Health-related quality of life in multiple sclerosis: temperament outweighs EDSS.

BACKGROUND: The influence of personality on health-related quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis has been the focus of previous studies showing that introversion and neuroticism were related with reduced health related quality of life. However, no data exist on the impact of temperament on quality of life in this patient group. METHODS: Between April 2014 and March 2016 139 multiple sclerosis patients were recruited from a specialized outpatient clinic of the general hospital of Vienna. Health-related quality of life was measured by "The Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life Questionnaire (MusiQol)", temperament by "Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris, and San Diego Questionnaire - Münster version" (briefTEMPS-M), and disability by the "Expanded disability status scale". All patients underwent a diagnostic psychiatric semi-structured interview (MINI). RESULTS: Known predictors (like disease duration, EDSS, psychiatric co-morbidities, immunomodulatory treatments) explain the proportion of variation in the outcome of MusiQol global index score in 30.9% in multi-variable linear regression analysis. It increased respectively to 40.3, 42.5, and 45.8% if adding the depressive, cyclothymic, or hyperthymic temperament to the list of variables. An increase of depressive and cyclothymic temperament scores significantly reduced global index score of MusiQol (p = 0.005, p = 0.002, respectively), while the hyperthymic temperament significantly raised it (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In MS patients, the depressive and cyclothymic temperament predict a lower and hyperthymic temperament an increased health-related quality of life, independent of current disability status, immunomodulatory treatments, and affective co-morbidities.

Reliability of assessing lifestyle and trigger factors in patients with migraine--findings from the PAMINA study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Numerous lifestyle factors are blamed for triggering migraine attacks. The reliability of assessing these factors retrospectively is unknown. Therefore, retrospective and prospective assessments of lifestyle in general and of migraine triggers in particular were compared in patients with migraine. METHODS: At baseline, the patients filled in two questionnaires covering the previous 90 days. Thereafter they kept a prospective 90-day diary. Questionnaires and diary included the same set of 45 factors. In the first questionnaire the patients assessed their lifestyle, in the second they rated for each factor the likelihood of triggering a migraine attack, and in the diary they recorded the daily presence of these factors irrespective of headache. Five categories were used for comparing frequencies in questionnaire and diary, defining agreement as identical categories in diary and questionnaire, minor disagreement and major disagreement as overestimation or underestimation by one category and two or more categories, respectively. RESULTS: In all, 327 patients (283 women, age 41.9 ± 12.1 years) who recorded 28,325 patient days were included. Calculating for each factor the percentage of patients with major disagreement the mean proportion was larger for trigger factors than for lifestyle (38.7% ± 6.6% vs. 16.9% ± 6.4%, P < 0.001). The proportion of factors showing major disagreement in more than 20% of the patients was 8.8% for lifestyle but 94.1% for trigger factors (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Comparing questionnaire and diary assessments of lifestyle and trigger factors in patients with migraine shows that questionnaire assessment of lifestyle is reliable, whereas trigger factors are overestimated and/or underestimated in retrospective questionnaires.

[Contribution of spinal cord biopsy to the differential diagnosis of longitudinal extensive transverse myelitis]. / Biopsie bei tumorverdächtiger spinaler Raumforderung: Fallstrick Neuromyelitis optica.

BACKGROUND: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are characterized by recurrent optic neuritis (ON) and longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM) as well as the serological detection of antibodies to aquaporin-4 (AQP4-ab). However, longitudinal extensive spinal cord lesions are not pathognomonic for NMOSD as they can also occur in systemic autoimmune diseases or mimic spinal cord tumors. OBJECTIVES/METHODS: We report a female patient who initially presented with a subacute spinal syndrome and a longitudinal spinal cord lesion on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). As the brain MRI showed only unspecific white matter lesions and the cerebrospinal fluid was normal, a spinal cord biopsy was performed to exclude malignancies and revealed inflammatory demyelinating changes. In addition, after several deep vein thromboses and the detection of antiphospholipid antibodies, an antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) was diagnosed. Many years after the spinal cord biopsy, AQP4-ab were tested and found to be positive. We discuss the important differential diagnoses of LETM, give an overview of previously reported NMOSD cases in which a spinal cord biopsy was performed and highlight the crucial role of AQP4-ab testing for the differential diagnosis of longitudinal spinal cord lesions. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: Considering possible serious sequelae of spinal biopsy procedures, testing for AQP4-ab is mandatory in patients with unclear longitudinally extensive spinal cord lesions and should be performed preoperatively in all cases. In light of the heterogeneity of available assays, different detection methods should be used in doubtful cases. The relationship between NMO and APS needs further clarification; however, AQP4 IgG testing is recommended in patients presenting with APS and myelitis, optic neuritis or brainstem encephalitis.

Contemporary treatment options for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease of the central nervous system, encompassing both neuroinflammatory as well as prominent neurodegenerative aspects. A significant proportion of MS patients will develop neurological disability over time and up until recently licensed drugs could not satisfactorily halt this process. However, in the last years MS treatment has raised a stage of rapid progress. Several new drugs with significantly improved efficacy have entered the therapeutic field and several others are currently undergoing phase III clinical trials. In this review, we will summarize efficacy data as well as safety and tolerability issues of currently licensed drugs for relapsing-remitting MS and will give a short update on new drugs currently undergoing late-stage clinical trials.

What to expect after natalizumab cessation in a real-life setting.

BACKGROUND: To minimize the risk of progressive multifocal leucoencephalopathy (PML), treatment with natalizumab is often stopped after 2 years, but evidence upon rebound of disease activity is limited and controversial. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate effects of natalizumab discontinuation on clinical disease activity within twelve months after cessation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data of 201 patients with MS who discontinued natalizumab between 2007 and 2012. Mean change scores of annualized relapse rate (ARR) and expanded disability status scale (EDSS) were calculated for detection of rebound disease activity after twelve months. RESULTS: Natalizumab exposure did not exceed 2 years in 50.2% of patients, and the most common reasons for discontinuation were a long treatment period and concern of PML (56%). A total of 11.9% experienced a rebound phenomenon within twelve months. Mean ARR prenatalizumab was lower (P = 0.001, 95% CI -1.0-0.000) and treatment response to natalizumab poorer (P < 0.001, 95% CI 0.4-1.3) in patients with rebound compared to those without, but rebound was not associated with brief exposure to natalizumab (P = 0.159, 95% CI -9.3-1.5). 86.1% of patients switched to another therapy. Patients without rebound were found more often in the group starting an alternative treatment early (P = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that rebound of MS disease activity affects a subgroup of patients (11.9%), especially those with low disease activity before natalizumab therapy and a longer treatment gap after its withdrawal.