Impact of a specific consultation for patients with progressive forms of multiple sclerosis on the response to their unmet care needs: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: As their disease evolves, most patients with progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (MS) develop particular healthcare needs that are not always addressed with usual follow-up. To adapt neurological care to these patients, we created a specific consultation for patients with progressive MS in our centre in 2019. OBJECTIVES: To explore the main unmet care needs of patients with progressive MS in our setting, and to establish the usefulness of the specific consultation to address them. METHODS: Literature review and interviews with patients and healthcare professionals were conducted to identify the main unmet needs in routine follow-up. Two questionnaires were developed, assessing the importance of the unmet needs identified and the usefulness of the consultation to meet them, for patients under follow-up in the specific consultation and their informal caregivers. RESULTS: Forty-one patients and nineteen informal caregivers participated. The most important unmet needs were the information about the disease, access to social services and coordination between specialists. A positive correlation was found between the importance of these unmet needs and the responsiveness to each of them in the specific consultation. CONCLUSIONS: The creation of a specific consultation may improve attention to the healthcare needs of patients with progressive MS.

A new protocol reduces median door-to-needle time to the benchmark of 30 minutes in acute stroke treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Recent analyses emphasise that The Benchmark Stroke Door-to-Needle Time (DNT) should be 30min. This study aimed to determine if a new in-hospital IVT protocol is effective in reducing door-to-needle time and correcting previously identified factors associated with delays. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 2014, we gradually introduced a series of measures aimed to reduce door-to-needle time for patients receiving IVT, and compared it before (2009-2012) and after (2014-2017) the new protocol was introduced. RESULTS: The sample included 239 patients before and 222 after the introduction of the protocol. Median overall door-to-needle time was 27min after the protocol was fully implemented (a 48% reduction on previous door-to-needle time [52min], P<.001)]. Median door-to-needle time was lower when pre-hospital code stroke was activated (22min). We observed a 26-min reduction in the median time from onset to treatment (P<.001). After the protocol was implemented, the "3-hour-effect" did not affect door-to-needle time (P=.98). Computed tomography angiography studies performed before IVT were associated with increased door-to-needle time (P<.001); however, the test was performed after IVT was started in most cases. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital reorganisation and multidisciplinary collaboration brought median door-to-needle time below 30min and corrected previously identified delay factors. Furthermore, overall time from onset to treatment was also reduced and more stroke patients were treated within 90min of symptom onset.

Un nuevo protocolo intrahospitalario reduce el tiempo puerta-aguja en el ictus agudo tratado con trombolisis intravenosa a menos de 30 minutos / A new protocol reduces median door-to-needle time to the benchmark of 30 minutes in acute stroke treatment

Introducción: El objetivo del tiempo puerta-aguja en el ictus isquémico agudo tratado con trombólisis intravenosa (TIV) tiende a situarse actualmente en los 30 min. Determinamos si un nuevo protocolo de actuación intrahospitalario es eficaz para reducir el intervalo puerta-aguja y corregir los factores de demora previamente identificados.Material y métodosEn 2014 se implantaron gradualmente unas medidas diseñadas para acortar los tiempos de actuación intrahospitalarios en los pacientes tratados con TIV. Se compararon los tiempos de actuación antes (2009-2012) y después (febrero 2014-abril 2017) de la introducción del nuevo protocolo.ResultadosSe incluyeron 239 pacientes antes y 222 después. Cuando todas las medidas fueron introducidas, la mediana global de tiempo puerta-aguja fue de 27 min (previa 52 min, 48% menos, p < 0,001) y de 22 min cuando se activó el código ictus extrahospitalario. El tiempo global al tratamiento (inicio-aguja) se redujo en 26 min de mediana (p < 0,001). En el período postintervención ya no se objetivó el «efecto de fin de ventana» (p = 0,98). Aunque la angio-TC antes de la TIV continuó retrasando los tiempos de actuación (p < 0,001), tras el nuevo protocolo, esta prueba se realizó después del inicio del tratamiento en la mayoría de los casos.ConclusionesLa reorganización intrahospitalaria y la colaboración multidisciplinar han situado la mediana de tiempo puerta-aguja por debajo de los 30 min y han corregido los factores de demora identificados previamente. Además, se ha reducido el tiempo global al tratamiento y una mayor proporción de pacientes son tratados en los primeros 90 min desde el inicio de los síntomas. (AU)

