Gynecologic oncology robot-assisted surgery in octogenarians: Impact of age on hospital stay.

OBJECTIVE: To compare postoperative stay in octogenarians and younger patients undergoing gynecologic oncology robot-assisted surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review of robot-assisted surgery in Gynecological Oncology division during 2019-2022. We included all consecutive cases. Octogenarians (age ≥80 years) and younger patients were investigated by univariable analysis for characteristics and outcome. RESULTS: A total of 816 robot-assisted surgeries were performed, 426 (52.2%) endometrial cancer, 159 (19.5%) ovarian cancer, 27 (3.3%) cervical cancer, 35 (4.3%) endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia, and in 169 (20.7%) the final pathology was benign. There were 60 (7.4%) octogenarians and 756 (92.6%) younger patients. The proportion of patients with an American Society of Anesthesiology score greater than 2 was higher among octogenarians (66.7% vs 32.0%, P < 0.001). The median console time, surgical time, and total operation theater time were similar between groups (P = 0.303, P = 0.643 and P = 0.688, respectively). Conversion rate did not differ between groups (0.4% among younger patients vs 0% in octogenarians, P > 0.99). The median length of stay in the recovery room was similar in both groups (median 170 min, interquartile range [IQR] 125-225 min vs 170 min, IQR 128-240 min in octogenarians, P = 0.731). Length of hospital stay was similar in both age groups; median 1 day (IQR 1-1) among octogenarians versus 1 (0-1) in younger patients (P = 0.136). CONCLUSION: Octogenarians undergoing robotic surgery have no increased risk of length of stay or conversion to laparotomy compared with younger patients.

Association between BMI and oncologic outcomes in epithelial ovarian cancer: a predictors-matched case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to study the association between obesity and survival in ovarian cancer (OC) patients, accounting for confounders as disease stage, histology, and comorbidities. METHODS: Retrospective matched case-control study of consecutive patients, with epithelial OC. Obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 35 kg m-2) patients were matched in a 1:4 ratio with patients having lower BMIs (BMI < 35 kg m-2) based on disease stage, cytoreduction state, tumor histology and ASA score. We compared the 3-year and total recurrence-free survival and overall survival through Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards. RESULTS: Overall, 153 consecutive patients were included, of whom 32 (20.9%) had a BMI ≥ 35. and 121 a BMI < 35. The median follow-up time was 39 months (interquartile range 18-67). Both study groups were similar in multiple prognostic factors, including American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, completion of cytoreduction, histology and stage of disease (p = 0.981, p = 0.992, p = 0.740 and p = 0.984, respectively). Ninety-five (62.1%) patients underwent robotic surgery and conversion rate from robotic to laparotomy was similar in both groups 2 (6.3%) in obese group vs. 6 (5.0%) in lower BMI patients, p = 0.673. During the follow-up time, the rate of recurrence was similar in both groups; 21 (65.6%) in obese group vs. 68 (57.1%), p = 0.387 and the rate of death events was similar; 16 (50.0%) in obese group vs. 49 (40.5%), p = 0.333). The 3-year OS was higher in the obese group (log rank p = 0.042) but the 3-year RFS was similar in both groups (log rank p = 0.556). Median total OS was similar in both groups 62 months (95% confidence interval 25-98 months) in obese vs. 67 months (95% confidence interval 15-118) in the lower BMI group, log rank p = 0.822. Median RFS was similar in both groups; 61 months (95% confidence interval 47-74) in obese, vs. 54 (95% confidence interval 43-64), log rank p = 0.842. In Cox regression analysis for OS, including obesity, age, laparotomy and neoadjuvant treatment - only neoadjuvant treatment was independently associated with longer OS: odds ratio 1.82 (95% confidence interval 1.09-3.05) and longer RFS: odds ratio 2.16 (95% confidence interval 1.37-3.41). CONCLUSIONS: In the present study on consecutive cases of ovarian cancer, obesity did not seem to be associated with outcome, except for an apparent improved 3-year survival that faded away thereafter.

Surgery Advances in Gynecologic Tumors: The Evolution and Outcomes of Robotic Surgery for Gynecologic Cancers in a Tertiary Center.

The integration of innovation into routine clinical practice is faced with many challenges. In 2007, we received the mandate to evaluate how the introduction of a robotic program in gynecologic oncology affected patient-centered care by studying its impact on clinical outcomes and hospital resource utilization. Here we summarize the history and experience of developing a robotic surgery program for gynecologic cancers over 16 years. Analysis of the data indicates that robotic surgery improved perioperative patient clinical parameters, decreased blood loss, complications, and hospital stay, maintained the oncologic outcome, and is cost-effective, resulting in it becoming the dominant surgical approach in gynecologic oncology in a tertiary cancer care institution.

The value of multicenter collaboration in Gynecologic Oncology research.

INTRODUCTION: Canadian gynecological oncology (GYNONC) is constantly evolving. We aim to study the patterns in Canadian GYNONC research using a systematic search approach and bibliometric analysis. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We used Web of Science to identify all relevant publications in the field of GYNONC by Canadian. We analyzed bibliometric data obtained from the iCite database. Publications were evaluated for specific characteristics including the province of all co-authors. We compared bibliometric metrics among provinces. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Overall, 1511 publications, published in 138 different journals during 1973-2022 were analyzed. Of those, 23.5% (N.=355) were of interprovincial origin. Interprovincial publications were constantly increasing, now reaching 34.1%. Publications of interprovincial setting had higher RCR, CPY, FCR and NIH percentile scores when compared to any single province (P=0.009, P>0.001, P<0.001, and P<0.001, respectively). The proportion of publications in high impact factor journals were higher in the interprovincial setting: 35 (9.9%) vs. 48 (4.2%), P<0.001. Excluding the interprovincial publications there were 1156 publications. Half of the publications were authored by authors from Ontario (N.=587, 50.6%), 278 (24.1%) by authors from Quebec, and 161 (14.0%) by authors from British Columbia. The mean FCR was higher in British Columbia as compared to Ontario, Quebec and Manitoba (6.0±2.1 vs. 5.3±2.1, 5.3±1.5, and 4.1±3.0 respectively; P=0.006, P=0.034, and 0.037, respectively). Only Ontario, Quebec, British Columbia and Alberta had publications in high impact factor journals, with similar rate (P=0.806). CONCLUSIONS: Interprovincial publications have the highest citation metrics in all domains. This underscores the importance of collaboration for the purpose of impactful research.

