COVID-19: Zinc and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) Deficiencies as Determinants of Risk and Severity of Disease: A Narrative Review.

A growing body of evidence supports the premise that deficiencies of zinc and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2, a zinc enzyme) determine severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). ACE2 is part of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and acts as a feedback control system moderating blood pressure, keeping blood pressure within normal limits. For a virus to infect a person, the virus has to get inside the person's cells. The virus that causes COVID-19 uses ACE2 to get into the cell. Think of this like an invader from outer space attacking your car by getting in through your cruise control; the RAS is like the cruise control of your car. What happens next depends on how robust your cruise control is. If your cruise control is young and healthy perhaps very little happens; your car may slow down or speed up a bit. But if your cruise control is in poor condition the attack might disrupt the entire speed control system; your car may brake suddenly or speed out of control and crash. Feedback control systems (natural or man-made) are designed to keep dynamic systems in control, but under certain situations can drive the system completely out of control. The RAS is composed of two feedback loops: the ACE loop provides amplification, increasing pro-inflammatory cytokines and blood pressure; the ACE2 loop provides fine control and mitigates the vasoconstrictive, pro-inflammatory, and thrombotic actions of the ACE loop. Usually, there is balance, but in the setting of COVID-19, underlying deficiencies of zinc and ACE2 can lead to an imbalance. Exacerbated by the severe downregulation of ACE2 seen with viral entry, a "tipping point" is reached with loss of control of the RAS system resulting in increased angiotensin II (Ang II) causing downstream vasoconstriction, inflammation, and thromboses. These, in turn, lead to complications often seen in "severe COVID-19" such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or cytokine storm, often seen in high-risk patients in the second week of illness. This model suggests that supplemental zinc could replenish zinc in ACE2, stabilize the ACE2 axis, and prevent disruption of the RAS. This would prevent the vasoconstrictive, inflammatory, and thrombotic actions of Ang II, thus preventing the severe COVID-19 complications which cause the high morbidity and mortality seen in high-risk patients with underlying zinc deficiency. Zinc supplements are available, easy to use, and relatively safe. Randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm safety and efficacy of zinc supplementation to decrease severity of and morality from COVID-19 in high-risk patients. Since replenishment of zinc and active ACE2 in patients in whom these are deficient may take weeks, supplementation in high-risk populations prior to COVID infection may be required. Such supplementation should not replace vaccination but may be useful in populations for whom vaccination is not available or for populations exposed to viral variants to which available vaccines have insufficient coverage.

Investigators' Experience With Expedited Safety Reports Prior to the FDA's Final IND Safety Reporting Rule.

Prior to enactment of the final investigational new drug application (IND) safety reporting rule, an attempt was made to document the effort expended at investigative sites in processing IND safety reports from sponsors and to assess the effect of these expedited reports on trial conduct. Investigators were asked to (1) prospectively document time to process IND safety reports and (2) retrospectively review safety reports from a previous 3-month period, documenting resultant actions. In this limited sample, sites spent a median of 0.25 hours per report at a median cost of US$22. Few expedited safety reports were retrospectively said to have changed study conduct or informed consent. However, a low response rate and the concentration of clinical sites in a single therapeutic area preclude generalizing these results. The authors discuss the challenges in gaining investigators' cooperation to evaluate the impact of regulatory requirements. Better methods to facilitate this type of research will enrich the scientific basis of future clinical trial regulation and guidance.

Thorough QT/QTc study of ritonavir-boosted saquinavir following multiple-dose administration of therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses in healthy participants.