Introduction: Recent analyses emphasize that The Benchmark Stroke Door-to-Needle Time (DNT) should be 30 min. This study aimed to determine if a new in-hospital IVT protocol is effective in reducing door-to-needle time and correcting previously identified factors associated with delays.Material and methodsIn 2014, we gradually introduced a series of measures aimed to reduce door-to-needle time for patients receiving IVT, and compared it before (2009-2012) and after (2014-2017) the new protocol was introduced.ResultsThe sample included 239 patients before and 222 after the introduction of the protocol. Median overall door-to-needle time was 27 min after the protocol was fully implemented (a 48% reduction on previous door-to-needle time [52 minutes], P<.001)]. Median door-to-needle time was lower when pre-hospital code stroke was activated (22 min). We observed a 26-min reduction in the median time from onset to treatment (P<.001). After the protocol was implemented, the «3-hour-effect» did not affect door-to-needle time time (P=.98). Computed tomography angiography studies performed before IVT were associated with increased door-to-needle time (P<.001); however, the test was performed after IVT was started in most cases.ConclusionsHospital reorganisation and multidisciplinary collaboration brought median door-to-needle time below 30 min and corrected previously identified delay factors. Furthermore, overall time from onset to treatment was also reduced and more stroke patients were treated within 90 min of symptom onset. (AU)

[Cognitive impairment in very elderly patients: a retrospective study in a neurology service]. / Deterioro cognitivo en el paciente muy anciano: estudio retrospectivo en una consulta de neurologia.

INTRODUCTION: A considerable proportion of very elderly patients with cognitive impairment are attended in the general neurology offices. There are few studies about the clinical characteristics of these patients. AIM: To describe the background and clinical features of very elderly patients who come to the general neurology clinic due to cognitive complaints or suspected cognitive impairment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 336 patients (296 patients < 85 years vs. 40 patients >= 85 years of age) who had been mostly referred by primary care physicians. Cognitive performance was measured by the Mini-Mental State Examination and the overall (i.e., cognitive and functional) clinical situation was measured by the Clinical Dementia Rating scale. RESULTS: Older patients had more frequently cognitive impairment (mild cognitive impairment or dementia), both at the first visit and at the one-year follow-up visit (p < 0.0005). No differences were found in symptom duration (2.0 ± 2.1 vs. 1.5 ± 1.4 years), type of symptoms, or comorbidity. Alzheimer's disease was the most frequent etiological diagnosis in both age groups (82.4% vs. 75.0%; p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Very elderly patients studied in the neurology office have a higher risk of presenting cognitive impairment, despite being comparable in terms of symptoms and time of evolution. These results could be explained from the hypotheses of brain reserve and combined brain pathology.

TITLE: Deterioro cognitivo en el paciente muy anciano: estudio retrospectivo en una consulta de neurologia.Introduccion. Una considerable proporcion de pacientes muy ancianos con deterioro cognitivo son atendidos en las consultas generales de neurologia, pero existen pocos estudios acerca de las caracteristicas clinicas de estos pacientes. Objetivo. Describir los antecedentes y rasgos clinicos de los pacientes muy ancianos que acuden a consulta general de neurologia por quejas o sospecha de deterioro cognitivo. Pacientes y metodos. Se estudio retrospectivamente a 336 pacientes (296 pacientes < 85 años frente a 40 pacientes >= 85 años) que habian sido remitidos en su mayoria desde la atencion primaria. El rendimiento cognitivo se midio mediante el test minimental de Folstein, y la situacion clinica global (cognitiva y funcional), mediante la escala de estadificacion clinica de la demencia. Resultados. Los pacientes de mas edad presentaban con mayor frecuencia deterioro cognitivo (alteracion cognitiva leve o demencia), tanto en la primera visita como en la visita de seguimiento al cabo de un año (p < 0,0005). No se encontraron diferencias en el tiempo desde el inicio de los sintomas (2,0 ± 2,1 frente a 1,5 ± 1,4 años), el tipo de sintomas ni la comorbilidad. La enfermedad de Alzheimer fue el diagnostico etiologico final mas frecuente en los dos grupos de edad (82,4% frente a 75%; p > 0,05). Conclusiones. Los pacientes muy ancianos estudiados en la consulta de neurologia presentan con mayor frecuencia deterioro cognitivo, a pesar de tener un tiempo de evolucion y una sintomatologia similares. Estos resultados podrian explicarse desde la hipotesis de la reserva cerebral y de la patologia cerebral combinada.