Wireless localisation of breast lesions with MagSeed. A radiological perspective of 300 cases.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this article is to review the technical and radiological aspects of MagSeed® localisation, to assess its accuracy based on post-localisation mammograms and excision specimen X-rays and to discuss the radiological experience of our institutions. METHODS: Two-year data were collected retrospectively from three NHS boards from the West of Scotland. A total of 309 MagSeeds® were inserted under mammographic or ultrasonographic guidance in 300 women with unifocal, multifocal and/or bilateral breast lesions at the day of surgery or up to 30 days prior to it. Radiological review of post-localisation mammograms and intraoperative specimen X-rays as well as a review of the surgical outcomes were performed to assess the accuracy and efficacy of the method. Our experience relating to the technique's strengths and downsides were also noted. RESULTS: The MagSeeds® were inserted on average 7.2 days before surgery. The localisation technique was straight forward for the radiologists. In 99% of the cases, the MagSeed® was successfully deployed and 100% of the successfully localised lesions were excised at surgery. There was no difference in the accuracy of the localisation whether this was mammographically or ultrasonographically guided. On post-localisation mammograms, the MagSeed® was radiologically accurately positioned in 97.3% of the cases. No delayed MagSeed® migration was observed. On the specimen X-rays, the lesion was centrally positioned in 45.1%, eccentric within more than 1 mm from the margin in 35.7% and in 14.8% it was at the specimen's margin. The re-excision rate was 18.3%. CONCLUSION: The MagSeed® is an accurate and reliable localisation method in breast conserving surgery with good surgical outcomes. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: To our knowledge, the radiological aspects of MagSeed® localisation have not been widely described in peer-reviewed journals thus far.

Rôle of contrast media viscosity in altering vessel wall shear stress and relation to the risk of contrast extravasations.

Iodinated contrast media (CM) are the most commonly used injectables in radiology today. A range of different media are commercially available, combining various physical and chemical characteristics (ionic state, osmolality, viscosity) and thus exhibiting distinct in vivo behaviour and safety profiles. In this paper, numerical simulations of blood flow with contrast media were conducted to investigate the effects of contrast viscosity on generated vessel wall shear stress and vessel wall pressure to elucidate any possible relation to extravasations. Five different types of contrast for Iodine fluxes ranging at 1.5-2.2gI/s were modelled through 18G and 20G cannulae placed in an ideal vein at two different orientation angles. Results demonstrate that the least viscous contrast media generate the least maximum wall shear stress as well as the lowest total pressure for the same flow rate. This supports the empirical clinical observations and hypothesis that more viscous contrast media are responsible for a higher percentage of contrast extravasations. In addition, results support the clinical hypothesis that a catheter tip directed obliquely to the vein wall always produces the highest maximum wall shear stress and total pressure due to impingement of the contrast jet on the vessel wall.