Machine learning for prediction of concurrent endometrial carcinoma in patients diagnosed with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia.

OBJECTIVE: To identify predictive clinico-pathologic factors for concurrent endometrial carcinoma (EC) among patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) using machine learning. METHODS: a retrospective analysis of 160 patients with a biopsy proven EIN. We analyzed the performance of multiple machine learning models (n = 48) with different parameters to predict the diagnosis of postoperative EC. The prediction variables included: parity, gestations, sampling method, endometrial thickness, age, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, serum CA-125, preoperative histology and preoperative hormonal therapy. Python 'sklearn' library was used to train and test the models. The model performance was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and AUC. Five iterations of internal cross-validation were performed, and the mean values were used to compare between the models. RESULTS: Of the 160 women with a preoperative diagnosis of EIN, 37.5% (60) had a post-op diagnosis of EC. In univariable analysis, there were no significant predictors of EIN. For the five best machine learning models, all the models had a high specificity (71%-88%) and a low sensitivity (23%-51%). Logistic regression model had the highest specificity 88%, XG Boost had the highest sensitivity 51%, and the highest positive predictive value 62% and negative predictive value 73%. The highest area under the curve was achieved by the random forest model 0.646. CONCLUSIONS: Even using the most elaborate AI algorithms, it is not possible currently to predict concurrent EC in women with a preoperative diagnosis of EIN. As women with EIN have a high risk of concurrent EC, there may be a value of surgical staging including sentinel lymph node evaluation, to more precisely direct adjuvant treatment in the event EC is identified on final pathology.

The impact of body mass index on robotic surgery outcomes in endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To compare surgical outcomes of patients with endometrial cancer who underwent robotic surgery across different BMI categories. METHODS: A retrospective study including all consecutive patients with endometrial cancer who underwent robotic surgery at a tertiary cancer center between December 2007 and December 2022. The study analyzed outcome measures, including blood loss, surgical times, length of hospitalization, perioperative complications, and conversion rates with the Kruskal-Wallis test for BMI group differences and the Chi-squared test for associations between categorical variables. RESULTS: A total of 1329 patients with endometrial cancer were included in the study. Patients were stratified by BMI: <30.0 (n = 576; 43.3%), 30.0-39.9 (n = 449; 33.8%), and ≥ 40.0 (n = 304; 22.9%). There were no significant differences in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay (p = 0.105) and hospital stay (p = 0.497) between the groups. The rate of post-op complications was similar across the groups, ranging from 8.0% to 9.5% (p = 0.761). The rate of conversion to laparotomy was also similar across the groups, ranging from 0.7% to 1.0% (p = 0.885). Women with a BMI ≥40.0 had a non-clinically relevant but greater median estimated blood loss (30 mL vs. 20 mL; p < 0.001) and longer median operating room (OR) time (288 min vs. 270 min; p < 0.001). Within the OR time, the median set-up time was longer for those with a higher BMI (58 min vs. 50 min; p < 0.001). However, skin-to-skin time (209 min vs. 203 min; p = 0.202) and post-op time (14 min vs. 13 min; p = 0.094) were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: BMI does not affect the peri-operative outcome of patients undergoing robotic staging procedures for endometrial cancer.

The Impact of Intrauterine Manipulators on Outcome and Recurrence Patterns of Endometrial Cancer Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Objective: To evaluate the use of manipulators on the outcome of women who had minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients operated with or without an intrauterine manipulator. Results: Six hundred ninety-nine patients were included. The median follow-up was 44 months (range, 29-67). Nineteen (8.8%) patients had positive cytology in the manipulator group versus 21 (4.4%) in the comparison group (p = 0.02). Total recurrence rate was similar between the groups (12.3% vs. 11.9%; p = 0.8). Vaginal vault recurrence was the most common site of recurrence with higher incidence in the manipulator group (4.5% vs. 1.3%; p = 0.007). Subgroup analysis of low-risk patients who did not receive adjuvant treatment showed higher recurrence rate (8.3% vs. 3%; p = 0.023) and worse disease-free survival (p = 0.01) for the manipulator group. After controlling for other variables, the use of a manipulator did not affect the risk of recurrence for the whole cohort (hazard ratio [HR], 1.28; confidence interval [95% CI], 0.7-2.1, p = 0.3) and for the low-risk subgroup of patients who did not receive adjuvant treatment (HR, 2.47; 95% CI, 0.8-7, p = 0.08). Conclusion: The use of a manipulator increases the risk of positive cytology as well as vaginal vault recurrences, but it does not reduce the overall survival of patients.

Guideline No. 403: initial investigation and management of adnexal masses

To aid primary care physicians, emergency medicine physicians, and gynaecologists in the initial investigation of adnexal masses, defined as lumps that appear near the uterus or in or around ovaries, fallopian tubes, or surrounding connective tissue, and to outline recommendations for identifying women who would benefit from a referral to a gynaecologic oncologist for further management.