The impact of acute kidney injury stages on the outcomes of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

BACKGROUND: Although acute kidney injury (AKI) has been established as an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality for patients on veno-arterial (V-A) extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO), the impact of Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) stages of AKI has yet to be elucidated as a risk factor. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patient outcomes based on KDIGO stages of AKI at a single institution. The analysis was a cohort of 179 patients; 66 without AKI, 19 with stage 1 AKI, 18 with stage 2 AKI, and 76 with stage 3 AKI. RESULTS: Every 1-year increase in age was associated with 4% increased odds of mortality at 30 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01, 1.07; p = 0.004). The presence of AKI at any stage was associated with 59% increased odds of 30-day mortality (95% CI 0.81, 3.10; p = 0.176). The presence of stage 1 AKI was associated with a 5% decreased odds of 30-day mortality (95% CI 0.32, 2.89). The presence of stage 2 AKI (odds ratio [OR] 2.29, 95% CI 0.69, 7.55; p = 0.173) and stage 3 AKI (OR 1.68, 95% CI 0.81, 3.46; p = 0.164) was associated with increased odds of 30-day mortality. CONCLUSION: Based on our single-center study, higher KDIGO stages of AKI likely have increased odds of mortality at 30 days. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Video-Based Assessment of Microsurgical Trainees: An Evaluation of Gender Bias.

BACKGROUND: Gender bias in graduate medical evaluations remains a challenging issue. This study evaluates implicit gender bias in video-based evaluations of microsurgical technique, which has not previously been described in the literature. METHODS: Two videos were recorded of microsurgical anastomosis; the first was performed by a hand/microsurgery fellow and the second by an expert microsurgeon. A total of 150 surgeons with microsurgical experience were recruited to evaluate the videos; they were told these videos depicted a surgical trainee 1 month into fellowship followed by the same trainee 10 months later. The only variable was the name ("Rachel" or "David") that each participant was randomly assigned to evaluate. Participants were asked to score each video for quality, technique, efficiency, as well as overall progression and development after the second video compared with the initial video. To focus on bias, these outcome measures were selected to be purposefully subjective and all ratings were based on a subjective 1to 10 scale (10 = excellent). RESULTS: The analysis included 150 participants (75% male). There were no statistically significant differences in scores between the "female" and "male" trainee. The trainees received the same median initial (1-month video) and final (11th-month video) scores for all criteria except initial technique, in which the female trainee received a 7 and the male trainee received an 8. Notably, 11-month scores were consistently the same or lower than 1-month scores for both study groups (p < 0.001). There were also no differences within either study group based on participant sex. Microsurgery practitioners overall rated both groups lower than those who do not currently practice microsurgery. CONCLUSION: Our study did not identify a gender bias in this evaluation method. Further investigation into how we assess and grade trainees as well as the presence and impact of implicit biases on varying surgical assessment methods is warranted.

Pulmonary Artery Dual-Lumen Cannulation Versus Two Cannula Percutaneous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Configuration in Right Ventricular Failure.

Refractory right ventricular failure has significant morbidity and mortality. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is indicated when medical interventions are deemed ineffective. However, it is still being determined if one configuration is better. We conducted a retrospective analysis of our institutional experience comparing the peripheral veno-pulmonary artery (V-PA) configuration versus the dual-lumen cannula with the tip in the pulmonary artery (C-PA). The analysis of a cohort of 24 patients (12 patients in each group). There was no difference in survival after hospital discharge (58.3% in the C-PA group compared to 41.7% in the V-PA group, p = 0.4). Among the C-PA group, there was a statistically significant shorter ICU length of stay (23.5 days [interquartile range {IQR} = 19-38.5] vs. 43 days [IQR = 30-50], p = 0.043) and duration of mechanical ventilation (7.5 days [IQR = 4.5-9.5] compared to (16.5 days [IQR = 9.5-22.5], p = 0.006) in the V-PA group. In the C-PA group, there were lower incidents of bleeding (33.33% vs. 83.33%, p =0.036) and combined ischemic events (0 vs. 41.67%, p = 0.037). In our single-center experience, the C-PA configuration might have a better outcome than the V-PA one. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Use of Treatments after Recovery from Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthritis Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Which treatments patients continue to use more than 1 year after primary thumb carpometacarpal arthritis surgery, and how such use relates to patient-reported outcomes, is largely unknown. METHODS: The authors identified patients who had isolated primary trapeziectomy alone or with ligament reconstruction ± tendon interposition and were 1 to 4 years postoperative. Participants completed a surgical site-focused electronic questionnaire about what treatments they still used. Patient-reported outcome measures were the Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire and visual analog/numerical rating scales for current pain, pain with activities, and typical worst pain. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria and participated. At a median of 3 years after surgery, over 40% reported current use of at least one treatment for their thumb carpometacarpal surgical site, with 22% using more than one treatment. Of those who still used treatments, 48% used over-the-counter medications, 34% used home or office-based hand therapy, 29% used splinting, 25% used prescription medications, and 4% used corticosteroid injections. A total of 108 participants completed all patient-reported outcome measures. With bivariate analyses, the authors found that use of any treatment after recovering from surgery was associated with statistically and clinically significantly worse scores for all measures. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically relevant proportions of patients continue to use various treatments a median of 3 years after primary thumb carpometacarpal arthritis surgery. Continued use of any treatment is associated with significantly worse patient-reported outcomes for function and pain.