The effect of saquinavir-boosted ritonavir at therapeutic (1000/100 mg twice daily [bid]) and supratherapeutic (1500/100 mg bid) doses was evaluated in a double-blind, placebo- and positive-controlled (moxifloxacin 400 mg) 4-way crossover thorough QT/QTc study. Least squares mean estimated study-specific QTc (QTcS) change from dense predose baseline (ddQTcS(dense)) was the primary endpoint. Greatest mean increase in ddQTcS(dense) occurred 12 hours postdose for the 1000/100-mg group (18.9 ms) and 20 hours for the 1500/10-mg group (30.2 ms). The upper 1-sided 95% confidence interval was >20 ms from 2 to 20 hours postdose in both groups. ddQTcB(dense) and ddQTcF(dense) were similar to ddQTcS(dense). No QTcS, QTcF, or QTcB measurements were >500 ms. One participant receiving 1000/100 mg and 3 receiving 1500/100 mg had a maximum ddQTcS(dense) >60 ms. More participants with ≥1 adverse event received saquinavir/ritonavir. PubMed search and Roche postmarketing data did not reveal publications or reports directly presenting the effect of saquinavir on QT/QTc or causing torsade de pointes.

Pharmacokinetic interaction study of ritonavir-boosted saquinavir in combination with rifabutin in healthy subjects.

The effect of multiple doses of rifabutin (150 mg) on the pharmacokinetics of saquinavir-ritonavir (1,000 mg of saquinavir and 100 mg of ritonavir [1,000/100 mg]) twice daily (BID) was assessed in 25 healthy subjects. Rifabutin reduced the area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h postdose (AUC(0-12)), maximum observed concentration of drug in plasma (C(max)), and minimum observed concentration of drug in plasma at the end of the dosing interval (C(min)) for saquinavir by 13%, 15%, and 9%, respectively, for subjects receiving rifabutin (150 mg) every 3 days with saquinavir-ritonavir BID. No effects of rifabutin on ritonavir AUC(0-12), C(max), and C(min) were observed. No adjustment of the saquinavir-ritonavir dose (1,000/100 mg) BID is required when the drugs are administered in combination with rifabutin. The effect of multiple doses of saquinavir-ritonavir on rifabutin pharmacokinetics was evaluated in two groups of healthy subjects. In group 1 (n = 14), rifabutin (150 mg) was coadministered every 3 days with saquinavir-ritonavir BID. The AUC(0-72) and C(max) of the active moiety (rifabutin plus 25-O-desacetyl-rifabutin) increased by 134% and 130%, respectively, compared with administration of rifabutin (150 mg) once daily alone. Rifabutin exposure increased by 53% for AUC(0-72) and by 86% for C(max). In group 3 (n = 13), rifabutin was coadministered every 4 days with saquinavir-ritonavir BID. The AUC(0-96) and C(max) of the active moiety increased by 60% and 111%, respectively, compared to administration of 150 mg of rifabutin once daily alone. The AUC(0-96) of rifabutin was not affected, and C(max) increased by 68%. Monitoring of neutropenia and liver enzyme levels is recommended for patients receiving rifabutin with saquinavir-ritonavir BID.

Elevated ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) in nelfinavir mesylate (Viracept, Roche): overview.

Roche's protease inhibitor nelfinavir mesylate (Viracept) produced between March 2007-June 2007 was found to contain elevated levels of ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS), a known mutagen (alkylator) - leading to a global recall of the drug. EMS levels in a daily dose (2,500 mg Viracept/day) were predicted not to exceed a dose of approximately 2.75 mg/day (approximately 0.055 mg/kg/day based on 50 kg patient). As existing toxicology data on EMS did not permit an adequate patient risk assessment, a comprehensive animal toxicology evaluation of EMS was conducted. General toxicity of EMS was investigated in rats over 28 days. Two studies for DNA damage were performed in mice; chromosomal damage was assessed using a micronucleus assay and gene mutations were detected using the MutaMouse transgenic model. In addition, experiments designed to extrapolate animal exposure to humans were undertaken. A general toxicity study showed that the toxicity of EMS occurred only at doses >or= 60 mg/kg/day, which is far above that received by patients. Studies for chromosomal damage and mutations in mice demonstrated a clear threshold effect with EMS at 25 mg/kg/day, under chronic dosing conditions. Exposure analysis (Cmax) demonstrated that approximately 370-fold higher levels of EMS than that ingested by patients, are needed to saturate known, highly conserved, error-free, mammalian DNA repair mechanisms for alkylation. In summary, animal studies suggested that patients who took nelfinavir mesylate with elevated levels of EMS are at no increased risk for carcinogenicity or teratogenicity over their background risk, since mutations are prerequisites for such downstream events. These findings are potentially relevant to >40 marketed drugs that are mesylate salts.

