME) consumption, outpatient OME prescriptions, major and minor complications, and need for additional opioid prescriptions were collected. Analysis was performed with the Fisher exact test or chi-square test as appropriate. RESULTS: Group 1 (pre-ERAS) and group 2 (ERAS) each included 68 patients. The cohorts had similar age, body mass index, diabetes status, and tobacco use. Group 1 was prescribed an average of 216 OMEs, compared with 126.4 OMEs for group 2, a 41.5% decrease ( P < 0.0001). The pre-ERAS group consumed an average of 23.3 OMEs in the PACU versus 16.6 OMEs in the ERAS group ( P = 0.005). Fewer patients in the ERAS group required additional prescriptions for narcotic pain medication at postoperative follow-up ( P = 0.116). No differences were seen in major or minor complications. CONCLUSION: An ERAS protocol that uses a multimodal approach to pain control and preoperative patient education is useful in the outpatient setting and can help decrease opioid consumption. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine to a Local Analgesic Cocktail for Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks in Abdominally Based Microvascular Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Transversus abdominis plane blocks can improve pain control and decrease opioid use within an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in patients undergoing abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction. The authors have transitioned to using a local analgesic cocktail for transversus abdominis plane blocks. The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative opioid use in patients who received the blocks. METHODS: Patients who underwent abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction between November of 2015 and December of 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The study group received bupivacaine, ketorolac, dexmedetomidine, and dexamethasone; the control group received liposomal bupivacaine with or without bupivacaine, ketorolac, or dexmedetomidine, as a transversus abdominis plane block. The primary outcome of interest was postoperative opioid use and pain scores. RESULTS: One hundred four women met inclusion criteria: 36 in group A (before ERAS, before transversus abdominis plane block), 38 in group B (ERAS, transversus abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine), and 30 in group C (ERAS, transversus abdominis plane block with local anesthetic cocktail). Total daily oral morphine equivalent consumption (group A, 633; group B, 240; group C, 135; p < 0.0001) and average daily oral morphine equivalent consumption (group A, 137; group B, 56; group C, 29; p < 0.0001) were significantly less for group C in the inpatient phase. Patients in group C were prescribed significantly fewer outpatient oral morphine equivalents (group A, 79; group B, 74; group C, 52; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Transversus abdominis plane blocks are a significant component of an ERAS protocol for abdominally based breast reconstruction. Liposomal bupivacaine is a popular option for transversus abdominis plane blocks. The authors' results demonstrate that a local anesthetic cocktail, composed of economical and readily available medications, can provide excellent patient pain control and decrease postoperative opioid use. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Microsurgery in the era of COVID-19.

The COVID-19 pandemic has presented new challenges to microsurgeons. The virus is highly transmissible, with increased risk during operations that involve the aerodigestive tract. It is important to be able to identify high-risk operations and scenarios to guide management decisions and selection of personal protective equipment. Preoperative testing is a key element in identifying high-risk scenarios, and preoperative testing protocols are essential to maintaining safety in the COVID-19 era. Because COVID-19 can be transmitted via the conjunctiva, adaptations to loupes and microscopes are necessary to safely perform microsurgery in high-risk scenarios. We outline a potential risk stratification algorithm, as well as precautions for each scenario. Potential areas for innovation are also discussed.

Propeller Flaps in Lower Extremity Reconstruction.

Propeller flaps represent an outstanding alternative to conventional pedicled and free flap options in lower extremity reconstruction, offering significant advantages over the latter. An understanding of the perforasome concept, hot and cold perforator locations, and basic flap design enable the surgeon to readily harvest flaps based on any clinically relevant perforator in freestyle fashion. The purpose of this article is to review fundamentals of propeller flap design and harvest in the lower extremity and discuss reconstructive strategies by level of injury.

Aesthetic Surgery in Plastic Surgery Academia.

