A rare case of an intramyocardial mesothelial inclusion cyst.

A symptomatic intramyocardial cyst, whilst a rare occurrence, is most effectively investigated using Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Furthermore, following diagnosis it can be effectively treated using a surgical approach.

Does the clinical effectiveness of Mitraclip compare with surgical repair for mitral regurgitation?

BACKGROUND: Surgical repair of the mitral valve has long been the established therapy for degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR). Newer transcatheter methods over the last decade, such as the MitraClip, serve to restore mitral function with reduced procedural burden and enhanced recovery. This study aims to compare the shortterm and midterm outcomes of MitraClip insertion with surgical repair for MR. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted for studies comparing outcomes between surgical repair and MitraClip. The initial search returned 1850 titles, from which 12 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria (one randomized controlled trial and 11 retrospective studies). RESULTS: The final analysis comprised 4219 patients (MitraClip 1210; surgery 3009). Operative mortality was not different between the groups (odds ratio [OR] = 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.63-4.23]; p = .317). Length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the MitraClip group (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.882, 95% CI: [0.77-0.99]; p < .001) with considerable heterogeneity (I2 > 90%; p < .001). The rate of reoperation on the mitral valve was lower in the surgical group (OR = 0.392; 95% CI: [0.188-0.817]; p = .012) as was the rate of MR recurrence grade moderate or above (OR = 0.29; 95% CI: [0.19-0.46]; p < .001) during midterm follow up. Long term survival (4-5 years) was also similar between both groups (hazard ratio = 0.70; 95% CI: [0.35-1.41]; p = .323). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the superior midterm durability of surgical valve repair for MR compared with the MitraClip.

Should the mitral valve be repaired for moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation at the time of revascularization surgery?

BACKGROUND: Ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is associated with increased mortality and recurrent congestive heart failure following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. While mitral surgery should be undertaken for severe MR during CABG, the treatment of moderate IMR remains controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to determine the outcomes of CABG alone and combine with mitral valve repair (MVr) in moderate IMR. METHODS: A literature search was conducted by Pubmed, Ovid, and Embase, which included 643 articles. Eleven studies (seven observational studies and four randomized controlled trials) with a total of 1406 patients were included (CABG alone = 864 and CABG plus MVr = 542). RESULTS: There was no difference in operative mortality (odds ratio 1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-2.71) or long-term survival at 1 or 5 years (hazard ratio 0.98, 95%CI 0.71-1.35, P = 0.49) between the two groups, and little evidence of heterogeneity was found in the studies (I2 = 0.0, P = 0.562). There was significantly greater improvement in MR grade (weighted mean difference [WMD] -1.15, 95%CI -1.67 to -0.064, P = < 0.001) and left ventricular systolic diameter (WMD -3.02, 95%CI -4.85 to -1.18, P = 0.001) following CABG and MVr compared to CABG alone. No difference in postoperative functional class or ejection fraction was found. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that in the presence of moderate IMR, adding MVr to revascularization reduces MR grade on follow-up echocardiography and promotes ventricular remodeling, with no improvement in long-term survival or functional class.

Endovascular "neobranching" to manage acute aortic syndrome.

Acute aortic syndrome was coined in 2001 to describe a spectrum of acute aortic wall pathologies. The syndrome represents a cluster of aortic conditions such as aortic dissection, intramural hematoma and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer. Acute aortic dissection is more common than the latter two pathologies with an incidence of up to 6 cases per 100,000 per year. The following report focuses on an unusual case presentation emphasizing the newest management techniques including "neobranching" whilst dealing with challenging patient anatomy and refractory hypertension. We believe this case report eventually broadens our understanding of acute aortic syndrome whilst addressing an entry tear outside the aorta by placing "neobranches". © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.