Emerging concepts in the CanMEDS physician competency framework.

Background: The CanMEDS physician competency framework will be updated in 2025. The revision occurs during a time of disruption and transformation to society, healthcare, and medical education caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and growing acknowledgement of the impacts of colonialism, systemic discrimination, climate change, and emerging technologies on healthcare and training. To inform this revision, we sought to identify emerging concepts in the literature related to physician competencies. Methods: Emerging concepts were defined as ideas discussed in the literature related to the roles and competencies of physicians that are absent or underrepresented in the 2015 CanMEDS framework. We conducted a literature scan, title and abstract review, and thematic analysis to identify emerging concepts. Metadata for all articles published in five medical education journals between October 1, 2018 and October 1, 2021 were extracted. Fifteen authors performed a title and abstract review to identify and label underrepresented concepts. Two authors thematically analyzed the results to identify emerging concepts. A member check was conducted. Results: 1017 of 4973 (20.5%) of the included articles discussed an emerging concept. The thematic analysis identified ten themes: Equity, Diversity, Inclusion, and Social Justice; Anti-racism; Physician Humanism; Data-Informed Medicine; Complex Adaptive Systems; Clinical Learning Environment; Virtual Care; Clinical Reasoning; Adaptive Expertise; and Planetary Health. All themes were endorsed by the authorship team as emerging concepts. Conclusion: This literature scan identified ten emerging concepts to inform the 2025 revision of the CanMEDS physician competency framework. Open publication of this work will promote greater transparency in the revision process and support an ongoing dialogue on physician competence. Writing groups have been recruited to elaborate on each of the emerging concepts and how they could be further incorporated into CanMEDS 2025.

Contexte: Le référentiel de compétences CanMEDS pour les médecins sera mis à jour en 2025. Cette révision arrive à un moment où la société, les soins de santé et l'enseignement médical sont bouleversés et en pleine mutation à cause de la pandémie de la COVID-19. On est aussi à l'heure où l'on reconnaît de plus en plus les effets du colonialisme, de la discrimination systémique, des changements climatiques et des nouvelles technologies sur les soins de santé et la formation des médecins. Pour effectuer cette révision, nous avons avons extrait de la littérature scientifique les concepts émergents se rapportant aux compétences des médecins. Méthodes: Les concepts émergents ont été définis comme des idées ayant trait aux rôles et aux compétences des médecins qui sont débattues dans la littérature, mais qui sont absentes ou sous-représentées dans le cadre CanMEDS 2015. Nous avons réalisé une recherche documentaire, un examen des titres et des résumés, et une analyse thématique pour repérer les concepts émergents. Les métadonnées de tous les articles publiés dans cinq revues d'éducation médicale entre le 1er octobre 2018 et le 1er octobre 2021 ont été extraites. Quinze auteurs ont effectué un examen des titres et des résumés pour relever et étiqueter les concepts sous-représentés. Deux auteurs ont procédé à une analyse thématique des résultats pour dégager les concepts émergents. Une vérification a été faite par les membres de l'équipe. Résultats: Parmi les 4973 articles dépouillés, 1017 (20,5 %) abordaient un concept émergent. Les dix thèmes suivants sont ressortis de l'analyse thématique: l'équité, la diversité, l'inclusion et la justice sociale; l'antiracisme; l'humanité du médecin; la médecine fondée sur les données; les systèmes adaptatifs complexes; l'environnement de l'apprentissage clinique; les soins virtuels; le raisonnement clinique; l'expertise adaptative; et la santé planétaire. L'ensemble de ces thèmes ont été approuvés comme concepts émergents par l'équipe de rédaction. Conclusion: Cet examen de la littérature a permis de relever dix concepts émergents qui peuvent servir à éclairer la révision du référentiel de compétences CanMEDS pour les médecins qui aura lieu en 2025. La publication en libre accès de ce travail favorisera la transparence du processus de révision et le dialogue continu sur les compétences des médecins. Des groupes de rédaction ont été recrutés pour développer chacun des concepts émergents et pour examiner la façon dont ils pourraient être intégrés dans la version du référentiel CanMEDS de 2025.

Pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009: chest radiographic findings from 147 proven cases in the Montreal area.

