Erectile Dysfunction Is Highly Prevalent in Men With Newly Diagnosed Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Cross-sectional studies on sexual function in men with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) yield mixed results. Using a prospective incidence cohort, we aimed to describe sexual function at baseline and over time and to identify factors associated with impaired sexual function in men with IBD. METHODS: Men 18 years and older enrolled between April 2008 and January 2013 in the Ocean State Crohn's and Colitis Area Registry (OSCCAR) with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up were eligible for study. Male sexual function was assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), a self-administered questionnaire that assesses 5 dimensions of sexual function over the most recent 4 weeks. To assess changes in the IIEF per various demographic and clinical factors, linear mixed effects models were used. RESULTS: Sixty-nine of 82 eligible men (84%) completed the questionnaire (41 Crohn's disease, 28 ulcerative colitis). The mean age (SD) of the cohort at diagnosis was 43.4 (19.2) years. At baseline, 39% of men had global sexual dysfunction, and 94% had erectile dysfunction. Independent factors associated with erectile dysfunction are older age and lower physical and mental component summary scores on the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). CONCLUSION: In an incident cohort of IBD patients, most men had erectile dysfunction. Physicians should be aware of the high prevalence of erectile dysfunction and its associated risk factors among men with newly diagnosed IBD to direct multidisciplinary treatment planning.

Long-term efficacy and safety of ustekinumab for Crohn's disease through the second year of therapy.

BACKGROUND: In Phase 3 studies of ustekinumab, a fully human monoclonal IL-12/23p40 antibody approved for moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease, patients entered a long-term extension after completing 8 weeks of induction and 44 weeks of maintenance treatment. Efficacy through 92 weeks and safety through 96 weeks of IM-UNITI maintenance are reported. METHODS: UNITI-1 (TNF-antagonist failures) and UNITI-2 (conventional therapy failures) patients (N = 1281) entered IM-UNITI, including 397 ustekinumab intravenous induction responders randomised to subcutaneous ustekinumab 90 mg every 12 weeks, every 8 weeks, or placebo and 884 nonrandomised patients. Dose-adjustment to 90 mg every 8 weeks occurred in patients randomised to 90 mg every 12 weeks and placebo patients with loss of response (Weeks 8-32). All Week 44 completers could enter the long-term extension without further dose adjustment. Placebo patients discontinued following study unblinding. RESULTS: A total of 718 patients (all treated) entered the long-term extension (298 randomised and 420 not randomised). Overall, 86.5% (621/718) completed Week 96. The proportions of randomised patients in clinical remission were generally maintained from Week 44 through 92 in ustekinumab 90 mg every 12 weeks (77.4% to 72.6%), every 8 weeks (84.1% to 74.4%), and prior dose adjustment groups (63.4% to 53.5%). At Week 92, the proportions of patients in clinical remission were similar in the ustekinumab 90 mg every 12 weeks and every 8 weeks groups and lower in patients with prior dose adjustment. Proportions of patients in clinical remission at Week 92 for all treated every 8 weeks (64.4%) and every 12 weeks (64.3%) groups were lower than randomised every 8 weeks (74.4%) and every 12 weeks (72.6%) groups, but similarly maintained. Safety events (per hundred patient-years) were similar among all placebo and ustekinumab patients (Week 0-96), including adverse events (484.39 vs 447.76), serious adverse events (19.24 vs 18.82), and serious infections (4.09 vs 4.02). No dose effect was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous ustekinumab maintained clinical response and remission through Week 92. No new safety signals were observed. ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01369355.

Opportunistic screening for bone disease using abdominal CT scans obtained for other reasons in newly diagnosed IBD patients.