Patient-Reported Data Augment Prediction Models of Persistent Opioid Use after Elective Upper Extremity Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Opioids play a role in pain management after surgery, but prolonged use contributes to developing opioid use disorder. Identifying patients at risk of prolonged use is critical for deploying interventions that reduce or avoid opioids; however, available predictive models do not incorporate patient-reported data (PRD), and it remains unclear whether PRD can predict postoperative use behavior. The authors used a machine learning approach leveraging preoperative PRD and electronic health record data to predict persistent opioid use after upper extremity surgery. METHODS: Included patients underwent upper extremity surgery, completed preoperative PRD questionnaires, and were prescribed opioids after surgery. The authors trained models using a 2018 cohort and tested in a 2019 cohort. Opioid use was determined by patient report and filled prescriptions up to 6 months after surgery. The authors assessed model performance using area under the receiver operating characteristic, sensitivity, specificity, and Brier score. RESULTS: Among 1656 patients, 19% still used opioids at 6 weeks, 11% at 3 months, and 9% at 6 months. The XGBoost model trained on PRD plus electronic health record data achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic 0.73 at 6 months. Factors predictive of prolonged opioid use included income; education; tobacco, drug, or alcohol abuse; cancer; depression; and race. Protective factors included preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Physical Health and Upper Extremity scores. CONCLUSIONS: This opioid use prediction model using preintervention data had good discriminative performance. PRD variables augmented electronic health record-based machine learning algorithms in predicting postsurgical use behaviors and were some of the strongest predictors. PRD should be used in future efforts to guide proper opioid stewardship. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Evaluating Language Characteristics and Related Gender Bias in Letters of Recommendation for Hand Surgery Fellowship.

PURPOSE: Letters of recommendation (LORs) function as an indicator of competence and future potential for a trainee. Our purpose was to evaluate gender bias in hand surgery fellowship applicant LORs. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of all LORs submitted to a hand surgery fellowship program between 2015 and 2020. Demographic data about applicants and letter writers were collected. Linguistic analysis was performed using a text analysis software, and results were evaluated with nonparametric tests, multiple linear regression models, and a mixed effects regression model. RESULTS: Letters of recommendation were analyzed; 720 letters for 188 (23.4%) female applicants and 2,337 letters for 616 (76.6%) male applicants. Compared with LORs written for men, those written for women had more references to categories of anxiety (eg, worried and fearful) and affiliation (eg, ally and friend). Letters for women had more "clout." In subgroup analysis, letters for female plastic surgery applicants had more words signaling power, whereas recommendations for female applicants from orthopedic residencies had more words related to anxiety, achievement, work, and leisure. CONCLUSIONS: Letters of recommendation written for female residents applying to hand fellowship had more references to anxiety but were written with higher clout and more words of affiliation. Subgroup analysis looking at orthopedic and plastic surgery applicants separately found a mixed picture. Overall, these LORs written for applicants to hand fellowship had no notable specific patterns of gender bias in our analyses. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Because programs look to train the next generation of hand surgeons, alerting letter readers to trends in implicit bias may help in the selection of qualified applicants. Bringing topics of implicit bias forward may help writers think more critically about word choice and topics.

