Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Recipients of Renal Allografts.

Kidney transplant recipients are at increased risk of malignancy as a result of immunosuppression and are increasingly exposed to checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs). However, CPI therapy can precipitate allograft rejection. This review aims to summarize the current literature describing the epidemiology, immunological mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment of CPI-associated allograft rejection.Initial studies of CPIs suggested allograft rejection post commencement of CPIs occured commonly (40-60%), occurring between 2 and 6 weeks after CPI initiation, with a cancer response rate approaching 50%. More recent studies with predefined, structured immunosuppressive regimens have seen rejection rates of 0-12.5%, with rejection occurring later. Allograft biopsy remains the mainstay of diagnosis; however, noninvasive tools are emerging, including donor-derived cell-free DNA, urinary chemokine assessment, and defining alloreactive T-cell clones prior to or during CPI therapy.

Rituximab Resistance in Glomerular Diseases: A GlomCon Mini Review.

Resistance to rituximab B-cell depletion therapy is a clinically pertinent adverse sequela that can have significant implications for the treatment of immune-mediated glomerular diseases. The true incidence of rituximab resistance remains unknown; however, it is an increasingly recognized treatment complication. Resistance typically presents with suboptimal treatment response, rapid B-cell reconstitution, and a relapsing disease course. Although the diverse mechanisms resulting in rituximab resistance are ongoing topics of research, both primary and secondary mechanisms have been identified as key catalysts. The emergence of human antichimeric antibodies (HACAs) is a major cause of secondary resistance to rituximab therapy and typically appears following repeated drug exposure. Frequently, HACAs develop in the setting of underlying autoimmune disease and contribute to poor B-cell depletion, reduced rituximab therapeutic efficacy, and enhanced drug clearance. The clinical challenge of rituximab resistance necessitates heightened awareness among clinicians. Screening for HACAs should be considered in individuals with poor clinical response to rituximab, more rapid B-cell reconstitution, and relapsing disease. Detection of HACAs may guide treatment alterations, including addition of further immunosuppressive therapy and transitioning to a humanized B-cell depleting monoclonal antibody.

Human leukocyte antigen association with azathioprine-induced drug hypersensitivity reactions in patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody associated vasculitis.

Azathioprine (AZA) drug hypersensitivity reaction (DHR) is an uncommon yet potentially lethal condition that often goes unrecognised in patients with anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody (ANCA) associated vasculitis (AAV). We conducted a retrospective review of AAV patients on AZA maintenance therapy (N = 35). Participants were categorised into those who had experienced AZA-DHR (N = 15) and those who were AZA-tolerant (N = 20). Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing was performed in both groups. The primary endpoint was identification of a HLA gene association with AZA-DHR in the context of AAV. HLA-C*06:02, was solely expressed in AZA-DHR patients (33.3 %), whilst no patient who tolerated AZA carried this allele (0.0 %). This yielded a positive predictive value of 100 % for HLA-C*06:02 in predicting AZA-DHR in AAV patients, negative predictive value of 66.7 %, sensitivity of 33.3 % and specificity of 100 %. HLA-C*06:02 may predict the development of AZA-DHR in patients with AAV and inform safer therapeutic choice.