Bone disease is prevalent among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), though bone density screening remains underutilized. We used CT scans performed for other indications in IBD patients to identify and monitor osteopenia using CT attenuation values at the lumbar spine. Significant rates of bone disease were detected which would have otherwise gone undiagnosed. INTRODUCTION: Osteoporosis affects about 14-42% of patients with IBD. Though screening is recommended in IBD patients with risk factors, it remains underutilized. In patients with newly diagnosed IBD, we used CT scans performed for other indications to identify and monitor progression of osteopenia. METHODS: Using the Ocean State Crohn's and Colitis Area Registry, we identified adult patients with one or more abdominal CT scans. Each patient had two age- and gender-matched controls. Radiologists measured attenuation through trabecular bone in the L1 vertebral body recorded in Hounsfield units (HU). Generalized estimating equations were used to measure how HU varied as a function of gender, type of IBD, and age. RESULTS: One hundred five IBD patients were included, and 72.4% were classified as "normal" bone mineral density (BMD) and 27.6% as potentially osteopenic: 8.6% with ulcerative colitis and 19.0% with Crohn's disease. We found a decrease in bone density over time (p < 0.001) and that BMD decreases more in Crohn's disease than in ulcerative colitis (p < 0.004). Sixty patients had two CT scans, and mean loss of 9.3 HU was noted. There was a non-significant decrease in BMD over time in patients exposed to > 31 days of steroids and BMD was stable with < 30 days of steroid exposure (p < 0.09). CONCLUSION: Using CT scans obtained for other indications, we found low rates of osteopenia and osteoporosis that may otherwise have gone undiagnosed. Refinement of opportunistic screening may have advantages in terms of cost-savings and earlier detection of bone loss.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: mucosal healing is associated with improved long-term outcomes in Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Clinical manifestations of Crohn's disease (CD) do not reliably correlate with endoscopic activity. While treating to achieve clinical remission (CR) has neither proven to improve CD outcomes nor alter the natural disease course, it is unclear whether targeting objective measures like mucosal healing (MH) is associated with improved long-term outcomes. AIM: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing long-term outcomes in active CD patients who achieve MH compared to those who do not. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search to identify studies with prospective cohorts of active CD patients that included outcomes of patients who achieved MH at first endoscopic assessment (MH1) compared to those who did not. The primary outcome was long-term (≥50 weeks) CR. Secondary outcomes included CD-related surgery-free rate, hospitalisation-free rate and long-term MH rate. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: Twelve studies with 673 patients met inclusion criteria. Patients achieving MH1 had a pooled OR of 2.80 (95%CI, 1.91-4.10) for achieving long-term CR, 2.22 (95%CI, 0.86-5.69) for CD-related surgery-free rate, and 14.30 (95%CI, 5.57-36.74) for long-term MH. Sensitivity analyses suggested no difference in outcomes if MH1 was achieved on biologics vs. non-biologics. No significant publication bias or heterogeneity was detected. CONCLUSIONS: Achieving MH1 is associated with increased rates of long-term clinical remission, and maintenance of mucosal healing in active Crohn's disease and may therefore be a reasonable therapeutic target.

Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (STRIDE): Determining Therapeutic Goals for Treat-to-Target.

OBJECTIVES: The Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (STRIDE) program was initiated by the International Organization for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IOIBD). It examined potential treatment targets for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) to be used for a "treat-to-target" clinical management strategy using an evidence-based expert consensus process. METHODS: A Steering Committee of 28 IBD specialists developed recommendations based on a systematic literature review and expert opinion. Consensus was gained if ≥75% of participants scored the recommendation as 7-10 on a 10-point rating scale (where 10=agree completely). RESULTS: The group agreed upon 12 recommendations for ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). The agreed target for UC was clinical/patient-reported outcome (PRO) remission (defined as resolution of rectal bleeding and diarrhea/altered bowel habit) and endoscopic remission (defined as a Mayo endoscopic subscore of 0-1). Histological remission was considered as an adjunctive goal. Clinical/PRO remission was also agreed upon as a target for CD and defined as resolution of abdominal pain and diarrhea/altered bowel habit; and endoscopic remission, defined as resolution of ulceration at ileocolonoscopy, or resolution of findings of inflammation on cross-sectional imaging in patients who cannot be adequately assessed with ileocolonoscopy. Biomarker remission (normal C-reactive protein (CRP) and calprotectin) was considered as an adjunctive target. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence- and consensus-based recommendations for selecting the goals for treat-to-target strategies in patients with IBD are made available. Prospective studies are needed to determine how these targets will change disease course and patients' quality of life.

Fatigue is highly associated with poor health-related quality of life, disability and depression in newly-diagnosed patients with inflammatory bowel disease, independent of disease activity.