BACKGROUND: Aesthetic surgery is a critical component of academic plastic surgery. As institutions are placing increased focus on aesthetic surgery, there is an opportunity to identify factors that facilitate the creation and maintenance of successful aesthetic plastic surgery programs. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to conduct a national survey to evaluate the current state of academic aesthetic surgery and to identify factors that contribute to success. METHODS: A REDCap 122-question survey was developed and validated by members of the Academic Aesthetic Surgery Roundtable (AASR). The national survey was distributed to department chairs and division chiefs with active ACGME-approved plastic surgery programs (n = 92). Responses underwent Pearson's chi-squared, Wilcoxon rank-sum, and postselection inference analyses. AASR members convened to interpret data and identify best practices. RESULTS: Responses were received from 64 of 92 queries (69.6%). The multivariate analysis concluded traits associated with successful academic aesthetic surgery practices included the presence of aesthetic surgery-focused, full-time faculty whose overall practice includes >50% aesthetic surgery (P = 0.040) and nonphysician aesthetic practitioners who provide injection services (P = 0.025). In the univariate analysis, factors associated with strong aesthetic surgery training programs included resident participation in faculty aesthetic clinics (P = 0.034), aesthetic research (P = 0.006), and discounted resident aesthetic clinics (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The growth of academic aesthetic surgery practices represents a significant opportunity for advancement of resident training, departmental financial success, and diversification of faculty practices. By identifying and sharing best practices and strategies, academic aesthetic surgery practices can be further enhanced.

"Does ERAS benefit higher BMI patients? A single institutional review".

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is increasingly used in plastic surgery to optimize patient care. Mitigating the risk of postoperative complications is particularly important in patients with risk factors, such as obesity. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of the ERAS pathway in patients, stratified by BMI, undergoing free flap breast reconstruction on length of stay and complications. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction from January 2014 to December 2017 was performed. Data collected include participation in the ERAS protocol, patient demographics, length of stay (LOS), complications (minor and major), and 30-day reoperation rates. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 36 non-ERAS and 87 ERAS patients. ERAS patients had a shorter length of stay than non-ERAS patients (4.14 vs. 4.69, p = 0.049). Higher BMI patients progressively benefited from their involvement in an ERAS pathway: class I obese patients had an LOS decrease of 0.99 days (p = 0.048) and class II+ obese patients had an LOS decrease of 1.35 days (p = 0.093). Minor complications, major complications, and reoperation rates were similar between ERAS and non-ERAS patients (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Utilization of an ERAS protocol for free flap breast reconstruction safely decreases LOS, especially with increasing BMI. Patients benefit from an ERAS protocol without increasing risk of postoperative complications, compared to non-ERAS patients of similar BMIs.

A Protocol for Safe Head and Neck Reconstructive Surgery in the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had significant implications for citizens globally and for the healthcare system, including plastic surgeons. Operations of the upper aerodigestive tract, including head and neck reconstruction and craniomaxillofacial procedures, are of particularly high risk because they may aerosolize the virus and lead to severe surgeon and surgical team illness. Until the virus is eradicated or widespread vaccination occurs, we recommend certain precautions to safely perform these operations. We propose evolving algorithms for head and neck reconstruction and facial trauma surgeries to maintain provider safety. Central to these guidelines are preoperative COVID-19 testing, appropriate personal protective equipment, and operative techniques/principles that minimize operative time and aerosolization of the virus. We aim to provide efficient care to our patients throughout this pandemic, while maintaining the safety of plastic surgeons and other healthcare providers.

Preconditioning with Foam-mediated External Suction on Flap Microvasculature and Perfusion in a Rodent Model.

Foam-mediated external suction (FMES) has previously shown to improve tissue microcirculation. We hypothesized that preconditioning fasciocutaneous perforator flaps with FMES would augment perfusion and demonstrate greater capillary recruitment. METHODS: Gluteal perforator flaps were designed on sixteen 400 g rats. Continuous FMES at -125 mm Hg was applied on one side (intervention) to precondition tissue for 5 days, with the contralateral side as a paired control. In group A, we assessed changes following pretreatment, after surgery, and 7 days postprocedure, and in group B, we evaluated changes during preconditioning alone. In group A (N = 8), control and intervention flaps were assessed using laser-assisted indocyanine green fluorescence angiography. In group B, flap regions were assessed using 4-dimensional computed tomographic angiography. All flaps were analyzed for microvessel density using micro-computed tomography and histological assessment using hematoxylin and eosin and CD3 immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Thirty-two flaps were included in this study (N = 16 intervention and matched controls). Four-dimensional computed tomographic angiography demonstrated 17% greater tissue perfusion in preconditioned flaps (mean, 78.7 HU; SD, 8.8) versus controls (mean, 67.3 HU; SD, 15.7; P < 0.01). Laser-assisted indocyanine green fluorescence angiography showed a 30% higher mean absolute intensity in preconditioned flaps versus controls (P < 0.01). Postsurgery mean absolute intensity in preconditioned flaps remained 21% higher than in controls (P = 0.03). Preconditioned flaps demonstrated a 2-fold increase in mean vessel volume of 9.1 mm3 (SD, 7) versus 4.5 mm3 (SD, 3) in controls (P = 0.04); there was a 33% higher mean area fraction of CD31 in preconditioned flaps, 3.9% (SD, 3) versus 2.9% (SD, 3) in controls (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: FMES preconditioning has the potential to augment vascularity of tissue for flap harvest; however, further experimental studies are required to optimize strategies and evaluate long-term effects for clinical applications.

Autologous Breast Reconstruction in Low Body Mass Index Patients: Strategies for Maximizing Skin Envelope and Breast Volume.

Pure autologous breast reconstruction in thin patients creates challenges. This review highlights techniques to optimize the scarce donor tissue available, approaches to reconstruction, and microsurgical techniques. A systematic approach to maximize breast volume and the skin envelope in patients who underwent pure autologous breast reconstruction by a single senior surgeon is presented with a clinical case series. Included in the study were 125 patients (217) with autologous breast reconstructions. Although DIEP flaps were the commonest flap used overall (79%), within in the low body mass index (<22) group, there was a greater use of Latissimus (32%), and thigh-based flaps (>50%).

Maximizing the Utility of the Pedicled Anterolateral Thigh Flap for Locoregional Reconstruction: Technical Pearls and Pitfalls.

The pedicled anterolateral thigh (PALT) flap is an underutilized flap for locoregional reconstruction largely because methods to maximize its reach are neither universally implemented nor fully understood. In addition, most of the available literature has focused on the utility of the free anterolateral thigh flap with less emphasis on the PALT flap. Moreover, flap design concepts to maximize its utility and reach and optimize outcomes have not been comprehensively described. In an effort to address this knowledge gap, the authors sought to review their institution's experience with the PALT flap for locoregional reconstruction.

Keystone and Perforator Flaps in Reconstruction: Modifications and Updated Applications.

Pedicle perforator flaps and keystone perforator island flaps provide additional tools for the reconstructive surgeon's armamentarium. Advances in understanding of vascular anatomy, dynamic nature of perforator perfusion, interperforator flow, and "hot spot" principle have led to reconstructive methods that allow for autologous tissue transfer, while limiting donor site morbidity. Further modifications in pedicle perforator flap enabled the propeller flap and freestyle perforator free flap for soft tissue reconstruction. Modifications in keystone perforator island flap increased degrees of freedom the reconstructive surgeon has for soft tissue coverage of large defects, with significant reliability, aesthetically pleasing results, and reduced donor site morbidity.

Recent Advances in Microsurgery: An Update in the Past 4 Years.

Microsurgery has broad applications in reconstructive surgery. As techniques, diagnostics, and advancing technology rapidly evolve, reconstructive microsurgeons can adapt to address new challenges and push the frontiers to achieve optimal functional and aesthetic reconstruction, and minimize donor site morbidity. This article briefly outlines some of the recent advances and innovations in microsurgery within the last 5 years in perforator flaps, breast, lymphedema surgery, extremity reconstruction, targeted muscle reinnervation, head and neck reconstruction, composite tissue allotransplantation, and robotic surgery.

How Fat Grafting Works.

Fat grafting has been shown to improve diseased soft issue. Although the mechanism behind fat grafting's regenerative properties is currently debated, published studies agree that there is an associated vasculogenic effect. A systematic literature review was conducted to elucidate the biochemical pathways responsible for establishing neo-vasculature to grafted fat. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted by searching PubMed for current basic science and clinical research relating to fat grafting. In total, 144 of 269 (54%) articles met the inclusion criteria for our literature review. These 144 articles were summarized, with 86 of them (60%) used to construct this article at the authors' discretion. RESULTS: Fat grafting-induced neovascularization can be divided into 3 parts. First, tissue trauma induced via fat injection activates a host inflammatory response necessary for cellular recruitment. Recruited cells promote the formation of connective tissue and neo-vasculature at the graft site. Second, cellular elements within the lipoaspirate contribute to neovascularization through a cytokine burst. Third, a synergistic relationship is established between recruited inflammatory cells and the cytokine burst of grafted fat. The end product of these processes is the differentiation of progenitor cells and the creation of neo-vasculature at the graft site. CONCLUSIONS: Establishing neovasculature is paramount for the survival of grafted fat. Fat graft take can be divided into 2 steps: imbibition and neovascularization. We believe this process occurs through 3 distinct concepts: host inflammation via graft injection, hypoxic response of lipoaspirate-derived cellular elements, and a synergistic relationship between host inflammation and grafted fat.

