Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 47
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes ; 7(4): 320-326, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37502338

RESUMO

Objective: To evaluate the effect of hemorrhoids on noninvasive stool test performance for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of test characteristics for the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and the multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test, on the basis of hemorrhoid status, recorded at the time of colonoscopy, among patients enrolled in the pivotal prospective study for mt-sDNA that was conducted from June 2011, to May 2013. Test characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values) for FIT and mt-sDNA (performed < 90 days before colonoscopy) were stratified by the presence of hemorrhoids and compared. Results: Hemorrhoids were found in 51.7% (5163 of 9989) of the study cohort. Across all test characteristics, there were no statistically significant differences for FIT or mt-sDNA when stratified by hemorrhoid status. Analysis revealed mt-sDNA sensitivity of 44% and 41% for advanced precancerous lesions in nonhemorrhoidal and hemorrhoid patients, respectively (P=.41). The FIT sensitivity among the same lesion category was 24.9% in patients without hemorrhoids and 22.8% in those with hemorrhoids (P=.48). The mt-sDNA specificity was 86.4% in patients without hemorrhoids vs 87.7% in those with hemorrhoids (P=.67), although FIT specificity was 95.0% among patients without hemorrhoids vs 94.7% in those with hemorrhoids (P=.44). Conclusion: The presence of asymptomatic hemorrhoids did not adversely affect test performance in this large clinical study. These findings suggest that in the absence of overt gastrointestinal bleeding, FIT and mt-sDNA are options for CRC screening, irrespective of hemorrhoid status. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01397747.

2.
JAMA ; 322(23): 2277, 2019 Dec 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31846002
3.
JAMA ; 322(23): 2277, 2019 Dec 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31846003
4.
JAMA ; 322(23): 2277, 2019 Dec 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31846004
5.
JAMA ; 322(19): 1854, 2019 Nov 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31742618
6.
JAMA ; 322(19): 1854, 2019 Nov 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31742619
7.
JAMA ; 322(19): 1854, 2019 Nov 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31742620
9.
JAMA ; 322(15): 1442, 2019 Oct 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31613332
10.
JAMA ; 322(15): 1442, 2019 Oct 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31613333
11.
JAMA ; 322(15): 1442, 2019 Oct 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31613334
12.
JAMA ; 322(16): 1537-1538, 2019 Oct 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31580382
13.
JAMA ; 322(11): 1036, 2019 Sep 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31528992
14.
JAMA ; 322(11): 1036, 2019 Sep 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31528993
15.
JAMA ; 322(11): 1036, 2019 Sep 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31528994
16.
JAMA ; 322(7): 604, 2019 Aug 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31429881
17.
JAMA ; 322(7): 604, 2019 Aug 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31429882
18.
JAMA ; 322(7): 604, 2019 Aug 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31429883
19.
JAMA ; 322(5): 388-389, 2019 Aug 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31314056
20.
JAMA ; 322(3): 199, 2019 Jul 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31310282
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...