All-Suture Anchor Repair of the Flexor Digitorum Profundus Insertion: A Biomechanical Comparison of 2 Suturing Techniques.

PURPOSE: We compared 2 suturing techniques for reattachment of the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) via all-suture anchor. METHODS: We used fresh, matched-pair, cadaveric hands. We disarticulated the fingers at the proximal interphalangeal joints, preserving the proximal FDP. We released the FDPs at their distal insertion and placed an all-suture, 1.0-mm anchor at the center of each FDP footprint. Each anchor's sutures were used to reattach each FDP using 1 of 2 techniques: group H (n = 14) via horizontal mattress; group H + K (n = 12) via horizontal mattress with knots thrown and, with each suture tail, 3 proximal, running-locking, Krackow-type passes on the radial and ulnar FDP sides with the suture ends tied together. We excluded 2 specimens from the H + K group because of improper anchor placement. All other fingers in both groups were individually mounted in an MTS machine for FDP loading in the following sequence for 500 cycles each: (1) to 15 N to simulate passive motion forces; (2) to 19 N for short-arc active motion forces; and (3) to 28 N for full active motion forces. Specimens that had not failed during cyclic testing were then loaded to failure. We measured FDP-to-bone gapping via a digital transducer. We defined failure as >3-mm gapping. RESULTS: The H + K group had significantly less gapping during cyclic loading up to 19 N and significantly higher load to failure. The H + K group failed exclusively at the anchor-bone level; the H group failed mostly by suture-tendon pullout. CONCLUSIONS: The H + K group performed significantly better regarding cyclic and load-to-failure testing after FDP reattachment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The H + K technique combines the benefits of horizontal-mattress tendon-to-bone apposition and Krackow-tendon locking. It converts the point of failure to the bone level rather than the suture-tendon level.

Billing and Utilization Trends for Hand Surgery Indicate Worsening Barriers to Accessing Care.

BACKGROUND: Hospitals and providers may increase hand surgery charges to compensate for decreasing reimbursement. Higher charges, combined with increasing utilization of ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs), may threaten the accessibility of affordable hand surgery care for uninsured and underinsured patients. METHODS: We queried the Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary to collect the number of procedures, charges, and reimbursements of hand procedures from 2010 to 2019. We adjusted procedural volume by Medicare enrollment and monetary values to the 2019 US dollar. We calculated weighted means of charges and reimbursement that were then used to calculate reimbursement-to-charge ratios (RCRs). We calculated overall change and r2 from 2010 to 2019 for all procedures and stratified by procedural type, service setting, and state where service was rendered. RESULTS: Weighted mean charges, reimbursement, and RCRs changed by + 21.0% (from $1,227 to $1,485; r2 = 0.93), +10.8% (from $321 to $356; r2 = 0.69), and -8.4% (from 0.26 to 0.24; r2 = 0.76), respectively. The Medicare enrollment-adjusted number of procedures performed in ASCs increased by 63.8% (r2 = 0.95). Trends in utilization and billing varied widely across different procedural types, service settings, and states. CONCLUSIONS: Charges for hand surgery procedures steadily increased, possibly reflecting an attempt to make up for reimbursements perceived to be inadequate. This trend places uninsured and underinsured patients at greater risk for financial catastrophe, as they are often responsible for full or partial charges. In addition, procedures shifted from inpatient to ASC setting. This may further limit access to affordable hand care for uninsured and underinsured patients.

Comparison of 3 Dynamic External Fixation Devices for Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Dorsal Fracture-Dislocations in a Cadaver Model.

PURPOSE: Several improvised dynamic external fixation devices are used for treating unstable dorsal proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint fracture-dislocations. We compared the effectiveness of 3 constructs for simulated dorsal PIP joint fracture-dislocations in a cadaver model. METHODS: We tested 30 digits from 10 fresh-frozen, thawed cadaver hands. We aimed to remove the palmar 50% of the base of each digit's middle phalanx (P2), simulating an unstable dorsal PIP joint fracture-dislocation. Each PIP joint was then stabilized via external fixation with either a pins-and-rubber-bands construct, pins-only construct, or tuberculin syringe-pins construct. We allocated 10 digits per fixation group. The finger tendons were secured to a computer-controlled stepper motor-driven linear actuator. Via this mechanism, all PIP joints were taken through 1,400 cycles of flexion-extension. With the PIP joint in neutral extension, we measured the P2 dorsal translation at baseline, after fixator stabilization, and after the motion protocol. RESULTS: The actual mean P2 palmar defect created was 48% of the base. All PIP joints were unstable after creating the defect, with a mean initial P2 dorsal displacement of 3.7 mm. After application of the fixators, all PIP joint dislocations were reduced. The median residual P2 dorsal displacements were 0.0 mm for the pins-rubber bands group, 0.1 mm for the pins-only group, and 0.5 mm for the syringe-pins group. There were no cases of PIP joint redislocation after flexion-extension cycling, and the median dorsal P2 displacements were 0.0 mm for the pins-rubber bands group; 0.0 mm for the pins-only group; and 0.5 mm for the syringe-pins group. CONCLUSIONS: All 3 external fixators restored PIP joint stability following simulated dorsal fracture-dislocation, with all reductions maintained after motion testing. The syringe-pins construct had significantly greater median residual P2 dorsal displacement after the initial reduction and motion testing, which is of unclear clinical importance. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study informs surgeon decision-making when considering dynamic external fixator options for dorsal PIP joint fracture-dislocations.

Passive Manipulation for Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Extension Contractures.

PURPOSE: We investigated closed passive manipulation as an alternative to surgery for certain proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint extension contractures. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with PIP joint extension contractures treated with passive manipulation at our institution between 2015 and 2019. The included patients were a minimum of 12 weeks from their initial injury/surgery (median 179 days; interquartile range: 130-228 days), had plateaued with therapy, and underwent a 1-time passive manipulation. All included fingers had congruent PIP joints and no indwelling hardware that could have had direct adhesions. Most (80%) patients had a direct injury to the finger ray(s) that led to the contractures. Most (75%) patients had the manipulation performed under local anesthesia in the office. Available measures of passive range of motion (PROM) and active range of motion (AROM) immediately, within 6 weeks, between 6 and 12 weeks, and at >12 weeks after the manipulation were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients and 46 digits met the criteria. The median PIP joint PROM improved from 50° to 90° immediately following the manipulation. The median PROM values within 6 weeks, between 6 and 12 weeks, and at >12 weeks following manipulation were 80°, 85°, and 85°, respectively. The median AROM immediately after the manipulation improved from 40° to 90°, and the median AROM values within 6 weeks, between 6 and 12 weeks, and at >12 weeks were 70°, 50°, and 60°, respectively. None of the patients experienced worsening of PIP joint range of motion. One patient who had 4 fingers manipulated had a 45° distal interphalangeal joint extension lag for one of the fingers after the manipulation. Eight fingers underwent later flexor tenolysis or reconstruction to improve AROM after the gains in PROM via manipulation were maintained. CONCLUSIONS: Passive manipulation is an alternative to surgical release for select PIP joint extension contractures. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Prescription Opioids and Patient-Reported Outcomes and Satisfaction After Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Amount of opioid use correlates poorly with procedure-related pain; however, prescription limits raise concerns about inadequate pain control and impacts on patient-reported quality indicators. There remain no consistent guidelines for postoperative pain management after carpal tunnel release (CTR). We sought to understand how postoperative opioid use impacts patient-reported outcomes after CTR. METHODS: This is a pragmatic cohort study using prospectively collected data from all adult patients undergoing uncomplicated primary CTR over 17 months at our center. Patients were categorized as having received or not received a postoperative opioid prescription, and then as remaining on a prescription opioid at 2-week follow-up or not. Questionnaires were completed before surgery and at 2-week follow-up. We collected brief Michigan Hand questionnaire (bMHQ) score, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health score, satisfaction, and pain score. RESULTS: Of 505 included patients, 405 received a postoperative prescription and 67 continued use at 2-weeks. These 67 patients reported lower bMHQ, lower satisfaction, and higher postoperative pain compared to those that discontinued. Multivariable regressions showed that receiving postoperative prescriptions did not significantly influence outcomes or satisfaction. However, remaining on the prescription at 2 weeks was associated with significantly lower bMHQ scores, particularly in patients reporting less pain. CONCLUSIONS: Patients remaining on a prescription after CTR reported worse outcomes compared to those who discontinued. Unexpectedly, the widest bMHQ score gap was seen across patients reporting lowest pain scores. Further research into this high-risk subgroup is needed to guide policy around using pain and patient-reported outcomes as quality measures.Level of Evidence: Level III.

