Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 45
Filtrar
1.
Aesthet Surg J ; 44(3): 275-285, 2024 Feb 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37738132

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The perception of an ideal nose is influenced by a variety of factors, with demographic characteristics playing a significant role in what is considered an ideal nose. The nasolabial angle (NLA) is considered one of the defining features shaping the nose. OBJECTIVES: In this study we set out to capture the perception of the ideal nasolabial angle among Canadian, Saudi, Kuwaiti, and Lebanese populations. METHODS: An online questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was conducted to investigate the ideal nasolabial angle among Canadian, Saudi, Kuwaiti, and Lebanese populations (n = 197). Participants were patients attending outpatient clinics, plastic surgery residents, and medical students. The questionnaire included demographics and the perception of respondents of the ideal NLA for each gender: male (85°, 90°, 95°, 100°, 110°) and females (95°, 100°, 110°, 115°). RESULTS: The majority of respondents were female (81.2%), ages between 20 and 39 (84.3%). The mean and standard deviation of ideal NLA choices in both male and female models were 97.1 ± 6.39 and 109.5 ± 5.32, respectively. The ideal male NLA choices were found to correlate significantly with age (P = .044) and work status (P = .019). In choosing the ideal female NLA, age was a significant factor (P = .012). CONCLUSIONS: Identifying the ideal NLA is essential to establishing aesthetic goals for patient and surgeon alike. It is important to understand the effects of demographics on the choice of the ideal NLA, which ultimately influences the planning and outcome of the rhinoplasty procedure.


Assuntos
Rinoplastia , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Rinoplastia/métodos , Estudos Transversais , Canadá , Nariz/cirurgia , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Aesthetic Plast Surg ; 47(5): 2144-2149, 2023 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37253847

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This study aims to systematically assess body and facial aesthetic surgery before-and-after photography bias on Instagram. METHODS: An Instagram search using the term "plastic surgeon" was conducted on October 2020. The top 11 plastic surgeons' accounts were selected, and the first 15 images were selected from these profiles pertaining to different anatomical locations. Each photo was analyzed by a blinded board-certified plastic surgeon utilizing a 5-domain clinical photography bias score. The domains covered: (1) photo quality; (2) photo background; (3) position; (4) exposure/coverage; (5) bias. RESULTS: The search strategy identified a total of 161 sets of before and after. The most common anatomical site posted was the nose (n=47), followed by breasts (n=37). The most common angles posted were anterior-posterior view (n=61). The majority of images showed bias toward the post-operative image (70.8%). The main culprit with photo characteristics occurred due to there being a different post-operative background which was more flattering for the post-operative result (n=46, p=0.006) and a different view or angle, which again, flattered the post-operative image (n=36, p=0.02). Other factors that influenced the post-operative bias included photos of the patient covered with clothing (n=15, p=0.014) or standing (n=20, p=0.001), compared to a supine pre-operative image. CONCLUSION: Before-and-after photography conditions in aesthetic surgery is biased toward the post-operative result on Instagram. This observation was noticed across all surgical anatomical areas. Accounts photographer tends to misrepresent the photo background, view of angle, patients pose or position, or covering certain body parts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .


Assuntos
Cirurgia Plástica , Humanos , Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Estética , Nariz , Face , Fotografação/métodos
3.
Aesthetic Plast Surg ; 47(6): 2853-2861, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36997736

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The methodological quality of open access studies has long been questioned due to increasing popularity and accessibility. The objective of this study is to compare the methodological quality of open access versus traditional journal publications in the plastic surgery literature. METHODS: Four traditional plastic surgery journals with their sister open access journals were chosen. For each of the eight journals, 10 articles were randomly selected for inclusion. Methodological quality was examined using validated instruments. Publication descriptors were compared to methodological quality values using ANOVA. Logistic regression was used to compare quality scores between open access and traditional journals. RESULTS: There was a wide distribution of levels of evidence, with a quarter being level one. Regression of non-randomized studies indicated a significantly higher proportion of traditional journal articles were of high methodological quality (89.6%) when compared to open access journals (55.6%; p < 0.05). This difference persisted in three quarter of the sister journal groups. No publication descriptions were associated with methodological quality. CONCLUSIONS: Methodological quality scores were higher among traditional access journals. Higher degrees of peer review may be necessary to ensure appropriate methodological quality in open access plastic surgery publications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .


Assuntos
Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Cirurgia Plástica , Humanos , Acesso à Informação
5.
Hand Surg Rehabil ; 42(2): 109-114, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36720347

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review seeks to understand whether cold intolerance (CI) improves with time and if there is any role for management strategies such as behavioural therapy, surgery, or pharmacotherapy. METHODS: Two independent reviewers used a predefined search strategy to query MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases. Articles written in English, Studies of interventions (such as pharmacotherapy or behavioural therapy) for cold intolerance in adult patients with a history of hand injury along with prevalence over time were included for review. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were included, with twelve prognostic studies of the effect of time on CI, four studies of self management/behavioural therapies, and a single study of surgical treatment of neuromas. No studies of pharmacotherapies were identified for inclusion in the hand injury literature. Most studies (76.4%) were either prevalence or prospective cohort studies; no level I or II evidence studies were included. CONCLUSIONS: Cold intolerance does not resolve over time for the vast majority of patients. Behavioral and self-management studies have low efficacy and studies presented had a high risk of bias. There is a lack of evidence for the use of pharmacotherapy in CI and this could be considered for future studies.


Assuntos
Temperatura Baixa , Traumatismos da Mão , Adulto , Humanos , Temperatura Baixa/efeitos adversos
9.
Aesthetic Plast Surg ; 46(2): 667-674, 2022 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34462800

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of using ultrasonic assisted liposuction (UAL) to achieve sufficient breast symmetry allowing for the use of same sized implants in patients presenting for elective breast augmentation surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients presenting for augmentation mammoplasty with breast asymmetry who underwent ultrasonic assisted liposuction in combination with implant augmentation. Pre-operative differences in breast volumes were determined using water displacement, and these measurements were compared to final lipoaspirates required to achieve symmetry. To estimate the volume of lipoaspirate required, we suggested to aim for twice the volume difference obtained by water displacement. The success of the procedure was measured by the ability to use the same size implants bilaterally. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients were included in this review. In 85% of patients, UAL was sufficient to permit the use of equally sized implants bilaterally. However, when different sized implants were required, the size difference between implants was not greater than 25 cc. The UAL was also effective in correcting minor ptosis and nipple position. The main observed disadvantage was prolonged bruising and swelling. CONCLUSION: The use of UAL for correction of primary breast asymmetry with bilateral breast augmentation allows balancing of breast tissue volumes and the use of same size implants and eliminates the need for balancing mastopexy procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.


Assuntos
Implante Mamário , Implantes de Mama , Lipectomia , Mamoplastia , Implante Mamário/métodos , Implantes de Mama/efeitos adversos , Estética , Humanos , Mamoplastia/métodos , Mamilos/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassom , Água
10.
Aesthetic Plast Surg ; 46(3): 1287-1289, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34799762

RESUMO

A non-aesthetic post-abdominoplasty umbilicus is known to be a significant concern for many patients who consider this procedure, due to its central and visible location. The goal of this method is to minimize the visible scar and create a natural-looking and aesthetically pleasing umbilicus. In this multimedia article, we illustrate our technique that is both reproducible and easy to perform. It produces a scarless caudal aspect, pleasant depth, and natural superior hooding appearance to the post-op umbilicus. Limitations of this technique are discussed.Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .


Assuntos
Abdominoplastia , Umbigo , Abdominoplastia/métodos , Cicatriz/prevenção & controle , Cicatriz/cirurgia , Humanos , Umbigo/cirurgia
12.
Aesthetic Plast Surg ; 45(5): 2190-2198, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33538853

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Our objective is to evaluate the evidence on the aesthetic effect and complications of skin-OOM strip resection compared to skin only upper blepharoplasty. METHODS: A systematic search of EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases was performed using our search strategy through to 31 December 2019. Only comparative studies of the two upper blepharoplasty techniques were included. Three reviewers performed study selection process, data extraction, and quality assessment. RESULTS: A total of six articles were eligible for final inclusion. The included studies consist of two controlled retrospective cohorts and four small randomized controlled studies (RCT). Three of which, were double blinded. Those RCTs were assigned level 2 evidence due to small size and methodological limitations. The sample size of included was studies 407 in the two retrospective studies and 57 in the four RCTs. The outcomes showed that resection of OOM along with skin in upper blepharoplasty showed no difference in long-term aesthetic outcome when skin only procedure is performed. Muscle strip resection was associated with initially higher ophthalmological morbidity (edema, bruising, pain, dry eye, sluggish eye closure and lagopthalmos). Those resolved a few weeks later with conservative treatment. CONCLUSION: The resection of OOM along with skin in upper blepharoplasty showed no difference in long-term aesthetic outcome and was associated with initially higher ophthalmological morbidity compared to skin only procedure. While we are not suggesting that OOM resection is never required, the evidence strongly support its preservation during standard upper blepharoplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .


Assuntos
Blefaroplastia , Doenças Palpebrais , Estética , Pálpebras/cirurgia , Músculos Faciais/cirurgia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
15.
Aesthetic Plast Surg ; 45(3): 1064-1075, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33095301

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Our main objective is to evaluate the effect of body contouring surgery (BCS) on the magnitude and durability of weight loss after bariatric surgery. METHODS: Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Scopus search were conducted from the time of their inception to June 2020. We included comparative studies that assessed weight progression, in terms of Body Mass Index change (∆BMI), Total Body Weight Loss (TBWL%), and Excess Weight Loss (%EWL) for the post-bariatric patient population and the effect of BCS on weight progression. RESULTS: Eleven articles were included. The pooled sample size was 2307, of which 691 were cases who underwent BCS post-bariatric surgery, and 1616 were comparative controls. The mean follow-up time for cases and controls were 61.6 ± 23.8 months and 52.2 ± 23.8 months, respectively. Nine studies reported results of BMI changes, six provided %EWL, and five used %TBWL. Significant improvement in weight loss was observed in the BCS group when measured by either ∆BMI (3 kg/m2 points decrease, p 0.023), %TBWL (6% increase, P < 0.0001), or %EWL (14% increase, P < 0.0001). Sub-group analysis showed that increased follow-up time was associated with higher TBWL% (p 0.02). CONCLUSION: The evidence provided in this review strongly supports the added long-term benefits of body contouring surgery for selected patients after massive weight loss following bariatric surgery. Having a multidisciplinary team that involves a bariatric and a plastic surgeon as well as nutritionists and psychologists for the management of patients with obesity going through the bariatric pathway is recommended. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.


Assuntos
Abdominoplastia , Cirurgia Bariátrica , Contorno Corporal , Obesidade Mórbida , Índice de Massa Corporal , Humanos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Redução de Peso
17.
J Craniofac Surg ; 31(5): 1246-1250, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32282481

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Autogenous costal cartilage grafts (ACCG) are frequently used in secondary rhinoplasty; however, these grafts tend to warp. The objective of this study is to systematically evaluate current interventions to prevent warping of ACCGs and to assess long-term outcomes with their use. METHODS: A systematic review was undertaken using a computerized search. Eligible articles assessed adult patients undergoing secondary rhinoplasty with ACCGs. Interventions to reduce warping were examined. Publication descriptors were extracted, heterogeneity was examined, and methodological quality of articles was assessed. RESULTS: Eighteen studies were included. Most studies were published after 2010 (83.3%), assessed a single intervention (83.3%), and were of levels of evidence III and IV. Mean patient age was 30 (range 5-95 years) and studies included a mean of 64 cases (range 9-357). Nine of the 15 non-comparative studies were considered of high methodological quality, while all 3 comparative studies were considered high quality. Secondary rhinoplasties which did not describe a method to address warping showed increased rates of warping compared to counter balancing techniques, chimeric grafts, titanium microplating, Kirschner wire and suture usage, irradiation, and various carving techniques. Rates of warping remained low with no major complications with the use of a variety of approaches. CONCLUSIONS: ACCG warping during secondary rhinoplasty can be alleviated with a variety of techniques with no clear difference in outcomes between approaches. Plastic surgeons may consider adopting one of the various techniques described in order to reduce warping, maximize aesthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction.


Assuntos
Cartilagem Costal/cirurgia , Rinoplastia , Animais , Coleta de Dados , Humanos , Rinoplastia/métodos , Suturas , Transplante Autólogo
18.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 145(1): 245-255, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31609284

