Impact of low mesopic contrast sensitivity outcomes in different types of modern multifocal intraocular lenses.

PURPOSE: To investigate the low mesopic contrast sensitivity function (LMCSF) of patients implanted with different modern optical bifocal and trifocal designs of multifocal intraocular lenses (mfIOLs). METHODS: This prospective, comparative, nonrandomized consecutive case series included 180 eyes that underwent cataract surgery. Six groups of eyes were differentiated: group A, eyes with the diffractive AT LISA tri 839MP; group B, eyes with diffractive FineVision; group C, eyes with the bifocal Lentis Mplus-LS313; group D, eyes with the diffractive bifocal Acri.Lisa 366D; group E, eyes with the diffractive apodized Acrysof ReSTOR SN6AD1; group F, as the control group, implanted with a monofocal spherical intraocular lens. The LMCSF was evaluated with the OPTEC® 6500 device at 3 months postoperatively using a luminance of 3 cd/m2. RESULTS: No significant differences among groups were detected in LMCSF for the spatial frequencies of 1.5, 3.0, 6.0, and 12.0 cpd (1.5 cpd: F = 1.81, p = 0.13; 3.0 cpd: F = 1.14, p = 0.14; 6.0 cpd: F = 1.87, p = 0.11; 12.0 cpd: F = 1.26, p = 0.29), but significant differences were found among groups for the spatial frequency of 18 cpd (F = 2.62, p = 0.03). When comparing the groups in pairs, only statistically significant differences were observed between groups E and F for the spatial frequency of 18.0 cpd (t = 3.27, p = 0.03) with better values for group F. CONCLUSION: No significant differences were observed in LMCSF among the different mfIOLs studied. The third focus of trifocal IOL models did not adversely affect the LMCSF. The ReSTOR SN6AD1 showed the poorest LMCSF for the highest spatial frequency analyzed when compared with the control group.

Correlating optical bench performance with clinical defocus curves in varifocal and trifocal intraocular lenses.

PURPOSE: To investigate the correlations existing between a trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) and a varifocal IOL using the "ex vivo" optical bench through-focus image quality analysis and the clinical visual performance in real patients by study of the defocus curves. METHODS: This prospective, consecutive, nonrandomized, comparative study included a total of 64 eyes of 42 patients. Three groups of eyes were differentiated according to the IOL implanted: 22 eyes implanted with the varifocal Lentis Mplus LS-313 IOL (Oculentis GmbH, Berlin, Germany); 22 eyes implanted with the trifocal FineVision IOL (Physiol, Liege, Belgium), and 20 eyes implanted with the monofocal Acrysof SA60AT IOL (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX). Visual outcomes and defocus curve were evaluated postoperatively. Optical bench through-focus performance was quantified by computing an image quality metric and the cross-correlation coefficient between an unaberrated reference image and captured retinal images from a model eye with a 3.0-mm artificial pupil. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences among defocus curves of different IOLs were detected for the levels of defocus from -4.00 to -1.00 diopters (D) (P < .01). Significant correlations were found between the optical bench image quality metric results and logMAR visual acuity scale in all groups (Lentis Mplus group: r = -0.97, P < .01; FineVision group: r = -0.82, P < .01; Acrys of group: r = -0.99, P < .01). Linear predicting models were obtained. CONCLUSIONS: Significant correlations were found between logMAR visual acuity and image quality metric for the multifocal and monofocal IOLs analyzed. This finding enables surgeons to predict visual outcomes from the optical bench analysis.

Intraocular stability of an angle-supported phakic intraocular lens with changes in pupil diameter.

PURPOSE: To use anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) to evaluate the stability of a recently released angle-supported phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) in the anterior segment with changes in pupil diameter. SETTING: Keratoconus Unit, Vissum Corporation, Alicante, Spain. METHODS: In this observational cross-sectional study of consecutive eyes with moderate to high myopia, an AcrySof Cachet pIOL was implanted with the aim of minimizing the refractive error. An analysis of the position and stability of the pIOL before and after pharmacologic pupil dilation was performed 3 months postoperatively using the Visante AS-OCT system. A measurement protocol that included several anatomic parameters was developed and applied; the parameter values before and after dilation were compared. RESULTS: Twenty eyes of 20 patients ranging in age from 24 to 48 years old were evaluated. The anterior chamber depth increased significantly with pupil dilation (mean change 0.06 mm +/- 0.08 [SD]) (P<.01). A significant change was also observed in the distance between the center of the cornea at the endothelial plane and the anterior surface of the pIOL (mean change 0.03 +/- 0.05 mm) (P = .01). The distances between the peripheral edges of the pIOL and the corneal endothelium and the distance between the crystalline lens and the pIOL did not change significantly (P>or=.14). CONCLUSION: The angle-supported pIOL showed excellent intraocular behavior after pupil dilation, with no shortening of the distance between the pIOL and corneal endothelium at the center or peripheral edges of the pIOL.

