Timing of exercise therapy when initiating adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a randomized trial.

AIMS: The most appropriate timing of exercise therapy to improve cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) among patients initiating chemotherapy is not known. The effects of exercise therapy administered during, following, or during and following chemotherapy were examined in patients with breast cancer. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a parallel-group randomized trial design, 158 inactive women with breast cancer initiating (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy were allocated to receive (1:1 ratio): usual care or one of three exercise regimens-concurrent (during chemotherapy only), sequential (after chemotherapy only), or concurrent and sequential (continuous) (n = 39/40 per group). Exercise consisted of treadmill walking three sessions/week, 20-50 min at 55%-100% of peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak) for ≈16 (concurrent, sequential) or ≈32 (continuous) consecutive weeks. VO2peak was evaluated at baseline (pre-treatment), immediately post-chemotherapy, and ≈16 weeks after chemotherapy. In intention-to-treat analysis, there was no difference in the primary endpoint of VO2peak change between concurrent exercise and usual care during chemotherapy vs. VO2peak change between sequential exercise and usual care after chemotherapy [overall difference, -0.88 mL O2·kg-1·min-1; 95% confidence interval (CI): -3.36, 1.59, P = 0.48]. In secondary analysis, continuous exercise, approximately equal to twice the length of the other regimens, was well-tolerated and the only strategy associated with significant improvements in VO2peak from baseline to post-intervention (1.74 mL O2·kg-1·min-1, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There was no statistical difference in CRF improvement between concurrent vs. sequential exercise therapy relative to usual care in women with primary breast cancer. The promising tolerability and CRF benefit of ≈32 weeks of continuous exercise therapy warrant further evaluation in larger trials.

Impact of Time from Completion of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy to Surgery on Survival Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: No studies have examined the impact of the interval from conclusion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to surgery in breast cancer patients. This study was undertaken to investigate the relationship between time interval from neoadjuvant chemotherapy to surgery and survival outcomes. METHODS: Breast cancer patients diagnosed with stage I-III disease who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy June 1995 to April 2007 were identified. The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to surgery interval, defined as ≤4, 4-6, or >6 weeks, on survival outcomes was examined. Descriptive statistics and Cox proportional hazards models were used. RESULTS: A total of 1101 patients were identified. Median time to surgery was 33 (range 8-159) days; 335 patients (30.4 %) had surgery within 4 weeks of their last dose of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 524 (47.6 %) within 4-6 weeks, and 242 (22.0 %) after more than 6 weeks. Median follow-up was 94 (range 3-178) months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) estimates were 79, 87, and 81 % in patients who underwent surgery ≤4, 4-6, and >6 weeks after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, respectively (p = 0.03). The three groups did not differ in 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) or locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS). In multivariable analysis, compared with an interval of ≤4 weeks, patients who underwent surgery at 4-6 or >6 weeks had equivalent OS, LRFS, and RFS; a sensitivity analysis suggested worse OS in patients who underwent surgery at >8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy to surgery intervals of up to 8 weeks had equivalent OS, RFS, and LRFS.

High incidence of germline BRCA mutation in patients with ER low-positive/PR low-positive/HER-2 neu negative tumors.

BACKGROUND: The 2015 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend that genetic counseling and germline BRCA mutation testing be offered to women under age 60 with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). As a result of the 2010 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines for breast cancer, patients with breast cancers that are estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) low-positive (1%-9% on immunohistochemistry) are no longer strictly considered to have TNBC and may not be referred for genetic counseling. However, the incidence of BRCA mutation in patients with hormone receptor (HR) low-positive breast cancers remains unknown, and current ASCO/CAP guidelines may result in undertesting for BRCA mutations. METHODS: A prospectively maintained research database of breast cancer patients evaluated at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2004 and 2014 was reviewed; 314 patients were identified with HER2/neu-negative breast cancers expressing ER and PR <10% with known BRCA mutation status. RESULTS: Three hundred fourteen patients had breast cancers expressing ER and PR <10%; 238 (75.8%) had HR-negative cancers (<1% ER and PR), and 76 (24.2%) had HR-low-positive cancers (1%-9% ER and/or PR). Among patients with HR-negative tumors, 86 of 238 (36.1%) had a BRCA1/2 mutation, whereas in the HR-low-positive group, 30 of 76 (39.5%) had a BRCA1/2 mutation. In multivariate analysis, HR status (<1% vs 1%-9%) was not significantly associated with BRCA1/2 mutations. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of BRCA1/2 mutations is similar in patients with HR-low-positive breast cancer and patients with HR-negative breast cancer. Genetic counseling and BRCA testing should be offered to patients under age 60 who have HR-low-positive breast cancers. Cancer 2015;121:3435-43. © 2015 American Cancer Society.

Patterns of care for non-small-cell lung cancer at an academic institution affiliated with a national cancer institute-designated cancer center.

PURPOSE: Evidence-based treatment guidelines for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) exist to improve the quality of care for patients with this disease. However, how often evidence-based decisions are used for care of NSCLC is poorly understood. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We examined patterns of care and rate of adherence to evidence-based guidelines for 185 new NSCLC patients seen between 2007 and 2009. Evidence-based care status was determined for 150 patients. RESULTS: Eighty-one percent of the patients were white, the mean age was 66 years, 49% were women, 11% were never smokers, 83% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 1, 49.7% of tumors were adenocarcinomas, 57.1% of never smokers had tumors genotyped (EGFR, ALK, KRAS), and 13.3% participated in clinical trials. The rate of evidence-based treatment adherence was 94.1% (16 of 17), 100% (21 of 21) and 100% (36 of 36) in patients with stages I, II, and III NSCLC, respectively. Stage IV disease, with adherence of 76.3% (58 of 76), was correlated with a higher rate of nonadherence when compared with stages I-III (odds ratio 16.33; 95% CI, 1.94 to 137.73). In patients with stage IV disease, the rate of evidence-based adherence was 95% (72 of 76) for first-line therapy, 95.2% (40 of 42) for second-line therapy, and only 33.3% (6 of 18) for third-line therapy (P < .001). There was no significant correlation between evidence-based adherence status and the patient's age, sex, performance status, smoking history, ethnicity, or the treating physician. CONCLUSION: These data point toward the need for improved evidence-based use of resources in the third-line setting of stage IV NSCLC.