BACKGROUND: Fatigue is common in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Data on fatigue in newly diagnosed patients are unavailable. AIM: To report prevalence of fatigue in newly diagnosed CD and UC patients and examine its association with health-related quality of life (HRQOL), depression and disability. METHODS: The Ocean State Crohn's and Colitis Area Registry (OSCCAR) is a statewide cohort of newly diagnosed inflammatory bowel disease patients in Rhode Island. Fatigue was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale. Patients were administered instruments measuring HRQOL, overall disability and work impairment, and depression. RESULTS: Fatigue was prevalent in 26.4% of 220 subjects. Cohen's d effect sizes for fatigue were large: Short-Form 36 Health Survey mental health component (CD 1.5, UC 1.4) and physical health component (CD 1.4, UC 1.4), EuroQol-5D valuation of current health state (CD 1.2, UC 1.0), Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (CD 1.9, UC 1.6) and Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (CD 1.8, UC 1.7). Fatigued patients reported more work impairment (Score difference: CD 29.5%, UC 23.8%) and activity impairment (score difference: CD 32.3%, UC 25.7%) on the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire. Fatigue's association with all scores remained highly significant despite controlling for disease activity. CONCLUSIONS: Fatigue is strongly associated with poor HRQOL, disability and depression similarly in CD and UC even when controlling for disease activity. Fatigue's association with a wide range of patient-reported outcome measures suggests that monitoring fatigue is a simple way to screen for overall disruption in patient life.

Validation of the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-fatigue (FACIT-F) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND Many patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) complain of significant fatigue. To date, no instrument to measure fatigue has been validated in a US inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) population. AIM To determine the reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) scale in IBD. METHODS A total of 209 patients with IBD completed the 13 items of the FACIT-F, alongside laboratory testing and disease activity assessment. Internal consistency was measured by Cronbach's alpha; test-retest reliability by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC); validity by the correlation of the FACIT-F score with C-reactive protein (CRP) erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), haematocrit (HCT) and disease activity as measured by the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI; CD) and Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI; UC). RESULTS The mean ± SD FACIT-F score was 38.9 ± 11.0 overall (CD 38.6 ± 11.3; UC 39.4 ± 10.6). Cronbach's alpha was 0.94. The ICC for first and repeat FACIT-F scores assessed within 180 days without change in disease state was 0.81 (CD 0.78; UC 0.87). FACIT-F scores were lower in patients with active symptoms (CD 4.6 points, 95% CI 2.4-6.9, P < 0.001; UC 8.5 points, 95% CI 5.5-11.4, P < 0.001). In UC, FACIT-F scores were correlated with ESR (-0.76, 95% CI -0.89 to -0.50), CRP (-0.72, 95% CI -0.88 to -0.43) and HCT (0.53, 95% CI 0.22-0.74). CONCLUSION The FACIT-F scale is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring fatigue in IBD.

Infliximab dose escalation vs. initiation of adalimumab for loss of response in Crohn's disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: Crohn's disease patients who have lost response to 5 mg/kg of infliximab may regain response by increasing the dose of infliximab to 10 mg/kg. Alternatively, adalimumab can be used as a rescue therapy. AIM: To determine whether dose escalation of infliximab was a cost-effective strategy compared with adalimumab initiation after loss of response to 5 mg/kg of infliximab. METHODS: A decision-analysis model simulated two cohorts of Crohn's patients: (i) infliximab dose was escalated to 10 mg/kg and (ii) infliximab was discontinued and patients were started on adalimumab. The time horizon was 1 year. One- and two-way sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: The infliximab dose escalation strategy yielded more quality-adjusted life years (0.79) compared with the adalimumab strategy (0.76). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $332,032/quality-adjusted life year. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the model findings were robust. The most significant variables were the cost of infliximab and that of adalimumab, such that a reduction in the cost of infliximab by 1/3 resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio below $80,000/quality-adjusted life year. CONCLUSION: After a Crohn's patient has lost response to 5 mg/kg of infliximab, dose escalation will yield more quality-adjusted life-year compared with switching to adaliumamb; however, the cost was considerable.