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have identified a high incidence of discrepancy between registered and published outcomes in registered medical and surgical randomized controlled trials. This has not yet been studied in the plastic surgery literature. METHODS: The authors systematically assessed plastic surgery randomized controlled trials published between 2012 and 2016 in seven high-impact plastic surgery journals. Data were collected from the registration website and published articles using a standardized data extraction form. RESULTS: A total of 145 randomized controlled trials were identified, with a 39 percent trial registration rate (n = 57). Forty-nine trials were included in the final analysis. Forty-three (88 percent) had a discrepancy between registered and published outcomes: 26 (53 percent) for primary outcome(s), and 39 (80 percent) for secondary outcome(s). The number of discrepancies in an individual trial ranged from one to seven for primary outcomes and one to 12 for secondary outcomes. Aesthetic surgery had the largest number of trials with outcome discrepancies (n = 15). The prevalence of unreported registered outcomes was 13 percent for primary outcomes and 38 percent for secondary outcomes. Registered nonsignificant primary outcomes were published as nonsignificant secondary outcomes in 30 percent of trials. Publishing new nonregistered secondary outcomes (65 percent) and changing the assessment timing of published primary outcomes (61 percent) were the most common types of discrepancies. Discrepancies favored a statistically significant positive outcome in 19 (44 percent) of the 43 trials with an outcome discrepancy. Discrepancies that resulted in published outcomes with improved patient relevance were found in eight trials (16 percent) for primary outcome discrepancies and 14 trials (29 percent) for secondary outcome discrepancies. CONCLUSIONS: The plastic surgery literature has high rates of discrepancies between registered and published trial outcomes. Outcome reporting discrepancy is even more problematic for secondary outcomes, an area of analysis that has previously been poorly studied. The high rate of discrepancy change favoring a statistically significant outcome and more patient-relevant outcomes may indicate the pressure to demonstrate significant results to be accepted for publication in high-impact journals.


Assuntos
Confiabilidade dos Dados , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/estatística & dados numéricos , Viés de Publicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento
19.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 144(2): 519-530, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31348375

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Meta-analyses are common in the plastic surgery literature, but studies concerning their quality are lacking. The authors assessed the overall quality of meta-analyses in plastic surgery, and attempted to identify variables associated with scientific quality. METHODS: A systematic review of meta-analyses published in seven plastic surgery journals between 2007 and 2017 was undertaken. Publication descriptors and methodologic details were extracted. Articles were assessed using the following two instruments: A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and AMSTAR 2. RESULTS: Seventy-four studies were included. The number of meta-analyses per year increased. Most meta-analyses assessed a single intervention (59.5 percent), and pooled a mean of 20.9 studies (range, two to 134), including a mean of 2463 patients (range, 44 to 14,884). Most meta-analyses were published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (44.6 percent) and included midlevel evidence (II to IV) primary studies. Only 16.2 percent of meta-analyses included randomized controlled trials. Meta-analyses generally reported positive (81.1 percent) and significant results (77.0 percent). Median AMSTAR score was 7 of 11 (interquartile range, 5 to 8). Higher AMSTAR scores correlated with more recent meta-analyses that provided a rationale for statistical pooling, and appropriately managed methodologic heterogeneity (r = 0.66; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Despite an increase in number and quality, meta-analyses are at high risk of bias because of the low level of evidence of included primary studies and heterogeneity within and between primary studies. Plastic surgeons should be aware of the pitfalls of conducting and interpreting meta-analyses.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Cirurgia Plástica/efeitos adversos
20.
Saudi Med J ; 40(5): 469-474, 2019 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31056624

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To explore weather seasonal variation in Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTI) in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada could be attributed to changes in environmental factors of temperature and humidity specifically. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of NSTIs between 2001 and 2015. Regional temperature and humidity data were obtained from the Environment Canada Agency, Halifax, Canada. Chi-square was used for categorical variables and continuous data was used for correlation analyses. Logistic regression was performed to analyze mortality. Results: Of 170 NSTI patients identified, more presented from March to July, especially when the temperature was greater than 10ºC. Higher incidence per 100,000 persons correlated with increased monthly temperatures (p less than 0.01). Monthly NSTI incidence was inversely related to mean humidity (p=0.005). Causative organism was associated with mean weekly temperature (p less than 0.01) but not humidity (p=0.66). Low body mass index, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class, long intensive care unit stay, and shorter overall hospital stay were associated with mortality. No correlation was identified between temperature and humidity and mortality. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a tendency toward more frequent cases of NSTI with warmer, but less humid weather, without effect on severity or mortality.


Assuntos
Fasciite Necrosante/epidemiologia , Umidade , Estações do Ano , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/epidemiologia , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/etiologia , Temperatura , Adulto , Idoso , Canadá/epidemiologia , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Enterobacteriaceae/patogenicidade , Fasciite Necrosante/microbiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/microbiologia , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/mortalidade , Streptococcus/patogenicidade , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...