A randomized, controlled study evaluating an induction treatment strategy in which enfuvirtide was added to an oral, highly active antiretroviral therapy regimen in treatment-experienced patients: the INTENSE study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of induction with the addition of enfuvirtide to a newly designed oral, highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen versus HAART alone followed by a maintenance phase wherein participants were randomized to either continue/discontinue enfuvirtide while maintaining HAART or continue HAART alone (NCT00487188). METHODS: Participants with HIV-1 RNA >/=1000 copies/mL, CD4 count >/=200 cells/mm(3) and genotype sensitivity score >/=2 (excluding enfuvirtide) were randomized 2:1 to enfuvirtide+HAART or HAART alone and assessed every 4 weeks. Participants achieving <50 copies/mL on two consecutive visits by week 24 entered a maintenance phase wherein those receiving enfuvirtide+HAART underwent another randomization 1:1 to maintain enfuvirtide+HAART or discontinue enfuvirtide; those receiving HAART alone continued their regimen. Virological and immunological endpoints were analysed at weeks 24 and 48. RESULTS: At 24 weeks, 20/31 (65%) participants in the enfuvirtide+HAART arm versus 8/16 (50%) participants in the HAART arm achieved <50 copies/mL. Median time to achieving <50 copies/mL was 57 versus 141 days in the enfuvirtide+HAART and HAART arms (P = 0.048). Withdrawals were similar between groups. In the maintenance phase, at 48 weeks, 14/19 (74%) in the original enfuvirtide+HAART arm (regardless of second randomization) versus 4/8 (50%) in the HAART arm had <50 copies/mL. During maintenance, there were two virological failures in the enfuvirtide+HAART continuation arm, one in the enfuvirtide discontinuation arm and none in the HAART arm. CONCLUSIONS: Although limited by small participant numbers, these results suggest that treatment with enfuvirtide added to HAART may be an option for many patients.

Efficacy and safety of 48 weeks of enfuvirtide 180 mg once-daily dosing versus 90 mg twice-daily dosing in HIV-infected patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and antiviral activity of once-daily (qd) enfuvirtide (ENF) compared with twice daily (bid) ENF. METHOD: T20-401 was a phase 2, open-label, randomized, 48-week pilot study comparing ENF 180 mg qd versus ENF 90 mg bid, added to an optimized background (OB) regimen. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive ENF 180 mg qd given as two 90-mg injections (n = 30) or one 90-mg injection bid (n = 31), plus OB. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a HIV-1 RNA viral load <400 copies/mL. Adherence, pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability parameters, including injection site reactions (ISRs), were compared between treatment arms. RESULTS: At Week 48, 23.3% of patients on once daily versus 22.6% on twice daily (p = .969) reached <400 copies/mL and 13.3% and 22.6% (p = .323), respectively, reached <50 copies/mL. The proportion reporting 1 adverse event or ISRs was comparable between arms, despite an increased incidence of grade 4 erythema (13% vs. 0%), induration (33% vs. 12%), and ecchymosis (7% vs. 0%) on twice daily versus once daily. ENF adherence (95% of prescribed doses) was higher on once daily (80.0%) versus twice daily (58.1%). CONCLUSION: The antiviral efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 180 mg ENF qd appeared comparable with that of 90 mg ENF bid at Week 48, although the study was not powered to demonstrate the noninferiority of once daily versus twice daily.