Pain Control and Satisfaction With Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Upper Extremity Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Regional anesthesia ("block") is an important component of upper extremity (UE) surgery pain control. However, little is known about patient experience related to perioperative opioid use. This study assessed patient-reported pain control and satisfaction with UE blocks and evaluated how opioid consumption impacted these outcomes before the block "wore off." METHODS: A postoperative phone survey was administered to patients who underwent outpatient UE surgery at a surgery center for more than 16 months. It assessed pain scores (scale 1-10), satisfaction with block duration (scale 1-5), duration until return of UE function, and opioid consumption. Analyses used Mann-Whitney U tests, Fisher exact tests, and bivariate and multivariable linear and ordered logistic regressions to understand relationships between opioid use and outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 509 patients (61%) completed the survey, and 441 (88%) were satisfied with block duration. Initial and final pain scores were significantly higher in patients who took opioids prior to the block wearing off (6 and 4.5, P = .04 and 3.5 and 2, P = .002, respectively). Although satisfaction with block duration was not different in group comparisons (ie, patients who premedicated vs those who did not), in a multivariable analysis, patients who premedicated with opioids had 78% increased odds of reporting the highest level of satisfaction compared with the lower 4 levels (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Upper extremity blocks are associated with high overall patient satisfaction and postsurgical pain control. Premedicating before the block wears off may increase patient satisfaction with block duration even if pain is not notably impacted.

Development of Osteopenia During Distal Radius Fracture Recovery.

Purpose: To determine the degree of disuse osteopenia (DO) and factors associated with its development during treatment of distal radius fractures (DRFs). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed charts and radiographs of patients with DRFs treated with and without surgery at 2 health care systems. We defined DO as a >10% drop from initial to 6-week second metacarpal cortical percentage and 6-week absolute second metacarpal cortical percentage <60%. Bivariate analyses were performed to evaluate associations between treatment type, patient and fracture characteristics, and radiographic measurements with odds of developing DO. Significant associations were included in multivariable analyses, adjusting for patient and fracture characteristics. Results: Approximately 18% of 517 included patients met the criteria for development of DO (n = 93). Bivariate analysis showed that surgical treatment was associated with lower odds of developing DO, whereas advancing age was associated with increased odds. In adjusted multivariable models, only advancing age was associated with increased odds of developing DO. Conclusions: A fairly important proportion of patients with DRF develop hand DO 6 weeks after surgical or nonsurgical treatment. The clinical relevance of this finding is uncertain and requires further investigation. Type of study/level of evidence: Prognostic IV.

Assessing Hand Perfusion With Eulerian Video Magnification and Waveform Extraction.

PURPOSE: Timely and accurate triage of upper extremity injuries is critical, but current perfusion monitoring technologies have shortcomings. These limitations are especially pronounced in patients with darker skin tones. This pilot study evaluates a Eulerian Video Magnification (EVM) algorithm combined with color channel waveform extraction to enable video-based measurement of hand and finger perfusion. METHODS: Videos of 10 volunteer study participants with Fitzpatrick skin types III-VI were taken in a controlled environment during normal perfusion and tourniquet-induced ischemia. Videos were EVM processed, and red/green/blue color channel characteristics were extracted to produce waveforms. These videos were assessed by surgeons with a range of expertise in hand injuries. The videos were randomized and presented in 1 of 3 ways: unprocessed, EVM processed, and EVM with waveform output (EVM+waveform). Survey respondents indicated whether the video showed an ischemic or perfused hand or if they were unable to tell. We used group comparisons to evaluate response accuracy across video types, skin tones, and respondent groups. RESULTS: Of the 51 providers to whom the surveys were sent, 25 (49%) completed them. Using the Pearson χ2 test, the frequencies of correct responses were significantly higher in the EVM+waveform category than in the unprocessed or EVM videos. Additionally, the agreement was higher among responses to the EVM+waveform questions than among responses to the unprocessed or EVM processed. The accuracy and agreement from the EVM+waveform group were consistent across all skin pigmentations evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Video-based EVM processing combined with waveform extraction from color channels improved the surgeon's ability to identify tourniquet-induced finger ischemia via video across all skin types tested. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Eulerian Video Magnification with waveform extraction improved the assessment of perfusion in the distal upper extremity and has potential future applications, including triage, postsurgery vascular assessment, and telemedicine.