OBJECTIVE: To describe chest radiographic findings in patients with isolated and complicated acute novel influenza A (H1N1) virus infection. METHODS: Retrospective study of 147 patients (64 men, mean age 41) with reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction confirmed acute influenza A (H1N1) infection, who also had a chest radiograph <72 hours of viral specimen collection. Radiographs were analysed for acute findings. A correlation with bacterial cultures results was performed. The unpaired 2-sample equal-variance Student t test was applied to continuous variables and the Pearson χ(2) test of association to discrete variables. RESULTS: In 71% of cases, chest radiograph was normal. The presence of acute imaging findings was associated with older age (P < .05), increased number of comorbidities (most commonly, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, asthma) (P < .05), higher rate of hospitalization (P < .05) and intensive care unit admission, and increased mortality. Predominant acute radiographic finding in isolated influenza A (H1N1) was alveolar opacity (88%), either unifocal or multifocal, most often in the lower lobes. In the subgroup of patients with positive imaging findings and for whom nonviral microbiologic data was available, 62% had superimposed bacterial or fungal infection. CONCLUSION: In the majority of patients with acute influenza A (H1N1) infection, the chest radiograph is normal. Acute imaging findings are associated with older age, an increased number of comorbidities, and a higher rate of complications and mortality. The predominant radiographic finding of isolated primary influenza A (H1N1) infection is alveolar opacity. Superimposed bacterial infection is frequent and must be excluded in patients with abnormal imaging.

Investigating the barriers to teaching family physicians' and specialists' collaboration in the training environment: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Collaboration between physicians in different specialties is often taken for granted. However, poor interactions between family physicians and specialists contribute significantly to the observed discontinuity between primary and specialty care. The objective of this study was to explore how collaboration between family physicians and specialists was conceptualised as a competency and experienced in residency training curricula of four faculties of medicine in Canada. METHODS: This is a multiple-case study based on Abbott's theory of professions. Programs targeted were family medicine, general psychiatry, radiology, and internal medicine. The content of the programs' objectives was analyzed. Associate deans of postgraduate studies, program directors, educators, and residents were interviewed individually or in focus groups (47 residents and 45 faculty members). RESULTS: The training objectives related to family physicians-specialists collaboration were phrased in very general terms and lacked specificity. Obstacles to effective collaboration were aggregated under themes of professional responsibility and questioned expertise. Both trainees and trainers reported increasing distances between specialty and general medicine in three key fields of the professional system: the workplace arena, the training setting, and the production of academic knowledge. CONCLUSION: The challenges of developing collaborating skills between generalists and specialist physicians are comparable in many ways to those encountered in inter-professional collaboration and should be given more consideration than they currently receive if we want to improve coordination between primary and specialty care.

Late retrograde perfusion of donor lungs does not decrease the severity of primary graft dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: The ideal preservation strategy has yet to be established in lung transplantation. This clinical study compares primary graft dysfunction using antegrade and retrograde perfusion of donor lungs. METHODS: Over a 6-year period, 153 consecutive patients underwent lung transplantation in our institution. Group I consists of 65 patients who received lungs preserved with an antegrade flush of modified Euro-Collins solution. Group II includes 65 patients who received lungs preserved with an antegrade flush of low-potassium dextran (LPD) solution. Group III consists of 23 patients who received lungs preserved with an antegrade and a preimplantation retrograde flush of LPD solution. Endpoints evaluated were the following: acute lung injury (ALI) score, time to achieve a fraction of inspired oxygen (Fio2) of 40% and a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5, length of ventilation, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, 90-day operative mortality, and patient survival rates. RESULTS: The patient demographic data, underlying diagnosis, number of single and double lung transplants, use of cardiopulmonary bypass, and mean ischemic times were similar in all 3 groups. The mean ALI score (6.2, 5.8, and 6.0) and the median length of ventilation (23.5, 24.0, and 27.0 hours) in groups I, II, and III, respectively, were not significantly different. The length of ICU stay, the 90-day operative mortality, and the survival rates were not significantly different in the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that late retrograde perfusion of donor lungs does not decrease the severity of primary graft dysfunction when compared with standard antegrade techniques.

Family practice: professional identity in transition. A case study of family medicine in Canada.

With increasingly fewer family physicians in many countries and students less interested in primary care careers, generalists are becoming an endangered species. This situation is a major health care resource management challenge. In a rapidly changing health care environment, family medicine is struggling for a clear identity -- a matter which is crucial to health system restructuring because it affects the roles and functioning of other professions in the system. The objective of our study was to explore representations of roles and responsibilities of family physicians held by future family and specialist physicians and their clinical teachers in four Canadian medical school faculties of medicine, using both focus groups and individual interviews. In addition to family medicine, we targeted residency programs in general psychiatry, radiology and internal medicine -- three areas that interface significantly between primary care and specialized medicine. In each faculty, respondents included the vice-dean of postgraduate studies; the director of each relevant program; educators in the program; residents in each specialty in their last year of training. Findings are centred around three major themes: (1) the definition of family medicine; (2) family medicine as an endangered species, and (3) the generation gap between young family physicians and their educators. The sustained physician-patient relationship is considered a core characteristic of family medicine that is much valued by patients and physicians -- both generalists and specialists -- as something to be preserved in any model of collaboration to be developed. Overall, two divergent directions emerge: preserving all the professions' traditional functions while adapting to changing contexts, or concentrating on areas of expertise and moving towards creating "specialist" general practitioners, in response to a rapidly expanding scope of practice, and to the high value attributed to specialization by society and the professional system.