Rapamycin and inulin for third-dose vaccine response stimulation (RIVASTIM): Inulin - study protocol for a pilot, multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, controlled trial of dietary inulin to improve SARS-CoV-2 vaccine response in kidney transplant recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at an increased risk of hospitalisation and death from COVID-19. Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is our primary risk mitigation strategy, yet vaccine effectiveness in KTRs is suboptimal. Strategies to enhance vaccine efficacy are therefore required. Current evidence supports the role of the gut microbiota in shaping the immune response to vaccination. Gut dysbiosis is common in KTRs and is a potential contributor to impaired COVID-19 vaccine responses. We hypothesise that dietary fibre supplementation will attenuate gut dysbiosis and promote vaccine responsiveness in KTRs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Rapamycin and inulin for third-dose vaccine response stimulation-inulin is a multicentre, randomised, prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled pilot trial examining the effect of dietary inulin supplementation prior to a third dose of COVID-19 vaccine in KTRs who have failed to develop protective immunity following a 2-dose COVID-19 vaccine schedule. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to inulin (active) or maltodextrin (placebo control), administered as 20 g/day of powdered supplement dissolved in water, for 4 weeks prior to and following vaccination. The primary outcome is the proportion of participants in each trial arm that achieve in vitro neutralisation of live SARS-CoV-2 virus at 4 weeks following a third dose of COVID-19 vaccine. Secondary outcomes include the safety and tolerability of dietary inulin, the diversity and differential abundance of gut microbiota, and vaccine-specific immune cell populations and responses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the Central Adelaide Local Health Network (CALHN) Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) (approval number: 2021/HRE00354) and the Sydney Local Health District (SHLD) HREC (approval numbers: X21-0411 and 2021/STE04280). Results of this trial will be published following peer-review and presented at scientific meetings and congresses. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12621001465842.

Rapamycin and inulin for booster vaccine response stimulation (RIVASTIM)-rapamycin: study protocol for a randomised, controlled trial of immunosuppression modification with rapamycin to improve SARS-CoV-2 vaccine response in kidney transplant recipients.

Kidney transplant recipients are at an increased risk of severe COVID-19-associated hospitalisation and death. Vaccination has been a key public health strategy to reduce disease severity and infectivity, but the effectiveness of COVID vaccines is markedly reduced in kidney transplant recipients. Urgent strategies to enhance vaccine efficacy are needed. METHODS: RIVASTIM-rapamycin is a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial examining the effect of immunosuppression modification prior to a third dose of COVID-19 vaccine in kidney transplant recipients who have failed to develop protective immunity to a 2-dose COVID-19 vaccine schedule. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to either remain on standard of care immunosuppression with tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and prednisolone (control) or cease mycophenolate and commence sirolimus (intervention) for 4 weeks prior to and following vaccination. The primary outcome is the proportion of participants in each trial arm who develop protective serological neutralisation of live SARS-CoV-2 virus at 4-6 weeks following a third COVID-19 vaccination. Secondary outcomes include SARS-CoV-receptor binding domain IgG, vaccine-specific immune cell populations and responses, and the safety and tolerability of sirolimus switch. DISCUSSION: Immunosuppression modification strategies may improve immunological vaccine response. We hypothesise that substituting the mTOR inhibitor sirolimus for mycophenolate in a triple drug regimen will enhance humoral and cell-mediated responses to COVID vaccination for kidney transplant recipients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12621001412820. Registered on 20 October 2021; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=382891&isReview=true.

COVID vaccination can be performed in patients with a history of allergic reactions to the vaccines or their components: experience from a specialist clinic in South Australia.

BACKGROUND: The development of vaccines against SARS-CoV2 has been a key public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, since their introduction, there have been reports of anaphylactic reactions to vaccines in individuals with history of allergic reactions to other vaccines, excipients or to COVID vaccines. AIM: A dedicated adult COVID vaccine allergy clinic with a standardised allergy testing protocol was set up to investigate safety and suitability of available COVID vaccines in Australia. METHODS: Patients referred to a state-wide COVID-19 vaccine allergy clinic between March and August 2021 with a history of allergy underwent skin-prick testing and intradermal testing to both available vaccine formulations (BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1-S), excipients (polyethylene glycol and polysorbate 80), excipient-containing medications and controls. Basophil activation testing was conducted in few subjects with convincing history of immediate type reactions. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients underwent testing for possible excipient allergy (n = 19), previous non-COVID vaccine reaction (n = 13) or previous reaction to dose 1 of COVID-19 vaccine (n = 21). Patients were predominantly female (n = 43, 81%), aged 18-83 (median 54) years. Forty-four patients tested negative and 42 of these received at least their first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. Nine patients tested positive to excipients or excipient-containing medication only (n = 3), or vaccines (n = 6). Five patients were positive to just BNT162b2, 3/5 have been vaccinated with ChAdOx1-S. One who was skin test positive to both vaccines, but negative BAT to ChAdOx1-S was successfully vaccinated with ChAdOx1-S. CONCLUSION: Even in a high-risk population, most patients can be vaccinated with available COVID-19 vaccines. This paper reports local experiences using a combined allergy testing protocol with skin testing and BAT during the pandemic.

