Leishmaniasis in Norway. / Leishmaniasis i Norge.

BACKGROUND: Leishmaniasis is a rare but potentially severe tropical infectious disease, and Norwegian clinicians are generally unfamiliar with its diagnosis and treatment. This study aimed to investigate the number of cases diagnosed, performance of diagnostic methods and treatment of leishmaniasis at five university hospitals in Norway. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The number of cases, diagnosis and treatment of suspected leishmaniasis were registered prospectively in the period March 2014 - September 2017 at the university hospitals of Bergen, Oslo, Stavanger, Trondheim and Tromsø. RESULTS: A total of 13 patients with leishmaniasis were registered in the period. Visceral leishmaniasis was diagnosed in two patients infected in the Mediterranean region, after 7 and 8 weeks with symptoms. The diagnosis was made by serology as well as microscopy and/or polymerase chain reaction tests (PCR) on spleen, blood and bone marrow. Both patients were treated effectively with liposomal amphotericin B. Cutaneous leishmaniasis was diagnosed in 11 patients, and samples from 10 of these tested positive with PCR. Two patients were infected with potentially mucotropic species. Liposomal amphotericin B was the first-line choice for all those who received treatment, but one patient recovered only after local therapy with sodium stibogluconate. INTERPRETATION: Assessment of visceral leishmaniasis was undertaken according to international guidelines. The patients were diagnosed late in the disease course, presumably because the disease is rare and not well known in Norway. Cutaneous leishmaniasis was diagnosed with PCR, but none of the patients received local treatment as the first-line choice, as recommended in suitable cases, presumably because the drugs are not readily available in Norway and many clinicians are unfamiliar with the route of administration with local infiltration.

Patient-reported outcome after treatment for definite Lyme neuroborreliosis.

OBJECTIVE: To chart patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in Norwegian patients treated for definite neuroborreliosis (NB). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Adult patients treated for definite NB 1-10 years earlier supplied demographics, symptoms and treatment during NB, and answered validated questionnaires; Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), health-related quality of life questionnaire (RAND-36), and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15). RESULTS: A higher proportion of NB-treated persons reported severe fatigue, defined as FSS score ≥ 5, than in Norwegian normative data, but when removing persons with confounding fatigue associated comorbidities (n = 69) from the analyses, there was no difference between groups. Physical health-related quality of life (RAND-36 PCS), mean FSS score, proportions of persons reporting moderate or severe somatic symptom burden (PHQ-15 score ≥ 10), anxiety (HADS-A ≥ 8), or depression (HADS-D ≥ 8) did not differ between NB-treated persons and reference scores. Mental health-related quality of life (RAND-36 MCS) was poorer than in normative data (47.1 vs. 53.3), but associated with anxiety, depression and current moderate or severe somatic symptom burden, and not with NB characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Results on validated PROM questionnaires measuring fatigue, anxiety, depression, self-reported somatic symptom burden, and physical health-related quality did not differ between persons treated for definite NB 1-10 years earlier and reference scores. NB-treated persons tended to report a slightly poorer mental health-related quality of life than found in normative data, but when adjusting for confounders the causative connection is questionable. Overall, the long-term prognosis of definite NB seems to be good.

Lyme neuroborreliosis: do we treat according to guidelines?

Evidence-based guidelines, published in 2010, equate the efficacy of oral and intravenous antibiotics and recommend treatment duration of 2 weeks in early Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB) without encephalitis or myelitis. Further, the Norwegian health authorities give a general advice to choose oral rather than intravenous administration when proven effective, due to lower costs, fewer risks, and reduced patient inconvenience. In this study we aimed to chart LNB treatment practice in Norway and compare it to these recommendations. Adult patients diagnosed with definite LNB between 2007 and 2013 in 11 different hospitals in the four health regions in Norway were invited to answer a questionnaire regarding duration and administration of antibiotic treatment. A total of 253 patients answered. Median age at diagnosis was 59 years (range 19-83), and 125 (49%) were women. Duration of treatment was 1 week in 7 (3%) patients, 2 weeks in 81 (32%), 3 weeks in 62 (25%), 4 weeks in 48 (19%), 5 weeks in 12 (5%), ≥6 weeks in 29 (12%), and unknown in 14 (6%). Treatment was given orally in 77 (30%) patients, intravenously in 110 (44%), both orally and intravenously in 65 (26%), and unknown in one. Treatment practices differed between the health regions (p = 0.002). During the study period, there were no significant time trend neither with respect to proportion of patients treated for only 2 weeks (OR 0.899, p = 0.109) nor with respect to proportion of patients treated exclusively with oral antibiotics (OR 1.131, p = 0.074). In conclusion, there seem to be a gap between evidence-based recommendations and treatment practice of LNB in Norway.