An Unusual Presentation of Erythema Multiforme Following the Administration of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine in a Pediatric Patient.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused a global calamity that forced emergency use authorization to Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 (BNT162b2) vaccine. It is efficacious in preventing symptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in seronegative recipients. The safety profile is still unclear; however, commonly reported symptoms post-vaccination are fatigue, headache, muscle pain, chills, and injection-site pain. COVID-19 disease elicits, to some extent, cutaneous side effects like urticaria, morbilliform rash, and chilblain-like eruption. Vaccination against COVID-19 was reported to induce similar dermatologic manifestations, such as urticarial rash, delayed large-local reaction, local injection-site reaction, and morbilliform eruption. Erythema multiforme (EM) is a rare manifestation post-vaccination, and only a few reports implicate it as a culprit in cutaneous eruptions following the BNT162b2 vaccine. This report delineates the presentation of a healthy 14-year-old girl to a dermatology clinic who developed EM post-vaccination with the first dose of BNT162b2. New-onset EM-eruption post-vaccination with BNT162b2 had been reported previously in 14 cases, and one case reported on the flare of preexisting-EM.

Physicians' Attitude and Perception Towards Social Media Medical Consultation.

AIM: Social media plays a major role in modern healthcare. However, little is known about physicians' experience as related to medical consultation through social media, such as Twitter. This study aims to characterize physicians' attitudes and perceptions toward medical consultations through social media and estimate the use of social media for medical consultation purposes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted through the distribution of electronic questionnaires to physicians from different specialities. A total of 242 healthcare providers responded to the questionnaire. RESULTS: Our results demonstrated that 79% of the healthcare providers received consultations through social media at least "sometimes" and that 56% of them agreed that it is appropriate to have personal social media platforms that can be accessible by patients. They also agreed (87%) that it is appropriate to interact with patients on social media; however, most of them do not find social media platforms appropriate for diagnosis or treatment. CONCLUSION: Physicians think positively of social media consults, but do not consider it a proper method to manage medical conditions.

The Impact of Social Media on Seeking Dermatological Care.

INTRODUCTION: Social media is used by more than half of the world's population. Social media is becoming more widely recognized as a significant factor when looking for healthcare services because of its capacity to affect an individual's decision. Therefore, we aim to investigate the influence of social media and the use of filters on seeking cosmetic dermatological procedures among the general population of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. METHODS: This cross-sectional study utilized an online form for data collection. The questionnaire was developed by the authors after an extensive literature review. The data collection took place in October 2022 in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Participants were recruited using convenience and snowball sampling methods. RESULTS: A total of 1,031 responses were analyzed, with females representing the majority (85.2%, n = 878). About half (47.4%, n = 489) indicated a willingness to undergo an aesthetic procedure, 16.3% (n = 168) had already done one procedure at least, and 53.2% (n = 548) had a specific procedure to do in the future. Healthcare professionals were the most common source of information (53.9; n = 556), followed by social media (22.7%; n = 234). In the Snapchat application, 94.5% (n = 974) of the participants used face filters. Undergoing an aesthetic procedure showed statistically significant associations with age, gender, educational level, employment, and income. CONCLUSION: Hiding skin lesions or acne was the most frequently reported reason for using photo editing apps or filters. While healthcare providers were the most frequently reported source of information, Snapchat influenced around 33% of the study's participants to undergo an aesthetic procedure.

Ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser combined with autologous platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of atrophic acne scars: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Atrophic acne scars are the most common cutaneous seqaule of acne vulgaris, representing 80%-90% of all acne scars. Ablative fractional carbon dioxide (FCO2 ) laser is the gold standard treatment for atrophic scars. Additionally, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is suggested to accelerate the healing process and collagen synthesis. The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy and safety of PRP combined with Ablative FCO2 laser in the treatment of moderate to severe atrophic acne scars. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have compared PRP in combination with ablative FCO2 laser to ablative FCO2 laser alone with respect to the efficacy and safety measures were included. We have systematically explored Embase, Medline, and CENTRAL databases via Ovid. The outcomes that our systematic review sought to evaluate were clinical improvement, patient satisfaction, and Goodman and Baron's qualitative acne scar score. The dichotomous outcomes were presented as odds ratio (OR) while the continuous outcomes were presented as standardized mean difference (SMD). Eleven RCTs that represents 313 participants were included. The combined use of laser and PRP showed a statistically significant clinical improvement and patient satisfaction compared to the use of laser alone (OR = 2.56, 95% CI 1.37-4.78 and OR = 3.38, 95% CI 1.80-6.34, respectively). Also, a significant improvement in Goodman and Baron's score was achieved by combining PRP with laser (SMD = -0.40, 95% CI -0.65 to -0.14). The combined treatment of laser and PRP was highly synergistic, effective, and safe in treating moderate to severe atrophic acne scars.

The Association Between Facial Dermatosis and Face-Mask Wearing During COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUND: During the coronavirus pandemic of 2019, there has been an upsurge in the number of reported cases of facial dermatosis caused by face masks wearing within the general population. Face mask-induced facial dermatosis has been investigated previously in healthcare workers without involving the general population. However, as a precautionary measure against the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, wearing a face mask has become mandatory for the general population, similar to healthcare workers.  Objective: To measure the prevalence of COVID-19 pandemic-induced facial dermatosis. Also, to determine the type of face mask used that causes the most facial dermatosis and the association between prolonged usage of face masks and facial dermatosis in Western Saudi Arabia's population. METHODS: The study covers the Western region of Saudi Arabia. A self-administered Google survey was shared on social media. The study used prior surveys from similar studies. The data collection included participants' demographic information, pre-existing skin conditions, mask type, and mask-related skin conditions. The data were analyzed using the statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). RESULTS: The median age was 30 years (interquartile range {IQR} 23-43). Females represented 65.5% of our sample. Face mask-wearing was associated with skin changes in 41.7% of the population. The most common skin condition associated with mask use was pimples and pustules representing 28.7%, of which the most common site was on the cheeks 31.4%. Acne vulgaris was the most common pre-existing skin condition, affecting 8.7% of the total population. Of the total, 46.2% experienced an exacerbation of their pre-existing skin condition with or after wearing masks. Skin changes were significantly associated with skin type and duration of wearing the mask (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of facial mask-induced facial dermatosis is 41.7% of the general population in which surgical mask was responsible for most cases. In addition, there is a strong association between the duration of wearing the mask and facial dermatosis.