Adherence to enfuvirtide and its impact on treatment efficacy.

High adherence rates to antiretroviral (ARV) therapy are associated with increased durability of viral suppression and decreased rates of drug resistance. The requirement of twice-daily subcutaneous self-administration of enfuvirtide (ENF) has raised concerns about adherence. This study assesses adherence to ENF and an optimized background (OB) of ARVs and its impact on virological and immunological responses during the TORO trials. Eighty-eight percent of patients in the OB arm reported > or = 85% adherence versus 87% of patients in the ENF + OB arm. Higher overall adherence was associated with improved virological and immunological response in both treatment arms at 48 weeks. In patients with > or = 85% adherence, 33% of patients in the ENF + OB arm achieved HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/ml, versus 13% in the OB arm (p < 0.0001). Similarly, patients with > or = 85% adherence in the ENF + OB arm achieved a mean increase in CD4 cell count of 104 cells/mm(3) compared with 58 cells/mm(3) for patients in the OB arm (p < 0.001). None of the demographic factors explored (age, gender, race) or baseline characteristics (CD4 count, viral load, or baseline sensitivity score) was significant in predicting adherence to ENF when analyzed by multiple regression. Importantly, a history of intravenous drug use (IDU) was not associated with a significant decrease in adherence (mean adherence for IDU 96% versus mean adherence for non-IDU 96%; p = 0.825). Adherence was high in patients receiving the self-injectable ARV enfuvirtide. In addition, the inclusion of ENF did not negatively impact adherence to the ARV regimen as a whole.

Enfuvirtide does not require dose adjustment in patients with chronic kidney failure: results of a pharmacokinetic study of enfuvirtide in HIV-1-infected patients with impaired kidney function.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the influence of kidney disease and hemodialysis on the pharmacokinetics ofenfuvirtide. DESIGN: An open-label, multicenter, parallel group study of HIV-1-infected patients with varying degrees of kidney dysfunction. METHODS: A 90-mg dose of enfuvirtide was administered by subcutaneous injection to 3 groups of patients: group A, patients with normal kidney function; group B, patients with chronic kidney disease; and group C, patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring dialysis. Patients with ESRD requiring dialysis received the 90-mg dose of enfuvirtide on 2 separate occasions; a dialysis day and a nondialysis day. After each dose, a full 48-hour pharmacokinetic profile was collected and pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using model-independent techniques. RESULTS: Enfuvirtide area under the curve (AUCinfinity) and maximum observed enfuvirtide plasma concentration (Cmax) for patients with normal kidney function (group A) was 49.6 microg h/mL and 3.79 microg/mL, respectively. Patients with chronic kidney disease (group B) had higher AUCinfinity (80.3 microg h/mL) and Cmax (5.72 microg/mL), which was similar to patients with ESRD (group C) on both nondialysis days (AUCinfinity 71.1 microg h/mL; Cmax 5.34 microg/mL) and dialysis days (AUCinfinity 66.9 microg h/mL; Cmax 6.31 microg/mL). An average of< 13% of enfuvirtide was removed during the dialysis procedure. The incidence of adverse events was comparable for all study groups. CONCLUSION: Enfuvirtide exposure observed in patients with ESRD requiring dialysis or chronic kidney disease was slightly higher than in patients with normal kidney function and similar to historical Cmax and AUC values from studies in patients with normal kidney function. Thus, enfuvirtide does not require dosage adjustment in patients with impaired kidney function.

Switching from a toxicity-causing antiretroviral to enfuvirtide in patients with HIV: the SWITCH TOX study.