Correction of presbyopia in hyperopia with a center-distance, paracentral-near technique using the Technolas 217z platform.

PURPOSE: To analyze the results of hyperopic patients treated with a peripheral presbyLASIK algorithm for the correction of presbyopia. METHODS: The study included 44 eyes of 22 hyperopic patients treated with a peripheral presbyLASIK technique using a Technolas 217z excimer laser. Mean patient age was 56 years (range: 47 to 72 years), mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was +1.21 +/- 0.77 diopters (D) (range: +0.50 to +4.00 D), and mean spectacle near addition was +1.76 +/- 0.42 D (range: +1.00 to +2.75 D). The Peripheral Multifocal LASIK (PML) ablation pattern creates a multifocal corneal profile over a 6.5-mm diameter, performing the distance correction first in a 6-mm optical zone and then near correction in a 6.5-mm zone. Main outcome measures were uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) for near and distance, spherical equivalent refraction, contrast sensitivity, and corneal aberrations. RESULTS: Six months postoperatively, mean binocular UCVA was 1.06 +/- 0.13 for distance and 0.84 +/- 0.14 for near. Mean postoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -0.42 D (range: -1.12 to +0.87 D). Two (4.5%) eyes lost 1 line of BSCVA for distance and near vision, and 20 (45%) eyes gained 1 line of distance BSCVA. Contrast sensitivity decreased for 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles/degree. Corneal aberration analysis showed a slight increase in coma and decrease in spherical aberration. CONCLUSIONS: The peripheral presbyLASIK technique used in this study is a safe and efficient treatment that may improve functional near vision in presbyopic patients with low and moderate hyperopia (from +0.50 to +3.00 D).

Optical analysis of presbyLASIK treatment by a light propagation algorithm.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the changes in the optical quality of corneas of hyperopic patients operated using central multifocal presbyLASIK treatment through the study of light patterns around the retinal plane. METHODS: This study included eight hyperopic eyes that underwent central presbyLASIK surgery with Presby-one software using an H. Eye Tech Technovision excimer laser platform. Mean patient age was 57 years. Mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was 1.28 +/- 0.87 diopters (D). Mean distance decimal visual acuity with correction was 1.02 +/- 0.13 and without correction was 0.37 +/- 0.15. The optical quality was characterized by the Strehl ratio, the spot size on the retina, and objective decimal visual acuity calculated based on measured corneal topography using Fresnel propagation algorithm based on a realistic eye model. RESULTS: The postoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -0.55 +/- 0.48 D. The distance decimal visual acuity with correction was 0.94 and without correction was 0.70. The pseudoaccommodation range was 1.60 +/- 0.40 D. A good Pearson correlation coefficient was obtained (r2 = 0.86) for the linear fit between the real and calculated decimal visual acuity for the eight eyes. The Strehl ratio value on the retinal plane increased after the surgery by a mean factor of 4.7. CONCLUSIONS: With a complete characterization of the eye and a complete propagation algorithm (that takes into account all refractive surfaces in the eye at the same time), it is possible to evaluate the optical quality in eyes of patients who have undergone central presbyLASlK treatment.

Correction of presbyopia by technovision central multifocal LASIK (presbyLASIK).

PURPOSE: To investigate central multifocal presbyLASIK based on the creation of a central hyperpositive area. METHODS: Twenty-five patients (50 eyes) underwent presbyLASlK in an open-label, prospective, non-comparative pilot study. Mean patient age was 58 years (range: 51 to 68 years), mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was +1.6 +/- 0.63 diopters (D) (range: +0.50 to +3.00 D), and mean spectacle near addition was +2.27 +/- 0.37 D (range: +1.75 to +3.00 D). The ablation pattern was performed with proprietary software from Technovision using an H. Eye Tech. excimer laser platform. RESULTS: Mean postoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -0.37 +/- 0.55 D (range: -1.50 to + 1.00 D) and mean spectacle near addition was +1.72 +/- 0.34 D (range: +1.25 to +2.25 D). After 6 months, 16 (64%) patients achieved a distance uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of > or = 20/20 and 18 (72%) patients achieved a near UCVA of > or = 20/40. Seven (28%) patients lost a maximum of 2 lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA). The safety index for distance was 0.98 binocular and for near was 0.99 binocular. After 6 months, no significant change was noted in contrast sensitivity at 1.5 cycles/degree. A significant mean reduction was found at spatial frequencies of 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles/degree (P<.001). There was a significant change in corneal aberrations after surgery. The coefficients for coma increased and the coefficients for spherical aberrations decreased. A significant decrease was noted in point spread function values (P=.0018). CONCLUSIONS: Central presbyLASIK may be used to provide improvement in functional near vision in patients with presbyopia associated with low and moderate hyperopia. However, factors involved in the loss of BSCVA in some cases and loss in vision quality should be further clarified prior to its general use.