Preoperative Patient-Reported Data Indicate the Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After Hand and Upper Extremity Surgeries.

PURPOSE: Opioids play an important role in pain management after surgery but also increase the risk of prolonged opioid use in patients. The identification of patients who are more likely to use opioids after intended short-term treatment is critical for employing alternative management approaches or targeted interventions for the prevention of opioid-related problems. We used patient-reported data (PRD) and electronic health record information to identify factors predictive of prolonged opioid use after surgery. METHODS: We used our institutional registry containing data on all patients who underwent elective upper extremity surgeries. We evaluated factors associated with prolonged opioid use in the cohort from the year 2018 to 2019. We then validated our results using the 2020 cohort. The predictive variables included preoperative PRD and electronic health record data. Opioid use was determined based on patient reports and/or filled opioid prescriptions 3 months after surgery. We conducted bivariate regression, followed by multivariable regression analyses, and model validation using area under the receiver operating curve. RESULTS: We included 2,114 patients. In our final model on the 2018-2019 electronic health records and PRD data (n = 1,589), including numerous patient-reported outcome questionnaire scores, patients who were underweight and had undergone trauma-related surgery had higher odds of being on opioids at 3 months. Additionally, each 5-unit decrease in the preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Physical Health score was associated with a 30% increased odds of being on opioids at 3 months. The area under the receiver operating curve of our model was 70.4%. On validation using data from the 2020 cohort, the area under the receiver operating curve was 60.3%. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated a good fit. CONCLUSIONS: We found that preoperative questionnaire scores were associated with prolonged postoperative opioid use, independent of other variables. Furthermore, PRD may provide unique patient-level insights, alongside other factors, to improve our understanding of postsurgical pain management. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.

Risk Factors for Preventable Emergency Department Use After Outpatient Hand Surgery.

PURPOSE: Emergency department (ED) visits for postoperative concerns that could be safely addressed in outpatient clinics have an impact on cost, quality measures, and care workflows. Patient-reported data (PRD) may give unique insights into individual-level factors that predict overuse of health care resources, and guide opportunities for intervention and prevention. We investigated the relationship between preoperative PRD and preventable ED use after outpatient hand surgery to determine whether the preoperative PRD can be used to identify patients at higher odds of having preventable ED visits. METHODS: All adult patients undergoing outpatient surgery at our hand center between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019, were included. Questionnaires, including the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper extremity (UE) and pain interference (PI) scales, were completed before surgery. We used our regional health information exchange to identify ED visits within 90 days of surgery. RESULTS: Our cohort included 2,819 patients. Within 90 days after surgery, 106 (3.8%) had preventable ED visits. Race, insurance status, and transportation issues increased odds of a preventable ED visit. Multivariable models found that each 1-point increase in the preoperative PROMIS UE score was associated with 4% decreased odds of ED presentation (odds ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-0.99), and each 1-point increase in the preoperative PROMIS PI score was associated with 4% increased odds of ED presentation (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.1). Any PROMIS UE or PI scores ≥1SDs worse than population norms increased the probability of a preventable ED visit, independent of other factors. CONCLUSIONS: Worse preoperative PROMIS UE and PI scores were associated with increased odds of preventable ED visits. Preoperative PRD may allow for identification of outliers at higher risk for preventable ED use, and facilitate preventative interventions. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.