PURPOSE: Treatment-related toxicities frequently limit antiretroviral therapy for patients with HIV-1 infection. This study evaluated the changes in treatment-limiting toxicities when the primary toxicity-causing agent was replaced with enfuvirtide. METHOD: Adult patients with HIV-1 infection (N = 91) with antiretroviral treatment-limiting toxicities were enrolled in this multicenter, open-label, single-arm, 24-week study. Enfuvirtide 90 mg bid was administered instead of a single toxicity-causing component of the previous antiretroviral regimen. Changes in severity of antiretroviral toxicity, safety, tolerability, and maintenance of efficacy of the enfuvirtide regimen were evaluated at baseline and at 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks. RESULTS: Eighty-four percent of participants completed the study. Injection site reactions with enfuvirtide caused premature withdrawal in 5 participants (5%); a further 10 participants (11%) also withdrew early. Overall antiretroviral-related, treatment-limiting toxicities improved or resolved in 53% of participants switching to enfuvirtide, remained unchanged in 43%, and worsened in 3%. At Week 24, 66% of participants (60/91; intent-to-treat population) maintained or improved their viral load category and 73% of participants (66/91) maintained or improved their CD4 cell counts. CONCLUSION: Replacing a toxicity-causing antiretroviral with enfuvirtide may reduce toxicity without compromising the efficacy of different antiretroviral regimens.

TORO: ninety-six-week virologic and immunologic response and safety evaluation of enfuvirtide with an optimized background of antiretrovirals.

The additional 48-week optional treatment extension of the T-20 versus Optimized Regimen Only (TORO) studies evaluated long-term safety and efficacy of enfuvirtide (ENF) through week 96 in patients receiving ENF plus optimized background (OB) and patients switching to ENF plus OB from OB alone. Patient randomization was 2:1 to ENF plus OB (n = 663) and OB (n = 334), of which 89.7% and 89.8% were male, 89.3% and 88.6% were Caucasian, and median age was 41 and 42 years, respectively. HIV risk factors were comparable between the ENF plus OB and OB groups with the major factors being 65.2% versus 66.2% homosexual contact, 17.8% versus 19.8% heterosexual contact, 4.1% versus 4.8% bisexual contact, respectively, and 6.9% injection drug use in both groups. OB patients were allowed to switch to ENF plus OB at virologic failure before week 48 and required to switch at week 48 to continue in the study (n = 230). Efficacy and safety assessments were conducted for each group. At week 96, 55% of ENF plus OB subjects completed the study and 26.5% achieved a viral load of less than 400 copies per milliliter (17.5% achieved less than 50 copies per milliliter). Viral load and CD4 mean change from baseline was -2.1 and -1.1 log(10) HIV-1-RNA copies per milliliter and +166 and +116 CD4 cells/mm(3) for ENF plus OB and switch patients, respectively. No new ENF-related safety issues emerged in weeks 48-96. Injection site reactions led to discontinuation in 7% and 10% of ENF plus OB and switch patients, respectively. In conclusion, these data demonstrate durable efficacy and safety of ENF over 96 weeks and that early use of ENF in combination with other agents for the treatment of antiretroviral-experienced HIV-infected subjects is beneficial.

Population pharmacokinetics of enfuvirtide in HIV-1-infected pediatric patients over 48 weeks of treatment.

The objective of this study was to characterize the population pharmacokinetics of enfuvirtide in HIV-1-infected children and adolescents. HIV-infected patients received combination antiretroviral therapy, including enfuvirtide 2.0 mg/kg subcutaneously, twice daily. Serial and trough blood samples were collected up to 48 weeks. NONMEM was used for population pharmacokinetic analysis. Enfuvirtide exposure was calculated from individual parameter estimates derived from the final model. A total of 218 samples from 43 patients were included in the analysis. Enfuvirtide plasma concentration-time data were described by a 1-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. The addition of each subject's actual body weight as a covariate affected CL/F but not V/F or K(a). The population CL/F, V/F, and K(a) for a 33-kg reference patient was 1.31 L/h, 2.31 L, and 0.105 h(-1), respectively. The final model was CL/F (L/h) = 1.31 . (body weight/33 [kg])(0.721). Age did not affect enfuvirtide exposure. These results confirm the appropriateness of body weight-based pediatric enfuvirtide dosing.

Viral decay dynamics in HIV-infected patients receiving ritonavir-boosted saquinavir and efavirenz with or without enfuvirtide: a randomized, controlled trial (HIV-NAT 012).

The availability of enfuvirtide enables assessment of whether human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) decay can be enhanced by targeting reverse transcriptase, protease, and fusion. We performed a 12-week study of 22 patients randomized to receive ritonavir-boosted saquinavir and efavirenz with (the 3-target arm) or without (the 2-target arm) enfuvirtide. We observed no difference in the mean+/-SD elimination-rate constant for overall decay (0.142+/-0.040 per day and 0.128 +/- 0.033 per day in the 2- and 3-target arms, respectively; P>.1) or for modeled first-phase decay rate (-0.62+/-0.34 per day and -0.51+/-0.16 per day; P>.1). Antiretroviral therapy that inhibits HIV reverse transcriptase and protease exerts potent antiviral effects that might not be augmented by the addition of an HIV fusion inhibitor.

Week-12 response to therapy as a predictor of week 24, 48, and 96 outcome in patients receiving the HIV fusion inhibitor enfuvirtide in the T-20 versus Optimized Regimen Only (TORO) trials.

BACKGROUND: Early virological response to antiretroviral therapy is predictive of long-term treatment outcome in therapy-naive patients. In treatment-experienced patients, such correlations are less well defined, because initial responses may be less pronounced and transient because of accumulated cross-resistance to prior therapies. Our objectives were to explore how the virological and immunological status of treatment-experienced patients at an early time point (week 12) during enfuvirtide-based therapy predicted their responses at weeks 24, 48, and 96 in the T-20 versus Optimized Regimen Only (TORO) trials. METHODS: Post hoc, modified, on-treatment and intent-to-treat analyses were performed to determine whether the relationship between virological and immunological outcomes at weeks 24, 48, and 96 were predicted by the patients' week-12 responses to therapy. RESULTS: Using a modified on-treatment analysis for patients who, by week 12, achieved a decrease in their HIV-1 RNA load of > or =1 log10 copies/mL, 39.2% (95% CI, 33.6%-44.8%) and 59.5% (95% CI, 53.8%-65.1%) achieved a viral load of <50 copies/mL or <400 copies/mL at week 96, respectively, compared with 1.3% (95% CI, 0%-3.8%) and 2.6% (95% CI, 0%-6.1%) of patients, respectively, who did not achieve an early virological response. Using the same modified on-treatment analysis method for patients who, at week 12, achieved a CD4 cell count increase of > or =50 cells/mm3, 87.2% (95% CI, 82.6-91.8) maintained or improved this response through week 96, compared with 56.6% (95% CI, 47.5-65.8) of patients who did not achieve this early categorical immunological response. CONCLUSION: Enfuvirtide-based treatment regimens are associated with a rapid and durable response. Week-12 virological and immunological responses to treatment with enfuvirtide are predictive of subsequent outcomes in triple-class treatment-experienced patients.

Durable efficacy of enfuvirtide over 48 weeks in heavily treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients in the T-20 versus optimized background regimen only 1 and 2 clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: The T-20 Versus Optimized Background Regimen Only (TORO) 1 and TORO 2 clinical trials are open-label, controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 studies comparing enfuvirtide plus an optimized background (OB) of antiretrovirals (n = 661) with OB alone (n = 334) in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients. METHODS: The primary objective at week 48 was to investigate durability of efficacy, as measured by the percentage of patients maintaining their week 24 response or improving. Efficacy analyses used the intent-to-treat population. RESULTS: A total of 73.7% of patients randomized to the enfuvirtide group remained on treatment through week 48 versus 21.3% originally randomized to the control group. At week 48, a higher proportion of week 24 responders maintained their response or were new responders in the enfuvirtide group than in the control group in each responder category: HIV-1 RNA level > or =1.0 log(10) change from baseline, <400 copies/mL and <50 copies/mL (37.4%, 30.4%, and 18.3% in the enfuvirtide group vs. 17.1%, 12.0%, and 7.8% in the control group, respectively; P < 0.0001 for all comparisons). CD4 cell count increases from baseline were twice as great in the enfuvirtide group as in the control group. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate durable efficacy of enfuvirtide plus OB over 48 weeks.

Safety of enfuvirtide in combination with an optimized background of antiretrovirals in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected adults over 48 weeks.

BACKGROUND: Antiretroviral tolerability is a critical factor contributing to treatment outcome. The T-20 Versus Optimized Background Regimen Only (TORO) studies assessed the safety and efficacy of enfuvirtide in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients. METHODS: A total of 997 patients were randomized at a 2:1 ratio to an optimized background antiretroviral regimen plus enfuvirtide (n = 663) or an optimized background regimen alone (control group; n = 334). Control patients could switch to enfuvirtide on virologic failure. RESULTS: In total, 26.5% of patients randomized to enfuvirtide and 36.6% to the control group discontinued study treatment before week 48; the percentage of patients withdrawn for safety reasons (including adverse events [AEs], deaths, and laboratory abnormalities) was 14.0% in the enfuvirtide group and 11.6% in the control group. Injection site reactions (ISRs) occurred in 98% of enfuvirtide patients and led to treatment discontinuation in 4.4%. Treatment-related (defined as possibly, probably, or remotely) AE rates per 100 patient-years were lower with enfuvirtide (96.2) than in the control group (149.9); diarrhea, nausea, and fatigue, the most frequently reported AEs, were significantly less frequent with enfuvirtide than in the control group. Pneumonia was significantly more frequent in patients treated with enfuvirtide (6.7 vs. 0.6 events per 100 patient-years), although the incidence was within expected ranges for this population. Lymphadenopathy was also higher in enfuvirtide-treated patients (7.1 vs. 1.2 events per 100 patient-years) for control patients. CONCLUSION: The addition of enfuvirtide to an optimized background regimen does not exacerbate AEs commonly associated with antiretrovirals. ISRs limited treatment in <5% of patients.

Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response relationship of enfuvirtide in treatment-experienced human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to characterize population pharmacokinetics of enfuvirtide, 90 mg twice daily injected subcutaneously, in treatment-experienced human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected patients, as well as the relationship between exposure and antiviral effect. METHODS: Plasma concentrations of enfuvirtide and HIV-1 ribonucleic acid were obtained from 628 patients in 2 phase III studies. NONMEM software was used for population pharmacokinetic analysis and to assess the effects of age, gender, body weight, anti-gp41 antibodies, and concomitant drugs. Enfuvirtide exposure (area under the plasma concentration-12-hour time curve or steady-state trough concentration) was calculated from individual parameter estimates derived from the model. The decline in HIV-1 ribonucleic acid from baseline at week 2 or 24 was regressed against estimates of enfuvirtide exposure by a maximum effect model. The exposure-response relationship was examined in functional monotherapy (phenotypic sensitivity score of 0) and combination therapy (phenotypic sensitivity score > or = 1). RESULTS: Enfuvirtide population pharmacokinetics was well described by a 1-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. Body weight and female gender were identified as affecting apparent clearance but not efficacy and safety. Concomitant medications had no significant effect on enfuvirtide pharmacokinetics. Antiviral response to enfuvirtide was independent of drug exposure, suggesting that the approved 90-mg twice-daily dose was in the plateau portion of the dose-response curve. For functional monotherapy (phenotypic sensitivity score of 0), approximately 66% of estimated maximal effect was achieved at week 2 and 73% at week 24, and for combination therapy, more than 92% was achieved at both weeks 2 and 24. CONCLUSIONS: Body weight and gender affected enfuvirtide clearance, but changes in exposure did not affect efficacy or safety. Efficacy reached a plateau at the 90-mg twice-daily dosage in the exposure-response curve.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and drug interaction potential of enfuvirtide.

Enfuvirtide, the first fusion inhibitor approved for the treatment of HIV-1 infection, is a synthetic peptide that binds to HIV-1 glycoprotein 41, blocking the fusion of viral and cellular membranes. When administered subcutaneously at the recommended dose of 90 mg twice daily with optimised background antiretroviral therapy, enfuvirtide significantly reduces plasma HIV-1 RNA levels up to 48 weeks compared with optimised background therapy alone. Enfuvirtide exhibits a small volume of distribution (5.48 L), low systemic clearance (1.4 L/h) and high plasma protein binding (92%). Less than 17% of enfuvirtide is converted to a minimally active deaminated form of the parent drug. Both enfuvirtide and its metabolite are primarily eliminated via catabolism to amino acid residues. Following subcutaneous administration, enfuvirtide is almost completely absorbed, and exposure increases almost linearly with dose over the range 45-180 mg. When administered at the recommended dose in adults, subcutaneous absorption is slow and protracted, resulting in relatively flat steady-state plasma concentration-time profiles. Bioavailability is high (84.3%) and the elimination half-life (3.8 hours) supports twice-daily administration. Comparable absorption was observed from three different anatomical injection sites. The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship indicates that the recommended dose, in combination with other active antiretrovirals, is optimal. Enfuvirtide clearance is influenced to a small extent by sex and bodyweight but this does not necessitate dosage adjustment. In vitro and in vivo studies indicate that enfuvirtide has a low potential to interact with concomitantly administered drugs. Enfuvirtide did not influence concentrations of drugs metabolised by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, CYP2D6 or N-acetyltransferase, and had only minimal effects on those metabolised by CYP1A2, CYP2E1 or CYP2C19. Coadministration of ritonavir, ritonavir-boosted saquinavir or rifampicin (rifampin) did not result in clinically significant changes in enfuvirtide pharmacokinetics. In HIV-1-infected paediatric patients, subcutaneous dosages based on bodyweight (2 mg/kg twice daily) produce pharmacokinetics broadly similar to those observed in adults administered 90 mg twice daily.

Prognostic staging of extensively pretreated patients with advanced HIV-1 disease.

PURPOSE: Determinants of therapeutic success are poorly characterized in patients with extensive HAART experience. Positive prognostic factors (PPFs) in the TORO trials could serve as the basis for a prognostically meaningful staging of treatment-experienced patients initiating a new antiretroviral regimen. METHOD: In TORO, triple-class-experienced patients with viral load (VL) > or = 5,000 copies/mL received an optimized background regimen of 3-5 antiretrovirals (based on treatment history and baseline resistance testing) +/- enfuvirtide (n = 995). Clinically relevant baseline PPFs that were predictive of 48-week virologic outcomes were identified via multiple regression analyses. RESULTS: The likelihood of VL < 400 copies/mL at 48 weeks (ITT analysis) was greater for those patients who had baseline CD4 count > or = 100 cells/mm3 (odds ratio [OR] 2.1; 95% confidence intervals [CIs] 1.5, 3.1); baseline VL < 5 log10 copies/mL (OR 1.8; 95% CIs 1.2, 2.6); received < or = 10 prior antiretrovirals (OR 2.4; 95% CIs 1.6, 3.4); or received > or = 2 active antiretrovirals in their background treatment regimen (OR 2.3; 95% CIs 1.6, 3.3). Overall, 67% of triple-class-experienced patients who met all four prognostic criteria and received enfuvirtide achieved VL < 400 copies/mL at 48 weeks vs. 43% for non-enfuvirtide patients (p < .05). Similar results were obtained when the analysis was done separately in each of the randomization arms of the study. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide guidance for physicians on expected outcomes in treatment-experienced patients and should be of value in their clinical management, as well as in stratifying participants in clinical trials involving treatment-experienced patients.