Review article: Medical therapy for fistulizing Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Fistulae will develop in approximately one-third of patients with Crohn's disease. With an expected spontaneous healing rate of only 10%, fistulizing Crohn's disease requires a comprehensive strategy with a medical and possible surgical approach. AIM: To summarize the current literature evaluating various medical options for treating patients with fistulizing Crohn's disease. METHODS: A literature review was conducted using PubMed (search terms: Crohn's disease and fistula) and manual search of references among the identified studies and relevant review papers to identify papers that present data on medical treatment of fistulizing Crohn's disease. RESULTS: The first line of medical therapy remains antibiotics (metronidazole and ciprofloxacin). Mercaptopurine and azathioprine are medications that are effective in treating fistulizing Crohn's disease. The current gold standard of medical treatment to induce and maintain remission for fistulizing Crohn's disease is infliximab. Used as induction therapy, infliximab produced a 62% clinical response, and a complete closure rate of 46%. A maintenance therapy trial demonstrated at 54 weeks, 46% of patients receiving infliximab continued to respond to treatment, compared with 23% in the placebo group (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Further research to find new therapies and to improve our existing medical treatment of fistulizing Crohn's disease is required.

Maintenance infliximab does not result in increased abscess development in fistulizing Crohn's disease: results from the ACCENT II study.

BACKGROUND: Rapid fistula healing may predispose Crohn's disease patients to abscess development. AIM: Data from ACCENT II were analysed to determine whether fistula-related abscess development is affected by infliximab exposure. METHODS: Following infliximab 5 mg/kg infusions at weeks 0, 2 and 6, patients were evaluated for fistula response for two consecutive visits at least 4 weeks apart. Patients (N = 282) were randomized at week 14 to either placebo or infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks through week 46. If response was lost at or after week 22, patients could crossover to a 5 mg/kg higher infliximab dose. Fistula-related abscesses were diagnosed by physical examination or by imaging procedures according to usual practice. RESULTS: Infliximab exposure was approximately twofold higher for the infliximab maintenance group. Twenty-one (15%) patients in the infliximab maintenance group had at least one newly developed fistula-related abscess compared with 27 (19%) in the placebo maintenance group (P = 0.526). The proportion of patients with a new fistula-related abscess was similar regardless of whether or not patients crossed over to a 5 mg/kg higher infliximab dose. The number of fistula-related abscesses diagnosed over time did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Abscess development in patients with fistulizing Crohn's disease is not dependent on cumulative infliximab exposure.

Immunosuppressive drugs in ulcerative colitis: twisting facts to suit theories?

Immunosuppressive drugs have become a mainstay of therapy for the inflammatory bowel diseases. Although robust evidence exists in support of the use of these drugs in Crohn's disease, a close evaluation of the available data in ulcerative colitis reveals a much weaker evidence base. In particular, randomised controlled trials of azathioprine, the most commonly used immunosuppressive agent, do not provide rich evidence of efficacy whereas observational cohorts suggest this agent is effective, particularly in patients with relapsing disease who require corticosteroids. Ciclosporin is also effective in the most refractory cases but its efficacy needs to be carefully weighed against the possibility of rare but life threatening complications. Although the evidence base in support of immunosuppressive drugs in ulcerative colitis is not as strong as in Crohn's disease, these agents clearly have a role in the treatment of this disease.

Review article: practical management of inflammatory bowel disease patients taking immunomodulators.

Azathioprine, mercaptopurine, methotrexate, ciclosporin and tacrolimus all have their respective niches in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. These immunomodulators are potent and effective medications; however, they potentially have serious toxicity. To maximize benefit and minimize risk, clinicians must understand the mechanism of action, appropriate indications, range of toxicity and proper dosing of these medications. Furthermore, once initiating therapy, patients need to be monitored appropriately for evidence of efficacy and toxicity. This review includes the rationale behind recommendations for the management and monitoring of patients using immunomodulators. For the purine antagonists--azathioprine and mercaptopurine--the evidence for utility of thiopurine methyltransferase testing and mercaptopurine metabolite monitoring is addressed. The roles of liver biopsy and screening for methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase mutations in patients taking methotrexate are reviewed. With appropriate monitoring, the calcineurin inhibitors--ciclosporin and tacrolimus--can be used safely and effectively. Immunomodulators are important agents for the treatment of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, and prescribing clinicians should be comfortable recognizing both their value and their limitations.

Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody (ASCA) positivity is associated with increased risk for early surgery in Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (ASCA) are a specific but only moderately sensitive diagnostic marker for Crohn's disease. We sought to explore the role of ASCA as a prognostic marker for aggressive disease phenotype in Crohn's disease. AIMS: To determine the role of ASCA status as a risk factor for early surgery in Crohn's disease. SUBJECTS: We performed a case control study in a cohort of patients, newly diagnosed with Crohn's disease, between 1991 and 1999. All patients were followed for at least three years. Case subjects (n = 35) included those who had major surgery for Crohn's disease within three years of diagnosis. Controls (n = 35) included patients matched to cases for age, sex, disease location, and smoking status, and who did not undergo major surgery for Crohn's disease within three years of diagnosis. METHODS: Blinded assays were performed on serum for ASCA (immunoglobulin (Ig)A and IgG). A paired analysis of cases-controls was performed to test for the association between ASCA status and risk of early surgery. RESULTS: ASCA IgA was strongly associated with early surgery (odds ratio (OR) 8.5 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.0-75.9); p = 0.0013). ASCA IgG+ and ASCA IgG+/IgA+ patients were also at increased risk for early surgery (OR 5.5 (95% CI 1.2-51.1), p = 0.0265; and OR 5.0 (95% CI 1.1-46.9), p = 0.0433, respectively). The association between ASCA and early surgery was evident in patients requiring surgery for ileal or ileocolonic disease. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with Crohn's disease who are positive for ASCA IgA, IgG, or both, may define a subset of patients with Crohn's disease at increased risk for early surgery.

Repifermin (keratinocyte growth factor-2) for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation trial.

BACKGROUND: Repifermin (keratinocyte growth factor-2) has been shown to reduce inflammation in animal models of colitis. AIM: To evaluate repifermin for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients with active ulcerative colitis were enrolled in a 6-week, double-blind trial. Patients were randomized to receive treatment for five consecutive days with intravenous repifermin at a dose of 1, 5, 10, 25 or 50 microg/kg, or placebo. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the safety of repifermin. The primary efficacy outcome was clinical remission at week 4, defined as a score of zero on the endoscopic appearance and stool blood components of the Mayo score and a score of zero or unity on the stool frequency and physician's global assessment components. RESULTS: At week 4, the rates of clinical remission in the 1, 5, 10, 25 and 50 microg/kg repifermin groups were 19%, 9%, 0%, 0% and 0%, respectively, and 11% for the placebo group (P = 0.32 for repifermin vs. placebo). The frequencies of commonly occurring adverse events and severe adverse events were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous repifermin at a dose of 1-50 microg/kg was very well tolerated, but there was no evidence that repifermin was effective for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis at these doses. An additional study to determine the efficacy of repifermin at doses of > 50 microg/kg or for a longer treatment duration may be warranted, as the maximally tolerated dose was not reached in the present study.

Randomized, controlled trial of recombinant human interleukin-11 in patients with active Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Interleukin-11 is a mesenchymally derived cytokine with pleiotropic activities. A pilot study suggested therapeutic benefit of recombinant human interleukin-11 (rhIL-11) in patients with Crohn's disease. AIM: To determine the safety and preliminary estimate of efficacy of rhIL-11 in treating active Crohn's disease. METHODS: Patients with mild to moderately active Crohn's disease, defined as a Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) > or = 220 and < or = 450, were enrolled in a multicentre trial. Stable doses of 5-aminosalicylates, antibiotics, 6-mercaptopurine or azathioprine were permitted with appropriate wash-in periods. Oral, intravenous or rectally administered corticosteroids were not allowed. Patients were randomized to 6 weeks of subcutaneous injection with rhIL-11 15 microg/kg or placebo weekly, or rhIL-11 7.5 microg/kg or placebo twice weekly. The primary end-point was per cent change in CDAI at week 6; the major secondary end-point was the proportion of patients in remission, defined as a 100 point decrease in CDAI and absolute CDAI < or = 150. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar among the 148 evaluated patients (49 placebo, 49 rhIL-11 15 microg/kg once weekly, 50 rhIL-11 7.5 microg/kg twice weekly). Treatment was well-tolerated, with mild injection site reactions occurring more frequently among patients treated with rhIL-11. Headache, oedema, and increased platelet count occurred significantly more often in the rhIL-11 7.5 microg/kg twice weekly group, but not the 15 microg/kg once weekly group. There was a trend toward decreased mean per cent change in CDAI in the rhIL-11 15 micro/kg once weekly group vs. placebo (-31.5% vs. -18.5%, 95% confidence interval for the difference -27.9-1.6%). A significantly greater proportion of patients receiving rhIL-11 15 microg/kg once weekly achieved remission compared to placebo (36.7% vs. 16.3%, 95% confidence interval for the difference 3.4-37.4%; 16.4% for rhIL-11 7.5 microg/kg, N.S.). CONCLUSIONS: Weekly subcutaneous injection with rhIL-11 15 microg/kg is safe and effective in inducing remission in a subset of patients with active Crohn's disease.

