RESUMO
Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients without lymph node (LN) metastases (pN0) may exhibit different survival rates, even when their T stage is similar. This divergence could be attributed to the current pathology practice, wherein LNs are examined solely in two-dimensional (2D). Unfortunately, adhering to the protocols of 2D pathological examination does not ensure the exhaustive sampling of all excised LNs, thereby leaving room for undetected metastatic foci in the unexplored depths of tissues. The employment of micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) facilitates a three-dimensional (3D) evaluation of all LNs without compromising sample integrity. In our study, we utilized quantitative micro-CT parameters to appraise the metastatic status of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) LNs. Methods: Micro-CT scans were conducted on 12 FFPEs obtained from 8 NSCLC patients with histologically confirmed mediastinal LN metastases. Simultaneously, whole-slide images from these FFPEs underwent scanning, and 47 regions of interest (ROIs) (17 metastatic foci, 11 normal lymphoid tissues, 10 adipose tissues, and 9 anthracofibrosis) were marked on scanned images. Quantitative structural variables obtained via micro-CT analysis from tumoral and non-tumoral ROIs, were analyzed. Result: Significant distinctions were observed in linear density, connectivity, connectivity density, and closed porosity between tumoral and non-tumoral ROIs, as indicated by kappa coefficients of 1, 0.90, 1, and 1, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic analysis substantiated the differentiation between tumoral and non-tumoral ROIs based on thickness, linear density, connectivity, connectivity density, and the percentage of closed porosity. Conclusions: Quantitative micro-CT parameters demonstrate the ability to distinguish between tumoral and non-tumoral regions of LNs in FFPEs. The discriminatory characteristics of these quantitative micro-CT parameters imply their potential usefulness in developing an artificial intelligence algorithm specifically designed for the 3D identification of LN metastases while preserving the FFPE tissue.
RESUMO
AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine the malignant potential of thyroid nodules with macrocalcifications and to evaluate the role of other sonographic findings in the diagnosis of malignancy in thyroid nodules besides macrocalcifications. METHODS: The findings of 8250 patients who applied to our outpatient clinic and underwent thyroid ultrasonography(US) between 2008 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. We included a total of 296 patients with 296 macrocalcified nodules (macrocalcification group) and an age- and sex matched group of 300 patients (control group) with the cytopathologic and/or histopathologic data of fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of thyroid nodules without calcification. Demographic characteristics of these patients, US characteristics of the nodules, and thyroid function tests were recorded. Cytopathological data of FNAB were classified according to BETHESDA. RESULTS: The malignancy rate was 14.2% (42/296) in the macrocalcification group and 5.3% (16/300) in the control group (p < 0.001). There was no significant relationship between interrupted peripheral calcification and malignancy. Hypoechoic or markedly hypoechoic appearance, irregular border, solid structure, presence of accompanying pathological lymphadenopathy on sonographic examination and upper and middle zone localization were other sonographic features that increased the risk of malignancy of a nodule. The presence of autoimmunity was not found to be associated with the risk of malignancy. TSH and calcitonin levels of malignant nodules were higher than benign nodules. There was no significant difference between gender and malignancy. In the univariate analysis, it was found that the presence of macrocalcification increased the risk of malignancy 2.935 times. (OR:2.935, p < 0.001.95% CI for OR 1.611-5.349) In addition, being younger, being in the high TIRADS category, and being in the upper and middle zones were factors that increased the risk of malignancy. Gender, TSH level, nodule volume and structure were not associated with malignancy. However, after multivariate analysis, factors that significantly increased the risk of malignancy were younger age, higher TIRADS category, and nodule localization. CONCLUSION: In our study, the malignancy rate was higher in the macrocalcification group than in the control group. However, no correlation was found after multivariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, younger age, higher TIRADS category, and nodules located in the upper and middle zone were other factors associated with malignancy. There was no association between peripheral interrupted calcification and malignancy risk.