Measurement of perception and interpretation skills during radiology training: utility of the script concordance approach.

Imaging specialties require both perceptual and interpretation skills. Except in very simple cases, data perception and interpretation vary among clinicians. This variability makes for difficulty in measuring these skills with traditional assessment tools. The script concordance approach is conceived to allow standardized assessment in contexts of uncertainty. In this exploratory study, the authors tested the usefulness of the approach for assessment of perceptual and interpretation skills in radiology. A perception test (PT) and an interpretation test (IT) were designed according to the approach. Both tests used plain chest X-rays. Three groups were tested: clerkship students (20), junior residents (R1-R3; 20), senior residents (R4-R5; 20). Eleven certified radiologists, all currently appointed to chest reading, provided the answers by aggregate scoring method. Statistics included descriptive, ANOVA, regression analysis, Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients. Cronbach alpha values were 0.79 and 0.81 for the PT and IT respectively. Score progression was statistically significant in both tests. Perception scores progressed more rapidly than interpretation scores during training. Effect size was large in discriminating low versus higher level of expertise, 2.2 (PT) and 1.6 (IT). The Pearson correlation coefficient between both tests was 0.58. Cronbach alpha coefficient values indicate reasonable reliability for both tests. The linear progression of scores, each at its own pace, and the positive and moderate magnitude of the Pearson correlation coefficient are arguments suggesting measurement of two different skills. More studies are necessary to document the approach usefulness for assessment in radiology training.

Decreased mortality and infectious morbidity in adult burn patients given enteral glutamine supplements: a prospective, controlled, randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: Enteral glutamine supplements have been shown to reduce infectious morbidity in trauma patients, but their effect on burn patients is not known. The objective of this study was to measure the impact of enteral glutamine supplementation on infectious morbidity, length of care, and the immune system in burn patients. DESIGN: Double-blinded, randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Burn center. PATIENTS: Forty-five adults with severe burns. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive either glutamine or an isonitrogenous control mixture until complete healing occurred. Length of care, incidence of positive blood culture, and mortality were recorded. Phagocytosis by circulating polymorphonuclear cells was measured every 3 days. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patient characteristics were similar in both groups. Four patients were excluded from the analysis, because three of them died within 72 hrs and the fourth could not receive enteral nutrition and amino acid supplements for the first 10 days. Of the remaining 41 patients, length of care in the survivors was not different between groups (0.9 vs. 1.0 days/percent total body surface area for glutamine vs. control, respectively), positive blood culture was three times more frequent in control than in glutamine treatment (4.3 vs. 1.2 days/patient, p <.05), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was detected in six patients on control and zero on glutamine (p <.05). Phagocytosis by polymorphonuclear cells was not different between groups. Mortality rate was significantly lower in glutamine than in control: intention to treat, two vs. 12 (p <.05); per protocol analysis, zero vs. eight (p <.01). CONCLUSIONS: Enteral glutamine supplementation in adult burn patients reduces blood infection by a factor of three, prevents bacteremia with P. aeruginosa, and may decrease mortality rate. It has no effect on level of consciousness and does not appear to influence phagocytosis by circulating polymorphonuclear cells.

[Systematic planning of technical training in urologic surgery: methodologic trial]. / Planification systématique de l'apprentissage des gestes techniques en chirurgie urologique: essai méthodologique.

OBJECTIVES: Trainee urologists must be helped and guided in order to acquire surgical techniques and professional skills. This methodological trial was designed to define the training objectives based on the needs formulated in terms of basic technical procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Systematic planning based on the training cycle was used in this study. Training needs were identified by a questionnaire sent to 4 groups composed of a limited number (about twelve) of urologists, but representative of the various modes of urological practice in several regions of France. Data were acquired according to the Delphi method. RESULTS: A list of 10 operations to be mastered at the end of urology training was defined consensually based on the replies (79.2%) to the questionnaire. This list was used as the basis for the design of general and specific training objectives for each operation. These objectives were validated by the urologists consulted. Three examples of these objectives are presented. CONCLUSION: A clear determination of the surgical technique training needs and objectives could lead to standardization of the practical training of urology residents. This would subsequently need to be completed by determination of the methods of evaluation of achievement of these objectives for tutors and trainee urologists.