Biologicals: principles, techniques and mechanisms of action.

Biological agents for the treatment of IBD are the result of both the explosion of knowledge precipitated by the techniques of molecular biology, and by the ability to use these same techniques to produce agents. Thus, there has been a greatly facilitated translation of basic knowledge into clinical therapy. An astounding number of biologic agents are currently in development for the treatment of IBD and other immune-mediated conditions. These include native microbiologic preparations isolated for beneficial properties, recombinant cytokines and anticytokines, monoclonal antibodies, antisense oligonucleotides, and in the future, somatic gene therapy. This work seeks to describe the principles and techniques of biologic agent development, as well as prime sites of action targeted by these agents. Recent advances in the techniques of molecular biology have made possible unprecedented progress in the treatment of many conditions. The techniques of molecular biology have provided new methods of drug discovery and at the same time have elucidated new therapeutic targets. Most notable has been the progress made in the treatment of chronic inflammatory and immune mediated conditions, including inflammatory bowel disease. This paper is intended to highlight the methodological principles behind biologic agents, methods of discovery and production, and to highlight potential therapeutic targets for these new agents.

Biological therapies for ulcerative colitis.

Biological therapies are being increasingly investigated for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. However, a great deal more study has been devoted to studies of Crohn's disease rather than ulcerative colitis. Ulcerative colitis, like Crohn's disease, represents an area of high clinical need, particularly for those patients who have disease inadequately responsive to corticosteroids and 5-aminosalicylates. The distinct anatomic distribution of inflammation in ulcerative colitis represents an important model for study, with the entire involved mucosa entirely accessible to endoscopy. In addition, there is an opportunity for local delivery of biologic agents in left-sided disease. Distinct pathogenetic factors in ulcerative colitis raise the possibility of therapies quite different from those used in Crohn's disease. This work describes the current state of knowledge regarding biological therapy in ulcerative colitis. The role of probiotic therapy, and studies of cytokine-directed therapies, therapies targeting adhesion and recruitment, and restitution and repair are described.

Infliximab in the treatment of severe, steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis: a pilot study.

We report the experience of 11 patients (of 60 planned patients) enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of infliximab in patients with severe, active steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. The study was terminated prematurely because of slow enrollment. Patients having active disease for at least 2 weeks and receiving at least 5 days of intravenous corticosteroids were eligible to receive a single intravenous infusion of infliximab at 5, 10, or 20 mg/kg body weight. The primary endpoint used in this study was treatment failure at 2 weeks after infusion. Treatment failure was defined as 1) unachieved clinical response as defined by a modified Truelove and Witts severity score, 2) increase in corticosteroid dosage, 3) addition of immunosuppressants, 4) colectomy, or 5) death. Safety evaluations included physical examination, clinical chemistry and hematology laboratory tests, and occurrence of adverse experiences. Four of 8 patients (50%) who received infliximab were considered treatment successes at 2 weeks, compared with none of 3 patients who received placebo. Improvement in erythrocyte sedimentation rates and serum concentrations of C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 correlated with the clinical response observed in patients receiving infliximab. Infusion with infliximab produced no significant adverse events. Infliximab was well tolerated and may provide clinical benefit for some patients with steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis.