Investigating the efficacy and safety of olanzapine prophylaxis for opioid-induced nausea and vomiting (JORTC-PAL20): a study protocol for an open-label, single-arm exploratory study.

INTRODUCTION: In opioid therapy for cancer pain, opioid-induced nausea and vomiting (OINV) occur in 20%-40% of patients during initial opioid treatment or increasing opioid doses. OINV result in failure to achieve pain relief due to poor opioid adherence. Therefore, antiemetics are used to prevent OINV, but their efficacy and safety in this context have not yet been fully elucidated. Olanzapine is a promising antiemetic for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single-arm, single-centre exploratory study will evaluate the prophylactic antiemetic efficacy and safety of 5 mg olanzapine in patients with cancer pain who are withholding initial regular opioid therapy. Thirty-five patients will be enrolled. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving complete control (CC) of OINV during 5 days of opioid treatment. CC was defined as the absence of emetic episodes, no need for rescue medication to treat nausea, and minimal or no nausea (3 or less on an 11-point categorical scale). Secondary endpoints include the complete response, defined as no emetic episodes and no use of rescue medication during the overall assessment period, the time from opioid initiation to first emetic episode, the time from opioid initiation to first rescue antiemetic administration, and adverse events graded by Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 1.0 and CTCAE version 5.0. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study protocol was approved by National Cancer Center Hospital Certified Review Board. The results will be used as preliminary data to conduct a validation study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT) jRCTs031220008.

Pharmacokinetic and dose-finding study of osimertinib in patients with impaired renal function and low body weight.

The safety of osimertinib is limited in patients with severe or moderate renal impairment, or low body weight. This study aimed to investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and recommended dose (RD) of osimertinib in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with impaired renal function and low body weight. Thirty-one eligible patients were enrolled and allocated into four cohorts: A, normal renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≥ 50 mL/min/1.73 m2 ) and normal body weight (≥45 kg); B, moderate renal impairment (eGFR = 30-50 mL/min/1.73 m2 ); C, low body weight (<45 kg); and D, severe renal impairment (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or undergoing dialysis). PK parameters and safety were evaluated with a starting dose of 80 mg osimertinib administered orally once daily in cohorts A, B, and C and 40 mg once daily in cohort D. The PK parameters in cohorts A, B, and C were found to be similar. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed, and the RD was determined to be 80 mg once daily in patients with moderate renal function and low body weight. Four serious adverse events, acneiform rash, diarrhea, QTc prolongation, and interstitial lung disease, were noted. Although the PK parameters of osimertinib were similar across all cohorts, toxicity occurred more frequently in patients with impaired renal function and low body weight. Clinicians should prescribe osimertinib with caution in NSCLC patients with impaired renal function and low body weight.

Safety Implications of Switching Pembrolizumab Dosage From 200 mg Every 3 Weeks to 400 mg Every 6 Weeks in Patients With Advanced NSCLC.

INTRODUCTION: Administration of 400 mg pembrolizumab every 6 weeks (400 mg Q6W) has been approved on the basis of the results of simulated pharmacokinetic modeling and exposure-response analyses. Nevertheless, the safety of switching dosage from 200 mg every 3 weeks (Q3W) to 400 mg Q6W during treatment remains unclear. METHODS: This study involved patients (N = 45) with advanced NSCLC, in whom the pembrolizumab dosage was switched from 200 mg Q3W to 400 mg Q6W between August 2020 and November 2021 in our institute. RESULTS: At the time of switching, the median age of the patients was 71 (range: 32-84) years, and 32 patients (71.1 %) were males. The median number of cycles of 200 mg Q3W before switching was six (range: 1-31). After switching, new or worsening immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occurred in 17 of the 45 patients (37.8%) within three cycles. The irAEs were pneumonitis in 11 patients (24.4%), diarrhea in three patients (6.7%), renal dysfunction in two patients (4.4%), adrenal dysfunction in two patients (4.4%), a skin rash in one patient (2.2%), fulminant type 1 diabetes mellitus in one patient (2.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The switching of pembrolizumab dosage from 200 mg Q3W to 400 mg Q6W resulted in the occurrence of new or worsening irAEs, in particular, pneumonitis, in the early cycles even in patients who had received stable treatment with 200 mg Q3W.

Evaluation of hepatic CYP3A enzyme activity using endogenous markers in lung cancer patients treated with cisplatin, dexamethasone, and aprepitant.

PURPOSE: Aprepitant is used with dexamethasone and 5-HT3 receptor antagonists as an antiemetic treatment for chemotherapy, including cisplatin. Aprepitant is a substrate of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and is known to cause its inhibition and induction. In addition, dexamethasone is a CYP3A4 substrate that induces CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 expression. In this study, we aimed to quantitatively evaluate the profile of CYP3A activity using its endogenous markers in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving a standard cisplatin regimen with antiemetics, including aprepitant. METHODS: Urinary 11ß-hydroxytestosterone (11ß-OHT)/testosterone concentration ratio and plasma 4ß-hydroxycholesterol (4ß-OHC) concentrations were measured before and after cisplatin treatment (days 1, 4, and 8). CYP3A5 was genotyped, and plasma aprepitant concentrations were measured on day 4 to examine its influence on CYP3A endogenous markers. RESULTS: The urinary 11ß-OHT/testosterone concentration ratio in the 35 patients included in this study increased by 2.65-fold and 1.21-fold on days 4 and 8 compared with day 1, respectively. Their plasma 4ß-OHC concentration increased by 1.46-fold and 1.66-fold, respectively. The mean plasma aprepitant concentration on day 4 was 1,451 ng/mL, which is far lower than its inhibitory constant. The allele frequencies of CYP3A5*1 and CYP3A5*3 were 0.229 and 0.771, respectively. In patients with the CYP3A5*1 allele, the plasma 4ß-OHC concentration was significantly lower at baseline but more potently increased with chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: CYP3A activity was significantly induced from day 4 to day 8 in patients receiving cisplatin and three antiemetic drugs.

Prognostic Value of Baseline Medications Plus Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in the Effectiveness of Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab and pembrolizumab are the standard treatments for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While there are reports on several inflammatory indices and the prognosis of patients with cancer, no study has combined baseline medication with the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) to predict clinical outcomes. This study investigated the efficacy of baseline medications plus NLR to predict the effectiveness of nivolumab and pembrolizumab in a real-world clinical setting. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective observational study of consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC who received nivolumab or pembrolizumab as first-line, second-line, or beyond treatment between December 2015 and November 2018 at the National Cancer Center Hospital in Japan. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The drug-based prognostic score for baseline medications plus NLR was weighed based on the regression ß coefficients. The multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the association between the prognostic score-stratified groups and survival outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 259 patients were evaluated in this study. A prognostic score calculated from the baseline medications plus NLR was used to categorize the patients into good (score 0), intermediate (scores 1-2), and poor (scores 3-6) -prognosis groups. The multivariable Cox proportional hazard model revealed a significant association between the poor-prognosis group and reduced OS. The hazard ratio of OS was 1.75 (95% confidence interval: 1.07-2.99; P = 0.031). In contrast, no association between these prognosis groups and PFS was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the baseline medications with nivolumab or pembrolizumab plus NLR could lead to progressively shorter survival outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC and could be used as a prognostic index for poor outcomes. However, to ascertain the clinical application of these findings, these concomitant medications need further validation in a large-scale multicenter study.

Absolute Lymphocyte Count Predicts Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Nivolumab Monotherapy: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Among patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who were treated with nivolumab monotherapy, the association of peripheral blood count data (at baseline and 2 weeks after treatment initiation) with the early onset of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and treatment efficacy has not been clearly established. This study aimed to identify peripheral blood count data that may be predictive of the development of nivolumab-induced irAEs in a real-world clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter observational study retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer undergoing nivolumab monotherapy in the second- or later-line setting between December 2015 and November 2018 at the National Cancer Center Hospital and Keio University Hospital in Japan. The primary endpoint was the association between peripheral blood count data and irAEs during the 6-week study period. Receiver operating characteristic curve and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of the 171 patients evaluated, 73 (42.7%) had ≥1 irAE during the first 6 weeks following treatment initiation. The median time to irAEs from the initiation of nivolumab was 15 (interquartile range: 13-28) days. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses revealed that the optimal cut-off values of the absolute lymphocyte count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio 2 weeks after treatment initiation for early irAE onset were 820, 4.3, and 2.2, respectively. In multivariable logistic regression analyses, absolute lymphocyte count >820 at 2 weeks after treatment initiation was significantly associated with an increased risk of early onset of any irAE. In contrast, no significant association was observed for the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (>4.3) or the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (>2.2) at 2 weeks following treatment initiation. CONCLUSIONS: The absolute lymphocyte count >820 at 2 weeks following nivolumab initiation predicts early onset of irAEs during a 6-week study period. Routinely available absolute lymphocyte count, which is measured after the initiation of nivolumab, may be useful for identifying patients at risk of early onset of irAEs.