Half a century of haemodialysis: two patient journeys.

The history of renal replacement therapy (RRT) for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) started in 1960 and has reached, in these six decades, goals initially unforeseen. This report describes two patients who commenced dialysis at the age of 17 and 27, for 53 and 45 years, respectively, whereby the modality of RRT was mostly in the form of home haemodialysis. The history of these two patients, who started RRT in distant parts of the world, Australia and Croatia, highlights not only the advances made over time, to significantly delay the onset and reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with ESKD, but also underlines the importance of empowerment and commitment, added values in home haemodialysis.

Multimodality Tachycardia-Induced Stress Testing Predicts a Low-Risk Group for Early Cardiovascular Mortality After Renal Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular events remain a major cause of death in kidney transplant recipients. The optimal noninvasive workup to prevent peritransplant cardiac mortality remains contentious. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis to assess the renal transplantation cardiovascular assessment protocol within a single-center population over a 5-year period. Asymptomatic patients aged less than 45 years with no history of cigarette smoking, without diabetes mellitus, and dialysis-dependent for less than 24 months did not undergo cardiac testing before listing. All other asymptomatic patients underwent a noninvasive, tachycardia-induced stress test, where a target heart rate of 85% predicted for age and gender was required. The primary endpoints were rates of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and cardiovascular death at 30 days after renal transplantation. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2019, 380 recipients underwent cardiac evaluation: 79 (20.8%) were deemed low cardiovascular risk and placed on the renal transplant waitlist without further assessment; 270 (71.1%) underwent a tachycardia-induced stress test; and 31 (8.1%) were deemed high risk and proceeded directly to invasive coronary angiography (ICA). In the 5-year follow-up, 3 patients (0.8%) experienced an AMI 30 days after renal transplantation, all of which occurred in the high-risk "direct to ICA" cohort. No events were documented in the low-risk cohort or in patients who had a negative tachycardia-induced stress test. There were no cardiovascular deaths within 30 days after transplantation. CONCLUSION: A negative tachycardia-induced cardiac stress test, achieving 85% of predicted heart rate, was associated with a 0% AMI rate and no cardiovascular deaths at 30 days after renal transplantation.

Long-Term Impact of Arteriovenous Fistula Ligation on Cardiac Structure and Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A 5-Year Follow-Up Observational Cohort Study.

Background: The long-term effects of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) ligation on cardiovascular structure following kidney transplantation remain uncertain. A prospective randomized, controlled trial (RCT) examined the effect of AVF ligation at 6 months on cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR)-derived parameters in 27 kidney transplant recipients compared with 27 controls. A mean decrease in left ventricular mass (LVM) of 22.1 g (95% CI, 15.0 to 29.1) was observed compared with an increase of 1.2 g (95% CI, -4.8 to 7.2) in the control group (P<0.001). We conducted a long-term follow-up observational cohort study in the treated cohort to determine the evolution of CMR-derived parameters compared with those documented at 6 months post-AVF ligation. Methods: We performed CMR at long-term follow-up in the AVF ligation observational cohort from our original RCT published in 2019. Results were compared with CMR at 6 months postintervention. The coprimary end point was the change in CMR-derived LVM and LVM index at long-term follow-up from imaging at 6 months postindex procedure. Results: At a median of 5.1 years (interquartile range, 4.7-5.5 years), 17 patients in the AVF ligation group were studied with repeat CMR with a median duration to follow-up imaging of 5.1 years (IQR, 4.7-5.5 years). Statistically significant further reductions in LVM (-17.6±23.0 g, P=0.006) and LVM index (-10.0±13.0 g/m2, P=0.006) were documented. Conclusions: The benefit of AVF ligation on LVM and LVM index regression appears to persist long term. This has the potential to lead to a significant reduction in cardiovascular mortality.