Risk Factors for Lymphedema after Thigh Sarcoma Resection and Reconstruction.

Secondary lymphedema can be a lifelong and debilitating consequence of lower extremity oncologic resection and reconstruction. The goal of this study was to identify risk factors for the development of lymphedema in patients treated for thigh sarcoma. METHODS: A retrospective review analyzed all patients who underwent thigh sarcoma resection and reconstruction by a plastic surgeon at the Mayo Clinic between 1997 and 2014. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical management, adjunctive therapies, and complications of patients who did and did not develop postoperative lymphedema were compared. RESULTS: A total of 148 patients were identified. Twelve percent of patients developed lymphedema postoperatively during an average follow-up of 26 months. Risk factors for the development of lymphedema included defect location in the medial thigh (P = 0.04), arterial resection (P = 0.001), arterial reconstruction (P = 0.027), and a history of cardiac disease (P = 0.03). Twenty-two percent of patients who developed lymphedema also experienced wound dehiscence compared with 4.6% of patients without lymphedema (P = 0.02). There were no differences in age, body mass index, smoking, history of deep venous thrombosis or venous stasis, wound dimensions, or type of reconstruction performed in patients with and without lymphedema. CONCLUSIONS: Lymphedema is common following major oncologic resection. Preexisting cardiac disease, tumor location in the medial thigh, and arterial resection and reconstruction were associated with a higher risk of postoperative lymphedema. Noninfectious wound dehiscence may be secondary to lymphedema or represent an early indicator of patients who will ultimately develop lymphedema.

Breast Reconstruction in Obese Patients: The Fat Grafted Latissimus versus Abdominal Free Tissue Transfer.

Immediate fat grafting to the pedicled myocutaneous latissimus dorsi (LD) flap has recently gained in popularity as a means to supplement volume for breast reconstruction. The aim of this study is to compare complication rates of the immediately fat-grafted LD to free tissue transfer in the obese population. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort, 82 patients (149 breasts) from 2015 to 2019 were included. Patients underwent either unilateral or bilateral breast reconstruction with either LD with immediate fat grafting or abdominal-based free tissue transfer. Included patients had a body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2 at the time of surgery. Complication data were recorded as minor, major, and medical complications. Procedure characteristics and postoperative data were also studied. RESULTS: Minor complication rates between the LD with immediate fat grafting and free tissue transfer cases were similar (26.9% versus 26%, respectively). The free tissue transfer group had a significantly higher rate of major complications (20.3% versus 3.8%; P = 0.048) and medical complications (10.6% versus zero). Finally, the LD with immediate fat grafting group had significantly shorter operating room times, hospital length of stay, and fewer donor-site revisions. CONCLUSIONS: LD with immediate fat grafting offers the benefit of a totally autologous reconstruction without the risks of abdominal-based microvascular free tissue transfer or an implant. Favorable complication rates, shorter operative times, and shorter hospital length of stay make this reconstructive option a safe alternative to free tissue transfer in the obese population.

Complications after thigh sarcoma resection.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Standard treatment for extremity sarcoma is limb-sparing surgery often with radiation, but complications occur frequently. We sought to determine factors predictive of wound complications after thigh sarcoma resection and reconstruction while analyzing trends over time. METHODS: We reviewed all thigh defects requiring plastic surgeon reconstruction following sarcoma resection at our institution from 1997 to 2014. Patient demographics, comorbidities, operative characteristics, multi-modality therapies, and complications were analyzed. Wound complications were: infection, dehiscence, seroma, hematoma, or partial/total flap loss. RESULTS: There were 159 thigh reconstructions followed for 30 months on average. Eighty-seven percent of patients underwent radiation and 42% had chemotherapy. Almost half (49.1%) had a complication. The most common wound complication was surgical site infection (23.3%) followed by dehiscence (19.5%), and seroma (10.7%). Less common were partial (2.5%) or total flap loss (0.6%). Reoperation was required in 21 patients (13.2%). Tobacco use, older patient age, cardiac disease, and higher body mass index were independently associated with wound complications. Complications trended towards decreasing over time, but this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Tobacco use, cardiac disease, and higher body mass index, but not the timing of reconstruction, appear to increase the risk of wound complications after thigh soft tissue sarcomas resection and plastic surgery reconstruction.