Peripheral blood biomarkers predict immune-related adverse events in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with pembrolizumab: a multicenter retrospective study.

Background: Pembrolizumab is currently the standard treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the association between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and peripheral blood cell counts remains unclear. We aimed at identifying peripheral blood cell counts that may predict the development of pembrolizumab-induced irAEs. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data on consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC who received pembrolizumab monotherapy as first-line or later-line therapy at the National Cancer Center Hospital and Keio University Hospital. We used data between December 2015 and November 2018. The primary endpoint was the relationship between peripheral blood cell count data and early-onset irAEs during the 6-weeks study period. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: In total, 92 patients were evaluated, of whom 45 (48.9%) had at least one irAE during the first 6-weeks after treatment initiation. The ROC curves revealed that the optimal cutoff of pretreatment absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) for onset of irAEs were 1459, 2.320, 1.538, and 165, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that pretreatment ALC>1450 and LMR>1.6 were significantly associated with a reduced risk for onset of any irAEs, whereas pretreatment NLR>2.3 and PLR>165 were significantly associated with an increased risk. Conclusions: The findings suggest that considering the routine availability of blood cell count data before the initiation of treatment with pembrolizumab, it may be useful in identifying early-onset irAEs during the 6-weeks study period in clinical practice.

Exacerbation of atrioventricular block associated with concomitant use of amlodipine and aprepitant in a lung cancer patient: A case report.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of second-degree atrioventricular block associated with concomitant use of aprepitant and amlodipine. CASE: A 73-year-old man with lung cancer was treated with aprepitant for prophylactic use for the prevention of nausea and vomiting, concomitantly with cisplatin, gemcitabine, and an investigational drug (anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody). He was diagnosed with first-degree atrioventricular block and was taking amlodipine for hypertension. During the first cycle of chemotherapy, 5 days after the start of aprepitant, he experienced Wenckebach second-degree atrioventricular block (Mobitz type I), and amlodipine was discontinued. After day 6, the atrioventricular block was not shown. According to the Naranjo adverse drug reaction scale, a score of 7 was obtained (causality: probable). In addition, using the Drug Interaction Probability Scale, a score of 6 was obtained (causality: probable). CONCLUSION: The drug-drug interaction between aprepitant and amlodipine was considered to have deteriorated his atrioventricular block, conceivably due to the inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A-mediated metabolism of amlodipine by aprepitant.

Efficacy and safety of osimertinib in a Japanese compassionate use program.

BACKGROUND: Osimertinib is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that targets the T790M mutation of EGFR. In 2016, AstraZeneca conducted a compassionate use program for osimertinib in Japan. METHODS: Eighteen consecutive patients with histologically proven non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and harboring the T790M EGFR mutation participated in the compassionate use program between 1 April and 25 May 2016, at the National Cancer Center Hospital. We examined the efficacy and safety of osimertinib in a compassionate use program. RESULTS: All patients had been previously treated with both cytotoxic chemotherapy and EGFR TKIs. Overall response rate was 62.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): 35.9-89.1%). Among the six patients pretreated with a third-generation EGFR TKI, two (33%) responded to osimertinib. On administration with osimertinib, median progression-free and overall survival rates at six months were 66.7% (95% CI: 44.9-88.5) and 88.9% (95% CI: 74.4-100), respectively. Although the toxicity of osimertinib was mild in most patients, three patients had severe adverse events: two developed interstitial lung disease (ILD) and one developed Grade 3 hepatotoxicity. Among these, two (33%) of the six patients who received osimertinib following nivolumab treatment developed severe adverse events, with one each developing Grade 3 hepatotoxicity and Grade 3 ILD. Only one patient visited our hospital seeking to participate in the compassionate program from another hospital. CONCLUSION: Osimertinib demonstrated efficacy even in patients with heavily pretreated NSCLC harboring the T790M mutation. Some patients pretreated with another third-generation EGFR TKI also responded to osimertinib.