Ten-year safety follow-up and post-explant analysis of an anterior chamber phakic IOL.

PURPOSE: To assess endothelial cell loss (ECL) rate and collect safety data in patients with AcrySof L-series Cachet phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) up to 10 years post-implantation. SETTING: Clinical settings in the United States, European Union, and Canada. DESIGN: Nonrandomized, observational, open-label safety study. METHODS: Central and peripheral endothelial cell density was evaluated and compared with 6-month post-implantation baseline. Nonlinear analysis was performed to identify factors affecting post-explantation ECL. Additional evaluations included uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), adverse device effects (ADEs), and serious adverse events (SAEs). RESULTS: The study included 1123 implanted eyes (mean age, 37.5 years). At 10 years, mean central and peripheral ECL was 16% (1.7% annualized). Explantations were performed in 10% of eyes (n = 136/1323). For eyes with pIOL explantation because of ECL (7%), annualized ECL rate post-explantation was numerically lower compared with the overall rate in eyes that underwent explantation for any reason (annualized rate, -1.65% vs -2.03%, respectively; n = 96) and compared with pre-explantation ECL. Mean ± SD CDVA and UCVA were -0.12 ± 0.11 and 0.03 ± 0.22 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, respectively. Common ocular ADEs included ECL (10%), pIOL extraction (9%), iris adhesion (7%), and pupillary deformity (2%). Common SAEs included pIOL extraction (11%), ECL (9%), and iris adhesions (8%). CONCLUSIONS: Cachet pIOLs were associated with long-term ECL in some cases. Overall, only 10% of all implanted eyes underwent explantation during 10-year follow-up. In patients requiring explantation because of ECL, the annualized ECL rates decreased post-explantation in some eyes. Continued monitoring of patients regardless of explantation is recommended.

A 3-month safety and efficacy study of travoprost 0.004% ophthalmic solution compared with timolol in pediatric patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

PURPOSE: To evaluate efficacy and safety of travoprost in pediatric patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma and demonstrate its noninferiority to timolol. METHODS: Patients aged 2 months to <18 years with glaucoma or ocular hypertension were randomized to receive travoprost (0.004%) or timolol eye drops (0.25% for patients aged 2 months to <3 years and 0.5% for patients ≥3 years old) for 3 months in this double-masked, parallel-group study. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured and patients were evaluated at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months after treatment. Change in IOP from baseline to 3 months was the primary endpoint, and the test of noninferiority was based on a margin of +3.0 mm Hg using the 95% 2-sided confidence interval of the mean change. RESULTS: Of 157 patients included (mean age, 9.6 years), 77 received travoprost and 75 timolol. All patients experienced a significant reduction in IOP in the study eye at 3 months: the mean IOP change from baseline was -5.4 mm Hg for travoprost; -5.3 mm Hg, for timolol. The mean difference between travoprost and timolol at month 3 was -0.1 mm Hg (95% CI, -1.5 to 1.4 mm Hg). The most common treatment-related adverse events for the travoprost group were ocular hyperemia and eyelash growth. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: This study found travoprost to be noninferior to timolol in lowering IOP in patients with pediatric glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Travoprost was well-tolerated, and no treatment-related systemic adverse events were reported.

Intraocular pressure-lowering efficacy of brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination compared with brinzolamide 1% and timolol 0.5%.

PURPOSE: To compare the safety and intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy of brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination with brinzolamide 1% or timolol 0.5% alone in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT). DESIGN: Randomized, double-masked, parallel group, multicenter study. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred twenty-three patients were randomized to the study treatments. METHODS: Patients with OAG or OHT were recruited to the study. Qualifying eyes had IOPs of 24 to 36 mmHg at 8 am and 21 to 36 mmHg at 10 am on 2 eligibility visits after an appropriate washout period from previous treatment. Patients were assigned randomly to either brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5%, brinzolamide 1% (Azopt; Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX), or timolol 0.5%, dosed twice daily and were followed up while receiving therapy for 6 months. At selected sites, additional IOP measurements were performed at 12 pm, 4 pm, and 8 pm during the 2 eligibility visits, at month 3, and at month 6. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mean IOP. RESULTS: Brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% produced statistically significant and clinically relevant reductions from baseline ranging from 8.0 to 8.7 mmHg, which were statistically and clinically superior to that of either brinzolamide 1% (5.1-5.6 mmHg) or timolol 0.5% (5.7-6.9 mmHg). No safety concerns were identified based on an assessment of ocular and cardiovascular parameters and a review of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Brinzolamide 1%/timolol 05% is superior in IOP-lowering efficacy to either brinzolamide 1% or timolol 0.5%.