Compliance and Variability of Hospital Price Transparency in Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: On January 1, 2019, in an effort to improve price transparency, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) mandated that hospitals display chargemasters and pricing for diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) online. We examined the compliance of the 50 top orthopaedic hospitals, ranked by US News, with CMS's mandate and compared pricing. METHODS: The chargemaster and pricing of DRG codes related to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) (469, 470, 461, 462, 466, 467, and 468) were evaluated in the top 50 orthopaedic hospitals in the United States. Spearman rank correlation coefficients (ρ) were used to evaluate the association between DRG 469, 470, and 467 prices with geographic practice cost index (GPCI) work and practice expense values. RESULTS: Thirty-six of the 50 hospitals reported DRG pricing for THA and TKA. Of these hospitals, 15 had prices for all seven DRGs of interest; only 467, 469, and 470 were reported across all the 36 hospitals. Of the 14 hospitals without DRG information, 12 had nothing and two had unsatisfactory reporting. Prices for DRGs 469, 470, and 467 were moderately or weakly correlated with both GPCI work and GPCI practice expense. All correlation analyses were statistically significant (P < 0.05). DISCUSSION: In summary, compliance with CMS's 2019 rule was poor overall. Fourteen of the 50 hospitals did not adequately report any DRG pricing, and only 15 of the hospitals were fully compliant with the mandate. In addition to poor compliance, the reported costs had variation not strongly accounted for by established geographic differences.

The Curtis Hand Injury Matrix Score: Determining the Need for Specialized Upper Extremity Care.

PURPOSE: Given the limited impact of transfer guidelines and the lack of comparative metrics for upper extremity trauma, we introduced the Curtis Hand Injury Matrix (CHIM) score to evaluate upper extremity injury acuity from the specialist perspective. Our goal was to evaluate the CHIM score as an indicator of complexity and specialist need by correlating the score with arrival mode, length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and procedure location. METHODS: We identified all hand and upper extremity emergency room visits at our institution in 2018 and 2019. On initial evaluation, our institution's hand surgery team assigned each patient an alphanumeric score with a number (1-5) and letter (A-H) corresponding to injury severity and pathology, respectively. Patients were divided into 5 groups (1-5) with lower scores indicating greater severity. We compared age, LOS, discharge disposition, procedure location, transfer status, and arrival mode between groups and assessed the relationships between matrix scores and discharge disposition, procedure performed, and LOS. RESULTS: There were 3,822 patients that accounted for 4,026 upper extremity evaluations. There were significant differences in LOS, discharge dispositions, procedure locations, transfer status, and arrival modes between groups. Patients with more severe scores had higher rates of admission and more operating room procedures. Higher percentages of patients who arrived via helicopter, ambulance, or transfer had more severe scores. Patients with more severe scores were significantly more likely to have a procedure, hospital admission, and longer hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: The CHIM score provides a framework to catalog the care and resources required when covering specialized hand and upper extremity calls and accepting transfers. This clinical validation supports considering broader use. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.

Surprise Out-of-Network Bills for Hand and Upper Extremity Trauma Patients.

PURPOSE: Patients may receive surprise out-of-network bills even when they present to in-network facilities. Surprise bills are common following emergency care. We sought to characterize and determine risk factors for surprise billing in hand and upper extremity trauma patients in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: We used IBM MarketScan data to evaluate hand and upper extremity trauma patients who received care in the ED from 2010 to 2017. Our primary outcome was the surprise billing incidence, defined as encounters in in-network EDs with out-of-network claims. We used descriptive and bivariate analyses to characterize surprise billing and used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate independent factors associated with surprise billing. RESULTS: Of 710,974 ED encounters, 97,667 (14%) involved surprise billing. The incidence decreased from 26% in 2010 to 11% in 2017. Mean coinsurance payments were higher for surprise billing encounters and had double the growth from 2010 to 2017 compared to those without surprise billing. Receiving care from different provider types-especially therapists, radiologists, and pathologists, as well as hand surgeons-was associated with significantly higher odds of surprise billing. Transfer to another facility was not significantly associated with surprise billing. CONCLUSIONS: Although the incidence of surprise billing decreased, more than 10% of patients treated in an ED for hand trauma remain at risk. Coinsurance for surprise billing encounters increased by twice as much as encounters without surprise billing. Patients requiring services from therapists, radiologists, pathologists, and hand surgeons were at greater risk for surprise bills. The federal No Surprises Act, passed in 2020, targets surprise billing and may help address some of these issues. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Many hand and upper extremity patients requiring ED care receive surprise bills from various sources that result in higher out-of-pocket costs.